Why is Building the Wall Wrong?

Understanding Border Fences for Dummies

Why are advocates for illegal aliens opposed to a border fence?
Because they know it works.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT BORDER FENCES


Q. Can fences along the border impede the flow of hordes of aliens who cross the border illegally daily?
A. Yes. Many successful fences to keep aliens and other types of intruders out have been built. In San Diego, the 14 mile double layer border fence led to a 97 percent decrease in apprehensions and a corresponding decrease in border crime from 1989 to present.


Israel’s border fence has been extraordinarily successful in keeping out potential infiltrators who are far more determined to cross the border than mere immigrants.

Even Saudi Arabia, one of the most vocal critics of Israel's "security fence" in the West Bank, has quietly emulated the Israeli example by erecting a barrier along its porous border with Yemen to prevent terrorists from entering.

Q. Won't border crossers simply go to where there is no fence?
A. That's not an argument against a fence -- it's an argument for a fence across both of the ENTIRE borders (Canada and Mexico).


Q. Isn't a fence of such a large magnitude an enormously costly engineering nightmare?
A. Building a complete double layer border fence across both borders is inexpensive child's play compared to American engineering feats such as the Panama Canal and Boulder Dam.


Q. Can a fence be put across all terrain such as mountains and rivers?
A. No. There are some lengths across both borders where a fence is impractical to install. In some cases, a fence would act as a dam by trapping plants and brush when heavy rain waters or melting snow flows. But those unfenced lengths of rough terrain are natural barriers that aliens would not easily cross. Moreover, those impassable areas are more easily monitored by the border patrol with hi-tech unmanned lookout posts.


Q. Won't a border fence be environmentally unfriendly?
A. A border fence can be built to minimize environmental problems. A fence will not only impede the flow of illegal aliens, but will also impede the flow of terrorists. Worrying about minor environmental problems at the border is like worrying about who will fix the potholes after an earthquake.


Q. Why do opponents of border fences compare it to the Great Wall of China saying that China's enemies still managed to enter china?
A. Just as any border barrier will not prevent 100 percent of intruders from crossing it, the Great Wall of China did in fact keep China safe from large invading armies.


Q. Why do opponents of border fences compare it to the Berlin wall?
A. Such a comparison is even an insult to the intelligence of dummies. When you build a wall to keep people in, that’s a prison. When you build a fence to keep people out, that’s securing your sovereignty. Would you compare a fence around your house to control who comes into your yard to the Berlin wall? Moreover, the proposal by congress was for building of a "fence," not a "wall."


Q. What's the difference between a fence and a wall?
A. A wall is a thick solid structure through which you cannot see. A fence is a thin structure that you can see through to the other side.


Q. Wait a minute. Isn't the section of border fence which separates Naco, Mexico from Naco, Arizona one that you cannot see through?
A. Yes. And there are many more border fences just like the Naco fence. Sometimes the government does stupid things like building fences through which the Border Patrol cannot see. Illegal crossers poke holes in the fence to watch for border patrol officers. When the coast is clear, they simply scale to the top on the Mexican side sometimes using ladders and drop down on the U.S. side sometimes with ropes. Successful border fences must be able to be seen through.


Speaking of government doing stupid things, this section of border fence which separates Douglas Arizona from Agua Prieta has the iron bar tips pointing away from Mexico. According to Rick Oltman of CAPS (Californians for Population Stabilization), when he asked a staffer at Arizona Senator John McCain's office why the tips were pointing towards the U.S., he was told that they didn't want to offend Mexico.

Q. Why not save all that money to build a physical fence by instead, building a "virtual" fence?
A. There is no such thing as a virtual fence? A physical fence physically impedes aliens from crossing. A so called virtual fence does not. What is referred to as virtual fences, are video cameras and invisible arrays of sensors along the border. When a sensor is triggered, a display appears at the Border Patrol station which tells the station officers in real time when and where aliens are crossing. But effective physical fences also use detection apparatus.


Q. So what's wrong with a virtual fence?
A. The problem at the border is not the inability to electronically detect intruders -- the problem is getting to them and arresting them once they are detected.


