Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #181
200 out of billions.About 200 years.
Not as stupid as you seem to be.
I'm certainly not the most intelligent person but I'm nowhere near as gullible as you dumbasses.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
200 out of billions.About 200 years.
Not as stupid as you seem to be.
How long has homo sapiens been on the planet?200 out of billions.
I'm certainly not the most intelligent person but I'm nowhere near as gullible as you dumbasses.
2 or 3 hundred thousand years is our best guess and it's only a guess. There has been carvings discovered that show humans riding dinosaurs but no other evidence to back it up other than fossilized footprints of humans next to dinosaur paw prints.How long has homo sapiens been on the planet?
How long since the development of agriculture?
How long since the first town/village/city was built?
How long has homo sapiens been on the planet?
How long since the development of agriculture?
How long since the first town/village/city was built?
Ever recorded...The Evidence Is Clear, Denying It Isn't Helping Anyone.
This is terrifying news. We need to take action now before it's too late.
Our planet is in trouble and we are all responsible for fixing it.
Governments aren't doing enough.
Individual actions matter too. We should reduce our carbon footprint by using public transportation or electric cars instead of gasoline ones, reducing energy consumption at home etc.
The transition to electric cars is threatened if Donald Trump becomes president because he lives in the 20th century. He advocates gasoline cars only.
He came out against electric cars last week.
If you believe humans have a significant impact in a global warming, Donald Trump is not your candidate.
![]()
Globe has hottest June on record as well as hottest day, data shows
News of the global extremes comes amid other indicators of human-caused climate change.www.axios.com
Imagine the forest fires back then as they had no way to combat the fires. Raging fires all over especially since fire was all they had back then.We've had a long time to learn how to adapt.
What prevents us from focusing on all those things?Imagine the forest fires back then as they had no way to combat the fires. Raging fires all over especially since fire was all they had back then.
There is evidence of fires so hot they melted stone.
Pollution is bad for sure now but it will dissipate as technology advances.
Our planetary concern should be focused on asteroids, comets and solar storms not my fucking choice of automobile or stove.
Pick any spending program by congress then get back to me. We'll spend millions to study shrimp on treadmills and untold millions on other nonsensical shit. Now compare that to our money spent on earthly defense..... literally NOTHINGWhat prevents us from focusing on all those things?
It's not nothing.Pick any spending program by congress then get back to me. We'll spend millions to study shrimp on treadmills and untold millions on other nonsensical shit. Now compare that to our money spent on earthly defense..... literally NOTHING
Does this clown know anything someone else hasn't came up with?It's not nothing.
Planetary Defense Whose budget this year is $122 million
![]()
FY23 Budget Outcomes: NASA
NASA’s Science Mission Directorate received a 2% budget increase in fiscal year 2023, a small boost relative to other science agencies, and budgets are under strain across its portfolio.ww2.aip.org
200 years is a microscopic amount of time on a planet scientists claim is 4 to 5 billion years old. I've never seen so many people so full of shit as I have these days.200 out of billions.
I'm certainly not the most intelligent person but I'm nowhere near as gullible as you dumbasses.
138 million doesn't even cover the cost of the last telescope we launched ya idiot. It's LITERALLY NOTHINGIt's not nothing.
Planetary Defense Whose budget this year is $138 million
![]()
FY23 Budget Outcomes: NASA
NASA’s Science Mission Directorate received a 2% budget increase in fiscal year 2023, a small boost relative to other science agencies, and budgets are under strain across its portfolio.ww2.aip.org
I wouldn't mind spending more but not that much more. The purpose of JWST was never planetary defense. There is no need for such an instrument in that role. And I still see no reason we cannot attack both issues simultaneously. One does not preclude the other. If you think planetary defense needs more priority, write your elected representatives and take care with your vote.138 million doesn't even cover the cost of the last telescope we launched ya idiot. It's LITERALLY NOTHING
James Webb cost 10 billion and it is used for DEEP space not near solar
He has as much if not more credibility than the Gutter Media.Alex Jones? Really?
LunacyThere is no need for such an instrument in that role
JWST was built from the very get go to look at things billions of light years away. Using such a device to search for threats millions of miles away... that would be lunacy.Lunacy
Well past? Do you believe the threat of a dangerous impact has increased recently?We are already well past the usual massive solar storm and asteroid impact.
Hell not that long ago one came between the earth and the moon.
I never suggested it was built for that. YOU implied it to create a reason to argue with me because I am right and you have no rebuttal.JWST was built from the very get go to look at things billions of light years away. Using such a device to search for threats millions of miles away... that would be lunacy.
Well past? Do you believe the threat of a dangerous impact has increased recently?