According to "Social Justice" does this apply to Bruce Willis..$100m/Tom Cruise..$200m ...et.al.?

[Camp]

Is it not possible for a CEO being a unique person in a corporate environment is like a movie star or athlete i.e. top of the pile so why are they targets for "Social Justice League" but movie stars/athletes aren't?

Movie and sports stars are not often required to commit malicious, evil burn in hell, monster type deeds the way CEO's are. Movie and sports stars are paid for their talents and not their willingness to rob, cheat, steal, rape and pillage the way CEO's do.

I love it when liberals tell us who they really are, but wow.

Ya, like CEO's and their actions have never been convicted in courts or sued in courts for those things. Certainly there are good decent CEO's with good character, but there a plenty without. You want to open a discussion on the evils committed by CEO'S?

 

[2aguy]

If you are hateful and filled with jealousy.....go after those actors in commercials....they work less than other actors and make bunches of money........

 

[Brain357]

From Department of Government and Justice Studies
Appalachian State University
For example, if in one arrangement, the most well off class (e.g., chief financial officers) received compensation in the amount of ten million dollars per year while the least well off (e.g., average workers) were paid a salary of $14,000, and in another the most well off received compensation in the amount of three million dollars per year while the least off were paid a salary of $30,000, the second arrangement would be to the greatest advantage of the least advantaged and thus the most just.

What is Social Justice Department of Government and Justice Studies Appalachian State University

So please all you "social justice" advocates... explain the below...
List of highest paid film actors - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
View attachment 36060

While they do make a lot of money they aren't deciding others wages. For instance the Waltons are making billions while paying workers so little they are on welfare. Actors don't have employees making the money for them.

Oh....not true....the budget of a movie relies on salaries.....and if Tom or Bruce are making 20 million...that doesn't trickle down to the make up people....and if Tom and Bruce are getting a percent of the movie....why aren't the make up people....?

Again...I don't really care....the greedy leftists do......

Yes but the actors aren't deciding the wages. Someone above is deciding to pay so much for the actors.

 

[2aguy]

Is it not possible for a CEO being a unique person in a corporate environment is like a movie star or athlete i.e. top of the pile so why are they targets for "Social Justice League" but movie stars/athletes aren't?

Movie and sports stars are not often required to commit malicious, evil burn in hell, monster type deeds the way CEO's are. Movie and sports stars are paid for their talents and not their willingness to rob, cheat, steal, rape and pillage the way CEO's do.

I love it when liberals tell us who they really are, but wow.

Ya, like CEO's and their actions have never been convicted in courts or sued in courts for those things. Certainly there are good decent CEO's with good character, but there a plenty without. You want to open a discussion on the evils committed by CEO'S?

How about we discuss evils committed by all professions......like the line employees or teachers, or clerks, or anyone else.....evil isn't worse because someone has money....evil is evil because it is evil........a lot of serial killers were electricians, and bus boys......and teachers .....

 

[2aguy]

From Department of Government and Justice Studies
Appalachian State University
For example, if in one arrangement, the most well off class (e.g., chief financial officers) received compensation in the amount of ten million dollars per year while the least well off (e.g., average workers) were paid a salary of $14,000, and in another the most well off received compensation in the amount of three million dollars per year while the least off were paid a salary of $30,000, the second arrangement would be to the greatest advantage of the least advantaged and thus the most just.

What is Social Justice Department of Government and Justice Studies Appalachian State University

So please all you "social justice" advocates... explain the below...
List of highest paid film actors - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
View attachment 36060

While they do make a lot of money they aren't deciding others wages. For instance the Waltons are making billions while paying workers so little they are on welfare. Actors don't have employees making the money for them.

Oh....not true....the budget of a movie relies on salaries.....and if Tom or Bruce are making 20 million...that doesn't trickle down to the make up people....and if Tom and Bruce are getting a percent of the movie....why aren't the make up people....?

Again...I don't really care....the greedy leftists do......

