Why is naturalism considered scientific and creationism is not ?

[Youwerecreated]

YWC obviously knows less than nothing about DNA.

What would you like to discuss concerning Dna and genetics I assure you, you're in my area of expertise. I would be more than happy to reveal your ignorance one again.

Been there, done that, don't need yet another t-shirt proving that creationists are clueless when it comes to science.

It would be fun to see if you can show you understand the Genome and Dna base pairs thouroughly enough to defend what you believe.

 

[Youwerecreated]

We are genetically linked to primates, genetically linked to mammals and genetically linked to vertebrates

The interrelationships of all species has been fully mapped

The existence of God has no similar proof

Do you think we are genetically related to mice ? frogs ?

It is very difficult to find reliable data comparing the human genome to animal genome. The principal reason is that few animals have had their full genome sequenced. Even those that have cannot be easily compared in terms of percentages because the genomic length and chromosomal division can vary greatly from one species to another.

Scouring the Web, here is what I have found so far.

- Genome-wide variation from one human being to another can be up to 0.5% (99.5% similarity)

- Chimpanzees are 96% to 98% similar to humans, depending on how it is calculated. (source)

- Cats have 90% of homologous genes with humans, 82% with dogs, 80% with cows, 79% with chimpanzees, 69% with rats and 67% with mice. (source)

- Cows (Bos taurus) are 80% genetically similar to humans (source)

- 75% of mouse genes have equivalents in humans (source), 90% of the mouse genome could be lined up with a region on the human genome (source) 99% of mouse genes turn out to have analogues in humans (source)

- The fruit fly (Drosophila) shares about 60% of its DNA with humans (source).

- About 60% of chicken genes correspond to a similar human gene. (source)


The number of genes across a few tested species can be compared on HomoloGene.

Percentage of genetic similarity between humans and animals

Which supports evolution

Thanks for posting

Not if you fully understood genetics.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Why? Isn't the evidence "equal"?

Because there is evidence for spiritual entities,There is no evidence for fairies,leperchauns,and gnomes.

Really? And what evidence is that? Be specific.

I already answered this before and we are gonna stay on topic.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Clearly, the answer here is "there's just gotta be. There's just gotta".

And right wingers get so upset when you point out that only a measly 6% of scientists will admit to being Republican.

If they are going to believe in mysticism and the occult over science, then quit insisting most scientists are Republican.

This does sound like a naturalist.

 

[rightwinger]

Do you think we are genetically related to mice ? frogs ?

It is very difficult to find reliable data comparing the human genome to animal genome. The principal reason is that few animals have had their full genome sequenced. Even those that have cannot be easily compared in terms of percentages because the genomic length and chromosomal division can vary greatly from one species to another.

Scouring the Web, here is what I have found so far.

- Genome-wide variation from one human being to another can be up to 0.5% (99.5% similarity)

- Chimpanzees are 96% to 98% similar to humans, depending on how it is calculated. (source)

- Cats have 90% of homologous genes with humans, 82% with dogs, 80% with cows, 79% with chimpanzees, 69% with rats and 67% with mice. (source)

- Cows (Bos taurus) are 80% genetically similar to humans (source)

- 75% of mouse genes have equivalents in humans (source), 90% of the mouse genome could be lined up with a region on the human genome (source) 99% of mouse genes turn out to have analogues in humans (source)

- The fruit fly (Drosophila) shares about 60% of its DNA with humans (source).

- About 60% of chicken genes correspond to a similar human gene. (source)


The number of genes across a few tested species can be compared on HomoloGene.

Percentage of genetic similarity between humans and animals

Which supports evolution

Thanks for posting

Not if you fully understood genetics.

Where are the genetics supporting creation?

Sorry, you lose

 

[Luddly Neddite]

 

[Youwerecreated]

Which supports evolution

Thanks for posting

Not if you fully understood genetics.

Where are the genetics supporting creation?

Sorry, you lose

Sorry but can you handle the truth ?

The bible say's 10 times in genesis that kinds only bring forth after their own kind and for thousands of years and billions upon billions of observations the bible is correct, You lose.

 

[Youwerecreated]

I have read several of those hard text books and they are filled with conjecture.

 

[eots]

DNA has shown the interrelationships between the species. There is much in common. Macro evolution occurs.

Dna does no such of a thing we are genetically to far apart to be related to anything other than a human. That is merely an inference.

