Czernobog
Gold Member
Nope. Even if your simplistic example of mutation was an accurate explanation of evolution - which it is not - you are still changing the subject. You have repeatedly implied that the theory claims man evolved from rocks, and ridiculed me for "not knowing" this, and have yet to demonstrate it, with any reference from any evolutionary scientist making, or even alluding to such a ridiculous notion. I'm still waiting.OK, you can't see the trees through the forest. Let's try something else.Demonstrate that. Show me the theory that claims that. As in, show me the theory, with references, that says rocks evolved into man.Rock. Rock which they programed you to believe became Beethoven.You're right. It isn't. Because there is no theory that said that is what happened. There is no theory that said we came from rocks.You also lack any knowledge of biology. If you did, you would know there is not enough timeto go from a super heated rock to Beethoven in 4 billion years.Speaking of red herrings... just because one guy says "God did it," is meaningless. Meanwhile, you have still not acknowledged that you completely misrepresented the theory of evolution by claiming that it, in any way, claims that humans evolved from rocks.
View attachment 114889
What is your computer, Windows 10? Go into the program and randomly change some code and let us know how much more improved your computer is. That is basically the theory of evolution.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk