7 things about Ahmed Aubrey you don’t know…and one is that he was a convicted felon. Of course he was…..

[2aguy]

Does a former felon lose all his rights?
What does something that several years ago have to with this?
Lastly, why do deny him the right to stand his ground?

What you are trying to do is scrape the bottom of the barrel to find anything negative on Arbery and see if it sticks, but it is irrelevant. The only argument you seem to be making is he deserved to die.

How about McMichael?

Retired DA investigator accused in Arbery’s death missed ‘critically important’ training

Personnel records obtained by the News4Jax I-TEAM show, for eight of the years Gregory Michael was employed as a chief investigator under District Attorney Jackie Johnson, he had no arrest powers.

www.news4jax.com

You mean the guy that chased him down in a truck, hit him, and then got out with a gun? I’d call trying to wrestle the gun away a desperate act of self defense.


So you claim, however according to the police he wasn’t a suspect for anything.

Being a former felon does not give you a license run him down and kill him.

Having a mental illness does not give you a license run him down and kill him.

Being off his meds is irrelevant because he wasn’t engaging in violent, he was jogging and minding his own business until three white rednecks attempted to illegally detain him, assaulted him with the truck, and then came out armed.

Not denying him anything....he is not an innocent, and was likely aggressive because of his mental illness....

Again.....he had used "running," as an excuse to hide criminal activity in the past.......

They didn't run him down, they didn't just "kill him,' and your dishonest reporting of what happened shows you know this isn't a simple case....

If they planned on "killing him," they could have shot him dead at any point......they confronted him, and he attacked the guy with the shotgun....

Again...the guys should have just called the police...but it isn't a simple case......his background complicates the situation...

 

[2aguy]

You don’t know he was casing the house, that is your spin. He is a black man running from three armed white vigilantes attempting to “detain” him.

Nope....that was his M.O. as a criminal......a convicted criminal......

 

[Coyote]

Granderson: Arbery case shows the worst chapter of Georgia's history is current events as well

The defense for three white men relies on a Civil War-era law intended to let white citizens harass and kill Black Americans.

www.latimes.com

Richard Dial, an assistant special agent in charge for the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and the lead agent in the case, said that Travis McMichael, the man who shot Arbery, had a Confederate flag sticker on the toolbox of his truck, used racial slurs in text messages, and said in an Instagram message that he wanted someone to have “blown that N-word’s head off,” though Dial wasn’t sure who McMichael wanted dead.

I guess we could put our heads in the sand and entertain the idea that the three were attempting to make a citizen’s arrest, or we can be honest about the situation and acknowledge that Arbery appears to have been either lynched by vigilantes or hunted by a modern-day slave patrol. It feels like one and the same.

The most unnerving part about all of this is they would have escaped attention had the video Bryan took on his cellphone not leaked and gone viral. Local law enforcement, of which Gregory McMichael is a retired member, said the three did nothing wrong and let them go. This despite Dial’s saying Gregory McMichael can be heard on police body camera footage saying he didn’t know whether Arbery had committed a crime.

“He had a gut feeling that Mr. Arbery may have been responsible for thefts that were in the neighborhood previously,” Dial said. “He actually says ‘gut.’ His instincts told him that.”

 

[Coyote]

Not denying him anything....he is not an innocent, and was likely aggressive because of his mental illness....

Again.....he had used "running," as an excuse to hide criminal activity in the past.......

They didn't run him down, they didn't just "kill him,' and your dishonest reporting of what happened shows you know this isn't a simple case....

If they planned on "killing him," they could have shot him dead at any point......they confronted him, and he attacked the guy with the shotgun....

Again...the guys should have just called the police...but it isn't a simple case......his background complicates the situation...

He wasn’t “aggressive” until finally forced into a situation where he couldn’t escape and he took the only option he saw left, try to get the gun away from Travis. Up until that point he was trying to get away from them until they cut him off, hitting him with a truck. Put yourself in his shoes. Three white men, almost certainly armed, chasing down a black man, and you think he should have given up and gone along with them? They hadn’t called the police.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

He wasnt murdered….he attacked the guy with the shotgun and got shot……

And again……their instincts were
Correct…..he was casing the house as a convicted felon…..a violent felon on drugs

By what right did they have to accost him? Brandishing a gun is also illegal.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

They were stalking him because he actually was casing the house….he was a convicted felon who was on drugs at
the time of the attack

Completely irrelevant.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It likely led him to attacking the guy with the shotgun.....they did not just shoot him.....the shooting didn't happen until he attacked the guy with the gun. A mental illness with violent tendencies likely led him to charge the guy with the shotgun......

Pure conjecture on your part. Irrelevant.

 

[JoeB131]

They, rightfully, suspected him of casing the house.......he was, in fact, a convicted felon, who robbed houses.........