Yes but the actors aren't deciding the wages. Someone above is deciding to pay so much for the actors.

Again.....so what........if those who work for the company don't like the wages.....start their own company, make their own movie......simple solution....then they would have a lot of money...........why bitch and moan about people who went out and worked to get that money....less time bitching....more time planning, and getting the necessary training, education and experience...........

Let go of the hate and jealousy people......go and get the skills to get that money.....

 

[Brain357]

From Department of Government and Justice Studies
Appalachian State University
For example, if in one arrangement, the most well off class (e.g., chief financial officers) received compensation in the amount of ten million dollars per year while the least well off (e.g., average workers) were paid a salary of $14,000, and in another the most well off received compensation in the amount of three million dollars per year while the least off were paid a salary of $30,000, the second arrangement would be to the greatest advantage of the least advantaged and thus the most just.

What is Social Justice Department of Government and Justice Studies Appalachian State University

So please all you "social justice" advocates... explain the below...
List of highest paid film actors - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
View attachment 36060

While they do make a lot of money they aren't deciding others wages. For instance the Waltons are making billions while paying workers so little they are on welfare. Actors don't have employees making the money for them.

Oh....not true....the budget of a movie relies on salaries.....and if Tom or Bruce are making 20 million...that doesn't trickle down to the make up people....and if Tom and Bruce are getting a percent of the movie....why aren't the make up people....?

Again...I don't really care....the greedy leftists do......

Yes but the actors aren't deciding the wages. Someone above is deciding to pay so much for the actors.

Again.....so what........if those who work for the company don't like the wages.....start their own company, make their own movie......simple solution....then they would have a lot of money...........why bitch and moan about people who went out and worked to get that money....less time bitching....more time planning, and getting the necessary training, education and experience...........

Let go of the hate and jealousy people......go and get the skills to get that money.....

The problem is people like the Waltons gettng rich on welfare.

 

[Camp]

Is it not possible for a CEO being a unique person in a corporate environment is like a movie star or athlete i.e. top of the pile so why are they targets for "Social Justice League" but movie stars/athletes aren't?

Movie and sports stars are not often required to commit malicious, evil burn in hell, monster type deeds the way CEO's are. Movie and sports stars are paid for their talents and not their willingness to rob, cheat, steal, rape and pillage the way CEO's do.

I love it when liberals tell us who they really are, but wow.

Ya, like CEO's and their actions have never been convicted in courts or sued in courts for those things. Certainly there are good decent CEO's with good character, but there a plenty without. You want to open a discussion on the evils committed by CEO'S?

How about we discuss evils committed by all professions......like the line employees or teachers, or clerks, or anyone else.....evil isn't worse because someone has money....evil is evil because it is evil........a lot of serial killers were electricians, and bus boys......and teachers .....

Two words to start with. Dioxin and tobacco. It took years of lying CEO's to perpetrate the deaths, grief and destruction CEO's of those industries heaped onto the mass's to earn their high salaries.

 

[SwimExpert]

Yes but the actors aren't deciding the wages. Someone above is deciding to pay so much for the actors.

You are saying that CEOs set their wages?

 

[healthmyths]

From Department of Government and Justice Studies
Appalachian State University
For example, if in one arrangement, the most well off class (e.g., chief financial officers) received compensation in the amount of ten million dollars per year while the least well off (e.g., average workers) were paid a salary of $14,000, and in another the most well off received compensation in the amount of three million dollars per year while the least off were paid a salary of $30,000, the second arrangement would be to the greatest advantage of the least advantaged and thus the most just.

What is Social Justice Department of Government and Justice Studies Appalachian State University

So please all you "social justice" advocates... explain the below...
List of highest paid film actors - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
View attachment 36060

While they do make a lot of money they aren't deciding others wages. For instance the Waltons are making billions while paying workers so little they are on welfare. Actors don't have employees making the money for them.

Oh....not true....the budget of a movie relies on salaries.....and if Tom or Bruce are making 20 million...that doesn't trickle down to the make up people....and if Tom and Bruce are getting a percent of the movie....why aren't the make up people....?

