Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I argued that you presented none. Damn son, you camt even follow a so.ple discussion.In the first line this dolt argued that there is no proof the universe was ever created, that it ever had a "start."
No, I argued that you presented none.In the first line this dolt argued that there is no proof the universe was ever created, that it ever had a "start."
I also argued that , while it may appear to those within our universe that it had a beginning, that doesnt mean it did.
Literally not one word of your bitchy little rant speaks to any of my points. Add to that that not only can you not support your points, you don't even know what they are....
Genesis is not flawed. It is not an account of the origin of the earth, that little blue orb in our solar system. It's an account of the origin of the earth, Palastine and the Levant, the seat of which, to the people of God, would be Jerusalem.As we see in every thread where the Bible thumpers insist upon a 6,000 year old planet and other literal interpretations of their bibles, there are
always irreconcilable contradictions to physical laws, hard facts and peer reviewed science.
It’s just an inconvenient truth that the Genesis fable is a flawed, contradictory tale that is actually devastating to the notion of supernatural creation.
Genesis is not flawed. It is not an account of the origin of the earth, that little blue orb in our solar system. It's an account of the origin of the earth, Palastine and the Levant, the seat of which, to the people of God, would be Jerusalem.As we see in every thread where the Bible thumpers insist upon a 6,000 year old planet and other literal interpretations of their bibles, there are
always irreconcilable contradictions to physical laws, hard facts and peer reviewed science.
It’s just an inconvenient truth that the Genesis fable is a flawed, contradictory tale that is actually devastating to the notion of supernatural creation.
It's a temple story, something that the ancients were actually able to grasp.
I never said that. There may have been an intelligent creation.Still unwilling to address how in one breath you said there was no creation,
Which does not support the idea of an intelligent creator, which is what you are getting at .But IF IT HAD A BEGINNING, it had to have been created, a START.
None, and not that, either. Magical horseshit.Divine law is consistently called a light to the nations.
What other kind of light can be spoken into existence?
Genesis is not flawed. It is not an account of the origin of the earth, that little blue orb in our solar system. It's an account of the origin of the earth, Palastine and the Levant, the seat of which, to the people of God, would be Jerusalem.As we see in every thread where the Bible thumpers insist upon a 6,000 year old planet and other literal interpretations of their bibles, there are
always irreconcilable contradictions to physical laws, hard facts and peer reviewed science.
It’s just an inconvenient truth that the Genesis fable is a flawed, contradictory tale that is actually devastating to the notion of supernatural creation.
It's a temple story, something that the ancients were actually able to grasp.
lol...right...None, and not that, either. Magical horseshit.Divine law is consistently called a light to the nations.
What other kind of light can be spoken into existence?
Oh look, the shaman pinched off a turd of a word salad. Somehow, I'm not moved.lol...None, and not that, either. Magical horseshit.Divine law is consistently called a light to the nations.
What other kind of light can be spoken into existence?
There is no darkness greater than the darkness in the mind of the person whose only guiding light in life is a lie.
Oh look, the shaman pinched off a turd of a word salad. Somehow, I'm not moved.lol...None, and not that, either. Magical horseshit.Divine law is consistently called a light to the nations.
What other kind of light can be spoken into existence?
There is no darkness greater than the darkness in the mind of the person whose only guiding light in life is a lie.
No, i think your are trying to fellate yourself.Oh look, the shaman pinched off a turd of a word salad. Somehow, I'm not moved.lol...None, and not that, either. Magical horseshit.Divine law is consistently called a light to the nations.
What other kind of light can be spoken into existence?
There is no darkness greater than the darkness in the mind of the person whose only guiding light in life is a lie.
lol...aww. you think that I am trying to convince you about something. How cute!
I never said that. There may have been an intelligent creation.Still unwilling to address how in one breath you said there was no creation,
Which does not support the idea of an intelligent creator, which is what you are getting at .[/QUOTE]But IF IT HAD A BEGINNING, it had to have been created, a START.
Lie and lie. I never said it. You are a rabid little freak.You never said that? Dipshit, YOU JUST SAID IT. And you said it first in Post 19.
You're like fundamentalist Christians who read the story literally.Genesis is not flawed. It is not an account of the origin of the earth, that little blue orb in our solar system. It's an account of the origin of the earth, Palastine and the Levant, the seat of which, to the people of God, would be Jerusalem.As we see in every thread where the Bible thumpers insist upon a 6,000 year old planet and other literal interpretations of their bibles, there are
always irreconcilable contradictions to physical laws, hard facts and peer reviewed science.
It’s just an inconvenient truth that the Genesis fable is a flawed, contradictory tale that is actually devastating to the notion of supernatural creation.
It's a temple story, something that the ancients were actually able to grasp.
The Genesis fable is a contradictory mess, written by unknown authors who turned the Christian gods into liars.
It was the superstitious invention of gods said that fruit theft and eating the apple would cause A&E to die.
It was the superstitious invention of satan who said eating the apple would not cause A&E to die.
Who told the truth?
