Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The question for you is :The policy of not using federal funds to bribe foreign officials for personal gain.What is "US Policy" on dealing with corrupt foreign governments, Care? What policy was it that Trump violated when he asked the President of the Ukraine to look into suspected corruption involving the Biden's and Burisma?
Where is the "bribery"? All that you have is that Ukraine felt NO PRESSURE at all, to investigate Sleepy Joe- who is just one of hundreds of liberal extremists that have hatred for President Trump.
Does the fact that someone hates Trump exempt them from the laws of the land?
if this were a politician that loved and supported trump to no end,
Would he go after them with a vengeance,
send his personal consiglieri Giuliani to hook up with bunch of Ukrainian Russian sympathizers, crooked oligarch and ex kgb, a corrupt ex prosecutor, and bring two other ex Soviet American goons in to the search, to find or create this conspiracy against this person and their son,
and make the Uke President make a public CNN announcement about an investigation opened on this Trump supporter, before the Uke President could get their aid and DC meeting at the white house?
Do you really think Trump would go after a politician that was a huge supporter of his for so called corruption, to the extent of bringing in Giuliani to be some faux personal Elliott Ness?
Why wouldn't you send Giuliani? He has a long background fighting organized crime and corruption. He's not a "faux" Elliott Ness...he's actually as close to the real thing as you can get. Giuliani cut his teeth going after the Mafia in New York City.
Giuliani is part of the corruption, are you telling us he is better at fighting organized crime and corruption than the FBI and the DOJ. Come to think of it what is Giuliani's official title and who is paying him?
The question for you is :The policy of not using federal funds to bribe foreign officials for personal gain.
Where is the "bribery"? All that you have is that Ukraine felt NO PRESSURE at all, to investigate Sleepy Joe- who is just one of hundreds of liberal extremists that have hatred for President Trump.
Does the fact that someone hates Trump exempt them from the laws of the land?
if this were a politician that loved and supported trump to no end,
Would he go after them with a vengeance,
send his personal consiglieri Giuliani to hook up with bunch of Ukrainian Russian sympathizers, crooked oligarch and ex kgb, a corrupt ex prosecutor, and bring two other ex Soviet American goons in to the search, to find or create this conspiracy against this person and their son,
and make the Uke President make a public CNN announcement about an investigation opened on this Trump supporter, before the Uke President could get their aid and DC meeting at the white house?
Do you really think Trump would go after a politician that was a huge supporter of his for so called corruption, to the extent of bringing in Giuliani to be some faux personal Elliott Ness?
Why wouldn't you send Giuliani? He has a long background fighting organized crime and corruption. He's not a "faux" Elliott Ness...he's actually as close to the real thing as you can get. Giuliani cut his teeth going after the Mafia in New York City.
Giuliani is part of the corruption, are you telling us he is better at fighting organized crime and corruption than the FBI and the DOJ. Come to think of it what is Giuliani's official title and who is paying him?
I'd be hard pressed to think of anyone in the FBI or the DOJ with a better record at fighting organized crime than Rudy Giuliani! His record at that is what got him elected in politics to higher things.
The question for you is :The policy of not using federal funds to bribe foreign officials for personal gain.
Where is the "bribery"? All that you have is that Ukraine felt NO PRESSURE at all, to investigate Sleepy Joe- who is just one of hundreds of liberal extremists that have hatred for President Trump.
Does the fact that someone hates Trump exempt them from the laws of the land?
if this were a politician that loved and supported trump to no end,
Would he go after them with a vengeance,
send his personal consiglieri Giuliani to hook up with bunch of Ukrainian Russian sympathizers, crooked oligarch and ex kgb, a corrupt ex prosecutor, and bring two other ex Soviet American goons in to the search, to find or create this conspiracy against this person and their son,
and make the Uke President make a public CNN announcement about an investigation opened on this Trump supporter, before the Uke President could get their aid and DC meeting at the white house?
Do you really think Trump would go after a politician that was a huge supporter of his for so called corruption, to the extent of bringing in Giuliani to be some faux personal Elliott Ness?
Why wouldn't you send Giuliani? He has a long background fighting organized crime and corruption. He's not a "faux" Elliott Ness...he's actually as close to the real thing as you can get. Giuliani cut his teeth going after the Mafia in New York City.
Giuliani is part of the corruption, are you telling us he is better at fighting organized crime and corruption than the FBI and the DOJ. Come to think of it what is Giuliani's official title and who is paying him?