When was he convicted of robbing houses? He shoplifted a TV once, and he had a gun once. (Silly Darkie, the Second Amendment is for white people!)

They should have simply called the cops on him....

And the cops would have let him go because he wasn't committing any crimes.

They did not simply shoot him...in fact, he rushed the guy with the shotgun....likely as a result of his mental illness......an illness that has a violence component....and he was off his prescribed meds for the condition......which likely resulted in him charging and attacking the guy with the shotgun....

Frankly, reading your posts, I think you are the one who is off his meds.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why didn't they just shoot him...if they planned on murdering him?

Good question. Why don't the lawyers ask their clients why they shot him?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Not denying him anything....he is not an innocent, and was likely aggressive because of his mental illness....

Again.....he had used "running," as an excuse to hide criminal activity in the past.......

They didn't run him down, they didn't just "kill him,' and your dishonest reporting of what happened shows you know this isn't a simple case....

If they planned on "killing him," they could have shot him dead at any point......they confronted him, and he attacked the guy with the shotgun....

Again...the guys should have just called the police...but it isn't a simple case......his background complicates the situation...

The accused did not know his background, making every point you have attempted to make completely irrelevant.

 

[Muhammed]

He was attempting to avoid them.

Could you explain to the USMB forum how you came to that stupid conclusion?

Do you avoid someone by purposefully running into them, repeatedly punching them and grabbing their personal property out of their hands?

 

[BULLDOG]

That all depends......I am not a convicted felon casing a house, off of my meds for the violent mental illness I suffer from...

So that would depend on the situation......

Again..they didn't just shoot him...

Answer the questions....

1) was there communication between the 3 and the convicted felon?

2) If they were communicating...what were they saying to each other...

I find that this guy has a good grasp of when violence is the answer...

1.

1. They made the fact that they were chasing him with guns very clear to him.
2. Blocking his escape and pointing guns at him certainly communicated that he was in grave danger.

They were not police, and he had no reason to obey their implied order to stop. Any person in his position would be in fear for their life, as he was, and would attempt to disarm crazy people assaulting him.

 

[g5000]

Do you understand the thread? The guy was an actual criminal, who cased homes under the cover of jogging...he wasn't an innocent guy out jogging......

Did his killers know all that?

Nope.

 

[Muhammed]

Richard Dial, an assistant special agent in charge for the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and the lead agent in the case, said that Travis McMichael, the man who shot Arbery, had a Confederate flag sticker on the toolbox of his truck,

Have you personally verified that Travis McMichael had a Confederate flag sticker on the toolbox of his truck?

I saw the videos of this incident the crooked cops released from several different angles, and you can clearly see his toolbox on the bodycam videos.

Was there stickers on his toolbox? Yes.

Was there a confederate flag sticker on his toolbox? No.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

He was a convicted felon and you can do your racist jan brady all you want

“racism, racism, racism,” but no matter how you try to hide it, he was a
Violent convicted felon who used “jogging” repeatedly as a cover for his crimes

That justifies him being murdered in your mind?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

None of those things had anything to do with him being chased down like an animal and murdered for no reason. Do you think some people deserve to be murdered?

Apparently

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

2aguy

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that three men were trying to detain him?

I've seen the raw videos. That's not what happened. That's simply the fake news media's fantasyland false narrative.

In realityland TM defended himself when AA tried to rob him of his shotgun. It's on video.

The perpetrators own statements to the officers responding to the scene of the shooting. They told him that they were attempting to affect a citizen's arrest. That's a bell that can't be unrung.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Why didn't they just shoot him...if they planned on murderingunsung. Erase that

Because that's obviously illegal. Violating his rights, forcing him to submit to their [none existent] authority to apprehend him and humiliate him by chasing him down and taking him into custody like the slave patrols of yore is just so much more satisfying <eye roll>

Besides they're cowards, 3 against 1. I wonder if any one of them on their own would have e had the guts to confront Ahmaud on their own, even if armed..

We know how frightening racist find black men.

 

[Persuader]

They have a rich text and social media history full of racist filth.

Being racist is not illegal.....this is not the U.K.

 

[Persuader]

He didn’t try to steal anyone’s gun, he was trying to defend himself against those thugs who had been stalking him.

You do not know the definition of stalking...Gregory McMichaels had been 'deputized' to deal with all the complaints from that neighborhood regarding trespassers and burglaries.
Lots of complaints and the police informed the residents to get in contact with Gregory McMichaels if they had a problem.

Not even to mention ...Gregroy McMichaels with a 30 yr history of employment as a policeman and criminal investigator recognized Ahbury as he was running by his house from having seen videos of him trespassing in the neighborhood....thus he was justified to pursue him by the citizens arrest law of Georgia.