Why gay marriage is wrong!

[Mr.Right]

Y

It is ultimately destructive to society.

How? Gay guys hold hands and....what? How is society 'destroyed'?

Look at our AIDS ecademic.

Most AIDS suffers are straight. And of course, there's almost no HIV among lesbians. If the threat is inherent to same sex unions, wouldn't it be ANY same sex union?

There's nothing inherently wrong with same sex couples. Why then would we exclude them from marriage? It makes no sense.

And if you were genuinely concerned about multiple sex partners and the spreading of AIDS, wouldn't the monogamy of marriage be something you'd *encourage* rather than oppose?

You are a ignorant fool!

• In 2010, gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM) accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among men and 63% of all new infections although they comprise only 4% of the U.S. male population.
  
  
• Then you have bisexuals, who spread it to the heterosexual community. AIDS is a homosexual disease. They own it, lock, stock and barrel. If it wasn't for sexual immorality, AIDS wouldn't be a problem. That is a cold hard fact.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

MR.RIGHT SAID:

“No civilization should condone sexual deviancy.”

Homosexuality isn't 'sexual deviancy.'

Problem solved.

MR.RIGHT SAID:

“Look at our AIDS ecademic,”

Perpetuated in part by the irresponsible sharing of needles by drug addicts and equally irresponsible sexual practices by heterosexuals; the notion that homosexuals are 'solely responsible' for HIV/AIDS is as anachronistic as it is wrong.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

i am waiting for you to tell us what sexual deviancy caused Ebola. I'm sure that I won't have to wait very long for your answer.

GREAT! And I am still waiting on YOU to explain how sexual deviancy stops tooth decay.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

MR.RIGHT SAID:

“No civilization should condone sexual deviancy.”

Homosexuality isn't 'sexual deviancy.'

ROFLMNAO!

Homsoexuality not only deviates from the human physiological norm, IT DEVIATES AS FAR FROM THE HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL STANDARD, AS IS HUMANLY POSSIBLE.

Again the Reader should realize that the entire premise of the above advocacy is demonstrably false... yet, it is advanced as truth. Thus we see, in practical and immediate terms "Homosexuality Injuring others".

See how that works?

 

[Skylar]

Y

It is ultimately destructive to society.

How? Gay guys hold hands and....what? How is society 'destroyed'?

Look at our AIDS ecademic.

Most AIDS suffers are straight. And of course, there's almost no HIV among lesbians. If the threat is inherent to same sex unions, wouldn't it be ANY same sex union?

There's nothing inherently wrong with same sex couples. Why then would we exclude them from marriage? It makes no sense.

And if you were genuinely concerned about multiple sex partners and the spreading of AIDS, wouldn't the monogamy of marriage be something you'd *encourage* rather than oppose?

You are a ignorant fool!

Or I recognize that AIDS doesn't end at our borders:

Heterosexual spread in the general population is the main mode of transmission in sub-Saharan Africa,which remains the most heavily affected region, with 67% of the global burden.

http://www.lwwpartnerships.com/assets/files/HIVAIDS/Global_epidemiology_of_HIV.4.pdf

Proportion of adults living with HIV/AIDS in 2011 who were women (%): 50 -

Worldwide HIV AIDS Statistics AVERT

Children living with HIV/AIDS in 2011: 3.3 million

Worldwide HIV AIDS Statistics AVERT

HIV is overwhelmingly a straight disease. Transmitted overwhelmingly through heterosexual sex.

So why would we deny gays marriage?

 

[Skylar]

MR.RIGHT SAID:

“No civilization should condone sexual deviancy.”

Homosexuality isn't 'sexual deviancy.'

ROFLMNAO!

Homsoexuality not only deviates from the human physiological norm, IT DEVIATES AS FAR FROM THE HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL STANDARD, AS IS HUMANLY POSSIBLE.

