Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Is there some sort of homosexual statistic that trumps real demographics that we aren't aware of? Not one state referendum in the entire Nation has supported homosexual unions. Do sissies think that demographics will support decisions by sissie judges that are contradictory to the will of the people?
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Why was a word so important to all those States a decade ago that banned BOTH Civil Marriage and Civil Unions?
You again act is if was the the homosexuals that took Civil Unions off the table, it was Social Authoritarians that did that. Instead of saying "lets have Civil Unions and equal Federal recognition" the decision was to BAN them instead.
>>>>
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Why was a word so important to all those States a decade ago that banned BOTH Civil Marriage and Civil Unions?
You again act is if was the the homosexuals that took Civil Unions off the table, it was Social Authoritarians that did that. Instead of saying "lets have Civil Unions and equal Federal recognition" the decision was to BAN them instead.
>>>>
thats an interesting bit of history, but has nothing to do with this discussion. CURRENTLY, it is the gays who refuse to accept civil unions as equal to man/woman marriage. The word 'marriage' is more important to them than equal rights.
Why is that? I have explained it many times, so I refuse to do it again.
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Why was a word so important to all those States a decade ago that banned BOTH Civil Marriage and Civil Unions?
You again act is if was the the homosexuals that took Civil Unions off the table, it was Social Authoritarians that did that. Instead of saying "lets have Civil Unions and equal Federal recognition" the decision was to BAN them instead.
>>>>
thats an interesting bit of history, but has nothing to do with this discussion. CURRENTLY, it is the gays who refuse to accept civil unions as equal to man/woman marriage. The word 'marriage' is more important to them than equal rights.
Why is that? I have explained it many times, so I refuse to do it again.
Interesting bit of history?
"We took Civil Unions off the table", why won't you accept the Civil Unions we didn't want acceptable?
Really?
>>>>
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Why was a word so important to all those States a decade ago that banned BOTH Civil Marriage and Civil Unions?
You again act is if was the the homosexuals that took Civil Unions off the table, it was Social Authoritarians that did that. Instead of saying "lets have Civil Unions and equal Federal recognition" the decision was to BAN them instead.
>>>>
thats an interesting bit of history, but has nothing to do with this discussion. CURRENTLY, it is the gays who refuse to accept civil unions as equal to man/woman marriage. The word 'marriage' is more important to them than equal rights.
Why is that? I have explained it many times, so I refuse to do it again.
Interesting bit of history?
"We took Civil Unions off the table", why won't you accept the Civil Unions we didn't want acceptable?
Really?
>>>>
what does that have to do with what is going on today? Today, its the gays who say they don't want civil unions. They want government mandated societal acceptance of homosexuality as a normal human condition and they want that mandate implemented by the federal government.
Its not about rights or equality------------wake the fuck up.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Why was a word so important to all those States a decade ago that banned BOTH Civil Marriage and Civil Unions?
You again act is if was the the homosexuals that took Civil Unions off the table, it was Social Authoritarians that did that. Instead of saying "lets have Civil Unions and equal Federal recognition" the decision was to BAN them instead.
>>>>
thats an interesting bit of history, but has nothing to do with this discussion. CURRENTLY, it is the gays who refuse to accept civil unions as equal to man/woman marriage. The word 'marriage' is more important to them than equal rights.
Why is that? I have explained it many times, so I refuse to do it again.
Interesting bit of history?
"We took Civil Unions off the table", why won't you accept the Civil Unions we didn't want acceptable?
Really?
>>>>
what does that have to do with what is going on today? Today, its the gays who say they don't want civil unions. They want government mandated societal acceptance of homosexuality as a normal human condition and they want that mandate implemented by the federal government.
Its not about rights or equality------------wake the fuck up.
Just pointing out that it wasn't homosexuals that slammed the door on Civil Unions, it was the Social Authoritarians. Civil Unions is now supposed to be an acceptable compromise, only because the pro-discrimination side is loosing.
>>>>
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Why was a word so important to all those States a decade ago that banned BOTH Civil Marriage and Civil Unions?
You again act is if was the the homosexuals that took Civil Unions off the table, it was Social Authoritarians that did that. Instead of saying "lets have Civil Unions and equal Federal recognition" the decision was to BAN them instead.
>>>>
thats an interesting bit of history, but has nothing to do with this discussion. CURRENTLY, it is the gays who refuse to accept civil unions as equal to man/woman marriage. The word 'marriage' is more important to them than equal rights.
Why is that? I have explained it many times, so I refuse to do it again.
Interesting bit of history?
"We took Civil Unions off the table", why won't you accept the Civil Unions we didn't want acceptable?
Really?
>>>>
what does that have to do with what is going on today? Today, its the gays who say they don't want civil unions. They want government mandated societal acceptance of homosexuality as a normal human condition and they want that mandate implemented by the federal government.
Its not about rights or equality------------wake the fuck up.
Just pointing out that it wasn't homosexuals that slammed the door on Civil Unions, it was the Social Authoritarians. Civil Unions is now supposed to be an acceptable compromise, only because the pro-discrimination side is loosing.
>>>>
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
[/QUOTE]Why was a word so important to all those States a decade ago that banned BOTH Civil Marriage and Civil Unions?
You again act is if was the the homosexuals that took Civil Unions off the table, it was Social Authoritarians that did that. Instead of saying "lets have Civil Unions and equal Federal recognition" the decision was to BAN them instead.
