Vox
Gold Member
- Jun 17, 2013
- 10,937
- 868
- 138
No, she would have been sedated. She had to live with excruciating pain for over a week. Doctors should be making these decisions with the woman whose body it is, not legislators.
Put in your fucking 20 week bans, but jesus fucking christ, put in some "loopholes". Ya'll are really good at giving loopholes to rich people on their taxes... give some to goddamn doctors so they can do their jobs.
oh, how hypocritical. so being sedated for abortion will take away an "excrutianing pain*?
Because they could not perform an abortion on her she had to wait until she went into labor "naturally". That took 10 days after her water broke. She was in pain that entire time.
Let doctors and their patients make these decisions.
what bans her doctor to perform a c-section?
having difficult delivery has nothing to do with necessity to abort the baby. she could have a c-section which is a quick operation and is done under anesthesia.
the whole article is a bunch of baloney, BTW - she suffered "excruciating pain" seeing her baby die in 15 minutes after delivery but she would be OK letting her baby feel excruciating pain while being dismembered in a womb.
what a hypocritical bitch
Last edited: