Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack?

Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack when reality shows o


  • Total voters
    18
You rabid righties never change. When all else fails lead with insults.

You do realize that is a new article from the NY Time right?

Personally I'm not willing to make a snap judgement like your candidate did. Let look at all the facts and then decide on the best course of action. Lets not shoot first and ask questions later.

Sorry, I'm just laughing at you now.

You're a clown; a sad, desperate little clown.

You traded your credibility for hyperpartisanship.

Hope your little tin Messiah® was worth it.
 
Why does the right insist Obama did not call it a terror attack when reality shows otherwise?


President Obama Speaks on the Attack on Benghazi - YouTube

None of those.

It's politics and it makes some people who should know better sound really, really, really stupid. One person was telling me that contraceptives do not prevent pregnancy AND that you do not pay for your prescription drugs through your insurance prmiums when you are using your PDP.

In a bizarre sense, it makes me think more highly of politicians than those who back them. After reading some of the literal bullshit here, I just want to bathe. I can't imagine how these guys and gals who run for office must feel at the end of the day when they have to pander to a crybaby electorate who is afraid that they won't not only get the sundae but will bitch about not getting the cherry and nuts on top. And even if they do get that; they'll bitch that someone else got better nuts and more cherries.
 
Why can't it be both?

Why can't it be magic lollipops and Obama is GOD?

It was;

  1. A well planned and coordinated attack by al Qaeda using heavy weapons
  2. A spontaneous attack by demonstrators angry about a YouTube video

Why can't it be a terrorist attack by a terrorist group triggered by an outbreak of anger in the Muslim world over an offensive video?

Why can't a well planned attack be spontaneous? Why can't an impromptu gathering be coordinated months in advance? Why can't an unorganized mob have a command structure with heavy weapons?

Why can't Obama's lies be the truth?

In other words you cannot deny that it could have been both.

Why did Romney lie and say the President never called the attack an act of terror?
 
In the Rose Garden speech, obama never called the attack a terrorist attack but the speech did not happen in a vacuum. Susan Rice went on five television shows saying that there was no terrorist attack. Jim Carney gave press briefings every day saying that it wasn't a terrorist attack and obama himself gave a speech before the UN saying it was the fault of the movie. That's the controversy, it's not limited to the speech in the Rose Garden.

Jay Carney in the briefing on the 20th said it was 'self-evident' that it was a terrorist attack.

STOP LYING. Stop lying now.

On the 20th. That's 9 fucking days later, you dimwit.

Stop being a total schmuck.

Why did it take over a week to verbalize that self-evident conclusion, anyway?
 
In the Rose Garden speech, obama never called the attack a terrorist attack but the speech did not happen in a vacuum. Susan Rice went on five television shows saying that there was no terrorist attack. Jim Carney gave press briefings every day saying that it wasn't a terrorist attack and obama himself gave a speech before the UN saying it was the fault of the movie. That's the controversy, it's not limited to the speech in the Rose Garden.

"Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done"


You really need to stop making fools of yourself.
 
The reason the politicizing an attack that killed 4 American is so offensive is that the truth of the matter that no matter how it was called the reaction was the same. The immediate start of the investigation to find out who was responsible for the attack and bring those people to justice. Whether it was spontaneous or planned the people responsible are being sought out and will be brought to justice. Right wingers believe that the political points that can be gained or lost in a decision count more than human life shows what we can expect in Romney foreign policy.
 
In the Rose Garden speech, obama never called the attack a terrorist attack but the speech did not happen in a vacuum. Susan Rice went on five television shows saying that there was no terrorist attack. Jim Carney gave press briefings every day saying that it wasn't a terrorist attack and obama himself gave a speech before the UN saying it was the fault of the movie. That's the controversy, it's not limited to the speech in the Rose Garden.

Jay Carney in the briefing on the 20th said it was 'self-evident' that it was a terrorist attack.

STOP LYING. Stop lying now.

How many days of saying it wasn't a terrorist attack did it take before he said it was?
 
In the Rose Garden speech, obama never called the attack a terrorist attack but the speech did not happen in a vacuum. Susan Rice went on five television shows saying that there was no terrorist attack. Jim Carney gave press briefings every day saying that it wasn't a terrorist attack and obama himself gave a speech before the UN saying it was the fault of the movie. That's the controversy, it's not limited to the speech in the Rose Garden.

Jay Carney in the briefing on the 20th said it was 'self-evident' that it was a terrorist attack.

STOP LYING. Stop lying now.

On the 20th. That's 9 fucking days later, you dimwit.

Stop being a total schmuck.

Why did it take over a week to verbalize that self-evident conclusion, anyway?

The President labeled it an act of terror THE DAY AFTER IT HAPPENED.

The fact that it's self-evident means that even idiots like you shouldn't have to be told over and over again that was a terrorist attack.

You're supposed to be smart enough to figure it out by the self-evidence of the act itself.

btw, do you want to apologize for saying that no one in the administration called it a terrorist act for 2 weeks?
 
Because in opposite land (where the rabid right live) when the President says it was an Act of Terror it really means that the President didn't say it, right?

Except, of course, you scubag lying sack of shit, the Pressident absolutley did NOT call the attack in Benghazi a terrorist attack.

In fact he and his minions went out of their way to claim it was soemthing else.

Reality burns you, doesn't it, you fucking pig lying sack of stupid.

The President called it an act of terror on the 12th, and on the 13th.

Jay Carney, as whitehouse spokesman, called it a terrorist act on September 19th.

So shut up and quit making a fool of yourself.

You lying piss face. The President WITHOUT HONEST QUESTION did NOT call it an act of terror on the 12th. NOR was that his cvlaim in Clorado, you depraved intentional lying rodent twat. You fucking lie more than you breathe.

That bullshit dishonest claim of yours has been refuted and re-re-re-refuted endlessly.
 
In the Rose Garden speech, obama never called the attack a terrorist attack but the speech did not happen in a vacuum. Susan Rice went on five television shows saying that there was no terrorist attack. Jim Carney gave press briefings every day saying that it wasn't a terrorist attack and obama himself gave a speech before the UN saying it was the fault of the movie. That's the controversy, it's not limited to the speech in the Rose Garden.

Jay Carney in the briefing on the 20th said it was 'self-evident' that it was a terrorist attack.

STOP LYING. Stop lying now.

How many days of saying it wasn't a terrorist attack did it take before he said it was?

We'll get to that right after you admit you lied.
 
Jay Carney in the briefing on the 20th said it was 'self-evident' that it was a terrorist attack.

STOP LYING. Stop lying now.

On the 20th. That's 9 fucking days later, you dimwit.

Stop being a total schmuck.

Why did it take over a week to verbalize that self-evident conclusion, anyway?

The President labeled it an act of terror THE DAY AFTER IT HAPPENED.

The fact that it's self-evident means that even idiots like you shouldn't have to be told over and over again that was a terrorist attack.

You're supposed to be smart enough to figure it out by the self-evidence of the act itself.

btw, do you want to apologize for saying that no one in the administration called it a terrorist act for 2 weeks?


No, the President did NOT call the attack in Benghazi and act of terror on 9/12, you depraved intentional lowlife bitch lying hack scumbag.

He was making reference to 9/11/2001. And you fucking know it.

And the fucking scumbag dishonest Administration continued the fraud that it was a reaction to the video for DAYS, which is kind of disgusting since they already supposedly had drawn the self-evident conclusion that it was instead a terrorist attack. They fucking KNEW it but insisted on mislabeling it.

You can't defend your position, you idiot. In fact, your imbecility only makes matters worse for your urgent desire to suck the President's dick.
 
Btett Baier is hosting a Benghazigate timeline tonight at 9pm Eastern time..





here's the deal... susan rice said it was because of a movie., she said that four days after you know who made a general benign comment about "no acts of terror shall go unpunished." At the very least ms rice should have said a group of well armed well organized militia armed with mortar rounds, RPG's and AK-47's attacked our consulate because they were pissed about a movie. and we are going to spend 70,000 tax payer dollars and send an apology to the muslim world for this move. We're sorry we fought back hard with our "flashlights" Now, I could go with that. How bout ewe?
 
In other words you cannot deny that it could have been both.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Dude, you owe me a keyboard.

There's a reason you're a leftist, and it isn't because you're super smart.

"So you cannot deny that it could be fire and water...."