The worst thing you can say about homosexuality is that its unproductive. But then, so are blow jobs, old people fucking, celibacy, or masturbation. And don't get me started on birth control.

 

[Mr.Right]

MR.RIGHT SAID:

“No civilization should condone sexual deviancy.”

Homosexuality isn't 'sexual deviancy.'

Problem solved.

MR.RIGHT SAID:

“Look at our AIDS ecademic,”

Perpetuated in part by the irresponsible sharing of needles by drug addicts and equally irresponsible sexual practices by heterosexuals; the notion that homosexuals are 'solely responsible' for HIV/AIDS is as anachronistic as it is wrong.

Read my previous post, retard. Gay men are responsible for 63% of all new aids cases, even though they comprise but 4% of the population.
And I never said they were solely responsible for its spread. BTW, there are gay junkies too. Where did you think the disease came from? Can you really be that stupid? Rhetorical question.

 

[Skylar]

MR.RIGHT SAID:

“No civilization should condone sexual deviancy.”

Homosexuality isn't 'sexual deviancy.'

Problem solved.

MR.RIGHT SAID:

“Look at our AIDS ecademic,”

Perpetuated in part by the irresponsible sharing of needles by drug addicts and equally irresponsible sexual practices by heterosexuals; the notion that homosexuals are 'solely responsible' for HIV/AIDS is as anachronistic as it is wrong.

Read my previous post, retard. Gay men are responsible for 63% of all new aids cases, even though they comprise but 4% of the population.

Read my previous post on the topic. Heterosexuals are responsible for at least 67% of the new infections. With the overwhelming majority of those with HIV being straight.

And of course, if disease is evidence of immorality, does that means you're cool with Lesbianism? As they have almost no HIV.

So why are we denying gays the right to marry again? So far, you've presented no compelling argument.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Perpetuated in part by the irresponsible sharing of needles by drug addicts and equally irresponsible sexual practices by heterosexuals; the notion that homosexuals are 'solely responsible' for HIV/AIDS is as anachronistic as it is wrong.

Again the would-be 'contributor' comes to advance deceit as truth. In point of FACT... absent a homosexual in the mix, there is virtually NO CHANCE of a human being contracting the HIV (The Virus the causes AIDS). the odds of such are roughly that of getting struck by a train the moment you learn that you hit the Powerball.

 

[Moonglow]

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Unless your brother dies and doesn't leave an eldest son to leave the farm to, so the living brother must have sex with his dead brothers wife, until they have a male heir...

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Unless your brother dies and doesn't leave an eldest son to leave the farm to, so the living brother must have sex with his dead brothers wife, until they have a male heir...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Moonglow]

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Unless your brother dies and doesn't leave an eldest son to leave the farm to, so the living brother must have sex with his dead brothers wife, until they have a male heir...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Yet they are not married...

 

[Skylar]

Perpetuated in part by the irresponsible sharing of needles by drug addicts and equally irresponsible sexual practices by heterosexuals; the notion that homosexuals are 'solely responsible' for HIV/AIDS is as anachronistic as it is wrong.

Again the would-be 'contributor' comes to advance deceit as truth. In point of FACT... absent a homosexual in the mix, there is virtually NO CHANCE of a human being contracting the HIV (The Virus the causes AIDS). the odds of such are roughly that of getting struck by a train the moment you learn that you hit the Powerball.

Says you. But then you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about:

Heterosexual spread in the general population is the main mode of transmission in sub-Saharan Africa,which remains the most heavily affected region, with 67% of the global burden.

http://www.lwwpartnerships.com/assets/files/HIVAIDS/Global_epidemiology_of_HIV.4.pdf

So 67% of all new infections are through heterosexual sex. But there's virtually no chance without a gay person in the mix?

Huh. I don't think 'virtually no chance' means what you think it means.

 

[Skylar]

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Unless your brother dies and doesn't leave an eldest son to leave the farm to, so the living brother must have sex with his dead brothers wife, until they have a male heir...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Keyes' tell already.