>>>>
thats an interesting bit of history, but has nothing to do with this discussion. CURRENTLY, it is the gays who refuse to accept civil unions as equal to man/woman marriage. The word 'marriage' is more important to them than equal rights.
Why is that? I have explained it many times, so I refuse to do it again.
Interesting bit of history?
"We took Civil Unions off the table", why won't you accept the Civil Unions we didn't want acceptable?
Really?
>>>>
what does that have to do with what is going on today? Today, its the gays who say they don't want civil unions. They want government mandated societal acceptance of homosexuality as a normal human condition and they want that mandate implemented by the federal government.
Its not about rights or equality------------wake the fuck up.
Just pointing out that it wasn't homosexuals that slammed the door on Civil Unions, it was the Social Authoritarians. Civil Unions is now supposed to be an acceptable compromise, only because the pro-discrimination side is loosing.
>>>>
bringing up the past adds nothing to the debate on current events.
At the risk of being redundant:
Today, its the gays who say they don't want civil unions. They want government mandated societal acceptance of homosexuality as a normal human condition and they want that mandate implemented by the federal government.
Its not about rights or equality------------wake the fuck up.
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Stop lying, Fish. You've been schooled (ha, fish...schooled) on this repeatedly. Gays don't care what's it's called, it just has to be the same. Change the name if you don't want us to be "married", but it's got to be changed for hets too.
thats an interesting bit of history, but has nothing to do with this discussion. CURRENTLY, it is the gays who refuse to accept civil unions as equal to man/woman marriage. The word 'marriage' is more important to them than equal rights.
Why is that? I have explained it many times, so I refuse to do it again.
Interesting bit of history?
"We took Civil Unions off the table", why won't you accept the Civil Unions we didn't want acceptable?
Really?
>>>>
what does that have to do with what is going on today? Today, its the gays who say they don't want civil unions. They want government mandated societal acceptance of homosexuality as a normal human condition and they want that mandate implemented by the federal government.
Its not about rights or equality------------wake the fuck up.
Just pointing out that it wasn't homosexuals that slammed the door on Civil Unions, it was the Social Authoritarians. Civil Unions is now supposed to be an acceptable compromise, only because the pro-discrimination side is loosing.
>>>>
bringing up the past adds nothing to the debate on current events.
At the risk of being redundant:
Today, its the gays who say they don't want civil unions. They want government mandated societal acceptance of homosexuality as a normal human condition and they want that mandate implemented by the federal government.
Its not about rights or equality------------wake the fuck up.
Interesting bit of history?
"We took Civil Unions off the table", why won't you accept the Civil Unions we didn't want acceptable?
Really?
>>>>
what does that have to do with what is going on today? Today, its the gays who say they don't want civil unions. They want government mandated societal acceptance of homosexuality as a normal human condition and they want that mandate implemented by the federal government.
Its not about rights or equality------------wake the fuck up.
Just pointing out that it wasn't homosexuals that slammed the door on Civil Unions, it was the Social Authoritarians. Civil Unions is now supposed to be an acceptable compromise, only because the pro-discrimination side is loosing.
>>>>
bringing up the past adds nothing to the debate on current events.
At the risk of being redundant:
Today, its the gays who say they don't want civil unions. They want government mandated societal acceptance of homosexuality as a normal human condition and they want that mandate implemented by the federal government.
Its not about rights or equality------------wake the fuck up.
I've been on boards for 10-years on multiple boards. I've heard many homosexuals be willing to remove "marriage" from the laws and replace it with "Civil Unions" applied equally to all and then let religious institutions assign "marriage" (which there are many religious institutions that will perform same-sex weddings).
>>>>
I'm one of those. Civil unions for all works fine for me.
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Stop lying, Fish. You've been schooled (ha, fish...schooled) on this repeatedly. Gays don't care what's it's called, it just has to be the same. Change the name if you don't want us to be "married", but it's got to be changed for hets too.
The hets?
Oh my, how bolds thou art.
Get real, the dynamics, just in the way each group is anatomically is sooooooo distinctively different, they art not be called the same.
Got that hom
oh look who got his feelings hurt. I'll be waiting for your condemnation of everyone on the thread that has used words like dyke, fag, queer, homo, etc.
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
they aren't the same, but they are entitled to equal rights. Why is a word so important to the gay agenda?
Stop lying, Fish. You've been schooled (ha, fish...schooled) on this repeatedly. Gays don't care what's it's called, it just has to be the same. Change the name if you don't want us to be "married", but it's got to be changed for hets too.
The hets?
Oh my, how bolds thou art.
Get real, the dynamics, just in the way each group is anatomically is sooooooo distinctively different, they art not be called the same.
Got that hom
So transparent...
Marriage equality apparently means "let's pretend same sex unions are the same as heterosexual unions and leave it at that because we need to adhere to contemporary tradition."
It doesn't get phonier than that.
The gay agenda is not about equality or rights. It is a move to force societal acceptance, by government edict, of a lifestyle that a majority of human beings find abnormal and aberant.
Most people recognize that gays don't have a choice in their sexual preferences, but most people also recognize that homosexuality is not a normal human condition.
The gay agenda wants government to mandate that everyone change their beliefs on the normality or homosexuality. The gay marriage debate is a smoke screen to cover the true agenda.
seawytch knows that, even thought she will not openly admit it.
It would harm society, thats the issue, fool. Legal bigamy would not be fraud.
civil rights are ESTABLISHED BY THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE-------A MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE.
why does it matter when it was? The people have spoken in many states.