Large numbers of up to one hundred aliens can quickly cross an invisible virtual fence (the crossing of such groups are known as Bonzai charges). Intruders crossing a virtual fence are not aware that they have been detected and keep moving on at a rate of about two miles per hour. By the time the border patrol gets to the point of detection, the crossers aren't there. Thus, the arriving border patrol officers must radio for helicopter help to search the area. At the same time other border patrol resources are dispatched to other trails and paths that the crossers MIGHT use. The border patrol is usually successful in apprehending some of the group, but are too overwhelmed to apprehend all those in a large group. Smugglers know how the border patrol works, so while all border patrol resources in the area are being used going after just one group, other groups cross almost unnoticed.

With a physical fence, a large group is easily detected just as with a virtual fence, but it takes time to climb a fence. Thus, the border patrol can get to the fence in time to intercept most of the crossers.

Q. Why bother with a physical fence that apparently is easy to get over using a ladder and rope?
A. Using a ladder and rope to get over a fence is not easy if the fence is a double layered fence as the 700 mile fence is supposed to be. With a double layered fence, a crosser would have to lift the ladder up with him to the top of the fence, lean it against the other side of the first layer, climb down the other side of the first layer and then repeat the process to climb the second layer and would have to leave the ladder behind. For a large group, two ladders would have to be in place -- one ladder against the first layer and second latter against the second layer. A large group would have to climb the first ladder, drop down on the other side of the first layer with a rope and repeat the process for the second layer. A large group trying to hurdle two layers of fence in single file, gives border patrol officers plenty of time to intercept all or most crossers.

Q. How much double layered fence has been built to date so far?

A. ABP (American Border Patrol), a non-profit corporation, performed aerial surveillance of the fence construction progress from the time congress mandated it to the present. ABP has documented proof that only 40 miles of double layered fence has been built to date (July, 2014.)

Q. I don't get it. On December 15, 2008, Michael Chertoff, then Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security claimed that 500 miles of fence had been built. Isn't this in conflict with American Border Patrol's figure of 40 miles?
A. Although congress originally mandated that the entire fence be double layered, Texas Senator Hutchison introduced and passed a Border Amendment which virtually gutted the original fence bill. The amendment required Chertoff to use double layer fence only in more smuggler troublesome areas but allowed the use of single layer fence where Chertoff determined it was adequate. But not only did Chertoff use single layer fence where he thought it adequate, he had vehicle barriers which do not impede pedestrian movement built in place of fencing and left existing inferior fencing in place in many locations. Chertoff came up with his 500 mile figure by adding any newly constructed double layer fencing (40 miles) plus newly constructed single layer fencing plus vehicle barriers plus existing fencing.
Watch ABP video which documents the "border fence scam."


Q. Hal, have you verified the border scam for yourself?
A. Yes. Watchdog America's satellite office is located within walking distance from the fence along the border separating Sonora, Mexico and Palominas, Arizona. Here is just one example of what Homeland Security isn't telling the public.

Q. So is the border fence a failure?
A. On the contrary. Although the Bush administration saw to it that the fence be designed and constructed to fail, to their's and the Obama administration surprise, it is working to a great extent despite its shortcomings and has caused the drug cartels to fight over remaining routes where there is no fence or inadequate fencing. So the Obama and the Democratic congress realizing that the fence works, they are determined not to finish it.

Q. Why hasn't the main stream media reported the truth on the border fence?
A. The only organization that has been reporting the truth on the border fence is American Border Patrol. It is no secret that the N.Y. Times, the L.A. Times, the Chicago Tribune and a myriad of other main stream news media are in lock step with President Obama and the majority of Democrats in congress who favor open borders. These media have enacted a virtual news blackout on American Border Patrol.


Q. Why do some people insist that a fence alone won't fix the problem?
A. They are right that a fence alone won't fix the (entire) problem. But that doesn't mean that if you can't fix the entire problem all at once, that you shouldn't fix part of the problem to begin with. Wouldn't you expect a doctor to first stop the hemorrhaging from an opening in a patient's body before fixing the cause of the hemorrhaging?


Q. Won't a border fence offend Hispanics?
A. There should be no American offended by a fence to secure our country. American Hispanics are AMERICANS.


Q. Shouldn't our government work together with the Mexican government to more harmoniously construct a fence?
A. No. As American citizens, we influence our elected leaders to reflect political policies in our national interest. As American citizens, we can't influence by vote, Mexican foreign policy. Mexican politicos do not make policy in the interest of the U.S.


Q. With the facts presented in this Q. and A., Why would anyone be opposed to a border fence?
A. Let's be honest. The majority of those opposed to a border fence, really don't want it because they want the border open to illegals, who will be future Democrat voters whose demographics will render the Republican party extinct.