Again...I don't really care....the greedy leftists do......

Yes but the actors aren't deciding the wages. Someone above is deciding to pay so much for the actors.

Right ! The market determines what they get!
People pay to see the actors/athletes they determine the market value.
SO to the CEO! Paid under contract for increasing revenues reducing costs increasing profits!
Board of Directors determine
A) Has those objectives been met
B) What would it cost the BoD to replace the CEO
Those factors determine CEOs pay WHICH grossly ignorant people think comes in
the form of SALARIES! Salaries make up less then 20% of the total compensation...yet ignorant people in the press and most people think the gross figure used is totally salary!
It isn't! It is mostly stock options!

 

[2aguy]

From Department of Government and Justice Studies
Appalachian State University
For example, if in one arrangement, the most well off class (e.g., chief financial officers) received compensation in the amount of ten million dollars per year while the least well off (e.g., average workers) were paid a salary of $14,000, and in another the most well off received compensation in the amount of three million dollars per year while the least off were paid a salary of $30,000, the second arrangement would be to the greatest advantage of the least advantaged and thus the most just.

What is Social Justice Department of Government and Justice Studies Appalachian State University

So please all you "social justice" advocates... explain the below...
List of highest paid film actors - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
View attachment 36060

While they do make a lot of money they aren't deciding others wages. For instance the Waltons are making billions while paying workers so little they are on welfare. Actors don't have employees making the money for them.

Oh....not true....the budget of a movie relies on salaries.....and if Tom or Bruce are making 20 million...that doesn't trickle down to the make up people....and if Tom and Bruce are getting a percent of the movie....why aren't the make up people....?

Again...I don't really care....the greedy leftists do......

Yes but the actors aren't deciding the wages. Someone above is deciding to pay so much for the actors.

Again.....so what........if those who work for the company don't like the wages.....start their own company, make their own movie......simple solution....then they would have a lot of money...........why bitch and moan about people who went out and worked to get that money....less time bitching....more time planning, and getting the necessary training, education and experience...........

Let go of the hate and jealousy people......go and get the skills to get that money.....

The problem is people like the Waltons gettng rich on welfare.

Then elect different politicians...the kind that won't use government to give breaks to certain businesses over others....the solution isn't to empower another set of politicians to take money from a different group of people.....just stop the whole "taking other peoples" money process.....

 

[2aguy]

Is it not possible for a CEO being a unique person in a corporate environment is like a movie star or athlete i.e. top of the pile so why are they targets for "Social Justice League" but movie stars/athletes aren't?

Movie and sports stars are not often required to commit malicious, evil burn in hell, monster type deeds the way CEO's are. Movie and sports stars are paid for their talents and not their willingness to rob, cheat, steal, rape and pillage the way CEO's do.

I love it when liberals tell us who they really are, but wow.

Ya, like CEO's and their actions have never been convicted in courts or sued in courts for those things. Certainly there are good decent CEO's with good character, but there a plenty without. You want to open a discussion on the evils committed by CEO'S?

How about we discuss evils committed by all professions......like the line employees or teachers, or clerks, or anyone else.....evil isn't worse because someone has money....evil is evil because it is evil........a lot of serial killers were electricians, and bus boys......and teachers .....

Two words to start with. Dioxin and tobacco. It took years of lying CEO's to perpetrate the deaths, grief and destruction CEO's of those industries heaped onto the mass's to earn their high salaries.

Hmmm...and only the CEOs knew about the evils of tobacco? The guys in the lab...the guys on the line making them? the politicians and the burueacrats who knew but looked the other way......CEOs are not the only people in the world and tobacco has a long list of other bad people involved.....

 

[BluesLegend]

Is it not possible for a CEO being a unique person in a corporate environment is like a movie star or athlete i.e. top of the pile so why are they targets for "Social Justice League" but movie stars/athletes aren't?

