All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

Status
Not open for further replies.
“The distortion created within the book’s argument is drawn from every level of error imaginable. The author made basic historical research mistakes, such as an over-reliance on, and disproportionate inclusion of, ideologically selected material. In addition – and more worryingly – the source material for the most part contradicts the author’s writing. And finally, there are several clear examples of such total distortion and inversion of meaning that it is difficult to conclude anything other than deliberate intent. The book is dripping with racial hatred against Jews.

(full article online)

"Has truth lost all meaning"? For Israel-haters, yes | MelaniePhillips.com
 
Back in 2005, the mother of all solutions to the the problem of Gaza was Israel's Disengagement from Gaza.

The favorable opinions at the time illustrated, in hindsight, how poorly the Disengagement and Gaza were understood, especially by even the most respected pundits.

(full article online)

Doesn't Anyone Understand Gaza? (Daled Amos) ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
What this ass does not mention is that part of the disengagement was installing a system of closure. When Israel left it closed the doors.

Hundreds of tons of produce rotted at the dock unable to export. Factories that made furniture, clothing, lighting fixtures, etc. were unable to export their products and had to shut down. Unemployment skyrocketed.

To say that Gaza could become the Hong Kong on the Mediterranean is just feeding you BS.
 
Back in 2005, the mother of all solutions to the the problem of Gaza was Israel's Disengagement from Gaza.

The favorable opinions at the time illustrated, in hindsight, how poorly the Disengagement and Gaza were understood, especially by even the most respected pundits.

(full article online)

Doesn't Anyone Understand Gaza? (Daled Amos) ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
What this ass does not mention is that part of the disengagement was installing a system of closure. When Israel left it closed the doors.

Hundreds of tons of produce rotted at the dock unable to export. Factories that made furniture, clothing, lighting fixtures, etc. were unable to export their products and had to shut down. Unemployment skyrocketed.

To say that Gaza could become the Hong Kong on the Mediterranean is just feeding you BS.
Any shipment devoid of weapons was allowed entrance.
You're a very poor liar.
 
Back in 2005, the mother of all solutions to the the problem of Gaza was Israel's Disengagement from Gaza.

The favorable opinions at the time illustrated, in hindsight, how poorly the Disengagement and Gaza were understood, especially by even the most respected pundits.

(full article online)

Doesn't Anyone Understand Gaza? (Daled Amos) ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
What this ass does not mention is that part of the disengagement was installing a system of closure. When Israel left it closed the doors.

Hundreds of tons of produce rotted at the dock unable to export. Factories that made furniture, clothing, lighting fixtures, etc. were unable to export their products and had to shut down. Unemployment skyrocketed.

To say that Gaza could become the Hong Kong on the Mediterranean is just feeding you BS.
Any shipment devoid of weapons was allowed entrance.
You're a very poor liar.
More Israeli bullshit. How is exporting bell peppers and beans a security threat? It is just illegal collective punishment.
 
What this ass does not mention is that part of the disengagement was installing a system of closure. When Israel left it closed the doors.

Even if this is true -- and I'm not at all convinced that it is -- Gaza's border with Egypt was open and agreements stipulate that exports were to continue through the Rafah Crossing.
 
To say that Gaza could become the Hong Kong on the Mediterranean is just feeding you BS.

It could. It still could. But there has to be a renunciation of terror and violence and a practical turning toward peace and prosperity.
 
What this ass does not mention is that part of the disengagement was installing a system of closure. When Israel left it closed the doors.

Even if this is true -- and I'm not at all convinced that it is -- Gaza's border with Egypt was open and agreements stipulate that exports were to continue through the Rafah Crossing.
You need to read up. Rafah is a pedestrian crossing only.
 
What this ass does not mention is that part of the disengagement was installing a system of closure. When Israel left it closed the doors.

Even if this is true -- and I'm not at all convinced that it is -- Gaza's border with Egypt was open and agreements stipulate that exports were to continue through the Rafah Crossing.
You need to read up. Rafah is a pedestrian crossing only.

Ah. YOU need to read up. The Rafah crossing was intended as a crossing for exports. It is what the agreements said would happen. So your claim that Israel "installed a system of closure" is patently false.
 
To say that Gaza could become the Hong Kong on the Mediterranean is just feeding you BS.

It could. It still could. But there has to be a renunciation of terror and violence and a practical turning toward peace and prosperity.
Israel has never done that and they still trade. Why the double standard.

Israel has never renounced violence? Um. I got a couple of peace treaties and a bunch of actual trade to tell you different.
 
To say that Gaza could become the Hong Kong on the Mediterranean is just feeding you BS.

It could. It still could. But there has to be a renunciation of terror and violence and a practical turning toward peace and prosperity.
Israel has never done that and they still trade. Why the double standard.

Israel has never renounced violence? Um. I got a couple of peace treaties and a bunch of actual trade to tell you different.
Israel has never stopped its violence against the Palestinians.
 
To say that Gaza could become the Hong Kong on the Mediterranean is just feeding you BS.

