Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you know 100% of unarmed people killed in a shooting are pretty much fucked? How is that for a point?Do you have a point? No, wait. Never mind.The IRS will get after you, if your neighborhood bully/mugger doesn't get to you first.Because the ability to be secure in public, without walking around armed, is why we have government on the first place. If I have to pack heat just to go to the grocery store, I'm not going to bother paying taxes.
Why are you so scared someone is going to try to kill you? Are you involved in illegal activity? I'm pretty old now and not only has nobody ever tried to kill me, but I don't know anyone who has had someone try to kill them.The notion that to walk around armed, is nuts, is what is nuts, and I can hardly think of anything more nuts. People who walk around unarmed, are just that >> NUTS (and to a very high degree).I realize that the subtext for this thread is the gun control debate. But the notion that the way to be safe in public is too walk around armed is nuts.
And your plan to repel the person about to kill you ? Lollipop ? Ice cream cone? Sing him a song ? Is there a doctor in the house ? I mean really.
Wow. Is anything dumber than this ? Hey dum dum, you know the definition of "paranoid" ? It means fearing something without a good reason. How is now being DEAD, for a good reason ? God, you're stupid.they weren't paranoid nutbars like the op
you're welcome
Because this commonly happens every day. Riiiiiight!Lots of guns in the club is a great idea....
Why are you so scared someone is going to try to kill you? Are you involved in illegal activity? I'm pretty old now and not only has nobody ever tried to kill me, but I don't know anyone who has had someone try to kill them.
Meanwhile, when was the last mass shooting in the UK?
Because this commonly happens every day. Riiiiiight!Lots of guns in the club is a great idea....
Their homicide rate is 1/4 of ours.Meanwhile, when was the last mass shooting in the UK?
When was the last spate of stabbings?
Why are you so scared someone is going to try to kill you? Are you involved in illegal activity? I'm pretty old now and not only has nobody ever tried to kill me, but I don't know anyone who has had someone try to kill them.The notion that to walk around armed, is nuts, is what is nuts, and I can hardly think of anything more nuts. People who walk around unarmed, are just that >> NUTS (and to a very high degree).I realize that the subtext for this thread is the gun control debate. But the notion that the way to be safe in public is too walk around armed is nuts.
And your plan to repel the person about to kill you ? Lollipop ? Ice cream cone? Sing him a song ? Is there a doctor in the house ? I mean really.
There are lots of bad people with guns because of so many guns.Why are you so scared someone is going to try to kill you? Are you involved in illegal activity? I'm pretty old now and not only has nobody ever tried to kill me, but I don't know anyone who has had someone try to kill them.
Because there are bad people out there with guns.
So the answer is good people with guns.
Why are you so confident nobody wants to harm you? Do you have armed guards?
Are you involved in criminal activity?Why are you so scared someone is going to try to kill you? Are you involved in illegal activity? I'm pretty old now and not only has nobody ever tried to kill me, but I don't know anyone who has had someone try to kill them.The notion that to walk around armed, is nuts, is what is nuts, and I can hardly think of anything more nuts. People who walk around unarmed, are just that >> NUTS (and to a very high degree).I realize that the subtext for this thread is the gun control debate. But the notion that the way to be safe in public is too walk around armed is nuts.
And your plan to repel the person about to kill you ? Lollipop ? Ice cream cone? Sing him a song ? Is there a doctor in the house ? I mean really.
The beautified argument of a volunteer victim.
I don't understand how it can be that 5 good people are shot dead by some lunatic, and all of them were walking around in public unarmed. I rarely go anywhere unarmed, and have my gun with me 99% of the time. If they had been armed (or even just 1 of them), the following scenario would have played out. Either >>>
1. The shooter would have been deterred and never would have showed up.
2. The shooter would have ran away as soon as he realized he had firearm resistance.
3. The shooter would have been shot dead, thereby saving at least some (if not all) of the lives that were lost.
I have heard that Maryland (blue state) is an entire, statewide gun-free zone. Not sure about that, but I do know that gun-free zones are getting people killed like flies, so I wouldn't doubt if that was part of the scenario here.
Does anybody know an answer to the question (title) of this OP ?
Why are you so scared someone is going to try to kill you? Are you involved in illegal activity? I'm pretty old now and not only has nobody ever tried to kill me, but I don't know anyone who has had someone try to kill them.The notion that to walk around armed, is nuts, is what is nuts, and I can hardly think of anything more nuts. People who walk around unarmed, are just that >> NUTS (and to a very high degree).I realize that the subtext for this thread is the gun control debate. But the notion that the way to be safe in public is too walk around armed is nuts.
And your plan to repel the person about to kill you ? Lollipop ? Ice cream cone? Sing him a song ? Is there a doctor in the house ? I mean really.
