Active shooter at YouTube

Mass shooters aren't out to "kill" per se. They're out for carnage as a sensory input.

I'd explain that in detail but on you it would be a waste of time.

Sure, you do that pogster. Then explain how a gun is the only way to produce carnage. K?

It isn't....but the second amendment reads "well regulated"...that tells me there has to be guidelines.

There you go again, misinterpreting the phrase "well regulated."

That phrase meant nothing to do with government "regulation" or restriction. During that time, it mean some thing that worked smoothly...

"The following are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary, and bracket in time the writing of the 2nd amendment:

1709: “If a liberal Education has formed in us well-regulated Appetites and worthy Inclinations.”

1714: “The practice of all well-regulated courts of justice in the world.”

1812: “The equation of time … is the adjustment of the difference of time as shown by a well-regulated clock and a true sun dial.”

1848: “A remissness for which I am sure every well-regulated person will blame the Mayor.”

1862: “It appeared to her well-regulated mind, like a clandestine proceeding.”

1894: “The newspaper, a never wanting adjunct to every well-regulated American embryo city.”

The phrase “well-regulated” was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people’s arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it."

"Well-Regulated" - Bearing Arms - Second Amendment, Well-Regulated

Indeed. So tell us, is a society where every few days another nut goes on a shooting spree, a "well-regulated society"?

The "well-regulated" part of society are the ones maintaining order. The criminal element and ones who carry out shootings like the one today are the criminal Tories and the British.

Try to wrap your head around that one.

A crazy ex-girlfriend shoots a guy and his new girlfriend. That's not a Tory. That's Tuesday.
 
Mass shooters aren't out to "kill" per se. They're out for carnage as a sensory input.

I'd explain that in detail but on you it would be a waste of time.

Sure, you do that pogster. Then explain how a gun is the only way to produce carnage. K?

It isn't....but the second amendment reads "well regulated"...that tells me there has to be guidelines.

There you go again, misinterpreting the phrase "well regulated."

That phrase meant nothing to do with government "regulation" or restriction. During that time, it mean some thing that worked smoothly...

"The following are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary, and bracket in time the writing of the 2nd amendment:

1709: “If a liberal Education has formed in us well-regulated Appetites and worthy Inclinations.”

1714: “The practice of all well-regulated courts of justice in the world.”

1812: “The equation of time … is the adjustment of the difference of time as shown by a well-regulated clock and a true sun dial.”

1848: “A remissness for which I am sure every well-regulated person will blame the Mayor.”

1862: “It appeared to her well-regulated mind, like a clandestine proceeding.”

1894: “The newspaper, a never wanting adjunct to every well-regulated American embryo city.”

The phrase “well-regulated” was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people’s arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it."

"Well-Regulated" - Bearing Arms - Second Amendment, Well-Regulated

Indeed. So tell us, is a society where every few days another nut goes on a shooting spree, a "well-regulated society"?

The "well-regulated" part of society are the ones maintaining order. The criminal element and ones who carry out shootings like the one today are the criminal Tories and the British.

Try to wrap your head around that one.

Ah but I didn't ask about the disparate parts. I'm asking whether a society --- the collective --- that continuously generates mass shootings --- may be considered a "well regulated society".

Not the parts --- the whole.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: cnm
Actually, each year Americans use their guns 1,500,000 times a year to stop criminals and mass shooters.....but thanks for not telling the whole truth.

Tell the Sandy Hook parents that. It will make feel much better about losing their babies....

And you tell them how much better it would have been if a Monster, unable to get a gun, instead mowed them down with a car.

You do understand that a homicidal maniac doesn’t care what he kills with, he just wants to kill.

I think it would be far better to discuss why he did it? Was he on mood altering prescription drugs?


Most were, likely him too.

Mass shooters aren't out to "kill" per se. They're out for carnage as a sensory input.

I'd explain that in detail but on you it would be a waste of time.

Sure, you do that pogster. Then explain how a gun is the only way to produce carnage. K?

It isn't....but the second amendment reads "well regulated"...that tells me there has to be guidelines.

Which had exactly what to do with my response to Pogo?

Interesting
 
I really hope they did not grab her by the you know what to stop her
I think she shot herself.

Such a waste of good or bad pussy. I guess it's a bad idea to stick it in crazy.

There is no such thing as bad pussy. Just good and gooder.

Obviously you've never had bad pussy. or crazy pussy. I have.

Been there, done that. And she didn't need a gun.

Even crazy can still be pretty good.
 
Actual picture of the NRA's Wayne La Pierre at google today.

terrorist woman.jpg
 
Active shooter at YouTube
Oh, another day in 'Murica. Yawn...


Actually, each year Americans use their guns 1,500,000 times a year to stop criminals and mass shooters.....but thanks for not telling the whole truth.

Tell the Sandy Hook parents that. It will make feel much better about losing their babies....

And you tell them how much better it would have been if a Monster, unable to get a gun, instead mowed them down with a car.

You do understand that a homicidal maniac doesn’t care what he kills with, he just wants to kill.

I think it would be far better to discuss why he did it? Was he on mood altering prescription drugs?


Most were, likely him too.

You could be right. All we have to do is cure mental illness, and guns won't be an issue. Why don't you take care of that, and let us know when you're done.

Now for seriousness, which ain’t way for B Dog.

You think taking each and every gun away from murderous maniacs will accomplish exactly what?

Will it keep them from constructing pipe bombs, pressure cooker bombs or just jumpin in the first available truck and offing several dozen folks?

You go right ahead and think that a murderous monster won’t find a way to murder. It is, after all, what murderous monsters do. Hell, you might provide them with actually accomplishing more carnage then they would have with guns!

