Your 2016 Republican Nominee Will Be...

Typical far left response, they post known propaganda not based on any truth and expect others to prove them wrong!

You can not prove a negative..

I can prove that you are an idiot.

From the Right-Wing Wall Street Journal:

Big Landslide, Modest Turnout

But it was not as big a landslide for the Republicans in 2010 as it appeared that it might be on election eve. Some national surveys showed Republicans with a double-digit lead among likely voters in the generic congressional ballot. Yet the actual GOP margin of 7 percentage points not only fell short of that but was not as large as that registered by congressional Democrats in the previous two elections when they won a majority of House seats. In 2008, Democrats had an edge of 11 points in the nationwide House vote; in 2006, it was 8 points.


Sucks to be you, fool.
 
Typical far left response, they post known propaganda not based on any truth and expect others to prove them wrong!

You can not prove a negative..

I can prove that you are an idiot.

From the Right-Wing Wall Street Journal:

Big Landslide, Modest Turnout

But it was not as big a landslide for the Republicans in 2010 as it appeared that it might be on election eve. Some national surveys showed Republicans with a double-digit lead among likely voters in the generic congressional ballot. Yet the actual GOP margin of 7 percentage points not only fell short of that but was not as large as that registered by congressional Democrats in the previous two elections when they won a majority of House seats. In 2008, Democrats had an edge of 11 points in the nationwide House vote; in 2006, it was 8 points.


Sucks to be you, fool.

First off the WSJ is not far right, but I guess it would be to a far left programmed drone..
However you continue to show that you are far left hack!

Although you continue to prove (with yet another link) that even the (D)'s were disenchanted with Pelosi and Obamacare.
 
[
Typical far left drone, anyone that against the far left is automatically the GOP.

Then again I bet this was the same lame excuse you used in 2010 when the far left lost the house by trying to pass a unpopular law..

well, they didn't TRY to pass an unpopular law. They DID pass that law, and the individual components are very popular.

the GOP isn't even talking about repealing it anymore.

You see, winning a few red districts or a few red states doesn't help you if you can't win the whole country.
 
Indiana Governor Mike Pence.

You heard it here first, folks!

He's a little bit Establishment, he's a little bit teabagger

He's an Evangelical, but not obnoxiously so.

He's been a Congresscritter, he's been a Governor.

He's in deep with the Koch brothers.

He went against the Party and expanded Medicaid - and no one in the Party (or Americans For Prosperity) attacked him for it.

He's media-friendly and is ready to discuss issues without looking like a dope.

No controversy.

He's well-liked by his colleagues. After just one term in the House, he became chairman of the Republican Study Committee. He's a first-time governor and was elected to the Executive Committee of the Republican Governors Committee.

He's not an ideologue, just a fairly orthodox conservative.

He has a history of going against his Party, intelligently. He opposed No Child Left Behind, Bush's 2003 Medicare expansion, and immigration reform in 2007. All three are issues that Republicans NOW deride and reject.

He's a Reaganite, economically.



I'm gonna look like a freakin' genius, over here!
Sorry, he's not nearly stupid enough to be a GOP candidate.
 
I'm predicting a Rand Paul/Hillary race. I really want that race too. It would mean great debates and I love a good debate.

Alas we will probably get some hee haw candidate from down South like Rick Perry or some shit.
 
We'd be better off with a former governor, whichever party wins.

Someone with strong managerial skills who knows how to be a leader not only as a figurehead, but as the leader of a well-oiled organization.

Senators and representatives, for the most part, just don't have that experience.
 
“He has a history of going against his Party, intelligently. He opposed No Child Left Behind, Bush's 2003 Medicare expansion, and immigration reform in 2007. All three are issues that Republicans NOW deride and reject.”

'Intelligently' a third of the time.

NCLB was nonsense, Medicare expansion was sound policy along with Bush's immigration reform proposal.

“He's a Reaganite, economically.”

Nice for republicans, bad for the country.
 
We'd be better off with a former governor, whichever party wins.

Someone with strong managerial skills who knows how to be a leader not only as a figurehead, but as the leader of a well-oiled organization.

Senators and representatives, for the most part, just don't have that experience.

George W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were both governors and they were complete fucking disasters.
 
The Liberal- Fascist machine has already started working against some of the potential GOP candidates..
"The Liberal- Fascist machine"

Are Liberals going to hypnotize you into voting for someone you don't want?

Then what are you worried about?


Me ??
laugh3.gif
No - but it looks like they did a good job on you
laugh3.gif
Right-wingers are terrified of the media doing their jobs and reporting what they DO (Gingrich cheating on his wives), or SAY (Romney and his 47%), or are FUNDED by (Koch/Big Oil).

They would rather cry about it to Sean Hannity.


One exapmle that comes to mind , and is very similar to the Liberal Clap-Trap that is till being perpetrated is the Wall within - a CBS special .

