HenryBHough
Diamond Member
Are you saying the Right has to be the adult in the room, because the left simply can't control itself?
Not so much "can't" as "won't".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you saying the Right has to be the adult in the room, because the left simply can't control itself?
I was being nice.Are you saying the Right has to be the adult in the room, because the left simply can't control itself?
Not so much "can't" as "won't".
I was being nice.Are you saying the Right has to be the adult in the room, because the left simply can't control itself?
Not so much "can't" as "won't".
Isn't that a bit of an oxymoron, beating your chest about being nice?I was being nice.Are you saying the Right has to be the adult in the room, because the left simply can't control itself?
Not so much "can't" as "won't".
ok. then beat your chest like an ape about it![]()
Only warfare-States require Taxes on the Incomes of Individuals, not welfare-States with a Commerce Clause.We have a Commerce Clause that the Right loves to appeal to ignorance of, merely so the least wealthy can Only receive the least benefit under our form of Capitalism.Then why blame the least wealthy for not paying taxes under our form of Capitalism. That was what I was responding to. Why the non sequitur; are you on the Right?I will try to type slowly so you can understand it.
Most of us are okay with a moderately progressive tax system. If that sentence is difficult for you to understand because you've been brainwashed, just read it over and over again. It might just sink in.
Our problem isn't that we don't tax the rich enough, it's because we spend too much on stupid shit....like $914,000 the NEA spent on studying "romance".
A drop in the bucket when compared to our socialized wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror, that wealthy Capitalists can invest in and still make money on unearned income and at a lower tax rate than that of the least wealthy who may work by the "sweat of their brow".
I don't blame the least wealthy for not paying taxes, nor do I blame the wealthy for using every legal method there is to avoid paying taxes I blame the politicians for setting up a system where so few pay income tax. This is the same system that allows all of the tax breaks & such that the "wealthy" use to avoid the exorbitant tax rates imposed on them.
Our federal government is way to bloated and expensive. I mean, now the FEDERAL government will be tracking the racial make-up of every neighborhood in the country so that they can impose punitive measures on local governments and businesses for not being diverse enough. (Attention America s Suburbs You Have Just Been Annexed National Review Online I doubt anyone can tell you how much this program costs the taxpayer, how many low-, mid-, and upper-level bureaucrats will be hired to run this program and, of course, the minions of lawyers needed to sue all of the local governments and businesses.
And yet nobody steps back and asks where the federal government gets the authority to do such things.
READ THE CONSTITUTION. It was supposed to limit the power of the federal government and form a republic of states. The republic is dead, replaced by the bureaucratical behemoth of a federal government.
Really? please elaborate
What most of us want is for the government to spend our tax dollars in a wise and responsible manner.
That is soooooo accurate......don't forget that they also get violent.......especially when you show how stupid their points are.......
That is soooooo accurate......don't forget that they also get violent.......especially when you show how stupid their points are.......
That is totally cool. Can you provide me a link to a discussion that you're particularly proud of ... one where you used your intellectual brilliance and command of logical arguments to make your point? I'm very curious. Thank you.
Thanks for the talking points response those are always helpful.What most of us want is for the government to spend our tax dollars in a wise and responsible manner.
The same people who don't want to spend money on education and create good-paying job opportunities for our nation's young people (and future tax payers) are the same ones clamoring for those young people to be thrown in prisons. They don't understand why disadvantaged youth might find it more lucrative to sell drugs or steal crap from your garage or become radicals because they can't make a decent living or support families on minimum wage jobs. Dunderheads are thrilled to throw billions of dollars on our amorphous wars on crime, terror, and drugs when common sense dictates that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
So yes ... let's have a discussion ... what spending is wise ... what spending is unwise.
Why not lower our tax burden by ending our War on Drugs? Does it usually only deny and disparage Individual Liberty for the least wealthy and the Right feels less need to end that boondoggle and generational form of theft as a result of the least wealthy being worth less under our form of Capitalism.I just can‘t seem to understand why so many Americans are extremely sensitive when it comes to taxes, and often oppose strongly of a progressive tax system.
At least personally, I think of taxes as giving back to the society and community, and I enjoy many of the governments services every day.
Also. I don‘t understand the objection towards a progressive taxation system
When you are taxed exessively you are giving money to people who are at the very least corrupt and greedy...why on earth is it better for you to give the money you earn to politicians to spend. They waste the money, steal it, spend it on themselves and their friends.......and yet you think it is better that they spend it than you.
A progressive tax system is unfair....you work harder, smarter, better, more efficiently....and they take more of what you earn......you don't do as well, you don't try as hard, you don't create, you work less efficiently, and they tax you less...
How does that make any sense. the tax rate should be the same...that is the fairest method to raise taxes....
Seriously kid; why have nothing but diversion instead of a clue and a Cause. Is it too much "hard work" for the lazy Right.You should stop trying to have nothing but diversion, which is also usually considered a fallacy.Is the right too socially lazy to provide a thoughtful response instead of Only having fallacies (of ad hominem) to work with?It is because righties have only fallacy to work with.
Income taxes are not the Only taxes; it is just special pleading on the part of the socially less responsible Right.
ah, so being a jerk is your gig. now we get it. that's about the FIFTH time you've said that since you and your jerk buddies has OVER taken this thread with your all's continuous spew in post after post. go outside and play or something. You're making a fool out of yourself
Income taxes are not the Only taxes; it is just special pleading on the part of the socially less responsible Right.
Special pleading is usually considered a fallacy.
You should stop trying to use words you don't understand.