Q. So why would anyone in the federal government and the Department of Homeland Security be opposed to a border fence?
A. Because the Obama administration and most Democrats know it works

So, you don't know the difference between a fence and a forty foot wall?
 
A- Cost prohibitive
B- Won't work
C- It's racist
D- It would reduce those successfully crossing the border
E- None of the Above

The machine benefits by not having a wall. Business (Republicans) get their cheap labor and (Democrats) get the votes

You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours

There is no excuse for the Republicans not funding the wall.

-Geaux

Trump's wall is foolish. Anyone with a brain knows this.

It would not be cost effective.

Nothing else needs said.

I realize you Trumpettes think that Trump knows more than anyone the past 50 years but I have news, Trump is an ignorant fool.

Only ignorant fools are ignorant enough to call billionaires ignorant fools....haha
 
Why cant any one consider that both sides of the disagreement have valued points, why does everything have to be my way or your way. do you honestly believe that half the population can be 100% wrong & the outer half 100% right about everything? that defies logic. why is every thing about winning, and not about finding solutions that work well for the majority, why should either half get to decide what's best for all.
 
Why cant any one consider that both sides of the disagreement have valued points, why does everything have to be my way or your way. do you honestly believe that half the population can be 100% wrong & the outer half 100% right about everything? that defies logic. why is every thing about winning, and not about finding solutions that work well for the majority, why should either half get to decide what's best for all.

So what is the middle ground between wall and no wall? Half a wall?
 
A- Cost prohibitive
B- Won't work
C- It's racist
D- It would reduce those successfully crossing the border
E- None of the Above

The machine benefits by not having a wall. Business (Republicans) get their cheap labor and (Democrats) get the votes

You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours

There is no excuse for the Republicans not funding the wall.

-Geaux

Trump's wall is foolish. Anyone with a brain knows this.

It would not be cost effective.

Nothing else needs said.

I realize you Trumpettes think that Trump knows more than anyone the past 50 years but I have news, Trump is an ignorant fool.


Trump isn't the only one:

Border Patrol agents back Trump wall, survey finds
 
A- Cost prohibitive
B- Won't work
C- It's racist
D- It would reduce those successfully crossing the border
E- None of the Above

The machine benefits by not having a wall. Business (Republicans) get their cheap labor and (Democrats) get the votes

You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours

There is no excuse for the Republicans not funding the wall.

-Geaux


Conservatives should start a GoFundMe page for their wall and stop demanding that everyone else pay for it.

So we should set up a Go Fund Me account for a wall, but have taxpayers keep paying for Planned Parenthood, NPR, PBS, Endowment for the Arts?

Now constitutionally speaking, which one of these items are closer to what the document says government should provide?
 
A- Cost prohibitive
B- Won't work
C- It's racist
D- It would reduce those successfully crossing the border
E- None of the Above

The machine benefits by not having a wall. Business (Republicans) get their cheap labor and (Democrats) get the votes

You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours

There is no excuse for the Republicans not funding the wall.

-Geaux


It won't work.
You build a 1000 wall there will be a 1000 tunnels underneath it as soon as it's built.

This 2-1/2 minute video at the end will describe the 240 tunnels they've already found in the San Diego region alone.


UZPRGACQVBCWTE6CPV5RJKTXLE.jpg

The ins and outs of U.S.-Mexico border tunnels

The only way to secure the border is with high tech motion detectors and more border patrol stations that can respond quickly to an alert. Anything that can be seen can & will always be compromised. Something that can't be seen won't even be attempted.


Correct, because our technology is so primitive we won't be able to detect construction machinery creating such tunnels.



You're not getting a WALL, you just lost the House. If Republicans wouldn't fund it, the odds of a Democrat congress funding it is zero to NONE.

Why build a wall with technology to make certain that no one is digging underneath the piece of shit, when you can just use technology to keep them from crossing the border.

39b867263d9eaa5e081b8aa606ccb5ec.jpg


There just isn't enough technology to stop them in an open border country like ours. Step one is to build the wall; all our border patrols say that would be a huge help. Then concentrate on keeping illegals out.

Have you noticed how all the douchebags who oppose the wall also support granting amnesty to the 20 million illegals who are already here?


Bullshit. We can put a man on the moon, we can protect our borders with technology.

Watch it again. 2-1/2 minutes that will show you some tunnels. Then it will go into other video's of terrain, making a wall the most ineffective way of protecting the border. It would make for the most expensive, laughable boondoggle in the history of this nation.

