danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #341
The minimum wage would be fifteen an hour, not fourteen equivalent for being unemployed. Market participants should self-select based on Market conditions. That is a form of "free market", as compared and contrasted to "wage slavery".Thank you for your support of the Left wing not Right wing policy, by having nothing but fallacy instead of a capitally fine and capitally wonderfully due to being valid, argument.You don't believe in Capitalism? The minimum wage would be fifteen an hour, not fourteen equivalent for being unemployed. Market participants should self-select based on Market conditions.unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more market friendly. the more participation in markets the greater the potential for the accuracy of better products at potentially lower cost.
Why provide rent control instead of more market participation for more people to help pay for more housing?
Unemployment compensation for people who quit their jobs or just refuse to work is lunacy. It is rewarding laziness. Unemployment compensation is meant to hold people over until they get another job. It was never meant to be a career.
I believe in capitalism. I also believe in actually addressing what was said in the post I quote.
Nothing you just posted has anything to do with your plea for unemployment compensation to be doled out to those who voluntarily quit their job or refuse to work. Want money? Get a job.
The minimum wage would be fifteen an hour, not fourteen equivalent for being unemployed. Market participants should self-select based on Market conditions.
Please point out where I have said anything about minimum wage. I can wait. Oh yeah, I haven't.
Unemployment compensation is not for people who quit a job voluntarily or refuse to get a job. That will not change. You don't get to draw a check and sit on your ass in your parent's house.