The beautified argument of a volunteer victim.
I know a lot of people that don't want to ever be armed. It is a sad state when they are considered less safe. The government needs to do something to protect our right to life.I don't understand how it can be that 5 good people are shot dead by some lunatic, and all of them were walking around in public unarmed. I rarely go anywhere unarmed, and have my gun with me 99% of the time. If they had been armed (or even just 1 of them), the following scenario would have played out. Either >>>
1. The shooter would have been deterred and never would have showed up.
2. The shooter would have ran away as soon as he realized he had firearm resistance.
3. The shooter would have been shot dead, thereby saving at least some (if not all) of the lives that were lost.
I have heard that Maryland (blue state) is an entire, statewide gun-free zone. Not sure about that, but I do know that gun-free zones are getting people killed like flies, so I wouldn't doubt if that was part of the scenario here.
Does anybody know an answer to the question (title) of this OP ?
To be blunt: Ef you for trying to turn this into a gun zone debate. They SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD TO BE ARMED? WTF kind of society do we live in that everyone should be ARMED ALL THE TIME???
Sure you do. It's in the news every day. It on the Justice Channel and Escape channel in hundreds of TV (real life) episodes. It's on the Most Shocking videos. You're just paying attention.Why are you so scared someone is going to try to kill you? Are you involved in illegal activity? I'm pretty old now and not only has nobody ever tried to kill me, but I don't know anyone who has had someone try to kill them.
the mindless ramblings of a rabid gun nut
I know a lot of people that don't want to ever be armed. It is a sad state when they are considered less safe. The government needs to do something to protect our right to life.I don't understand how it can be that 5 good people are shot dead by some lunatic, and all of them were walking around in public unarmed. I rarely go anywhere unarmed, and have my gun with me 99% of the time. If they had been armed (or even just 1 of them), the following scenario would have played out. Either >>>
1. The shooter would have been deterred and never would have showed up.
2. The shooter would have ran away as soon as he realized he had firearm resistance.
3. The shooter would have been shot dead, thereby saving at least some (if not all) of the lives that were lost.
I have heard that Maryland (blue state) is an entire, statewide gun-free zone. Not sure about that, but I do know that gun-free zones are getting people killed like flies, so I wouldn't doubt if that was part of the scenario here.
Does anybody know an answer to the question (title) of this OP ?
To be blunt: Ef you for trying to turn this into a gun zone debate. They SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD TO BE ARMED? WTF kind of society do we live in that everyone should be ARMED ALL THE TIME???
If you want to stay alive you should support gun control. Countries with strong gun control don't have regular mass shootings. They also have homicide rates that are a fraction of ours. Quite the circle of stupidity you are stuck in. Gun industry tells you that you need a gun to be safe. Lots of guns makes us all less safe.Sure you do. It's in the news every day. It on the Justice Channel and Escape channel in hundreds of TV (real life) episodes. It's on the Most Shocking videos. You're just paying attention.Why are you so scared someone is going to try to kill you? Are you involved in illegal activity? I'm pretty old now and not only has nobody ever tried to kill me, but I don't know anyone who has had someone try to kill them.
BTW, ever hear of Capital Gazette ? San Bernardino ? Fort Hood ? Pulse Club ? Parkland ?LAX ? Virginia Tech ? etc , etc.
And I'm not scared that someone is trying to kill me. I'm just a believer in being prepared for what's important. Like staying alive. You wanna tell the friends and relatives of all the deceased in these killings, that everything is fine & dandy ?
I own lots of guns too. I don't carry and have never needed one. Common sense works just fine....I know a lot of people that don't want to ever be armed. It is a sad state when they are considered less safe. The government needs to do something to protect our right to life.I don't understand how it can be that 5 good people are shot dead by some lunatic, and all of them were walking around in public unarmed. I rarely go anywhere unarmed, and have my gun with me 99% of the time. If they had been armed (or even just 1 of them), the following scenario would have played out. Either >>>
1. The shooter would have been deterred and never would have showed up.
2. The shooter would have ran away as soon as he realized he had firearm resistance.
3. The shooter would have been shot dead, thereby saving at least some (if not all) of the lives that were lost.
I have heard that Maryland (blue state) is an entire, statewide gun-free zone. Not sure about that, but I do know that gun-free zones are getting people killed like flies, so I wouldn't doubt if that was part of the scenario here.
Does anybody know an answer to the question (title) of this OP ?
To be blunt: Ef you for trying to turn this into a gun zone debate. They SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD TO BE ARMED? WTF kind of society do we live in that everyone should be ARMED ALL THE TIME???
I own guns. I don't carry them around. Why should I? Why should I NEED to? There is something WAY WRONG with my country if people NEED to carry a gun to work in a newsroom!@!!!!
