usmbguest5318
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #41
One will recall that Putin was quite vocal about the U.S. expelling but ~40 of his diplomats. Trump has not said a word about Putin expelling nearly 800 U.S. diplomats! What's up with that?
Putin will speak up for his people, but Trump won't for our. Can there really be any question of Trump's utter ineptitude as POTUS. I mean, really. Not a peep!?! Not even a tweet!!!
We should be thankful that Trump hasn't responded, be it a peep or a tweet it is sure to inflame a problem into a crisis.
Q. What's up with that?
A. Trump only cares about Trump, thus the families displaced, like those who will lose health insurance, is a minor annoyance easily ignored.
We should be thankful that Trump hasn't responded, be it a peep or a tweet it is sure to inflame a problem into a crisis.
I disagree.
As POTUS, Trump has the duty to stand up for the U.S. when there's no indication the nation has done something wrong. Putin instructed his people to meddle in our electoral process. Putin knows it and our intelligence agencies and Congresspersons know it. His doing so is wrong and tantamount to being an act of war. What has the U.S. done in Russia that is tantamount to being an act of war? Nothing. Thus, Putin's expelling our diplomats is unjustified. (Moreover, it shows Putin is indifferent about actually improving relations between the U.S. and Russia.)
Accordingly, Trump obliged to say something in outrage over the expulsion. His silence on the matter is tacit acquiescence to Putin's assertion that the expulsion is fitting and deserved. Should he say something this late after Putin's announcement, it is an indication of his naivete and weakness on the foreign policy/relations aspect of his job. Indeed, as goes the latter dimension, even a dumbass tweet would have been better than delay; at the very least an inane remark can, by more sage, saner and better informed heads, be clarified later.
We should be thankful that Trump hasn't responded, be it a peep or a tweet it is sure to inflame a problem into a crisis.
I doubt a tweet will take things that far with Putin. Were we talking about a less sophisticated head of state than Putin, perhaps so.
Q. What's up with that?
A. Trump only cares about Trump, thus the families displaced, like those who will lose health insurance, is a minor annoyance easily ignored.
Is that what you think is his reason?
Q. What's up with that?
A. Trump only cares about Trump, thus the families displaced, like those who will lose health insurance, is a minor annoyance easily ignored.
What? The risk of sudden displacement of one's family members living "in country" is a risk associated with the job of being a diplomat and choosing to have one's family "in country." That wouldn't be among my first and foremost concerns, and it shouldn't be among Trump's. Even so, I don't see the logic that may be attendant to Trump keeping mum because of families being displaced or not displaced.
That notion strikes me as being the realm of "If Minnie Mouse and Donald Duck had a son, would he follow the yellow brick road to find Sleeping Beauty and wake her with a magic kiss?" What I mean by that is that it's so absurd that I don't even know what specific question to ask about it or what to make of it.