Would you support a war on Islam?

[CrusaderFrank]

...at the Bush Family home, they're all laughing.

 

[Bleipriester]

I currently support a war on radical Islamism and have been accused over that by some people here aboard. You cannot support a war on terrorism when your government wages way by terrorism. So they accuse me of many things while they lie about the situation in Syria like programed robots. I cant express my abhorrence with words, just know, that it is those who blame me who are the ones that should be blamed. And this is not limited to that case.

So you also support going into countries all over the world and making war on certain of their citizens.

If you're talking about America, what do you want to do about that darned ole First Amendment?

That is not what I have said.
What if a sect your law consideres a religion aims at the replacement of that law by - lets say the sharia?

 

[JoeB131]

If you dispute that Christendom can out-gun Islam, then, by all means, have at it.

Well, yeah, if this really was a "clash of civilizations" or any of the other nutty shit you clowns say. More likely, we'd probably just end up wiping out our entire sorry species.

even more likely than that, people would just tire of war, and just look for a graceful exit. I mean, I remember how upset we were after 9/11, but now, man, nobody is seriously talking about, "Hey, let's invade Syria to get those guys who shot our cartoonists!!!!"

 

[Kondor3]

If you dispute that Christendom can out-gun Islam, then, by all means, have at it.

Well, yeah, if this really was a "clash of civilizations" or any of the other nutty shit you clowns say. More likely, we'd probably just end up wiping out our entire sorry species.

even more likely than that, people would just tire of war, and just look for a graceful exit. I mean, I remember how upset we were after 9/11, but now, man, nobody is seriously talking about, "Hey, let's invade Syria to get those guys who shot our cartoonists!!!!"

Translation: "I concede the point, on further reflection." Acknowledged.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

I currently support a war on radical Islamism and have been accused over that by some people here aboard. You cannot support a war on terrorism when your government wages way by terrorism. So they accuse me of many things while they lie about the situation in Syria like programed robots. I cant express my abhorrence with words, just know, that it is those who blame me who are the ones that should be blamed. And this is not limited to that case.

So you also support going into countries all over the world and making war on certain of their citizens.

If you're talking about America, what do you want to do about that darned ole First Amendment?

That is not what I have said.
What if a sect your law consideres a religion aims at the replacement of that law by - lets say the sharia?

Frankly, your post doesn't make a lot of sense but you did write "I currently support a war on radical Islamism ...". Where do you think you would find them so you could make war on them?

If you're against laws based on religious beliefs, you must also be against laws for personal freedoms like marriage equality and abortion. Or are you saying you do support some laws against personal freedom but not others?

 

[Bleipriester]

I currently support a war on radical Islamism and have been accused over that by some people here aboard. You cannot support a war on terrorism when your government wages way by terrorism. So they accuse me of many things while they lie about the situation in Syria like programed robots. I cant express my abhorrence with words, just know, that it is those who blame me who are the ones that should be blamed. And this is not limited to that case.

So you also support going into countries all over the world and making war on certain of their citizens.

If you're talking about America, what do you want to do about that darned ole First Amendment?

That is not what I have said.
What if a sect your law consideres a religion aims at the replacement of that law by - lets say the sharia?

Frankly, your post doesn't make a lot of sense but you did write "I currently support a war on radical Islamism ...". Where do you think you would find them so you could make war on them?

If you're against laws based on religious beliefs, you must also be against laws for personal freedoms like marriage equality and abortion. Or are you saying you do support some laws against personal freedom but not others?

You misunderstood completely.
At first, I support the Syrians in defending their country against Islamist terrorists.
Secondly, there is no way to tolerate a sect that wamts to remove the freedoms it profits from.
You are arguing as it should be one of ones personal freedoms do kill others.

 

[Nutz]

Bring it on.
There are almost 2 billion Muslims in the world - you'd be fucked.

LOL...1.75 billion live in backwards, 3rd country worlds. The rest are only slaves to the rich.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

I currently support a war on radical Islamism and have been accused over that by some people here aboard. You cannot support a war on terrorism when your government wages way by terrorism. So they accuse me of many things while they lie about the situation in Syria like programed robots. I cant express my abhorrence with words, just know, that it is those who blame me who are the ones that should be blamed. And this is not limited to that case.

So you also support going into countries all over the world and making war on certain of their citizens.