We are genetically linked to primates, genetically linked to mammals and genetically linked to vertebrates

The interrelationships of all species has been fully mapped

The existence of God has no similar proof. In fact, existing proof refutes the idea of God creating all species at creation

you confuse bible stories with the concept intelligent design...and the statement "The interrelationships of all species has been fully mapped is really meaningless"

 

[eots]

I have read several of those hard text books and they are filled with conjecture.

another reactionary equating intelligent design with politics and right wing christains

 

[eots]

Evolution is a fact....

God is a theory

the theory of evolution is a theory thats why its called the "theory of evolution"

 

[Hollie]

Evolution is a fact....

God is a theory

the theory of evolution is a theory thats why its called the "theory of evolution"

If you had a science vocabulary and a bit of knowledge regarding science terms, you would understand what "theory" means.

 

[Hollie]

Do you think we are genetically related to mice ? frogs ?

It is very difficult to find reliable data comparing the human genome to animal genome. The principal reason is that few animals have had their full genome sequenced. Even those that have cannot be easily compared in terms of percentages because the genomic length and chromosomal division can vary greatly from one species to another.

Scouring the Web, here is what I have found so far.

- Genome-wide variation from one human being to another can be up to 0.5% (99.5% similarity)

- Chimpanzees are 96% to 98% similar to humans, depending on how it is calculated. (source)

- Cats have 90% of homologous genes with humans, 82% with dogs, 80% with cows, 79% with chimpanzees, 69% with rats and 67% with mice. (source)

- Cows (Bos taurus) are 80% genetically similar to humans (source)

- 75% of mouse genes have equivalents in humans (source), 90% of the mouse genome could be lined up with a region on the human genome (source) 99% of mouse genes turn out to have analogues in humans (source)

- The fruit fly (Drosophila) shares about 60% of its DNA with humans (source).

- About 60% of chicken genes correspond to a similar human gene. (source)


The number of genes across a few tested species can be compared on HomoloGene.

Percentage of genetic similarity between humans and animals

Which supports evolution

Thanks for posting

Not if you fully understood genetics.

For someone who gets their science from Harun Yahya, you're a poor candidate to be offering a critique on the biological sciences.

 

[Hollie]

I have read several of those hard text books and they are filled with conjecture.

ID'iots confuse their conspiracy theories with a meaningful understanding of science.

Ken Ham would like you to visit his creation museum. You would obviously be impressed

 

[rightwinger]

Not if you fully understood genetics.

Where are the genetics supporting creation?

Sorry, you lose

Sorry but can you handle the truth ?

The bible say's 10 times in genesis that kinds only bring forth after their own kind and for thousands of years and billions upon billions of observations the bible is correct, You lose.

Actually, this has been proven to be untrue. Even by Darwins biological observations

Your Bible is wrong and once again is disproven by science

 

[Hollie]

Not if you fully understood genetics.

Where are the genetics supporting creation?

Sorry, you lose

Sorry but can you handle the truth ?

The bible say's 10 times in genesis that kinds only bring forth after their own kind and for thousands of years and billions upon billions of observations the bible is correct, You lose.

We know that in the genesis tale, your gawds lied. Satan told the truth.

Once again, we see that the bibles are self-refuting.

 

[dblack]

Evolution is a fact....

God is a theory

the theory of evolution is a theory thats why its called the "theory of evolution"

Exactly. A theory is rationally coherent, explains the available evidence and makes verifiable predictions about the world we live in.

Evolution is a theory. God is not.

 

[rightwinger]

Evolution is a fact....

God is a theory

the theory of evolution is a theory thats why its called the "theory of evolution"

Exactly. A theory is rationally coherent, explains the available evidence and makes verifiable predictions about the world we live in.

Evolution is a theory. God is not.

God is a fable...but if creationists want to present it as a theory, they are welcome to provide credible scientific evidence

 

[Hollie]

It seems some of the more excitable creationist should spend some time and get acquainted with what the term "theory" actually means as it applies in the science world.

Evolution is a Fact and a Theory

Otherwise, I suppose we can dismiss gravity, Einstein's silly notions of "relativity", etc. because they are merely theories.

 

[Youwerecreated]

I have read several of those hard text books and they are filled with conjecture.

another reactionary equating intelligent design with politics and right wing christains

The reason why so many confuse ID with creationism is the trial in Dover PA. That is the result of activist and secular courts not understanding science.

NOVA | Intelligent Design on Trial