rylah
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 21,957
- 4,690
- 290
140 generations of continuous Jewish presence is a fact,No, you bring up documents that give you title. I don't have to prove there were people living in the area for generations, because that is an historical fact.This is where You've got it all wrong.
Israel didn't need 181 as a legal basis for sovereignty, since it was already established in international law 2 decades prior to that. It is actually the Arabs who use this straw man to confuse everyone, because they're themselves detached, it was the first time they were suggested sovereignty west of Jordan by the international community.
That's called Palestinian mentality - bring up documents that suppose to give You title, brag about how they're non binding, walk proudly away as if it made any sense or helped the argument, then get angry and blame the other after You've spat in Your own well.
Muslim conquests and theft of land from the Jews is another fact.
International law recognizes the legal historic title of the Jewish nation to sovereignty in all of Palestine:
The 1920 San Remo Resolution
"The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust... the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory [authority that] will be responsible for putting into effect the [Balfour] declaration... in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people."
Treaties themselves have no statute of limitations, so their rights go on ad infinitum.
Therefore any borders assigned by treaty to Palestine are sovereign borders of a Jewish Nation.
Last edited: