Bruce_T_Laney
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #241
What exactly is "not so".Not so. We all can pull up one instance of something.
Point 1: There already is help for the homeless.
point 2: Many homeless go without the help because the will not accept the strings that are attached to the help.
Question: At what point should public assistance be limited/end?
Point 2 is true. Otherwise all the homeless shelters would be full. However, some homeless cannot go without alcohol and drugs in order to stay at the shelters.
Many homeless people have family that they could live with for awhile; however, they would have to live by the rules of the family member's house.
And there are some people that simply choose to live a minimalist lifestyle because sleeping under bridges and savaging for food means that they are responsible to no one.....stereotypical hobos.
This is untrue. I worked in this field for over 30 years. .There just aren't a that many who live in this situation who do not want to follow the rules. Plus there are not all that many beds to meet the homeless numbers Of you are homeless in some small towns you don't have a homeless shelter.
Then create one or open your home to help those in need.
Why demand the taxpayer to do what you refuse to do?
I'm a taxpayer asshole. So I demand that my money go to help Americans who need help..
Asshole?
Well fucktard the government is elected by the people and your candidate lost, so the majority candidate get to dictate how the fucking money is spent.
Oh before you claim Clinton won the majority vote she lost the Electoral College!
So look asshole you don't dictate shit and if you refuse to give more then sit down and shut the fuck up!
Open your home to those in need and if not then fuck off!