It could. It still could. But there has to be a renunciation of terror and violence and a practical turning toward peace and prosperity.
Israel has never done that and they still trade. Why the double standard.

Israel has never renounced violence? Um. I got a couple of peace treaties and a bunch of actual trade to tell you different.
Israel has never stopped its violence against the Palestinians.

Israel has every right to defend itself against violence from the Arabs-Moslems. They have announced their intentions.

"Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it" (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory)."
 
Hamas has successfully learned the lessons taught by the ICRC. It is using the language of international law to insist that its prisons adhere to some sort of standard, but of course it will not allow the Red Cross to visit any actual Israeli prisoners.

The fundamental issue that Hamas has managed to obfuscate is that these "prisoners" are not prisoners - but hostages. The reason Hamas didn't allow Maurer to speak with the Israelis who for whatever reason ended up in Gaza is because it wants to use them as bargaining chips to get Israel to release terrorists and achieve other goals, and even the promise of showing proof of life is something that Hamas sees as something to be bartered..

Hostage-taking, of course, is a grave violation of international law. But Maurer, as far as we can tell, never uttered the word "hostage" to Hamas - but Hamas pretends that these Israelis are prisoners of war, or criminals.

(full article online)

The ICRC did the exact opposite of what was needed in Gaza in its meeting with Hamas ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
Though most don’t typically turn to the British tabloid for hard ‘news’, the piece, by Tom Howell, doesn’t adhere to even the most minimum standards of accuracy, and is in fact more akin to Hamas propaganda than anything resembling journalism.

For starters, it completely ignores the use of such tunnels by Hamas for terror purposes. It also perversely describes Hamas’s illegal use of child labor in these tunnels as something noble, rather than the cynical exploitation of young boys by a terrorist organization.

(full article online)

Daily Mirror posts 4 year-old pics of Gaza ‘Tunnel Children’, pretends they’re current.
 
An edition of the BBC World Service radio news and current affairs programme ‘Weekend‘ that was broadcast on September 3rd included an item promoting some noteworthy framing of the Gaza Strip but before that, presenter Paul Henley introduced his studio guests (from 26:30) Stewart Purvis – formerly of ITV and OFCOM – and Jane Kinninmont of Chatham House.

Leading up to the Gaza related item, listeners heard some interesting signposting (from 28:09) concerning radicalisation and terrorism which dovetails perfectly with the BBC’s chosen narrative on those topics.

(full article online)

BBC WS ‘big prison’ framing of Gaza Strip misleads audiences – part one
 
While one might have expected the discussion to turn at that point to relevant topics such as the 2007 violent Hamas take-over of the Gaza Strip, the terror organisation’s subsequent escalation of attacks on Israeli civilians and its Israel erasing agenda or the decade-long rift between Hamas and the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority, instead Henley turned (at 36:03) to his other guest, Jane Kinninmont, with a topic much less helpful to audience understanding of the topic of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

Henley: “The residents of Gaza have been off the news radar a bit, haven’t they Jane?”

In the eight months between January and August 2017, the BBC itself has produced at least 18 reports about the Gaza Strip on its English language services alone. In addition to its regular reporting, since the end of the summer 2014 conflict between Israel and Hamas, the BBC has broadcast a documentary on that topic and produced special ‘anniversary’ coverage both six months and twelve months after the war. How Henley reached the conclusion that Gaza is “off the news radar” is therefore unclear but his guest played along with that notion.

(full article online)

BBC WS ‘big prison’ framing of Gaza Strip misleads audiences – part two
 
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier said at the ceremony that the memorial should not have taken 45 years to be built.

"It is high time and we owe it firstly to you, the relatives," Steinmeier said. "The Olympic village became a place of Palestinian terrorists, a stage for their boundless hatred for Israel. It should never have happened."

(full article online)

Rivlin attends memorial to Munich Massacre - 45 years late
 


We contacted The Independent, pointing out that the Rafah crossing is the sole responsibility of Egypt and it was nigh impossible that Guterres had said anything about Israel opening it.

In fact, while Israel has allowed enormous amounts of goods and aid into the Gaza Strip and facilitated transfer of humanitarian and medical cases, Egypt’s border at Rafah has, in recent times, remained mostly shut.

Following our complaint, The Independent has replaced the paragraph:

(vide online)

HR Prompts Gaza Strip Crossing Correction | HonestReporting
 
Though most don’t typically turn to the British tabloid for hard ‘news’, the piece, by Tom Howell, doesn’t adhere to even the most minimum standards of accuracy, and is in fact more akin to Hamas propaganda than anything resembling journalism.

For starters, it completely ignores the use of such tunnels by Hamas for terror purposes. It also perversely describes Hamas’s illegal use of child labor in these tunnels as something noble, rather than the cynical exploitation of young boys by a terrorist organization.

(full article online)

Daily Mirror posts 4 year-old pics of Gaza ‘Tunnel Children’, pretends they’re current.
More Israeli bullshit, of course. Those tunnels were used only to attack invading Israeli troops. No civilians were attacked.

This is just part of Israel's terrorist propaganda attack on Palestinians.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top