Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The very notion that a moderator should also act as judge, jury and executioner is SO far gone from the way an actual debate should be held as to not even be recognized as something American.Famous quote by Sen D Moynihan
I have to wonder if he's spinning in his grave after the debate.
Opinion - With fact-checks like these, how does truth stand a chance?
What's interesting is whether the story is true or even complete, it's good to remember that $24 invested at just 6% per year would now be worth over $280Trillion. That's more than all the private wealth of the entire U.S. --including Manhattan.money?
$24 dollars' worth of pretty beads.
you sold cheap.
Remember, it was Biden who said they believe truth over the facts.Opinion and fact are not mutually exclusive.
You get that from the DNC playbook?There's a fine line (if any) between propaganda, spin and opinion vs. facts. You can rig statistics, you can pull an out of context phrase and spin it to something different, you can pick out a throwaway line and turn it into a federal case. you can pretend that an overestimation or an underestimation is a lie. All those things fall into the category of facts depending on the political motivation.
?? Trump accurately says that crime is way up under Harris. Dickhead Muir hits his buzzer. Exactly what is Trump supposed to do?will never happen, but I'd like to see integrity brought to debates.
2 moderators, 2 basically silent fact checkers.
Moderator asks the question, candidate responds, if the response is deemed inaccurate, fact checker sounds a buzzer. they don't correct, they don't say anything, just hit the buzzer.
it would be up to the candidate to revise their statement, knowing they were wrong.
Moderator is NOT the fact checker.?? Trump accurately says that crime is way up under Harris. Dickhead Muir hits his buzzer. Exactly what is Trump supposed to do?
Actually it's the mainstream media playbook.You get that from the DNC playbook?
The person's own words.One of the big problems we face today is determining fact from fiction or exaggeration. I don't know about you, but I don't believe anybody with doing some back-checking as best I can. Most of everything we see or hear or read has a slant to it, one way or the other. Maybe not everything, but damn if it isn't hard to tell what is truth and what is somewhat distorted truth or outright misinformation/disinformation. So, with such a shaky foundation of truth, how does one trust anybody if you don't really know them personally?
OK, THe Dickhead David Muir look alike in some room back in NYC. What's the difference?Moderator is NOT the fact checker.
There is a difference?Actually it's the mainstream media playbook.
Free speech allows people to differ in their opinions, conclusions, beliefs, perceptions. Free speech allows people to be wrong. When (the collective) you do not allow people to think or believe wrongly without retaliation, you do not believe in free speech at all.Famous quote by Sen D Moynihan
I have to wonder if he's spinning in his grave after the debate.
Opinion - With fact-checks like these, how does truth stand a chance?
good pointThere is a difference?
They are just two intertwined arms of the world economic forum.
That would be the end of political debates.will never happen, but I'd like to see integrity brought to debates.
2 moderators, 2 basically silent fact checkers.
Moderator asks the question, candidate responds, if the response is deemed inaccurate, fact checker sounds a buzzer. they don't correct, they don't say anything, just hit the buzzer.
it would be up to the candidate to revise their statement, knowing they were wrong.