Does the Border Fence work?

Which is why a full house of Republicans have REFUSED to fund Trump's worthless POS WALL.
 
Last edited:
It’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .

More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .


Right on, Timmy! Spending 20 billion to stop a problem that costs us 120 billion in court costs, benefits, agents, courts, crime, healthcare, housing, and many other things is a TOTAL waste of money! We need to keep those borders open, keep that 120 billion bleeding us every year and on top of that, spend yet MORE money on more agents, courts and judges as a venue for even more attorneys to argue their case to keep them here! Glad to know you are of the school of math where 50+50 = -75. You make liberals proud.
 

It won't work.
You build a 1000 wall there will be a 1000 tunnels underneath it as soon as it's built.

This 2-1/2 minute video at the end will describe the 240 tunnels they've already found in the San Diego region alone.


UZPRGACQVBCWTE6CPV5RJKTXLE.jpg

The ins and outs of U.S.-Mexico border tunnels

The only way to secure the border is with high tech motion detectors and more border patrol stations that can respond quickly to an alert. Anything that can be seen can & will always be compromised. Something that can't be seen won't even be attempted.


Correct, because our technology is so primitive we won't be able to detect construction machinery creating such tunnels.



You're not getting a WALL, you just lost the House. If Republicans wouldn't fund it, the odds of a Democrat congress funding it is zero to NONE.

Why build a wall with technology to make certain that no one is digging underneath the piece of shit, when you can just use technology to keep them from crossing the border.

39b867263d9eaa5e081b8aa606ccb5ec.jpg


There just isn't enough technology to stop them in an open border country like ours. Step one is to build the wall; all our border patrols say that would be a huge help. Then concentrate on keeping illegals out.

Have you noticed how all the douchebags who oppose the wall also support granting amnesty to the 20 million illegals who are already here?


Bullshit. We can put a man on the moon, we can protect our borders with technology.

Watch it again. 2-1/2 minutes that will show you some tunnels. Then it will go into other video's of terrain, making a wall the most ineffective way of protecting the border. It would make for the most expensive, laughable boondoggle in the history of this nation.

Does the Border Fence work?

Which is why a full house of Republicans have REFUSED to fund Trump's worthless POS WALL.

Yes they work. Yuma is proof that a wall reduces illegal crossings

-Geaux

Homeland Security secretary: Border walls work. Yuma sector proves it.

The bipartisan Secure Fence Act of 2006 — supported by then-Sens. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and others — mandated the construction of hundreds of additional miles of secure fencing and infrastructure investments. Yuma sector was one of the first areas to receive infrastructure investments.


We built new infrastructure along the border east and west of the San Luis Arizona Port of Entry in 2006. The existing fence was quickly lengthened, and we added second and third layers to that fencing in urban areas. Lighting, roads and increased surveillance were added to aid agents patrolling the border.

Although there is still work to do, the border in Yuma sector today is more secure because of this investment. Even under lax enforcement standards, apprehensions in fiscal year 2016 were roughly a 10th of what they were in FY 2005 — and are on track to be even lower this year. Crime has significantly decreased in the Yuma area, and smugglers now look for other less difficult areas of the border to cross — often areas without fencing.

Homeland Security secretary: Border walls work. Yuma sector proves it.
 
It’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .

More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .

Do both.... build the wall and enforce companies who hire illegals. Further, facilitate legal immigration.
 
Why cant any one consider that both sides of the disagreement have valued points, why does everything have to be my way or your way. do you honestly believe that half the population can be 100% wrong & the outer half 100% right about everything? that defies logic. why is every thing about winning, and not about finding solutions that work well for the majority, why should either half get to decide what's best for all.

I’m pretty sure the debate isn’t necessarily all about the Wall...I’d say more than anything it’s perplexing to most that we have people, so called citizens on our soil whom do not respect our sovereignty, our laws and the good Americans funding Mexico and all their filthy rejects.
Good folks find it very disappointing that we have to live elbow to elbow with anyone illegitimate enough to put the needs of foreign thirdworlders ahead of our nations laws and values.
 
Correct, because our technology is so primitive we won't be able to detect construction machinery creating such tunnels.


You're not getting a WALL, you just lost the House. If Republicans wouldn't fund it, the odds of a Democrat congress funding it is zero to NONE.

Why build a wall with technology to make certain that no one is digging underneath the piece of shit, when you can just use technology to keep them from crossing the border.

