Another Lie debunked-IG report concludes FBI did not spy on trump campaign

[colfax_m]

You claimed Hunter Biden did nothing, not me. I wanted to know why you believe that.

I said he did nothing for Burisma that would justify paying him 50K per month. try again.

Did you now? Let’s check the tape.

However, we have Biden on tape threatening Ukraine with withholding 1 billion in aid if they don't fire the prosecutor looking into Burisma where his son was getting 50K per month for doing nothing.

Oops. You actually did say that.

then can you tell us what expertise or experience he had that made him that valuable to a Ukrainian gas company?

Burisma was buying influence in the US government, if you cannot see that, then there is no hope for you

Yale law grad. Worked at Commerce Dept. Board member of Amtrak. Runs a venture capital firm. Founded an investment capital firm. Founded a lobbying firm.

A UKRAINIAN GAS COMPANY WTF DOES ANY OF THAT HAVE TO DO WITH GAS OR UKRAINE?

HIS INVESTMENT COMPANY GOT A BILLION DOLLARS FROM CHINA, WHAT DO YOU THINK THEY WANTED IN RETURN?

Let's say Burisma was buying influence. Did they ask Biden to do something in return?

 

[Redfish]

so how was it different when the hillary campaign paid russians to create a dossier or lies to try to hurt her political opponent? You think that was fine, why? How was it OK for the FBI to try to influence a national election? Comey, Srtzok, Page, McCabe and others did exactly that, why do you condone that corruption and make a big deal out of some alleged unproven request by Trump to investigate corruption?

you libs are such hypocrites.

Clinton wasn’t president at the time and wasn’t using the threat of US taxpayer dollars to get what she wanted.

Good lord, did that little detail just escape your mind?

neither did Trump, what's your point? The money was released to Ukraine, nothing was asked for in return. the media and pencil neck Schiff are lying to you.

Hillary used campaign funds to pay a foreign entity to create a dossier of lies on her political opponent, she also destroyed 33000 emails that were subpeonaed by congress.

Biden successfully bribed Ukraine with US money to fire a prosecutor that was looking into Burisma, the company that employed his son and the sons of Pelosi, Romney, and Kerry to sit on a board and do nothing for thousands per month. But you don't care about any of that corruption, you are focused on made up corruption and the attempts of the sick dems to overturn the 2016 election because the people didn't follow their instructions and elect crooked hillary.

The money was mostly released to Ukraine. The delay made it impossible to distribute all the money that Congress had appropriated. Trump didn't actually have the legal authority to stop the money and even then it was only released AFTER the IG notified Congress that there was a report. Getting caught in a crime doesn't absolve you of the crime. Trump was using the lack of money as leverage to get an announcement into an investigation by Ukraine of Biden. That's a problem.

Clinton can use campaign funds for campaign expenses, which last time I looked, opposition research is a legitimate campaign expense.

Biden successfully had a corrupt prosecutor removed before allowing US loan guarantees to be signed. I thought you guys wanted that?

Stop already with the "opposition research" whitewash, Colfax! Hillary Clinton bought a smear job from Glenn Simpson. Claiming it was opposition research is putting lip stick on a pig and calling it a beauty queen!

All opposition research is a smear job. That's what it's for.

Clinton never even used the stupid thing.

the clinton media used it, that was the plan all along.

 

[Redfish]

I said he did nothing for Burisma that would justify paying him 50K per month. try again.

Did you now? Let’s check the tape.

However, we have Biden on tape threatening Ukraine with withholding 1 billion in aid if they don't fire the prosecutor looking into Burisma where his son was getting 50K per month for doing nothing.

Oops. You actually did say that.

then can you tell us what expertise or experience he had that made him that valuable to a Ukrainian gas company?

Burisma was buying influence in the US government, if you cannot see that, then there is no hope for you

Yale law grad. Worked at Commerce Dept. Board member of Amtrak. Runs a venture capital firm. Founded an investment capital firm. Founded a lobbying firm.