So, basically, you can make it mean whatever you want it to mean. I imagine the 15th century you would have made it all mean something very different than the 21st century you.You're like fundamentalist Christians who read the story literally.Genesis is not flawed. It is not an account of the origin of the earth, that little blue orb in our solar system. It's an account of the origin of the earth, Palastine and the Levant, the seat of which, to the people of God, would be Jerusalem.As we see in every thread where the Bible thumpers insist upon a 6,000 year old planet and other literal interpretations of their bibles, there are
always irreconcilable contradictions to physical laws, hard facts and peer reviewed science.
It’s just an inconvenient truth that the Genesis fable is a flawed, contradictory tale that is actually devastating to the notion of supernatural creation.
It's a temple story, something that the ancients were actually able to grasp.
The Genesis fable is a contradictory mess, written by unknown authors who turned the Christian gods into liars.
It was the superstitious invention of gods said that fruit theft and eating the apple would cause A&E to die.
It was the superstitious invention of satan who said eating the apple would not cause A&E to die.
Who told the truth?
What was the fruit of the tree of life? (Hint: the Bible doesn't say apple.) What did it look like? What did it taste like? Has one ever been found and classified? And how does a tree grow in more than one place, such as on two different sides of a river (Rv 22:2)?
In the midst of the Garden was not a woody plant but rather the good things of God. And also idolatry, a knowledge of everything.
You're just like a fundamentalist who reads out of context. What is the earth? The globe? Did any kingdom ever rule over the whole earth, as we read in Daniel (2:39)? Genesis is not about the creation of the planet. The planet was never a disc covered by a dome bedazzled with stars, the sun, and the moon.
You and the fundies project your 21st-century worldviews onto the ancient manuscripts. It creates confusion.
No, you cannot make it mean whatever you want it to mean. It means whatever historical, literary, and cultural context says it means. To derive a reasonable meaning, the 15th-century me and the 21st-century me would still have to read it in its proper context.So, basically, you can make it mean whatever you want it to mean. I imagine the 15th century you would have made it all mean something very different than the 21st century you.You're like fundamentalist Christians who read the story literally.Genesis is not flawed. It is not an account of the origin of the earth, that little blue orb in our solar system. It's an account of the origin of the earth, Palastine and the Levant, the seat of which, to the people of God, would be Jerusalem.As we see in every thread where the Bible thumpers insist upon a 6,000 year old planet and other literal interpretations of their bibles, there are
always irreconcilable contradictions to physical laws, hard facts and peer reviewed science.
It’s just an inconvenient truth that the Genesis fable is a flawed, contradictory tale that is actually devastating to the notion of supernatural creation.
It's a temple story, something that the ancients were actually able to grasp.
The Genesis fable is a contradictory mess, written by unknown authors who turned the Christian gods into liars.
It was the superstitious invention of gods said that fruit theft and eating the apple would cause A&E to die.
It was the superstitious invention of satan who said eating the apple would not cause A&E to die.
Who told the truth?
What was the fruit of the tree of life? (Hint: the Bible doesn't say apple.) What did it look like? What did it taste like? Has one ever been found and classified? And how does a tree grow in more than one place, such as on two different sides of a river (Rv 22:2)?
In the midst of the Garden was not a woody plant but rather the good things of God. And also idolatry, a knowledge of everything.
You're just like a fundamentalist who reads out of context. What is the earth? The globe? Did any kingdom ever rule over the whole earth, as we read in Daniel (2:39)? Genesis is not about the creation of the planet. The planet was never a disc covered by a dome bedazzled with stars, the sun, and the moon.
You and the fundies project your 21st-century worldviews onto the ancient manuscripts. It creates confusion.
Sure you can. Amd you just did. And i can find 100 different christian sectarians and get 100 versions of what that part means. And there is no way to tell who is correct.. Which basically means all of you are full of it.No, you cannot make it mean whatever you want it to mean.
Let me guess. When you read The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, you thought Mark Twain was writing about your generation.Sure you can. Amd you just did. And i can find 100 different christian sectarians and get 100 versions of what that part means. And there is no way to tell who is correct.. Which basically means all of you are full of it.No, you cannot make it mean whatever you want it to mean.
Lie and lie. I never said it. You are a rabid little freak.You never said that? Dipshit, YOU JUST SAID IT. And you said it first in Post 19.
Chapter 1 and 2 of Genesis is ancient man’s allegorical account of his belief that God created existence and man is a product of that creation.Genesis Chapters 1 and 2 is the allegorical account of creation and tells us that God created space and time and that man is a product of that creation.The earth and the Universe are billions of years old and is completely compatible with scripture.
What scripture and how much expertise do you have?
Seems accurate to me.
The story of Genesis has absolutely nothing whatever to do with the beginning of the universe, space, time, the solar system, the earth, nor the first plants, animals, or humans..
Genesis is about the creation of the distinction between heaven and earth, a world above and the world below, by an extraterrestrial intelligence when law designed to instruct perplexed human beings to distinguish between clean and unclean, right and wrong, true and false, good and evil, life and death, was spoken into existence like a dividing light in a world that was without shape or form, astonishingly void, and covered in darkness for billions of years.
Incorrect.
wow, that was quite a response, devoid of any sign of intelligence, but very impressive.
I will let you on on a little secret.
Any written story that starts with "in the beginning' just like "once upon a time" and introduces a talking serpent in paradise isn't about the big bang or the beginning of time, but it is about exactly what I said, the establishment of divine law like a light to the nations in the midst of the darkness of a world run by and filled with blithering idiots.
