Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 70,039
- 34,962
- 2,300
By not ruling , they allowed the law to stand. That’s tacit approval^^^
A statement of abject ignorance
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By not ruling , they allowed the law to stand. That’s tacit approval^^^
A statement of abject ignorance
It is my personal belief that no one should be allowed to murder another person. If someone comes after you with a gun, I expect the government to intervene and prosecute them. The killer has no "right to privacy" in such matters.That's fine, you're entitled to your beliefs.
Indeed, the right to privacy safeguards your beliefs from government interference, just as the right to privacy prohibits government from forcing such personal, subjective beliefs on others as a matter of law.
No, it isn't. All the Supreme Court did was deny an injunction.By not ruling , they allowed the law to stand. That’s tacit approval
^^^^^^
A statement of abject ignorance
It does not matter how many times your repeat your statement of abject ignorance, it remains a statement of abject ignroance.By not ruling , they allowed the law to stand. That’s tacit approval
He doesn't, that's the point; that the lawsuits are completely devoid of merit doesn't matter, they're intended to intimidate and one must still defend himself against them.
You -do- agree, however: This law is constitutional.Such is the authoritarian right, more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty.
If a woman is raped, and some dipshit Texan sues anyone who helped her get an abortion, I think Jesus Christ himself would drop the plaintiff into the deepest bowels of hell.Yep, if they think this will be a big hit with the ladies they're sadly mistaken.
![]()
It contravenes Roe v. Wade.You -do- agree, however: This law is constitutional.
This law as it stands… gives them standing and that’s insane
Fuck their souls. It’s their JOBS that should be imperiledIf a woman is raped, and some dipshit Texan sues anyone who helped her get an abortion, I think Jesus Christ himself would drop the plaintiff into the deepest bowels of hell.
I think the very souls of the legislators who passed this law without excepting rape or incest are imperiled.
oThis law as it stands… gives them standing and that’s insane
Anyone who is sued under this law will have standing.The logic is that it makes it almost impossible to file suit in opposition to the measure.
I'd be much more worried about my soul.Fuck their souls. It’s their JOBS that should be imperiled
Yep, if they think this will be a big hit with the ladies they're sadly mistaken.
![]()
No living person is harmed by an abortion.
If only your mother was a fan of the Planned Parenthood extermination camps.![]()
Texas Abortion Law Takes Effect Pending Supreme Court Action
The Supreme Court didn’t act on a request to block the law, which bars the procedure after about six weeks of pregnancy, making it the most restrictive abortion law in effect in the U.S.www.wsj.com
"A new Texas abortion law that bars the procedure after approximately six weeks of pregnancy took effect Wednesday, after the Supreme Court didn’t act on an emergency request by clinics and abortion-rights advocates to block it. When the court said nothing by midnight, the ban officially went into force, making it the most restrictive abortion law in effect in the U.S. The state law dictates that a physician can’t knowingly perform an abortion if there is a detectable fetal heartbeat after 6 weeks of pregnancy. Abortion-rights advocates typically challenge new restrictions before they go into effect by suing the government officials -- but lawmakers devised a measure that shifts enforcement from the state to private parties. Under the new law private parties can file civil lawsuits against any person who allegedly performs or aids a banned abortion, or who intends to do so. Under the law, a successful suit entitles the plaintiff to collect at least $10,000 in damages per abortion challenged."
One of the many good things about living in Texas is now one is able to sue any whore whom they think had an abortion, along with the doctor that helped that whore; the receptionist at the clinic -- and even the person who gave the whore a ride to the clinic -- if you want, you can sue all of them.. In fact, there are already lawsuits in the works to sue..For example, there is a lawyer in Collin County, Tx who donated to abortion rights groups; now that person is getting sued...and there is this other lawyer who represents women who were impregnated from "sexual assault" and are trying to get abortions -- not so fast...they are getting sued too....At $10,000 per abortion challenge, one can make a pretty penny or at least put these folks who are part of this abortion industry out of business and hopefully in jail -- because that is what freedom is all about.
This is the exact center of the divide between pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-lifers believe a human is being murdered by abortion.No living person is harmed by an abortion.
You -do- agree, however: This law is constitutional.Conservatives couldn't care less about ending abortion, it's about compelling conformity and punishing dissent.