A UKRAINIAN GAS COMPANY WTF DOES ANY OF THAT HAVE TO DO WITH GAS OR UKRAINE?

HIS INVESTMENT COMPANY GOT A BILLION DOLLARS FROM CHINA, WHAT DO YOU THINK THEY WANTED IN RETURN?

Let's say Burisma was buying influence. Did they ask Biden to do something in return?

that should be investigated, thats what the fired guy was doing.

 

[colfax_m]

Clinton wasn’t president at the time and wasn’t using the threat of US taxpayer dollars to get what she wanted.

Good lord, did that little detail just escape your mind?

neither did Trump, what's your point? The money was released to Ukraine, nothing was asked for in return. the media and pencil neck Schiff are lying to you.

Hillary used campaign funds to pay a foreign entity to create a dossier of lies on her political opponent, she also destroyed 33000 emails that were subpeonaed by congress.

Biden successfully bribed Ukraine with US money to fire a prosecutor that was looking into Burisma, the company that employed his son and the sons of Pelosi, Romney, and Kerry to sit on a board and do nothing for thousands per month. But you don't care about any of that corruption, you are focused on made up corruption and the attempts of the sick dems to overturn the 2016 election because the people didn't follow their instructions and elect crooked hillary.

The money was mostly released to Ukraine. The delay made it impossible to distribute all the money that Congress had appropriated. Trump didn't actually have the legal authority to stop the money and even then it was only released AFTER the IG notified Congress that there was a report. Getting caught in a crime doesn't absolve you of the crime. Trump was using the lack of money as leverage to get an announcement into an investigation by Ukraine of Biden. That's a problem.

Clinton can use campaign funds for campaign expenses, which last time I looked, opposition research is a legitimate campaign expense.

Biden successfully had a corrupt prosecutor removed before allowing US loan guarantees to be signed. I thought you guys wanted that?

Stop already with the "opposition research" whitewash, Colfax! Hillary Clinton bought a smear job from Glenn Simpson. Claiming it was opposition research is putting lip stick on a pig and calling it a beauty queen!

All opposition research is a smear job. That's what it's for.

Clinton never even used the stupid thing.

the clinton media used it, that was the plan all along.

The dossier wasn't published in the media until after the election.

 

[colfax_m]

Did you now? Let’s check the tape.

Oops. You actually did say that.

then can you tell us what expertise or experience he had that made him that valuable to a Ukrainian gas company?

Burisma was buying influence in the US government, if you cannot see that, then there is no hope for you

Yale law grad. Worked at Commerce Dept. Board member of Amtrak. Runs a venture capital firm. Founded an investment capital firm. Founded a lobbying firm.

A UKRAINIAN GAS COMPANY WTF DOES ANY OF THAT HAVE TO DO WITH GAS OR UKRAINE?

HIS INVESTMENT COMPANY GOT A BILLION DOLLARS FROM CHINA, WHAT DO YOU THINK THEY WANTED IN RETURN?

Let's say Burisma was buying influence. Did they ask Biden to do something in return?

that should be investigated, thats what the fired guy was doing.

So you don't have any idea if they asked Biden to do anything?

 

[Redfish]

you said, "no actual request for cooperation" LOL, thats exactly what the dems are trying to impeach Trump for, a "request for cooperation". But there was none, right? you just confirmed it.

No requests for cooperation through the DoJ. Just a demand made by Trump through his personal lawyer. You see why this seems more like a personal request rather than for the benefit of the US?

so how was it different when the hillary campaign paid russians to create a dossier or lies to try to hurt her political opponent? You think that was fine, why? How was it OK for the FBI to try to influence a national election? Comey, Srtzok, Page, McCabe and others did exactly that, why do you condone that corruption and make a big deal out of some alleged unproven request by Trump to investigate corruption?

you libs are such hypocrites.

