A challenge to our liberals re: the “crime” the NY County DA may indict Trump on.

[Death-Ninja]

Ok

Show any law that has been broken

Behold America, behold above fucking impossible idiot, I just alerted the sub-moron to the irrefutable fact that its man, its awesome leader whose toes it sucks, is directly linked to the reception of some $30-million dollars given to him and his family by the highest ranking agents in the Chinese Communist Party, including the top dog in CCP's counter to CIA, behold above cretins thoughts on that matter, "what law did he break!!!" These cretins need to be purged from our shores, they should not be allowed to vote anymore than they should be allowed to procreate, this is the exact type of IQ necessary to believe gender is an option, absolutely dead from neck up....

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Behold America, behold above fucking impossible idiot, I just alerted the sub-moron to the irrefutable fact that its man, its awesome leader whose toes it sucks

Dude, WHAT?!

 

[Marener]

Repaying a person isn’t a crime.

It is when you falsify business records to do so.

 

[BackAgain]

It is when you falsify business records to do so.

No. Repaying a debt is not the same thing.

The allegedly falsified record is another matter. What record do you maintain was falsified?

 

[Marener]

No. Repaying a debt is not the same thing.

The allegedly falsified record is another matter. What record do you maintain was falsified?

The records about repaying Michael Cohen were falsified.

Jesus, you’re dense. How many times do we have to tell you.

Trump disgusted the payments to Cohen as legal fees which was false.

 

[Lesh]

Challenge to our liberals:

While I recognize that all of you are thrilled that the Manhattan DA might be on the verge of indicting President Trump over the Stormy Daniels matter, and while of course I hate to burst your bubble, I can’t help but wonder:

Can any of you name the alleged NY State crime that Trump allegedly committed?

I know it’s not murder. I know it’s not kidnapping. I know it’s not a felony drug sale case. But I’m not sure I get what crime you folks assume he allegedly committed. Do you?

Step right up. Name that alleged crime or crimes.

(This post was originally posted within a different thread — but I like the question as a stand-alone thread.)

That would be the crime Michael Cohen was convicted of right?

 

[BackAgain]

The records about repaying Michael Cohen were falsified.

Jesus, you’re dense. How many times do we have to tell you.

Trump disgusted the payments to Cohen as legal fees which was false.

And you believe that because a man as virtuous as Cohen told you so?

You mental midgets are highly selective in which one of Cohens conflicting accounts you shove to (pretend to) believe.

 

[candycorn]

Nope. That’s a federal issue. DA Bragg doesn’t have jurisdiction.

Therefore, the question is what New York State alleged “crime” (apparently a felony since he is in the grand jury) does Bragg have in mind?

The State of New York likely has election laws similar to the federal election commission. Not sure but there are likely laws against using campaign money to pay off a porn star.

Of course the larger question we should be asking is whether we want the head of state to know a porn star. Is that how we make america great again...have the president hold conference with the porn community?

 

[candycorn]

And you believe that because a man as virtuous as Cohen told you so?

And you believe Trump...the guy who employed Cohen?

 

[BackAgain]

The State of New York likely has election laws similar to the federal election commission. Not sure but there are likely laws against using campaign money to pay off a porn star.

Of course the larger question we should be asking is whether we want the head of state to know a porn star. Is that how we make america great again...have the president hold conference with the porn community?

I don’t want our head of state getting hummers from young interns and then lying about it under oath.

The difference is a matter of actual proof.

 

[BackAgain]

And you believe Trump...the guy who employed Cohen?

Believe him about what? I certainly believe him over a convicted scumbag liar such as cohen.

 

[candycorn]

Believe him about what? I certainly believe him over a convicted scumbag liar such as cohen.

The guy who hires the "scumbag liar" is more credible than the scumbag liar? Wow. Okay.

 

[BackAgain]

The guy who hires the "scumbag liar" is more credible than the scumbag liar? Wow. Okay.

Some times. In any event, on this case it is a clear choice. Cohen has zero credibility.

 

[Marener]

And you believe that because a man as virtuous as Cohen told you so?

You mental midgets are highly selective in which one of Cohens conflicting accounts you shove to (pretend to) believe.

Its consistent with known facts.

Including the checks that Cohen has produced. The grand jury will have plenty of paper records to go over. Nowhere has it ever been suggested the case hinges on Cohen’s testimony.

Resorting to straw men. Pretty weak.

 

[BackAgain]

Its consistent with known facts

Nope.

Including the checks that Cohen has produced.

Oh cool. He produced a check whereby HE paid the ho. And he also got paid for legal services. Wow. Compelling.

The grand jury will have plenty of paper records to go over. Nowhere has it ever been suggested the case hinges on Cohen’s testimony.

Resorting to straw men. Pretty weak.

All of your posts are weak. Always.

 

[Marener]

Oh cool. He produced a check whereby HE paid the ho. And he also got paid for legal services. Wow. Compelling.

Let the grand jury handle the details. We haven’t been made aware of any of them.

 

[BackAgain]

Let the grand jury handle the details. We haven’t been made aware of any of them.

The grand jury will get a selected version of the “details.” And it will get instructed on “the” law. And I. A deep blue shit pile line NYC, regardless of merit, an indictment could get returned.

Yeo. We shall see. But let’s also wait to see how the case proceeds once the persecution is obliged to reply to dismissal motions and it has to turn over discovery.

 

[Clipper]

Challenge to our liberals:

While I recognize that all of you are thrilled that the Manhattan DA might be on the verge of indicting President Trump over the Stormy Daniels matter, and while of course I hate to burst your bubble, I can’t help but wonder:

Can any of you name the alleged NY State crime that Trump allegedly committed?

I know it’s not murder. I know it’s not kidnapping. I know it’s not a felony drug sale case. But I’m not sure I get what crime you folks assume he allegedly committed. Do you?

Step right up. Name that alleged crime or crimes.

(This post was originally posted within a different thread — but I like the question as a stand-alone thread.)

I guess we'll find out when he's indicted, won't we? You worried about it?

 

[BackAgain]

I guess we'll find out when he's indicted, won't we? You worried about it?

You said “when.”

It’s still an if.

And no. I’m not worried about not. I’m disgusted by this charade.

 

[Clipper]

The grand jury will get a selected version of the “details.” And it will get instructed on “the” law. And I. A deep blue shit pile line NYC, regardless of merit, an indictment could get returned.

Yeo. We shall see. But let’s also wait to see how the case proceeds once the persecution is obliged to reply to dismissal motions and it has to turn over discovery.

Yea, I guess we'll do that just like in any other prosecution. But thanks for giving the MAGA cult a heads up before they soil themselves again.