Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^^^ I see we've added yet another retard to the forum![/QUOTE]
Slave Labor? you mean like what is used to make the most over priced electronics known as apple products?
And though, here American liberals are using these same Apple electronics. HYPOCRITES!
^^^ I see we've added yet another retard to the forum!
Slave Labor? you mean like what is used to make the most over priced electronics known as apple products?
And though, here American liberals are using these same Apple electronics. HYPOCRITES!
^^^ I see we've added yet another retard to the forum!
Slave Labor? you mean like what is used to make the most over priced electronics known as apple products?
And though, here American liberals are using these same Apple electronics. HYPOCRITES!
And after 25+ years, you could turn it into billions.That's my guess too, surely he knows better. What he's saying simply is not going to happen. But he keeps saying stuff like this to fire up his supporters that just isn't reasonable, so there is just no way of knowing what he would do in office.I don't support tariffs, but I don't believe Trump will actually impose any. He's just using the threat as a negotiating tactic. Trump cannot impose any tariffs without the approval of Congress. That's the bottom line.
.
why would you think he knows better.
the man bankrupted four corporations, screwing his vendors.
if someone handed you 125 million dollars, i think you could make money with it too.
Holy shit! You're drinking the Trump Kool-Aid by the gallon!He tried to help out Atlantic City's economy and got kicked in the a$$ for it by the ungrateful amongst us who are hooked on Hillary.
Trump only tries to help out Trump. His casino went bankrupt because he's not the genius businessman that he says he is, and you swallow hook, line and sinker.
Owning a casino is a license to print money. And he failed spectacularly, screwing over all the people he signed contracts with.
President Obama (praise be unto Him!) made America Great Again after Bush shit the bed economically, militarily, and diplomatically.I seriously don't understand the conventional wisdom that because Trump has a lot of money he's smart, knowledgeable, or wise.surely he knows better.
It must be pure partisanship, because I don't hear conservatives talk that way about George Soros.
This from a far left drone that voted for "Hope and Change" twice and got worse than Bush!
President Obama (praise be unto Him!) made America Great Again after Bush shit the bed economically, militarily, and diplomatically.I seriously don't understand the conventional wisdom that because Trump has a lot of money he's smart, knowledgeable, or wise.surely he knows better.
It must be pure partisanship, because I don't hear conservatives talk that way about George Soros.
This from a far left drone that voted for "Hope and Change" twice and got worse than Bush!
Why 'non-internet'?...from money given to him by daddy.Not surprising, given that economists - regardless of political stripe - agree that free trade is good for Americans.
Donald Trump’s solution is to ... levy a 45% tax on Chinese imports. The idea is to make Chinese goods more expensive so that American producers who pay their workers more can gain a competitive edge.
There’s a painful side effect to this plan, however: It would, well, make a lot of products more expensive, and most of the price hikes would come straight out of consumer wallets. ... A 45% tariff on Chinese imports would encourage other low-cost exporters, such as Vietnam, Bangladesh and Mexico, to ship more goods to America. Whether U.S. producers would gain an edge is debatable. ...
Trump’s tariff plan would likely meet firm public resistance. Economists would also protest. “Economists disagree about a lot,” says Ozimek, “but there’s very strong agreement that free trade benefits Americans, on average.” A poll of economists by the University of Chicago, for instance, found that 100% of them believe U.S. trade with China makes most Americans better off.
Most economists also agree that free trade—like anything that improves efficiency and market performance—produces winners and losers. And the losers usually include people who get the job done slower, at a higher cost than competitors. Protecting underperformers isn’t likely to help the U.S. economy. Helping them perform better would.
Donald Trump wants you to pay more for smartphones, TVs and a lot else
How many of them are worth billions?
I already know that you're a fool.
Why don't you list 10 Wealthy non-Internet Business People who made it completely on their own.
Which, by definition means that anyone not agreeing that water is wet must be a fucking idiot, correct?100% Leftard bullshit.
You can't get 100% of any group to even agree water is wet.
No, it simply validates for the millionth time Leftards are liars.Which, by definition means that anyone not agreeing that water is wet must be a fucking idiot, correct?100% Leftard bullshit.
You can't get 100% of any group to even agree water is wet.
Looks like you've made Toro's point.
I just LOVE it when people post articles without reading them first!No links to actual Krugman words. I'm shocked.You are consistently among the least informed posters here.Paul Krugman is constantly correct on economic matters.If a bunch of economists are against it...argues pretty strongly in favor of it.
When was the last time an economist was right about anything.
If you have any evidence to the contrary, step up.
The Unofficial Paul Krugman Web Page
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/07/opinion/paul-krugman-trump-is-right-on-economics.html?_r=0
Wow! That was tough to find.
How is Apple a Liberal's pet company?Should Apple just give away their intellectual property? The electronics may be cheap - or maybe not: those touch screens can't be produced in every electronics shop.That's because of slave labor. Period.Because the jobs argument is an illusion.
It costs about $2 to make a T-shirt in Vietnam. It costs about $12 (or more) to make the same T-shirt in America. Even if you got rid of all the government regulations crap, it would still cost many times more to make a T-shirt in America. That $10 difference is money out of your pocket that you could have spent elsewhere in the economy. So that's $10 towards an American job somewhere else that doesn't exist anymore because of the tariff.
Only 15% of America's economy is exports. 85% of America's economy is internally generated. Most of the money that is spent by you - that $10 - stays here. But if you put on a tariff, that $10 doesn't exist anymore, and you are poorer for it.
If you have $12 to spend on a T-shirt or $12 to spend on a T-shirt and $10 on something else, in which one are you better off?
Jobs are not an illusion. That is pretty absurd coming from a decently minded individual..
You sound like the chamber of commerce just freshly shit you out.
What's next? Amnesty or open borders?
Slave Labor? you mean like what is used to make the most over priced electronics known as apple products?
See how the far left will defend their pet companies that exploit slave labor in China...
And according to the far left, profit is "evil"..
Silly far left drone!
If you said Ben & Jerry's I could understand your limited ability to think, but Apple?
Why 'non-internet'?...from money given to him by daddy.Not surprising, given that economists - regardless of political stripe - agree that free trade is good for Americans.
Donald Trump’s solution is to ... levy a 45% tax on Chinese imports. The idea is to make Chinese goods more expensive so that American producers who pay their workers more can gain a competitive edge.
There’s a painful side effect to this plan, however: It would, well, make a lot of products more expensive, and most of the price hikes would come straight out of consumer wallets. ... A 45% tariff on Chinese imports would encourage other low-cost exporters, such as Vietnam, Bangladesh and Mexico, to ship more goods to America. Whether U.S. producers would gain an edge is debatable. ...
Trump’s tariff plan would likely meet firm public resistance. Economists would also protest. “Economists disagree about a lot,” says Ozimek, “but there’s very strong agreement that free trade benefits Americans, on average.” A poll of economists by the University of Chicago, for instance, found that 100% of them believe U.S. trade with China makes most Americans better off.
Most economists also agree that free trade—like anything that improves efficiency and market performance—produces winners and losers. And the losers usually include people who get the job done slower, at a higher cost than competitors. Protecting underperformers isn’t likely to help the U.S. economy. Helping them perform better would.
Donald Trump wants you to pay more for smartphones, TVs and a lot else
How many of them are worth billions?
I already know that you're a fool.
Why don't you list 10 Wealthy non-Internet Business People who made it completely on their own.
Yet none of you can come up with the simple solution of making elections publicly funded, getting big money out of elections?Both parties suck as they are both dependent on MNC contributions to run their campaigns.I'm just wondering what the Right would say to blame the 40% increase on Democrats. Because they never take responsibility for their own actions.So...if Trump gets elected (Yep free trade has done WONDERS for Americans. I can point out at LEAST 25 plants/factories I either worked at or family members worked at OR people were working at as I was growing up that are now CLOSED either gone overseas or just closed down because of CHEAP CRAP from overseas. Trump is right 100%. PERIOD.), and goes ahead with this, and now almost everything you buy goes up 40%, how will you blame Democrats?
The void will be filled and more people will be employed and products will be bought.
Nah! We can't have THAT!
Depends on the end game.I just LOVE it when people post articles without reading them first!No links to actual Krugman words. I'm shocked.You are consistently among the least informed posters here.Paul Krugman is constantly correct on economic matters.If a bunch of economists are against it...argues pretty strongly in favor of it.
When was the last time an economist was right about anything.
If you have any evidence to the contrary, step up.
The Unofficial Paul Krugman Web Page
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/07/opinion/paul-krugman-trump-is-right-on-economics.html?_r=0
Wow! That was tough to find.
So, you agree with Krugman when he agrees with Trump wanting to raise taxes?
^^^ I see we've added yet another retard to the forum!
Slave Labor? you mean like what is used to make the most over priced electronics known as apple products?
And though, here American liberals are using these same Apple electronics. HYPOCRITES!
^^^ Another low information voter.No links to actual Krugman words. I'm shocked.You are consistently among the least informed posters here.Paul Krugman is constantly correct on economic matters.If a bunch of economists are against it...argues pretty strongly in favor of it.
When was the last time an economist was right about anything.
If you have any evidence to the contrary, step up.
The Unofficial Paul Krugman Web Page
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/07/opinion/paul-krugman-trump-is-right-on-economics.html?_r=0
Wow! That was tough to find.
Now if Krugman agrees I'm going to have to be skeptical of it. He right about as often as a stopped clock.
Yet none of you can come up with the simple solution of making elections publicly funded, getting big money out of elections?Both parties suck as they are both dependent on MNC contributions to run their campaigns.I'm just wondering what the Right would say to blame the 40% increase on Democrats. Because they never take responsibility for their own actions.So...if Trump gets elected (Yep free trade has done WONDERS for Americans. I can point out at LEAST 25 plants/factories I either worked at or family members worked at OR people were working at as I was growing up that are now CLOSED either gone overseas or just closed down because of CHEAP CRAP from overseas. Trump is right 100%. PERIOD.), and goes ahead with this, and now almost everything you buy goes up 40%, how will you blame Democrats?
The void will be filled and more people will be employed and products will be bought.
Nah! We can't have THAT!
9Aces is a self-reliant, super Conservative...he's a tough guy.^^^ Another low information voter.No links to actual Krugman words. I'm shocked.You are consistently among the least informed posters here.Paul Krugman is constantly correct on economic matters.
If you have any evidence to the contrary, step up.
The Unofficial Paul Krugman Web Page
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/07/opinion/paul-krugman-trump-is-right-on-economics.html?_r=0
Wow! That was tough to find.
Now if Krugman agrees I'm going to have to be skeptical of it. He right about as often as a stopped clock.
I know that casinos don't lose money unless they are run spectacularly badly. Period.Holy shit! You're drinking the Trump Kool-Aid by the gallon!He tried to help out Atlantic City's economy and got kicked in the a$$ for it by the ungrateful amongst us who are hooked on Hillary.
Trump only tries to help out Trump. His casino went bankrupt because he's not the genius businessman that he says he is, and you swallow hook, line and sinker.
Owning a casino is a license to print money. And he failed spectacularly, screwing over all the people he signed contracts with.
I saw Casino but I still can't write a Dissertation on casinos.
I guess you can.