How do you STILL not understand the difference? Imagine political dirt on a candidate is a television. Hillary went to Best Buy and bought a TV. Trump got a TV that was stolen off the back of a truck. No, he didn't steal it, but he encouraged the theft. ( "Russia if you're listening ")Fast forward to 2019 and Trump is telling Ukraine "give me a TV or you won't get the home security system you want". Hillary = legal purchase. Trump = stolen goods and extortion.

( "Russia if you're listening ") That was a joke, are you so dumb that you think it was serious?

So now Trump is a jokester?? A real comic ?? He has been I agree ,as a president but he wasn't trying to be funny

the whole russia thing was so ridiculous, why not make a joke of it? the entire dem party has become a joke and thats too bad for the country, the party of Kennedy and Truman has been murdered by the clintons and obamas

 

[Redfish]

then can you tell us what expertise or experience he had that made him that valuable to a Ukrainian gas company?

Burisma was buying influence in the US government, if you cannot see that, then there is no hope for you

Yale law grad. Worked at Commerce Dept. Board member of Amtrak. Runs a venture capital firm. Founded an investment capital firm. Founded a lobbying firm.

A UKRAINIAN GAS COMPANY WTF DOES ANY OF THAT HAVE TO DO WITH GAS OR UKRAINE?

HIS INVESTMENT COMPANY GOT A BILLION DOLLARS FROM CHINA, WHAT DO YOU THINK THEY WANTED IN RETURN?

Let's say Burisma was buying influence. Did they ask Biden to do something in return?

that should be investigated, thats what the fired guy was doing.

So you don't have any idea if they asked Biden to do anything?

Personally? no I don't, but don't you think it smells funny and we should find out what was going on?

Or, are democrats in your mind, above the law?

 

[Redfish]

neither did Trump, what's your point? The money was released to Ukraine, nothing was asked for in return. the media and pencil neck Schiff are lying to you.

Hillary used campaign funds to pay a foreign entity to create a dossier of lies on her political opponent, she also destroyed 33000 emails that were subpeonaed by congress.

Biden successfully bribed Ukraine with US money to fire a prosecutor that was looking into Burisma, the company that employed his son and the sons of Pelosi, Romney, and Kerry to sit on a board and do nothing for thousands per month. But you don't care about any of that corruption, you are focused on made up corruption and the attempts of the sick dems to overturn the 2016 election because the people didn't follow their instructions and elect crooked hillary.

The money was mostly released to Ukraine. The delay made it impossible to distribute all the money that Congress had appropriated. Trump didn't actually have the legal authority to stop the money and even then it was only released AFTER the IG notified Congress that there was a report. Getting caught in a crime doesn't absolve you of the crime. Trump was using the lack of money as leverage to get an announcement into an investigation by Ukraine of Biden. That's a problem.

Clinton can use campaign funds for campaign expenses, which last time I looked, opposition research is a legitimate campaign expense.

Biden successfully had a corrupt prosecutor removed before allowing US loan guarantees to be signed. I thought you guys wanted that?

Stop already with the "opposition research" whitewash, Colfax! Hillary Clinton bought a smear job from Glenn Simpson. Claiming it was opposition research is putting lip stick on a pig and calling it a beauty queen!

All opposition research is a smear job. That's what it's for.

Clinton never even used the stupid thing.

the clinton media used it, that was the plan all along.

The dossier wasn't published in the media until after the election.

wrong, already been refuted multiple times.

 

[colfax_m]

Yale law grad. Worked at Commerce Dept. Board member of Amtrak. Runs a venture capital firm. Founded an investment capital firm. Founded a lobbying firm.

A UKRAINIAN GAS COMPANY WTF DOES ANY OF THAT HAVE TO DO WITH GAS OR UKRAINE?

HIS INVESTMENT COMPANY GOT A BILLION DOLLARS FROM CHINA, WHAT DO YOU THINK THEY WANTED IN RETURN?

Let's say Burisma was buying influence. Did they ask Biden to do something in return?

that should be investigated, thats what the fired guy was doing.

So you don't have any idea if they asked Biden to do anything?

Personally? no I don't, but don't you think it smells funny and we should find out what was going on?