If you're talking about America, what do you want to do about that darned ole First Amendment?

That is not what I have said.
What if a sect your law consideres a religion aims at the replacement of that law by - lets say the sharia?

Frankly, your post doesn't make a lot of sense but you did write "I currently support a war on radical Islamism ...". Where do you think you would find them so you could make war on them?

If you're against laws based on religious beliefs, you must also be against laws for personal freedoms like marriage equality and abortion. Or are you saying you do support some laws against personal freedom but not others?

You misunderstood completely.
At first, I support the Syrians in defending their country against Islamist terrorists.
Secondly, there is no way to tolerate a sect that wamts to remove the freedoms it profits from.
You are arguing as it should be one of ones personal freedoms do kill others.

Again, your words are pretty garbled but if you meant to write 'there is no way to tolerate a sect that wants to remove the freedoms it profits from', then you must include others, such as Christianity.

And no, it should not "be one of ones personal freedoms [sic] do kill others" in the name of a religion.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Bring it on.
There are almost 2 billion Muslims in the world - you'd be fucked.

LOL...1.75 billion live in backwards, 3rd country worlds. The rest are only slaves to the rich.

Have you written how you plan to find these people so you can kill them?

 

[Nutz]

I wouldn't want to see Muslims rounded up and interned like the Japanese were, but we have the technology to "watch" people, and we should take full advantage of it.

Personally, I don't want my freedoms abridged because of asshole terrorists. Sure, certain measures need to be taken to watch these assholes, but how if we are critical of the NSA? War is the only answer...it will expose those who believe in terrorism.

Actually, "abridging freedom" is exactly what you're describing.

When in a state of war, freedoms are rightfully abridged against the enemy for obvious reasons.

 

[Nutz]

Bring it on.
There are almost 2 billion Muslims in the world - you'd be fucked.

LOL...1.75 billion live in backwards, 3rd country worlds. The rest are only slaves to the rich.

Have you written how you plan to find these people so you can kill them?

They will expose themselves at the outset of war. What did ush say...'You are either with us, or against us'.

 

[squeeze berry]

I would end any further Muslim immigration into western nations.
I would take away the citizenship of any Muslim in a western nation that showed signs of radicalization. I would spy on ALL mosques in western nations.

Yes, and make sure there would be no more Hispanics coming in because that's how a lot of these terrorists types are getting in. They all look so much alike.

No, actually, that's not how they get in but you want it to be illegal to be dark skinned.

Like Jesus was.

you are correct. here is a pic of jesus

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Bring it on.
There are almost 2 billion Muslims in the world - you'd be fucked.

LOL...1.75 billion live in backwards, 3rd country worlds. The rest are only slaves to the rich.

Have you written how you plan to find these people so you can kill them?

They will expose themselves at the outset of war. What did ush say...'You are either with us, or against us'.

Yabut, "ush" didn't go after terrorists like President Obama has. He said they weren't even "on his radar".


But, apparently you also want to kill all the baptists.

 

[rdean]

Republicans are currently engaged in a war on America. Aren't they stretching themselves a little thin?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Christendom? What a creepy fucking reality you live in.

Yes, Christendom.

And, I'm sure it's "creepy" to those whom (1) are atheist in nature and (2) are loath to acknowledge and respect their own culture's spiritual heritage.

It doesn't change the facts, though.

There's no harm or loss in being atheist or agnostic.

But there is harm (or loss) in failing to acknowledge or respect their own culture's spiritual heritage.

If you are largely of European descent then you are the product of Christian Europe - the nucleus or root of 'Christendom', since that shifted from the Middle East, in the opening centuries of the Christian Era.

Hell, even your calendar measures the years according to their distance from the birth of the Founder of Christianity; a measuring scheme so pervasive that even non-Christian regions have adopted it, although we now play games in substituting BCE (Before Common Era) instead of BC (Before Christ), and CE (Common Era) for AD (Anno Domini, [The Year of Our Lord])... doubly reinforced by the advent of computer technology, and the Christian calendar being so deeply embedded within the world's automation.

In the modern sense, Christendom is the collection of regions and countries, worldwide, including the vastness of Russia, which is primarily Christian in its present-day subscription to religious beliefs and in its historical religious and spiritual heritage.

People refer to the domains of Islam all the time.