ROFL

Funniest post of the week.

Why did Romney lie and say the President never called the attack an act of terror?

You mean why did Obama lie? Because he only cares about being reelected. That's why he went to Las Vegas while terrorists killed our Ambassador - of course he denied that they were terrorists, and apologized to them.
 
Christ you people are stupid! There was a lot going on at the time of the protests and assaults on embassies in the ME, NA and other regions as well as the attack at Bengahzi. There was that Muslim cleric that showed the video and demanded revenge..whatever.. It was 9/11 .. A lot on the table at once. So NOW in retrospect we have a bunch of Obama haters trying to pick out certain elements of that frame of time and say THEY have been lied to. Ya... that's about it. The butt hurt republicans are the victims AGAIN... Not the four Americans.. The republicans. The very same people that lap up Fox lies and missinformation like mothers milk are sure Obama told them something out of sequence ...or Obama purposely reduced security ... or for sure DID SOMETHING that should get him impeached immediately cuz these republicans just can't get enough red meat to chew on as we are closing in on an election.

So as it turns out the Bengahzi attack was unrelated to the video except that maybe the terrorists used that whole episode as cover to get into position to attack a safe house out in the middle of nowhere. There is no evidense that the terrorists knew our ambassadore was there. Obviously from the size of the group and weapons involved they had been planning this thing for some time. It just happened that our ambassadore was there and not in Trippoli where the actual embassy is located.

So THAT are the facts as we know them at least at this time.

Do any of you actually care WHY the terrorists chose that remote safe house to attack with such a large group?

If they wanted to do something against the U S specifically why didn't they attack the real embassy in Trippoli?

None of you think it odd that this safe house was singled out for their big attack?

OK... What was the purpose of this "safe house"? Who were we keeping "safe" there? Not ambassadore.. his normal post was in Trippoli. The place was supposed to be guarded by private contractors yet we had at least two Navy Seals there. Why?

OK.. now try to put all this in the context that we have been running an operation for several months stashing special ops personnel thruout the region to seek out, report on and destroy Al Queada cells that moved in to disrupt the emerging democracies.

And with all these layers of activity and danger inherant in the region...you crazy fucks think you were lied to. THAT is what you take out of this. YOU were lied to. You stupid sniveling morons. Has it ever occured to you that some of what our foreign service and special ops personnel are up to is none of your goddamned business?

The president lied? So fucking what? He is supposed to lie. He is not obligated to tell you morons what is REALLY going on minute to minute and day to day in these dangerous places.

I'm glad he takes his duty as Commander in Cheif seriously and tells you stinking idiots lies.
 
So Rev. Jim, it was 9/11 but your Messiah® didn't think a little extra security was called for, even after Stevens begged for it?

BTW, we had zero Navy Seals there, the private contractor had two EX-Navy Seals employed. Obama outsourced the security, dumbfuck.
 
Last edited:
Except, of course, you scubag lying sack of shit, the Pressident absolutley did NOT call the attack in Benghazi a terrorist attack.

In fact he and his minions went out of their way to claim it was soemthing else.

Reality burns you, doesn't it, you fucking pig lying sack of stupid.

The President called it an act of terror on the 12th, and on the 13th.

Jay Carney, as whitehouse spokesman, called it a terrorist act on September 19th.

So shut up and quit making a fool of yourself.

You lying piss face. The President WITHOUT HONEST QUESTION did NOT call it an act of terror on the 12th. NOR was that his cvlaim in Clorado, you depraved intentional lying rodent twat. You fucking lie more than you breathe.

That bullshit dishonest claim of yours has been refuted and re-re-re-refuted endlessly.

"Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done"


Learn to read.
 
Do any of you actually care WHY the terrorists chose that remote safe house to attack with such a large group?

If they wanted to do something against the U S specifically why didn't they attack the real embassy in Trippoli?

None of you think it odd that this safe house was singled out for their big attack?

OK... What was the purpose of this "safe house"? Who were we keeping "safe" there? Not ambassadore.. his normal post was in Trippoli. The place was supposed to be guarded by private contractors yet we had at least two Navy Seals there. Why?

It is starting to filter out the safe house and its occupants may have been lining up SAM's and other military hardware to pass on to the Syrians.
 

Forum List

Back
Top