Or, are democrats in your mind, above the law?

I don't think you get to launch investigations if you don't have any idea if anything illegal happened. This isn't the Soviet Union. We have rights here, yes, even Democrats.

 

[colfax_m]

The money was mostly released to Ukraine. The delay made it impossible to distribute all the money that Congress had appropriated. Trump didn't actually have the legal authority to stop the money and even then it was only released AFTER the IG notified Congress that there was a report. Getting caught in a crime doesn't absolve you of the crime. Trump was using the lack of money as leverage to get an announcement into an investigation by Ukraine of Biden. That's a problem.

Clinton can use campaign funds for campaign expenses, which last time I looked, opposition research is a legitimate campaign expense.

Biden successfully had a corrupt prosecutor removed before allowing US loan guarantees to be signed. I thought you guys wanted that?

Stop already with the "opposition research" whitewash, Colfax! Hillary Clinton bought a smear job from Glenn Simpson. Claiming it was opposition research is putting lip stick on a pig and calling it a beauty queen!

All opposition research is a smear job. That's what it's for.

Clinton never even used the stupid thing.

the clinton media used it, that was the plan all along.

The dossier wasn't published in the media until after the election.

wrong, already been refuted multiple times.

100% true.

 

[edward37]

No requests for cooperation through the DoJ. Just a demand made by Trump through his personal lawyer. You see why this seems more like a personal request rather than for the benefit of the US?

so how was it different when the hillary campaign paid russians to create a dossier or lies to try to hurt her political opponent? You think that was fine, why? How was it OK for the FBI to try to influence a national election? Comey, Srtzok, Page, McCabe and others did exactly that, why do you condone that corruption and make a big deal out of some alleged unproven request by Trump to investigate corruption?

you libs are such hypocrites.

How do you STILL not understand the difference? Imagine political dirt on a candidate is a television. Hillary went to Best Buy and bought a TV. Trump got a TV that was stolen off the back of a truck. No, he didn't steal it, but he encouraged the theft. ( "Russia if you're listening ")Fast forward to 2019 and Trump is telling Ukraine "give me a TV or you won't get the home security system you want". Hillary = legal purchase. Trump = stolen goods and extortion.

( "Russia if you're listening ") That was a joke, are you so dumb that you think it was serious?

So now Trump is a jokester?? A real comic ?? He has been I agree ,as a president but he wasn't trying to be funny

the whole russia thing was so ridiculous, why not make a joke of it? the entire dem party has become a joke and thats too bad for the country, the party of Kennedy and Truman has been murdered by the clintons and obamas

Red you still don't get it?? What are people with brains in their heads supposed to think of Trump holding back documents, holding back 5 or 6 witnesses who have been under subpoena? No other president held back so much from congress as trump On another note the schmuck even held back showing his taxes like all others since Nixon have You must think we're all stupid not to know that dishonesty has followed trump throughout his lifetime

 

[Seawytch]

The treaty be relevant except that was no actual request for cooperation.

Ukraine’s prosecutor general : Barr didn’t ask for a joint investigation into the Bidens

Are you beginning to see why some might believe the “investigation” into Biden was a sham?

you said, "no actual request for cooperation" LOL, thats exactly what the dems are trying to impeach Trump for, a "request for cooperation". But there was none, right? you just confirmed it.

No requests for cooperation through the DoJ. Just a demand made by Trump through his personal lawyer. You see why this seems more like a personal request rather than for the benefit of the US?

so how was it different when the hillary campaign paid russians to create a dossier or lies to try to hurt her political opponent? You think that was fine, why? How was it OK for the FBI to try to influence a national election? Comey, Srtzok, Page, McCabe and others did exactly that, why do you condone that corruption and make a big deal out of some alleged unproven request by Trump to investigate corruption?

you libs are such hypocrites.