Good for you
 
People like yourself [FFI] are the ones voting to have someone invade my home, take away my rights, and possibly shoot me. That makes you my enemy and there's no difference than if you did that yourself.
Ah, hysterical ninnyism, it never gets old.
You deny it but that's exactly what you are trying to bring about - people with no means to defend themselves from people who refuse to obey laws.

Rise in recorded crime is accelerating in England and Wales

8% murder rate increase in those wonderful countries.
 
Oh, another day in 'Murica. Yawn...


Actually, each year Americans use their guns 1,500,000 times a year to stop criminals and mass shooters.....but thanks for not telling the whole truth.

Tell the Sandy Hook parents that. It will make feel much better about losing their babies....

And you tell them how much better it would have been if a Monster, unable to get a gun, instead mowed them down with a car.

You do understand that a homicidal maniac doesn’t care what he kills with, he just wants to kill.

I think it would be far better to discuss why he did it? Was he on mood altering prescription drugs?


Most were, likely him too.

You could be right. All we have to do is cure mental illness, and guns won't be an issue. Why don't you take care of that, and let us know when you're done.

Now for seriousness, which ain’t way for B Dog.

You think taking each and every gun away from murderous maniacs will accomplish exactly what?

Will it keep them from constructing pipe bombs, pressure cooker bombs or just jumpin in the first available truck and offing several dozen folks?

You go right ahead and think that a murderous monster won’t find a way to murder. It is, after all, what murderous monsters do. Hell, you might provide them with actually accomplishing more carnage then they would have with guns!

Good for you

You figure out who all the murderous maniacs are, and then we can figure out what to do about them.
 
People like yourself [FFI] are the ones voting to have someone invade my home, take away my rights, and possibly shoot me. That makes you my enemy and there's no difference than if you did that yourself.
Ah, hysterical ninnyism, it never gets old.
You deny it but that's exactly what you are trying to bring about - people with no means to defend themselves from people who refuse to obey laws.

Rise in recorded crime is accelerating in England and Wales

8% murder rate increase in those wonderful countries.

With their amazingly low gun related murder rate, what is 8%? A dozen more per year?
 
Actually, each year Americans use their guns 1,500,000 times a year to stop criminals and mass shooters.....but thanks for not telling the whole truth.

Tell the Sandy Hook parents that. It will make feel much better about losing their babies....

And you tell them how much better it would have been if a Monster, unable to get a gun, instead mowed them down with a car.

You do understand that a homicidal maniac doesn’t care what he kills with, he just wants to kill.

I think it would be far better to discuss why he did it? Was he on mood altering prescription drugs?


Most were, likely him too.

You could be right. All we have to do is cure mental illness, and guns won't be an issue. Why don't you take care of that, and let us know when you're done.

Now for seriousness, which ain’t way for B Dog.

You think taking each and every gun away from murderous maniacs will accomplish exactly what?

Will it keep them from constructing pipe bombs, pressure cooker bombs or just jumpin in the first available truck and offing several dozen folks?

You go right ahead and think that a murderous monster won’t find a way to murder. It is, after all, what murderous monsters do. Hell, you might provide them with actually accomplishing more carnage then they would have with guns!

Good for you

You figure out who all the murderous maniacs are, and then we can figure out what to do about them.

It’s fourth down. You just punt?
 
People like yourself [FFI] are the ones voting to have someone invade my home, take away my rights, and possibly shoot me. That makes you my enemy and there's no difference than if you did that yourself.
Ah, hysterical ninnyism, it never gets old.
You deny it but that's exactly what you are trying to bring about - people with no means to defend themselves from people who refuse to obey laws.

Rise in recorded crime is accelerating in England and Wales

8% murder rate increase in those wonderful countries.

With their amazingly low gun related murder rate, what is 8%? A dozen more per year?

I think I proved my point. Murderers murder, it’s what they do. Doesn’t matter what you do, they could give a rats ass.
 
Tweet from Trump:

"Was just briefed on the shooting at YouTube’s HQ in San Bruno, California. Our thoughts and prayers are with everybody involved. Thank you to our phenomenal Law Enforcement Officers and First Responders that are currently on the scene."

Did he NOT get the memo. The term "thoughts and prayers" has become toxic....
 
Tell the Sandy Hook parents that. It will make feel much better about losing their babies....

And you tell them how much better it would have been if a Monster, unable to get a gun, instead mowed them down with a car.

You do understand that a homicidal maniac doesn’t care what he kills with, he just wants to kill.

I think it would be far better to discuss why he did it? Was he on mood altering prescription drugs?


Most were, likely him too.

You could be right. All we have to do is cure mental illness, and guns won't be an issue. Why don't you take care of that, and let us know when you're done.

Now for seriousness, which ain’t way for B Dog.

You think taking each and every gun away from murderous maniacs will accomplish exactly what?

Will it keep them from constructing pipe bombs, pressure cooker bombs or just jumpin in the first available truck and offing several dozen folks?

You go right ahead and think that a murderous monster won’t find a way to murder. It is, after all, what murderous monsters do. Hell, you might provide them with actually accomplishing more carnage then they would have with guns!

Good for you

You figure out who all the murderous maniacs are, and then we can figure out what to do about them.

It’s fourth down. You just punt?

Nope. That was a touchdown with extra points. You're just too dumb to see it.
 
Tweet from Trump:

"Was just briefed on the shooting at YouTube’s HQ in San Bruno, California. Our thoughts and prayers are with everybody involved. Thank you to our phenomenal Law Enforcement Officers and First Responders that are currently on the scene."

Did he NOT get the memo. The term "thoughts and prayers" has become toxic....
/——/ Thoughts as well as prayers have always been toxic to liberals.
 

Forum List

Back
Top