Dude, why bother posting if you're committed to running away so easily?

 

[Mr.Right]

Perpetuated in part by the irresponsible sharing of needles by drug addicts and equally irresponsible sexual practices by heterosexuals; the notion that homosexuals are 'solely responsible' for HIV/AIDS is as anachronistic as it is wrong.

Again the would-be 'contributor' comes to advance deceit as truth. In point of FACT... absent a homosexual in the mix, there is virtually NO CHANCE of a human being contracting the HIV (The Virus the causes AIDS). the odds of such are roughly that of getting struck by a train the moment you learn that you hit the Powerball.

Says you. But then you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about:

Heterosexual spread in the general population is the main mode of transmission in sub-Saharan Africa,which remains the most heavily affected region, with 67% of the global burden.

http://www.lwwpartnerships.com/assets/files/HIVAIDS/Global_epidemiology_of_HIV.4.pdf

So 67% of all new infections are through heterosexual sex. But there's virtually no chance with a gay person in the mix?

Huh. I don't think 'virtually no chance' means what you think it means.

You do realize that Africa does not have adequate testing or medical facilities, right? And do you know how many of those victims were born with the disease? That accounts for a good percentage of new cases. Do some honest research, and quit embarrassing yourslf.

 

[hipeter924]

Meh. Most Americans are over gay marriage now, especially in my own state.

Only the bible belt that gets all wound up over it, as in the hypocritical bible belt that places brothels near churches - so they can sin and then ask for forgiveness without walking far.

 

[Skylar]

Perpetuated in part by the irresponsible sharing of needles by drug addicts and equally irresponsible sexual practices by heterosexuals; the notion that homosexuals are 'solely responsible' for HIV/AIDS is as anachronistic as it is wrong.

Again the would-be 'contributor' comes to advance deceit as truth. In point of FACT... absent a homosexual in the mix, there is virtually NO CHANCE of a human being contracting the HIV (The Virus the causes AIDS). the odds of such are roughly that of getting struck by a train the moment you learn that you hit the Powerball.

Says you. But then you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about:

Heterosexual spread in the general population is the main mode of transmission in sub-Saharan Africa,which remains the most heavily affected region, with 67% of the global burden.

http://www.lwwpartnerships.com/assets/files/HIVAIDS/Global_epidemiology_of_HIV.4.pdf

So 67% of all new infections are through heterosexual sex. But there's virtually no chance with a gay person in the mix?

Huh. I don't think 'virtually no chance' means what you think it means.

You do realize that Africa does not have adequate testing or medical facilities, right? And do you know how many of those victims were born with the disease? That accounts for a good percentage of new cases. Do some honest research, and quit embarrassing yourslf.

You do realize that AIDS is overwhelmingly a straights disease? That most with the disease are straight. That the overwhelming majority of new infections are through heterosexual sex?

And we're supposed to deny say, a lesbian couple the right to marry because of this?

I don't get it.

 

[Mr.Right]

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Unless your brother dies and doesn't leave an eldest son to leave the farm to, so the living brother must have sex with his dead brothers wife, until they have a male heir...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Keyes' tell already.

Dude, why bother posting if you're committed to running away so easily?

Maybe he just doesn't like conversing with clueless idiots. I don't blame him.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Unless your brother dies and doesn't leave an eldest son to leave the farm to, so the living brother must have sex with his dead brothers wife, until they have a male heir...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Yet they are not married...

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

 

[Skylar]

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Unless your brother dies and doesn't leave an eldest son to leave the farm to, so the living brother must have sex with his dead brothers wife, until they have a male heir...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Keyes' tell already.

Dude, why bother posting if you're committed to running away so easily?

Maybe he just doesn't like conversing with clueless idiots. I don't blame him.

There are far more effective ways of avoiding conversations with people you don't want to talk to then tucking your tail between your legs and running from them.