Is it Any wonder why some on the left believe the Right is just full of fallacy.
Seriously kid, look the word up at least once if you're going to keep repeating it.
Why not lower our tax burden by ending our War on Drugs? Does it usually only deny and disparage Individual Liberty for the least wealthy and the Right feels less need to end that boondoggle and generational form of theft as a result of the least wealthy being worth less under our form of Capitalism.I just can‘t seem to understand why so many Americans are extremely sensitive when it comes to taxes, and often oppose strongly of a progressive tax system.
At least personally, I think of taxes as giving back to the society and community, and I enjoy many of the governments services every day.
Also. I don‘t understand the objection towards a progressive taxation system
When you are taxed exessively you are giving money to people who are at the very least corrupt and greedy...why on earth is it better for you to give the money you earn to politicians to spend. They waste the money, steal it, spend it on themselves and their friends.......and yet you think it is better that they spend it than you.
A progressive tax system is unfair....you work harder, smarter, better, more efficiently....and they take more of what you earn......you don't do as well, you don't try as hard, you don't create, you work less efficiently, and they tax you less...
How does that make any sense. the tax rate should be the same...that is the fairest method to raise taxes....
Why should anyone believe that equality in taxation is not a form of socialism not capitalism; equality is a social concept not a capital concept. Are the wealthiest not really full of worth as is claimed by Capitalists on their Income tax returns.
Does the right prefer to believe in Socialism merely for their bottom line.
No; I am saying the Right has only one trick; repeal. Instead of better solutions at lower cost.Are you saying the Right has to be the adult in the room, because the left simply can't control itself?I am not asking if we can afford it; I am asking the Right to do the Only thing they know how to do in modern times; nothing but repeal, of those useless public policies such as our wars crime, drugs, poverty, and terror.And you have to ask if we can afford it. The fact that we will owe $20 trillion after Obama leaves office means we can really afford very little new anything.We have a Commerce Clause that the Right loves to appeal to ignorance of, merely so the least wealthy can Only receive the least benefit under our form of Capitalism with any social programs.You certainly have to ask the question, "are they working?". If they are not, perhaps there's a better way that would actually work without society putting a stamp of approval on what's being fought.Like our alleged wars on crime, drugs, poverty and terror?
I just can‘t seem to understand why so many Americans are extremely sensitive when it comes to taxes, and often oppose strongly of a progressive tax system.
At least personally, I think of taxes as giving back to the society and community, and I enjoy many of the governments services every day.
Also. I don‘t understand the objection towards a progressive taxation system
I would have no problem with privatizing everything you mentioned. As it is now the government contracts out much of the work to private companies anyway.You enjoy the fruits of those taxes but you think it is robbing from you??/ You don't believe in civilization is what you're saying.
Why am I no longer surprised by the cluelessness and Causelessness of the Right. Are y'all naturals at it?Only warfare-States require Taxes on the Incomes of Individuals, not welfare-States with a Commerce Clause.We have a Commerce Clause that the Right loves to appeal to ignorance of, merely so the least wealthy can Only receive the least benefit under our form of Capitalism.Then why blame the least wealthy for not paying taxes under our form of Capitalism. That was what I was responding to. Why the non sequitur; are you on the Right?
A drop in the bucket when compared to our socialized wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror, that wealthy Capitalists can invest in and still make money on unearned income and at a lower tax rate than that of the least wealthy who may work by the "sweat of their brow".
I don't blame the least wealthy for not paying taxes, nor do I blame the wealthy for using every legal method there is to avoid paying taxes I blame the politicians for setting up a system where so few pay income tax. This is the same system that allows all of the tax breaks & such that the "wealthy" use to avoid the exorbitant tax rates imposed on them.
Our federal government is way to bloated and expensive. I mean, now the FEDERAL government will be tracking the racial make-up of every neighborhood in the country so that they can impose punitive measures on local governments and businesses for not being diverse enough. (Attention America s Suburbs You Have Just Been Annexed National Review Online I doubt anyone can tell you how much this program costs the taxpayer, how many low-, mid-, and upper-level bureaucrats will be hired to run this program and, of course, the minions of lawyers needed to sue all of the local governments and businesses.
And yet nobody steps back and asks where the federal government gets the authority to do such things.
READ THE CONSTITUTION. It was supposed to limit the power of the federal government and form a republic of states. The republic is dead, replaced by the bureaucratical behemoth of a federal government.
Really? please elaborate
That's about the dumbest thing I have ever read... have you been taking lessons from rdean?
In order to help pay for its war effort in the American Civil War, Congress imposed its first personal income tax in 1861.[50]--Source: Income tax in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
what happened to the gas tax money?Do they use our roads?
Do we really need so many agencies doing the same thing? Just the drug field: DEA, FBI, Coast Guard, ICE Drug Unit, ATF Drug Unit, City Police Drug Unit, Sheriff's Office Drug Unit, State Police/Highway Patrol Drug Unit, State Bureau of Investigation Drug Unit. Wasting money. I am not saying they shouldn't enforce drug laws, I am saying they boost staffing by creating those units.Do they use our police?
Paid well? That's debatable. I understand that many employers are "not taking care of their employees."Do they enjoy the rights they have gained to work and get paid well?
Do you really believe that anybody wants to drink dirty water and eat rotten food?Do they like eating clean food and drinking clean water?
OK.. I give those to you. Where the rest of the money goes? Foreign aid on credit? Unnecessary Federal Departments? Nobody disputes taxes for necessary things but the government is way out of control.