I'd be hard pressed to think of anyone in the FBI or the DOJ with a better record at fighting organized crime than Rudy Giuliani! His record at that is what got him elected in politics to higher things.
Also he isn't fighting any crime or corruption he is running around trying to find dirt on Trump's political opponents.
Also he isn't fighting any crime or corruption he is running around trying to find dirt on Trump's political opponents.
Its the same dam thing. The dirt on Trump's political enemies is their disgraceful corruption that is being brought forward.
Also he isn't fighting any crime or corruption he is running around trying to find dirt on Trump's political opponents.
Its the same dam thing. The dirt on Trump's political enemies is their disgraceful corruption that is being brought forward.
Now that's funny for the simple fact you Trump Humpers turned a blind eye to the disgraceful corruption that Trump has done.
The question for you is :Where is the "bribery"? All that you have is that Ukraine felt NO PRESSURE at all, to investigate Sleepy Joe- who is just one of hundreds of liberal extremists that have hatred for President Trump.
Does the fact that someone hates Trump exempt them from the laws of the land?
if this were a politician that loved and supported trump to no end,
Would he go after them with a vengeance,
send his personal consiglieri Giuliani to hook up with bunch of Ukrainian Russian sympathizers, crooked oligarch and ex kgb, a corrupt ex prosecutor, and bring two other ex Soviet American goons in to the search, to find or create this conspiracy against this person and their son,
and make the Uke President make a public CNN announcement about an investigation opened on this Trump supporter, before the Uke President could get their aid and DC meeting at the white house?
Do you really think Trump would go after a politician that was a huge supporter of his for so called corruption, to the extent of bringing in Giuliani to be some faux personal Elliott Ness?
Why wouldn't you send Giuliani? He has a long background fighting organized crime and corruption. He's not a "faux" Elliott Ness...he's actually as close to the real thing as you can get. Giuliani cut his teeth going after the Mafia in New York City.
Giuliani is part of the corruption, are you telling us he is better at fighting organized crime and corruption than the FBI and the DOJ. Come to think of it what is Giuliani's official title and who is paying him?
I'd be hard pressed to think of anyone in the FBI or the DOJ with a better record at fighting organized crime than Rudy Giuliani! His record at that is what got him elected in politics to higher things.
More smoke blowing, the FBI and DOJ were around long before Guiliani was ever heard of and they will be around long after he is gone and if he is so SHARP why didn't Trump make him the AG? I'll tell you why, because then he couldn't use him as a operative because his actions would have to be above board if he was the DOJ. Also he isn't fighting any crime or corruption he is running around trying to find dirt on Trump's political opponents.
Also he isn't fighting any crime or corruption he is running around trying to find dirt on Trump's political opponents.
Its the same dam thing. The dirt on Trump's political enemies is their disgraceful corruption that is being brought forward.
Now that's funny for the simple fact you Trump Humpers turned a blind eye to the disgraceful corruption that Trump has done.
It isn't "corrupt" to troll the Far Left and ridicule the pathetic characters of the Deep State.
Lisa Page has sued because she is embarrassed by Trump's award winning impression of her
And that's all that Donald J Trump has done, and no, it isn't "corrupt".
The question for you is :
if this were a politician that loved and supported trump to no end,
Would he go after them with a vengeance,
send his personal consiglieri Giuliani to hook up with bunch of Ukrainian Russian sympathizers, crooked oligarch and ex kgb, a corrupt ex prosecutor, and bring two other ex Soviet American goons in to the search, to find or create this conspiracy against this person and their son,
and make the Uke President make a public CNN announcement about an investigation opened on this Trump supporter, before the Uke President could get their aid and DC meeting at the white house?
Do you really think Trump would go after a politician that was a huge supporter of his for so called corruption, to the extent of bringing in Giuliani to be some faux personal Elliott Ness?
Why wouldn't you send Giuliani? He has a long background fighting organized crime and corruption. He's not a "faux" Elliott Ness...he's actually as close to the real thing as you can get. Giuliani cut his teeth going after the Mafia in New York City.
Giuliani is part of the corruption, are you telling us he is better at fighting organized crime and corruption than the FBI and the DOJ. Come to think of it what is Giuliani's official title and who is paying him?
I'd be hard pressed to think of anyone in the FBI or the DOJ with a better record at fighting organized crime than Rudy Giuliani! His record at that is what got him elected in politics to higher things.