Movie and sports stars are not often required to commit malicious, evil burn in hell, monster type deeds the way CEO's are. Movie and sports stars are paid for their talents and not their willingness to rob, cheat, steal, rape and pillage the way CEO's do.

I love it when liberals tell us who they really are, but wow.

Ya, like CEO's and their actions have never been convicted in courts or sued in courts for those things. Certainly there are good decent CEO's with good character, but there a plenty without. You want to open a discussion on the evils committed by CEO'S?

I know I'll regret discussing this idiocy but okay, define plenty how many CEO's what percentage? Do you have any facts OR are you simply parroting liberal talking points like some mindless liberal drone?

 

[2aguy]

From Department of Government and Justice Studies
Appalachian State University
For example, if in one arrangement, the most well off class (e.g., chief financial officers) received compensation in the amount of ten million dollars per year while the least well off (e.g., average workers) were paid a salary of $14,000, and in another the most well off received compensation in the amount of three million dollars per year while the least off were paid a salary of $30,000, the second arrangement would be to the greatest advantage of the least advantaged and thus the most just.

What is Social Justice Department of Government and Justice Studies Appalachian State University

So please all you "social justice" advocates... explain the below...
List of highest paid film actors - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
View attachment 36060

While they do make a lot of money they aren't deciding others wages. For instance the Waltons are making billions while paying workers so little they are on welfare. Actors don't have employees making the money for them.

Oh....not true....the budget of a movie relies on salaries.....and if Tom or Bruce are making 20 million...that doesn't trickle down to the make up people....and if Tom and Bruce are getting a percent of the movie....why aren't the make up people....?

Again...I don't really care....the greedy leftists do......

Yes but the actors aren't deciding the wages. Someone above is deciding to pay so much for the actors.

Again.....so what........if those who work for the company don't like the wages.....start their own company, make their own movie......simple solution....then they would have a lot of money...........why bitch and moan about people who went out and worked to get that money....less time bitching....more time planning, and getting the necessary training, education and experience...........

Let go of the hate and jealousy people......go and get the skills to get that money.....

The problem is people like the Waltons gettng rich on welfare.

How exactly do they get rich on welfare......they are getting rich because they produce goods that people pay for......

 

[2aguy]

Is it not possible for a CEO being a unique person in a corporate environment is like a movie star or athlete i.e. top of the pile so why are they targets for "Social Justice League" but movie stars/athletes aren't?

Movie and sports stars are not often required to commit malicious, evil burn in hell, monster type deeds the way CEO's are. Movie and sports stars are paid for their talents and not their willingness to rob, cheat, steal, rape and pillage the way CEO's do.

I love it when liberals tell us who they really are, but wow.

Ya, like CEO's and their actions have never been convicted in courts or sued in courts for those things. Certainly there are good decent CEO's with good character, but there a plenty without. You want to open a discussion on the evils committed by CEO'S?

I know I'll regret discussing this idiocy but okay, define plenty how many CEO's what percentage? Do you have any facts OR are you simply parroting liberal talking points like some mindless liberal drone?

Sadly, these liberals need to be addressed whenever we see them....by ignoring them...we let them advance their stupidity.........too long now regular conservatives/libertarians/Tea Party people have decided to avoid arguing with crazy people....but we have the mess we have because the crazy people have control of the media, education, and government.....

 

[Papageorgio]

Is it not possible for a CEO being a unique person in a corporate environment is like a movie star or athlete i.e. top of the pile so why are they targets for "Social Justice League" but movie stars/athletes aren't?

Movie and sports stars are not often required to commit malicious, evil burn in hell, monster type deeds the way CEO's are. Movie and sports stars are paid for their talents and not their willingness to rob, cheat, steal, rape and pillage the way CEO's do.

You apparently haven't watched the actors and sports stars performances have you?

You see how much these guys rob people to watch them? It's criminal, they have convinced you that you like being raped and robbed.

 

[2aguy]

All the hate and jealousy....these lefties....no wonder they turn violent so often.....