How do you STILL not understand the difference? Imagine political dirt on a candidate is a television. Hillary went to Best Buy and bought a TV. Trump got a TV that was stolen off the back of a truck. No, he didn't steal it, but he encouraged the theft. ( "Russia if you're listening ")Fast forward to 2019 and Trump is telling Ukraine "give me a TV or you won't get the home security system you want". Hillary = legal purchase. Trump = stolen goods and extortion.

( "Russia if you're listening ") That was a joke, are you so dumb that you think it was serious?

Russia didn’t think it was a joke...

Mueller: Russians tried to hack Clinton accounts hours after Trump's email remarks

 

[bodecea]

Clinton wasn’t president at the time and wasn’t using the threat of US taxpayer dollars to get what she wanted.

Good lord, did that little detail just escape your mind?

neither did Trump, what's your point? The money was released to Ukraine, nothing was asked for in return. the media and pencil neck Schiff are lying to you.

Hillary used campaign funds to pay a foreign entity to create a dossier of lies on her political opponent, she also destroyed 33000 emails that were subpeonaed by congress.

Biden successfully bribed Ukraine with US money to fire a prosecutor that was looking into Burisma, the company that employed his son and the sons of Pelosi, Romney, and Kerry to sit on a board and do nothing for thousands per month. But you don't care about any of that corruption, you are focused on made up corruption and the attempts of the sick dems to overturn the 2016 election because the people didn't follow their instructions and elect crooked hillary.

The money was mostly released to Ukraine. The delay made it impossible to distribute all the money that Congress had appropriated. Trump didn't actually have the legal authority to stop the money and even then it was only released AFTER the IG notified Congress that there was a report. Getting caught in a crime doesn't absolve you of the crime. Trump was using the lack of money as leverage to get an announcement into an investigation by Ukraine of Biden. That's a problem.

Clinton can use campaign funds for campaign expenses, which last time I looked, opposition research is a legitimate campaign expense.

Biden successfully had a corrupt prosecutor removed before allowing US loan guarantees to be signed. I thought you guys wanted that?

Stop already with the "opposition research" whitewash, Colfax! Hillary Clinton bought a smear job from Glenn Simpson. Claiming it was opposition research is putting lip stick on a pig and calling it a beauty queen!

All opposition research is a smear job. That's what it's for.

Clinton never even used the stupid thing.

the clinton media used it, that was the plan all along.

"the clinton media"....

 

[Seawytch]

The money was mostly released to Ukraine. The delay made it impossible to distribute all the money that Congress had appropriated. Trump didn't actually have the legal authority to stop the money and even then it was only released AFTER the IG notified Congress that there was a report. Getting caught in a crime doesn't absolve you of the crime. Trump was using the lack of money as leverage to get an announcement into an investigation by Ukraine of Biden. That's a problem.

Clinton can use campaign funds for campaign expenses, which last time I looked, opposition research is a legitimate campaign expense.

Biden successfully had a corrupt prosecutor removed before allowing US loan guarantees to be signed. I thought you guys wanted that?

Stop already with the "opposition research" whitewash, Colfax! Hillary Clinton bought a smear job from Glenn Simpson. Claiming it was opposition research is putting lip stick on a pig and calling it a beauty queen!

All opposition research is a smear job. That's what it's for.

Clinton never even used the stupid thing.

the clinton media used it, that was the plan all along.

The dossier wasn't published in the media until after the election.

wrong, already been refuted multiple times.

He’s right...it was reported on before the election...one week before and roundly poo pooed by Conservatives because it came from Mother Jones.

 

[LaDairis]

No other president held back so much from congress as trump

LMFAO!!!!!


Sincerely,

Col Tim Osman aka "Bin Laden"

 

[Seawytch]

Yale law grad. Worked at Commerce Dept. Board member of Amtrak. Runs a venture capital firm. Founded an investment capital firm. Founded a lobbying firm.

A UKRAINIAN GAS COMPANY WTF DOES ANY OF THAT HAVE TO DO WITH GAS OR UKRAINE?

HIS INVESTMENT COMPANY GOT A BILLION DOLLARS FROM CHINA, WHAT DO YOU THINK THEY WANTED IN RETURN?