More smoke blowing, the FBI and DOJ were around long before Guiliani was ever heard of and they will be around long after he is gone and if he is so SHARP why didn't Trump make him the AG? I'll tell you why, because then he couldn't use him as a operative because his actions would have to be above board if he was the DOJ. Also he isn't fighting any crime or corruption he is running around trying to find dirt on Trump's political opponents.
The FBI and DOJ were around before Giuliani and will be after he's gone. That doesn't change the fact that Rudy Giuliani led the task force that crippled the Mafia more than any other prosecutor in US history! He put heads of the 5 families in prison with sentences of 100 years. Your claim that he's somehow not qualified to look into corruption is quite frankly LAUGHABLE!
Also he isn't fighting any crime or corruption he is running around trying to find dirt on Trump's political opponents.
Its the same dam thing. The dirt on Trump's political enemies is their disgraceful corruption that is being brought forward.
Now that's funny for the simple fact you Trump Humpers turned a blind eye to the disgraceful corruption that Trump has done.
It isn't "corrupt" to troll the Far Left and ridicule the pathetic characters of the Deep State.
Lisa Page has sued because she is embarrassed by Trump's award winning impression of her
And that's all that Donald J Trump has done, and no, it isn't "corrupt".
That is what they call WISHFUL thinking. Yea that looked real presidential and man acting like a woman having sex. It is corruptful to try and have a foreign gov't find dirt on your political opponents.
Why wouldn't you send Giuliani? He has a long background fighting organized crime and corruption. He's not a "faux" Elliott Ness...he's actually as close to the real thing as you can get. Giuliani cut his teeth going after the Mafia in New York City.
Giuliani is part of the corruption, are you telling us he is better at fighting organized crime and corruption than the FBI and the DOJ. Come to think of it what is Giuliani's official title and who is paying him?
I'd be hard pressed to think of anyone in the FBI or the DOJ with a better record at fighting organized crime than Rudy Giuliani! His record at that is what got him elected in politics to higher things.
More smoke blowing, the FBI and DOJ were around long before Guiliani was ever heard of and they will be around long after he is gone and if he is so SHARP why didn't Trump make him the AG? I'll tell you why, because then he couldn't use him as a operative because his actions would have to be above board if he was the DOJ. Also he isn't fighting any crime or corruption he is running around trying to find dirt on Trump's political opponents.
The FBI and DOJ were around before Giuliani and will be after he's gone. That doesn't change the fact that Rudy Giuliani led the task force that crippled the Mafia more than any other prosecutor in US history! He put heads of the 5 families in prison with sentences of 100 years. Your claim that he's somehow not qualified to look into corruption is quite frankly LAUGHABLE!
What is more laughable is that bullshit you are spewing that he was looking into corruption. He is part of the corruption you claim that he fought for years, he is in Ukraine looking for anything he think Trump can use to defeat Joe Biden.
Also he isn't fighting any crime or corruption he is running around trying to find dirt on Trump's political opponents.
Its the same dam thing. The dirt on Trump's political enemies is their disgraceful corruption that is being brought forward.
Now that's funny for the simple fact you Trump Humpers turned a blind eye to the disgraceful corruption that Trump has done.
It isn't "corrupt" to troll the Far Left and ridicule the pathetic characters of the Deep State.
Lisa Page has sued because she is embarrassed by Trump's award winning impression of her
And that's all that Donald J Trump has done, and no, it isn't "corrupt".
That is what they call WISHFUL thinking. Yea that looked real presidential and man acting like a woman having sex. It is corruptful to try and have a foreign gov't find dirt on your political opponents.
When Lisa Page decided to have an adulterous relationship with Adam Schiff, she had to realize that there was a risk of being found out and ridiculed.
Its the same dam thing. The dirt on Trump's political enemies is their disgraceful corruption that is being brought forward.
Now that's funny for the simple fact you Trump Humpers turned a blind eye to the disgraceful corruption that Trump has done.
It isn't "corrupt" to troll the Far Left and ridicule the pathetic characters of the Deep State.
Lisa Page has sued because she is embarrassed by Trump's award winning impression of her
And that's all that Donald J Trump has done, and no, it isn't "corrupt".
That is what they call WISHFUL thinking. Yea that looked real presidential and man acting like a woman having sex. It is corruptful to try and have a foreign gov't find dirt on your political opponents.
When Lisa Page decided to have an adulterous relationship with Adam Schiff, she had to realize that there was a risk of being found out and ridiculed.
When did Lisa Page have a relationship with Schiff? You can't get any lower than a Trump Humper.
I named policies, you talked about your feelings...Oh, so you support her Medicare For All plan...cool...So therefore, impeachment should be removed from the constitution because after all...its all politics...big deal.....It is all politics and that is why the votes in the House went the way they did and that is why in the Senate the vote will go the way it is predicted to go.
Until someone you don't worship gets back in office..then suddenly you will be back to carrying around your little pocket constitutions whining about the rule of law...
I see it for what it is. With Clinton it was the same deal. You knew the House would impeach and the Senate didn’t have the votes to convict. Gabbard had the right idea, censure him and put an end to the posturing. The longer this plays out the worse it is for America and if the holds the articles for long, them Democrats will look worse to independents. I’m voting Gabbard, she is at least sane. Trump and the rest of the Democrats are nothing but grandstanders and ego stokers. They are supposed to serve the American people, they only serve themselves.
- Tulsi strongly supports the Medicare for All Act and serves on the Medicare for All Caucus
- Tulsi believes that our present healthcare system is organized by and for the benefit of big insurance and pharmaceutical companies and not the American people, which must be changed
- We pay far more in this country on healthcare costs than any other country in the world and get worse results. Far too many Americans in this country are sick and unable to get the care they need.
- Tulsi supports Medicare for all to make sure that every American gets quality healthcare - we must also focus on reducing the cost of healthcare overall, preventive health, bring down cost of prescription drugs by allowing Medicare to negotiate those prices down, and ensure transparency so people know exactly what the cost is and what they’re paying for.
- Tulsi believes that the Affordable Care act was a step in the right direction, but points out that issues remain with the number of uninsured and high costs related to deductibles, copayments for medical services, and prescription drugs
Medicare for All
She supports bringing America together. She is not going to be abrasive, like Trump and Warren, she is not going to be senile and forgetful like Biden or Sanders. I can see her reaching across the aisle unlike the others. She is willing to compromise, she is willing to work for America. I don't see any other candidate that will work for America.
This is why folks like you are so easily conned and are politically all over the place with who you claim to support....because its all about your feelings and then you project them onto the candidate....
Why do you think reaching across the aisle is important when on one side of the aisle is a party who consistently caters and appeases the worst segment of America?? Republicans are the problem....
Obama tried that "reach across the aisle" -- Obama ditched the public option and settled for a healthcare plan that was a republican idea until the black guy was for it...
Obama tried that "reach across the aisle" bullshit when he appointed republicans to his cabinet -- what did that get him??
Obama was even willing to cut social security and medicare in order to "reach across the aisle" -- what did that get him??
I care about policies, period.....reaching across the aisle doesn't mean shit if you can't talk policies
I named policies, you talked about your feelings...Oh, so you support her Medicare For All plan...cool...So therefore, impeachment should be removed from the constitution because after all...its all politics...big deal.....
Until someone you don't worship gets back in office..then suddenly you will be back to carrying around your little pocket constitutions whining about the rule of law...
I see it for what it is. With Clinton it was the same deal. You knew the House would impeach and the Senate didn’t have the votes to convict. Gabbard had the right idea, censure him and put an end to the posturing. The longer this plays out the worse it is for America and if the holds the articles for long, them Democrats will look worse to independents. I’m voting Gabbard, she is at least sane. Trump and the rest of the Democrats are nothing but grandstanders and ego stokers. They are supposed to serve the American people, they only serve themselves.
- Tulsi strongly supports the Medicare for All Act and serves on the Medicare for All Caucus
- Tulsi believes that our present healthcare system is organized by and for the benefit of big insurance and pharmaceutical companies and not the American people, which must be changed
- We pay far more in this country on healthcare costs than any other country in the world and get worse results. Far too many Americans in this country are sick and unable to get the care they need.
- Tulsi supports Medicare for all to make sure that every American gets quality healthcare - we must also focus on reducing the cost of healthcare overall, preventive health, bring down cost of prescription drugs by allowing Medicare to negotiate those prices down, and ensure transparency so people know exactly what the cost is and what they’re paying for.
- Tulsi believes that the Affordable Care act was a step in the right direction, but points out that issues remain with the number of uninsured and high costs related to deductibles, copayments for medical services, and prescription drugs
Medicare for All
She supports bringing America together. She is not going to be abrasive, like Trump and Warren, she is not going to be senile and forgetful like Biden or Sanders. I can see her reaching across the aisle unlike the others. She is willing to compromise, she is willing to work for America. I don't see any other candidate that will work for America.
This is why folks like you are so easily conned and are politically all over the place with who you claim to support....because its all about your feelings and then you project them onto the candidate....