39b867263d9eaa5e081b8aa606ccb5ec.jpg

There just isn't enough technology to stop them in an open border country like ours. Step one is to build the wall; all our border patrols say that would be a huge help. Then concentrate on keeping illegals out.
Have you noticed how all the douchebags who oppose the wall also support granting amnesty to the 20 million illegals who are already here?

Bullshit. We can put a man on the moon, we can protect our borders with technology.

Watch it again. 2-1/2 minutes that will show you some tunnels. Then it will go into other video's of terrain, making a wall the most ineffective way of protecting the border. It would make for the most expensive, laughable boondoggle in the history of this nation.

Does the Border Fence work?

Which is why a full house of Republicans have REFUSED to fund Trump's worthless POS WALL.
Yes they work. Yuma is proof that a wall reduces illegal crossings

-Geaux

Homeland Security secretary: Border walls work. Yuma sector proves it.

The bipartisan Secure Fence Act of 2006 — supported by then-Sens. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and others — mandated the construction of hundreds of additional miles of secure fencing and infrastructure investments. Yuma sector was one of the first areas to receive infrastructure investments.


We built new infrastructure along the border east and west of the San Luis Arizona Port of Entry in 2006. The existing fence was quickly lengthened, and we added second and third layers to that fencing in urban areas. Lighting, roads and increased surveillance were added to aid agents patrolling the border.

Although there is still work to do, the border in Yuma sector today is more secure because of this investment. Even under lax enforcement standards, apprehensions in fiscal year 2016 were roughly a 10th of what they were in FY 2005 — and are on track to be even lower this year. Crime has significantly decreased in the Yuma area, and smugglers now look for other less difficult areas of the border to cross — often areas without fencing.

Homeland Security secretary: Border walls work. Yuma sector proves it.

The 1000 mile wall that Mexico was going to pay for--is no more! If you can't get a Republican full house to approve funds for the wall---the odds of a Democrat house agreeing to fund it is zero to none.

Especially when the American public is overwhelming against it.

Donald Trump has vowed that there will be a wall on the United States’ border with Mexico if and when he is president — “100 percent,” as he put it to Sean Hannity on Tuesday. But the percentage of Americans backing the edifice in a new Pew Research Center study on attitudes about immigration released Thursday is far lower: 36 percent. More than six in 10 — 61 percent — of the thousands of adults surveyed, said they oppose the construction of a wall along the entire border with Mexico, as Trump has proposed throughout his campaign. And 34 percent of voters identifying themselves as Republican or leaning toward the GOP said they opposed the wall, with 63 percent supporting.
Pew study: Majority of Americans still oppose Trump's wall

This issue is not even worth talking about right now.
 
Last edited:
You're not getting a WALL, you just lost the House. If Republicans wouldn't fund it, the odds of a Democrat congress funding it is zero to NONE.

Why build a wall with technology to make certain that no one is digging underneath the piece of shit, when you can just use technology to keep them from crossing the border.

39b867263d9eaa5e081b8aa606ccb5ec.jpg

There just isn't enough technology to stop them in an open border country like ours. Step one is to build the wall; all our border patrols say that would be a huge help. Then concentrate on keeping illegals out.
Have you noticed how all the douchebags who oppose the wall also support granting amnesty to the 20 million illegals who are already here?

Bullshit. We can put a man on the moon, we can protect our borders with technology.

Watch it again. 2-1/2 minutes that will show you some tunnels. Then it will go into other video's of terrain, making a wall the most ineffective way of protecting the border. It would make for the most expensive, laughable boondoggle in the history of this nation.

Does the Border Fence work?

Which is why a full house of Republicans have REFUSED to fund Trump's worthless POS WALL.
Yes they work. Yuma is proof that a wall reduces illegal crossings

-Geaux

Homeland Security secretary: Border walls work. Yuma sector proves it.

The bipartisan Secure Fence Act of 2006 — supported by then-Sens. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and others — mandated the construction of hundreds of additional miles of secure fencing and infrastructure investments. Yuma sector was one of the first areas to receive infrastructure investments.


We built new infrastructure along the border east and west of the San Luis Arizona Port of Entry in 2006. The existing fence was quickly lengthened, and we added second and third layers to that fencing in urban areas. Lighting, roads and increased surveillance were added to aid agents patrolling the border.