Let's say Burisma was buying influence. Did they ask Biden to do something in return?

that should be investigated, thats what the fired guy was doing.

So you don't have any idea if they asked Biden to do anything?

Personally? no I don't, but don't you think it smells funny and we should find out what was going on?

Or, are democrats in your mind, above the law?

Nope. I’m all for it. In fact, I think Congress should open an investigation into all potential nepotism issues with ALL elected representatives. Let’s start with Mitch McConnell and Elaine Chau...or Jared and Ivanka.

 

[LaDairis]

Russia didn’t think it was a joke

Exposing the truth of Democrat corruption is not a joke. Democrat corruption is real. You and the rest of your sick party just hate it when the truth of it gets outed....

CNN = Trump "inciting violence"

Who started the "violence?"

PAID HILLARY CAMPAIGN WORKERS IN CAHOOTS WITH CNN

So sayeth PODESTA's EMAILS


Thank you, whoever hacked Podesta, for shining a bright light of truth into a snake pit....

 

[okfine]

Oh, the irony.

 

[Oldstyle]

You've demonstrated that you're sleazy enough to "paraphrase" what someone's saying while you're simultaneously accusing them of lying! You attempt to put YOUR words in my mouth...and when you get called on it you do your usual whine about "lying con tools"!

All the while claiming that all Hillary Clinton was buying in that election was "opposition research"! As usual...you're more than willing to lie your ass off, Faun! Hillary Clinton bought herself a political smear job from Glenn Simpson and it was aided and abetted by high ranking members of the FBI and the main stream media!

Spits a lying con tool who can't prove a word of that beyond the part where I paraphrased your uncorroborated claims.

You mean where you LIED about what I claimed...right, Faun?

Anyone ever notice how the people that constantly accuse others of lying...have little problem lying their asses off?

I never lied about any such thing, ya lying con tool. You asked me to believe your version of events that you had no evidence to corroborate. That's the same as had you said, take my word for it.

I gave you a choice between two things...you lying liberal shill but instead of making that choice you "paraphrased" and claimed that I was saying "take my word for it"! That's you doing what you always do, Faun...lie...and accuse others of lying when they haven't!

LOL

You pathetic lying con tool. You gave two choices and then insinuated yours was "believable" despite you posting zero evidence to back it up. The only way yours is more believable is to ignore you posted no corroborating evidence and to simply take your word for it.

I gave you two choices to decide WHICH was more "believable"...you couldn't do that (because your choice would have been laughable!) so you decided to "paraphrase" and call me a liar! It's why I say you're intellectually lazy.

 

[Oldstyle]

you said, "no actual request for cooperation" LOL, thats exactly what the dems are trying to impeach Trump for, a "request for cooperation". But there was none, right? you just confirmed it.

No requests for cooperation through the DoJ. Just a demand made by Trump through his personal lawyer. You see why this seems more like a personal request rather than for the benefit of the US?

so how was it different when the hillary campaign paid russians to create a dossier or lies to try to hurt her political opponent? You think that was fine, why? How was it OK for the FBI to try to influence a national election? Comey, Srtzok, Page, McCabe and others did exactly that, why do you condone that corruption and make a big deal out of some alleged unproven request by Trump to investigate corruption?

you libs are such hypocrites.

How do you STILL not understand the difference? Imagine political dirt on a candidate is a television. Hillary went to Best Buy and bought a TV. Trump got a TV that was stolen off the back of a truck. No, he didn't steal it, but he encouraged the theft. ( "Russia if you're listening ")Fast forward to 2019 and Trump is telling Ukraine "give me a TV or you won't get the home security system you want". Hillary = legal purchase. Trump = stolen goods and extortion.

( "Russia if you're listening ") That was a joke, are you so dumb that you think it was serious?

So now Trump is a jokester?? A real comic ?? He has been I agree ,as a president but he wasn't trying to be funny

Sarcasm is obviously above your intellectual pay grade, Eddie!