Why do you think reaching across the aisle is important when on one side of the aisle is a party who consistently caters and appeases the worst segment of America?? Republicans are the problem....
Obama tried that "reach across the aisle" -- Obama ditched the public option and settled for a healthcare plan that was a republican idea until the black guy was for it...
Obama tried that "reach across the aisle" bullshit when he appointed republicans to his cabinet -- what did that get him??
Obama was even willing to cut social security and medicare in order to "reach across the aisle" -- what did that get him??
I care about policies, period.....reaching across the aisle doesn't mean shit if you can't talk policies
Hating Republicans is a feeling. Liking Democrats is a feeling. Those are two facts. I didn’t vote for either major candidate and unless the Democrats put a moderate candidate, I will vote third party again. Gabbard is an option for me. Every Democratic candidate is for government run healthcare, so if I follow your stupid logic, if I vote for any Democrat I would be supporting government mandated and controlled insurance, so I should vote for someone else. I like her isolationist policy, I like her standing up to the establishment Democrats. Sanders is to old for me to vote for him and he is a hypocrite. Warren is a self serving politician trying to play that she is for the common people. I could go on but I’ll vote Gabbard if you put her up, the rest of the field I am not interested in them as they all sound alike.
My preference is a Democratic President and a Republican Congress, that seem the best fiscally, which is my biggest concern.
LOLOLOLYou've been shown, lying con tool. Keep in mind, you call claim the Impeached Trump lowered the unemployment rate even before he became president and before he passed any policies.Um, the stock market is not an economic indicator.
Ok, what about record low unemployment? Is that an "economic indicator?"
You mean the record low unemployment that started under Pres. Obama.
What about record wage growth? Is that an "economic indicator?"
Which jobs are these record wage growths growing under.
What about record housing sales, is that an "economic indicator?"
When did these record home sales start?
Did you want to take a crack at telling us all what economic policies of Barack Obama's it was that caused unemployment to go down?
Actually he did. The positive vibes that Trump created throughout the business world after his vanquishing of Hillary, helped the economy immensely even before inauguration.
The business community realized that the large dark night of Obamunism was over and it was dawn in America.
What's your point? A president should be allowed to break the law if the stick market rises on their watch?This is about the US Constitution. This is about the law.So you don’t see it as 100% political theater?The House is the prosecutor and his grand jury, determining if there are crimes to be indicted with in the impeachment process.
The Senate is the trial, senators are the jury, chief justice Roberts is judge....
That has not been started yet.
The ones playing politics are the Republicans.
Oh, bullshit! This was never about "the law"! This was always about removing Donald Trump no matter what! Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff and Schumer know that Trump hasn't done anything that most Presidents before him have done...impeaching him on some vague "abuse of power" charge is farcical! This is a political maneuver because the Democrats are terrified that their candidates suck and that Trump is doing such a good job with the economy that he's going to get reelected. What's happening now is the very definition of political theatre!
This is 100% about Trump breaking the law.
If Obama would have done similar, Republicans would have impeached him.
Trump is a crook & is fucking over America & you are too stupid to see it.
The expe t GDP growth this yerar is 2.3%
You assfucks were dancing naked around the fire when Obama would have such a rate. Where is that promised 4%?
If the stupid fat ass fuck can't lower the deficit in the best economy ever, when is he?
LMAO
I disagree. Bush lied about WMDs and cost us 1000s of lives an trillions of dollars and he was not impeached. This is 100% about Trump and their loss in 2016. So Dave, you've never seen politicians over promise? Market is up over 500pts in ~7 says? The budget and lack of attention to healthcare is disappointing. But those are hardly impeachable offenses. I am also not a Republican. I am just an anti Leftist. I believe people like you are ruining this country and no one triggers you more than DJT.
Thank you, Mr. Trump.
Not true. Impeached Trump could shoot someone on 5th avenue for no good reason and Republicans would still defend him conservatism is a cult.You are kidding. LOL. Delusion is your BFF. Both parties are playing political games.This is about the US Constitution. This is about the law.So you don’t see it as 100% political theater?The House is the prosecutor and his grand jury, determining if there are crimes to be indicted with in the impeachment process.
The Senate is the trial, senators are the jury, chief justice Roberts is judge....
That has not been started yet.
The ones playing politics are the Republicans.
The crime is real
Democrats are doing their Constitutional duty.
If it were "real" then there would be bi-partisan support. Plus the transcript was released and still more than half the country doesn't see an impeachable offense.
