ChrisL
Diamond Member
What compliments? Lol. Oh, I see, IOW, I should agree with you and that is your idea of mutual cooperation?Let's see . . . is that going to happen? You must know by now that I'm a very opinionated person!
No Chris... I've already told you I don't care if you agree with me, I am not trying to "convert" you. I have no problem with you saying you don't believe what I've said or don't believe in spirituality. My only problem is the supporting arguments you make for your beliefs. When you claim it is something man invented to explain the unexplained, that's when I have a problem because you've not proven your claim. When you say it is "silly superstition" I take exception because, again, you've not proven it. You're displaying your faith and that's fine but your faith does not become statement of fact.
But I have. All religions started that way, from the ancient Greeks and into the present day. The Mayans, the Incans, the Egyptians all had beliefs based on superstition and the feeling that natural events were due to gods being angry with them.
But Lake Mungo predates organized religion by about 15~20k years or so.
Yeah? So what? What does that prove? They were still people who had a need to explain the world around them and events that they didn't understand. Knowing about your own mortality is not an easy thing to deal with. Of course, people would love to make up and believe in some kind of "afterlife." Some believe in reincarnation.
Are all these beliefs real? Of course not! If you are saying that all belief systems are based upon reality, then you would have to acknowledge that ALL beliefs are real. That's crazy talk, IMO.