Although there is still work to do, the border in Yuma sector today is more secure because of this investment. Even under lax enforcement standards, apprehensions in fiscal year 2016 were roughly a 10th of what they were in FY 2005 — and are on track to be even lower this year. Crime has significantly decreased in the Yuma area, and smugglers now look for other less difficult areas of the border to cross — often areas without fencing.

Homeland Security secretary: Border walls work. Yuma sector proves it.

The 1000 mile wall that Mexico was going to pay for--is no more! If you can't get a Republican full house to approve funds for the wall---the odds of a Democrat house agreeing to fund it is zero to none.

Especially when the American public is overwhelming against it.

Donald Trump has vowed that there will be a wall on the United States’ border with Mexico if and when he is president — “100 percent,” as he put it to Sean Hannity on Tuesday. But the percentage of Americans backing the edifice in a new Pew Research Center study on attitudes about immigration released Thursday is far lower: 36 percent. More than six in 10 — 61 percent — of the thousands of adults surveyed, said they oppose the construction of a wall along the entire border with Mexico, as Trump has proposed throughout his campaign. And 34 percent of voters identifying themselves as Republican or leaning toward the GOP said they opposed the wall, with 63 percent supporting.
Pew study: Majority of Americans still oppose Trump's wall

This issue is not even worth talking about right now.
They oppose construction of the wall "along the entire border with Mexico" That doesn't mean they oppose construction of a smaller portion of that.

In other words, you are a fucking liar.
 
I don't think a wall is wrong.... I think building one across the whole southern border is wrong and cost prohibitive, but I do think we need to rebuild the walls near heavy crossing points, which seem to be shabby... like the one near Tijuana... videos showed how shabby parts of it were.... they are still likely going to be able to cross over it...but it will slow them down... giving time for border patrol to catch them (fingers crossed) or even under it... unless somehow it is technically able to detect such tunnels...a ''Smart'' wall, so to say... :)
 
A- Cost prohibitive
B- Won't work
C- It's racist
D- It would reduce those successfully crossing the border
E- None of the Above

The machine benefits by not having a wall. Business (Republicans) get their cheap labor and (Democrats) get the votes

You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours

There is no excuse for the Republicans not funding the wall.

-Geaux

East Germany's leader, Walter Ulbricht, once stated the same EXACT question as your thread's title.
Good for him

-Geaux

.....and, eventually.......

b8accfa97f880d456dd41f9d583b5143.jpg


Only Nat could try to compare the two.


.
 
Moron leftists say a wall wont stop them all. There is truth in that BUT just ask them this...

If you had to play Russian Roulette would you rather have 1 bullet in the revolver or 5?
And righies say gun control won't stop them all.

What's your point?

No, what we said is disarming law abiding citizens will only empower the criminal.
No, it's not.

Yes, it is. When you disarm the general public, criminals will not obey any new gun laws. Therefore what you end up with is a society where only the police and criminals have guns and nobody else does. That's been our argument all along.

Where are people banning guns ? Typical gun nut lies .


In Chicago for years ..



But you refuse to acknowledge it
 
I don't think a wall is wrong.... I think building one across the whole southern border is wrong and cost prohibitive, but I do think we need to rebuild the walls near heavy crossing points, which seem to be shabby... like the one near Tijuana... videos showed how shabby parts of it were.... they are still likely going to be able to cross over it...but it will slow them down... giving time for border patrol to catch them (fingers crossed) or even under it... unless somehow it is technically able to detect such tunnels...a ''Smart'' wall, so to say... :)

Well, your people are against building a wall anywhere. They are against slowing down illegals coming into this country along with dangerous drugs that kill over 60,000 Americans a year.
 
Do both.... build the wall and enforce companies who hire illegals. Further, facilitate legal immigration.

I frankly don't care if you waste money on the former, it's not my land you will be confiscating...as long as you do the latter...which you won't
 
I don't think a wall is wrong.... I think building one across the whole southern border is wrong and cost prohibitive, but I do think we need to rebuild the walls near heavy crossing points, which seem to be shabby... like the one near Tijuana... videos showed how shabby parts of it were.... they are still likely going to be able to cross over it...but it will slow them down... giving time for border patrol to catch them (fingers crossed) or even under it... unless somehow it is technically able to detect such tunnels...a ''Smart'' wall, so to say... :)
The cost of the wall is .01% of the annual budget. Medicare for everyone? $1.5 trillion/yr. Which one does the snowflake moron believe to be too expensive?
 

Forum List

Back
Top