In June 1988, CBS presented an hour-long special "CBS Reports: The Wall Within" . The show was praised by critics, the Washington Post called it "extraordinarily powerful" One Vet Terry Bradley, told Rather he had tortured and skinned alive whole Vietnamese families, 50 men, women, and children in a single hour. George Grule claimed he was stationed on the U.S.S. Ticonderoga off the Vietnamese coast during a secret mission. Grule claimed to have witnessed a friend walk into an airplane propeller which turned him into mincemeat and sprayed Grule with his blood. Coaxed by Dan Rather, Steve Southards, vividly described slaughtering hordes of Vietnamese civilians, and blaming the North Vietnamese. "... you went into the village, killed people, burned part of the village, then made it appear that the other side had done this?" Rather replied. Grizzly fantastic horrifying tales, ALL FABRICATED - ---

B. G. Burkett and Glenna Whitley, in their book * Stolen Valor : How the Vietnam Generation Was Robbed of Its Heroes and Its History
ir
*, claim that they had obtained the service records of all six soldiers, documenting where each was stationed throughout the Vietnam War. Only one of the men actually served in Vietnam; he claimed he was a Navy SEAL, but the records contradicted his claims and listed him as an equipment repairman , the other 5 never even set foot on Vietnamese soil. I can understand and possibly forgive One charlatan slipping through, but not 6 !!!!

A similar incident occurred In 1998, apparently CNN took lessons from the same folks who controlled Dan Rather when they ran a report that the 1970 Operation Tailwind used Sarin gas to kill American defectors . The Pentagon denied the story. Skeptics proved it extremely improbable that such an atrocity went unnoticed , and CNN had no facts or viable witnesses to offer the slightest bit of credibility to the story.

Prior to Fox News and the Internet this was everyday business in the Liberal Media , Now with Fox and the internet blowing their asses up more often Truth & Freedom has a chance
 
We'd be better off with a former governor, whichever party wins.

Someone with strong managerial skills who knows how to be a leader not only as a figurehead, but as the leader of a well-oiled organization.

Senators and representatives, for the most part, just don't have that experience.

George W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were both governors and they were complete fucking disasters.

[

And the far left continues to post their propaganda as they loose the 2014 election and the senate.

I would say that Obama would be on his lame duck session, but he has been a lame duck since the day he was elected.

Uh, guy, winning the 2014 Midterms is like winning the Special Olympics.


Even if you win, you're still retarded.

The GOP should be winning all of these races, hands down. Just like Reagan and Bush-43 lost their Senate in their sixth year. The guys who came in with you get swept out six years later.

Typical far left drone, anyone that against the far left is automatically the GOP.

Then again I bet this was the same lame excuse you used in 2010 when the far left lost the house by trying to pass a unpopular law..
Hey moron: the reason why the GOP won in 2010 was because Democrats didn't show up to vote. That's the only reason.

It has been proven over and over that Republican turnout was no higher in 2010 than any other midterm.


The reason they showed up after that was out of Racism - 90% of Black voters voted for Obama - not having the slightest clue as to what he was about

 
The Liberal- Fascist machine has already started working against some of the potential GOP candidates..
"The Liberal- Fascist machine"

Are Liberals going to hypnotize you into voting for someone you don't want?

Then what are you worried about?


Me ??
laugh3.gif
No - but it looks like they did a good job on you
laugh3.gif
Right-wingers are terrified of the media doing their jobs and reporting what they DO (Gingrich cheating on his wives), or SAY (Romney and his 47%), or are FUNDED by (Koch/Big Oil).

They would rather cry about it to Sean Hannity.

So how much money do you get for posting all the far left keywords/propaganda in one post?
Prove me wrong, dope.

Seen that done already ,,,,lol .... time and time and time again - you are no fun , you're too easy to bitch smack. A word of advice sit back , STFU and watch JoeB131 - he's pretty good at for a Libtard . And he knows when to run away like a bitch when he's been beaten.
 
I'm predicting that Rand Paul will be the Republican nominee. I don't think he'll win the general election, but I like him more than Hillary Clinton.
shit stain

You think establishment repubs, attached at the hip to defense contractors, would back a professed non-interventionist?


I dono, Obama started a shit ton of new wars, never ended Iraq (his words), showered the rich with free money and you guys still voted for him... Anything is possible.
 
We'd be better off with a former governor, whichever party wins.

Someone with strong managerial skills who knows how to be a leader not only as a figurehead, but as the leader of a well-oiled organization.

Senators and representatives, for the most part, just don't have that experience.

George W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were both governors and they were complete fucking disasters.

As was Reagan with the most corrupt administration since Grant, not too mention Iran-Contra. At least Carter was intelligent, unlike reagan or bush.
 
We'd be better off with a former governor, whichever party wins.

Someone with strong managerial skills who knows how to be a leader not only as a figurehead, but as the leader of a well-oiled organization.

Senators and representatives, for the most part, just don't have that experience.

George W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were both governors and they were complete fucking disasters.

Jimmy Carter was a disaster thanks to the far left trying to Hijack the (D) party that incestuously support.

GWB was not a complete disaster like Obama or Carter, but definitely in the top three..

3. GWB
2. Carter
1. Obama
 
We'd be better off with a former governor, whichever party wins.

Someone with strong managerial skills who knows how to be a leader not only as a figurehead, but as the leader of a well-oiled organization.

Senators and representatives, for the most part, just don't have that experience.

George W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were both governors and they were complete fucking disasters.

As was Reagan with the most corrupt administration since Grant, not too mention Iran-Contra. At least Carter was intelligent, unlike reagan or bush.

And the far left propaganda come out once again. Carter was fool, but not as big as Obama. He was fool by trying to take on the far left.
 

Forum List

Back
Top