References to Christendom (i.e., the modern, secularized West - including Europe, the Russias, the entire Western Hemisphere, and much of Oceania) are equally valid.

Merely a counterweight reference to Islam at large.

Your atheist twitchings about living within the vastness of Christendom (the modern, secularized West, with a Christian-centric focus and tradition) are of little significance, although I'm sure that it's a little uneasy from time to time, being on the outside, looking in.

Creepy and weird.

 

[Esmeralda]

I wouldn't want to see Muslims rounded up and interned like the Japanese were, but we have the technology to "watch" people, and we should take full advantage of it.

Blow up Mecca and all the crazies would have no choice but to realize that the world didn't end and maybe some of their actions are pretty crazy.

I know someone very well who just got back from a trip to Mecca. He's a very nice, ordinary working man, middle aged, married & with a son who just graduated university. Why should he be blown up?

 

[Ava]

No need to justify your answer if you don't want to. Would you support a war...a crusade against Islam and the killer muslims. Would you support a forced exodus and travel restrictions to the West?

Personally I would. Perhaps starting by exiling or imprisoning all family members of a known terrorist to a backwards ME nation.

As much as I like the idea, I am against it. I would go with the solutions of Lt. Col Ralph Peters though, in a heartbeat.

 

[Kondor3]

Christendom? What a creepy fucking reality you live in.

Yes, Christendom.

And, I'm sure it's "creepy" to those whom (1) are atheist in nature and (2) are loath to acknowledge and respect their own culture's spiritual heritage.

It doesn't change the facts, though.

There's no harm or loss in being atheist or agnostic.

But there is harm (or loss) in failing to acknowledge or respect their own culture's spiritual heritage.

If you are largely of European descent then you are the product of Christian Europe - the nucleus or root of 'Christendom', since that shifted from the Middle East, in the opening centuries of the Christian Era.

Hell, even your calendar measures the years according to their distance from the birth of the Founder of Christianity; a measuring scheme so pervasive that even non-Christian regions have adopted it, although we now play games in substituting BCE (Before Common Era) instead of BC (Before Christ), and CE (Common Era) for AD (Anno Domini, [The Year of Our Lord])... doubly reinforced by the advent of computer technology, and the Christian calendar being so deeply embedded within the world's automation.

In the modern sense, Christendom is the collection of regions and countries, worldwide, including the vastness of Russia, which is primarily Christian in its present-day subscription to religious beliefs and in its historical religious and spiritual heritage.

People refer to the domains of Islam all the time.

References to Christendom (i.e., the modern, secularized West - including Europe, the Russias, the entire Western Hemisphere, and much of Oceania) are equally valid.

Merely a counterweight reference to Islam at large.

Your atheist twitchings about living within the vastness of Christendom (the modern, secularized West, with a Christian-centric focus and tradition) are of little significance, although I'm sure that it's a little uneasy from time to time, being on the outside, looking in.

Creepy and weird.

Glad you liked it... always happy to explain things to folks who have lost their way and have forgotten their roots.

You don't have to be a Believer in a godhead, to acknowledge that you live within the domain of a particular Belief System, even if that domain has been largely secularized over the past couple of centuries.

 

[Derideo_Te]

I believe total war will defeat terrorism.

Assumes facts not in evidence.

Terrorism is about ideas and it is impossible to wage war against ideas.

What you are proposing will be futile and it will fail because the expenditure will bankrupt the West while not eliminating the problem.

There are other better and way cheaper ways to deal with terrorism.

 

[Discombobulated]

No need to justify your answer if you don't want to. Would you support a war...a crusade against Islam and the killer muslims. Would you support a forced exodus and travel restrictions to the West?

Personally I would. Perhaps starting by exiling or imprisoning all family members of a known terrorist to a backwards ME nation.

Another supporter of Muslim extremists, the terrorists should thank you for spreading their message for them.

How am I supporting killer muslims? I advocate a total war against Islam. I am down for re-education camps and nuclear war to end the scourge.

So y'all are in favor of going into countries all over the world, dropping nukes, forcing people into concentration camps, "bombing to glass" and killing.

Sounds like terrorism to me. And sounds an awful lot like Hitler's final solution.

Why don't you just force them to wear a big M on their clothes?

Dummies like Nutz are always ready to send other people to do their fighting for them.