OnePercenter
Gold Member
- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,880
- 265
Federal Funding PBSAccording to a national survey recently commissioned by PBS and undertaken by the bipartisan polling firms of Hart Research and American Viewpoint, 69% of voters oppose congressional elimination of government funding for public broadcasting. Over half of all voters say it would be a massive or significant loss for themselves and their family if Congress, voting to eliminate funding, forced PBS to eliminate some programming and jeopardized some PBS television stations. The survey also shows that six in ten voters believe this would be a massive or significant loss for the country as a whole.
I trust a study commissioned by PBS about as much as I trust Harry Reid.
If only you had intelligence you could challenge the results of the poll.
{Public television is America’s largest classroom, the nation’s largest stage for the arts and a trusted window to the world – all at the cost of about $1 per person per year. The proposed legislation overlooks the critical value that PBS’ nearly 360 member stations provide to major cities and small towns.}
The problem is, not a word of this is true.
In 1970 it was, but in 2014 it is a steaming pile of shit.
The viewership of the Science Channel, History Channel, and the dozen Discovery Channels dwarf PBS - combined they provide a classroom that is thousands of times more watched than PBS. A&E and Paladium offer vastly more cultural fare than does PBS.
IF PBS is the value you leftist claim, then viewers will be happy to pay for it, just as we pay for Science and Discovery channels.
When their were 3 network stations, the argument for PBS was sound. With 3,000+ stations on most systems, it is total bullshit.
So according to you, the better idea is that PBS should play commercials, receive revenue from the commercials, than charge you to watch?