 

[Brain357]

While they do make a lot of money they aren't deciding others wages. For instance the Waltons are making billions while paying workers so little they are on welfare. Actors don't have employees making the money for them.

Oh....not true....the budget of a movie relies on salaries.....and if Tom or Bruce are making 20 million...that doesn't trickle down to the make up people....and if Tom and Bruce are getting a percent of the movie....why aren't the make up people....?

Again...I don't really care....the greedy leftists do......

Yes but the actors aren't deciding the wages. Someone above is deciding to pay so much for the actors.

Again.....so what........if those who work for the company don't like the wages.....start their own company, make their own movie......simple solution....then they would have a lot of money...........why bitch and moan about people who went out and worked to get that money....less time bitching....more time planning, and getting the necessary training, education and experience...........

Let go of the hate and jealousy people......go and get the skills to get that money.....

The problem is people like the Waltons gettng rich on welfare.

How exactly do they get rich on welfare......they are getting rich because they produce goods that people pay for......

This helps explain it:
How McDonald s and Wal-Mart Became Welfare Queens - Bloomberg

They are paying so little that employees are on welfare. Meanwhile they a making billions.

 

[Brain357]

Report Walmart Workers Cost Taxpayers 6.2 Billion In Public Assistance - Forbes

“It found that a single Walmart Supercenter cost taxpayers between $904,542 and $1.75 million per year, or between $3,015 and $5,815 on average for each of 300 workers.”

 

[2aguy]

Oh....not true....the budget of a movie relies on salaries.....and if Tom or Bruce are making 20 million...that doesn't trickle down to the make up people....and if Tom and Bruce are getting a percent of the movie....why aren't the make up people....?

Again...I don't really care....the greedy leftists do......

Yes but the actors aren't deciding the wages. Someone above is deciding to pay so much for the actors.

Again.....so what........if those who work for the company don't like the wages.....start their own company, make their own movie......simple solution....then they would have a lot of money...........why bitch and moan about people who went out and worked to get that money....less time bitching....more time planning, and getting the necessary training, education and experience...........

Let go of the hate and jealousy people......go and get the skills to get that money.....

The problem is people like the Waltons gettng rich on welfare.

How exactly do they get rich on welfare......they are getting rich because they produce goods that people pay for......

This helps explain it:
How McDonald s and Wal-Mart Became Welfare Queens - Bloomberg

They are paying so little that employees are on welfare. Meanwhile they a making billions.

Brain....they don't own their employees....I know the left likes that model....but only an owner of another human being is responsible for every aspect of their lives....they get a wage....they take it or get a different job......

In the preferred relationship of the left....slave and master......the master provides for food, clothing, shelter and healthcare of his slaves.....in a free country....a man has work that needs to be done and either he can't do it himself, or he doesn't want to do it himself so he pays someone else to do it....if he offers too little, he gets no one to work, or poor quality workers...too much, and he wastes his money.....

I really don't understand how you blame Walmart and MCdonalds if their employees can't live on the wages they pay.....

Here is a fucking clue.....

--graduate from high school...get the diploma...

--don't have sex or kids until you are established....that way you aren't a single parent providing for children on a low wage...

--if you want to have kids, have a job and a spouse first...makes raising kids a hell of a lot easier...especially in hard times....

--get an education, training and experience at a job and advance in that job to the point where you can provide for a family.......before you have the fucking family......

Do those things Brain.....and you won't be working for a low salary at McDonalds trying to support 3 or 4 kids........


How about the individual tries that before they bitch about McDonalds and Walmart..........?

 

[2aguy]

Report Walmart Workers Cost Taxpayers 6.2 Billion In Public Assistance - Forbes

“It found that a single Walmart Supercenter cost taxpayers between $904,542 and $1.75 million per year, or between $3,015 and $5,815 on average for each of 300 workers.”

No they don't Brain.......they don't own those people......they pay a wage for a job....that is all they owe those people...anything more and it is a bonus.....how do you come up with that vision of the world.....?