Anthony The Mooch Scaramucci to Bill Maher: "I'll give ya that one", Trump is destroying environment

The EPA was destroying our economy. One of the reasons that under Obama economic growth was dismal.

How dare they stop companies from polluting at will !


You are really confused about this aren't you Moon Bat?

Congress and Nixon created the EPA. In the next 10 years or so the US cleaned up about 80% of the pollution for about 20% of the cost. Most people would agree that was a good thing.

Then that piece of shit Slick Willy came along and insisted that we clean of 15% of the pollution for 40% of the cost. Most people would agree that was a big waste of money to do. Lots of money, very little return.

Then that dumbsit Kenyan came along and insisted that we clean up 4% of the pollution for another 40% of the cost and that is one of the reasons the economy did so bad under the Kenyan. Most people except the stupid environmental wackos would think that was a moronic thing to do . Tremendous expenditure of money and almost negligible return.

The US spends as much money for cleanup and pollution control as the rest of the world combined. Ever since the CWA, CAA, RCRA, SWDA etc were passed the US has had declining air and water emissions and a tremendous decrease in hazardous waste. Most that was achieved long before we elected those idiot Democrat Presidents.

The first part of cleanup is the easiest .

Yes cleaning up cancer causing pollution from our water is expensive . How do you measure that in your cost benefit analysis?


What's the point of having an environment if we can't use it?
Isn't the environment a product of nature?
Man is part of nature.

True . And some of us have evolved to know we must care for the environment so we don’t end up like the dinosaurs.
 
There used to be an environment here, liberals obliterated it with concrete and filth.

1200px-Los_Angeles%2C_CA_from_the_air.jpg
That filth is the economic engine of the us .

No one says u can’t use the environment. Just use it responsibly .
 
"when Trump said he was gonna drain the swamp, we thought he meant lobbyists. instead he meant civil servants. the civil servants are the swamp. morale is done. people are walking around feeling devalued, targeted, like a group of folks with Stockholm Syndrome"
 
Show me one example of a Trump policy having a negative impact on the environment.

science gets little attention from the Trump administration, other than firing scientists, whose work offends Trump's love of coal & steam.

research in science gets more return on investment than coal jobs ever could. Trump is cutting research and expanding coal.

Trump's budget cut billions of dollars in research for biomedicine. Reagan, on the other hand, wasn't against science, though he was close with the fossil fuel industry.
 
The EPA was destroying our economy. One of the reasons that under Obama economic growth was dismal.

How dare they stop companies from polluting at will !


You are really confused about this aren't you Moon Bat?

Congress and Nixon created the EPA. In the next 10 years or so the US cleaned up about 80% of the pollution for about 20% of the cost. Most people would agree that was a good thing.

Then that piece of shit Slick Willy came along and insisted that we clean of 15% of the pollution for 40% of the cost. Most people would agree that was a big waste of money to do. Lots of money, very little return.

Then that dumbsit Kenyan came along and insisted that we clean up 4% of the pollution for another 40% of the cost and that is one of the reasons the economy did so bad under the Kenyan. Most people except the stupid environmental wackos would think that was a moronic thing to do . Tremendous expenditure of money and almost negligible return.

The US spends as much money for cleanup and pollution control as the rest of the world combined. Ever since the CWA, CAA, RCRA, SWDA etc were passed the US has had declining air and water emissions and a tremendous decrease in hazardous waste. Most that was achieved long before we elected those idiot Democrat Presidents.

The first part of cleanup is the easiest .

Yes cleaning up cancer causing pollution from our water is expensive . How do you measure that in your cost benefit analysis?


What's the point of having an environment if we can't use it?
Isn't the environment a product of nature?
Man is part of nature.

True . And some of us have evolved to know we must care for the environment so we don’t end up like the dinosaurs.

for the right it's about spite. if they think something matters to anyone to the left then they have to crush it. they get a smug enjoyment from it... kind of like a real life version of trolling. they do it with the environment, the arts, education, CHIP, anything that's decent....even meals on wheels.
 
How dare they stop companies from polluting at will !


You are really confused about this aren't you Moon Bat?

Congress and Nixon created the EPA. In the next 10 years or so the US cleaned up about 80% of the pollution for about 20% of the cost. Most people would agree that was a good thing.

Then that piece of shit Slick Willy came along and insisted that we clean of 15% of the pollution for 40% of the cost. Most people would agree that was a big waste of money to do. Lots of money, very little return.

Then that dumbsit Kenyan came along and insisted that we clean up 4% of the pollution for another 40% of the cost and that is one of the reasons the economy did so bad under the Kenyan. Most people except the stupid environmental wackos would think that was a moronic thing to do . Tremendous expenditure of money and almost negligible return.

The US spends as much money for cleanup and pollution control as the rest of the world combined. Ever since the CWA, CAA, RCRA, SWDA etc were passed the US has had declining air and water emissions and a tremendous decrease in hazardous waste. Most that was achieved long before we elected those idiot Democrat Presidents.

The first part of cleanup is the easiest .

Yes cleaning up cancer causing pollution from our water is expensive . How do you measure that in your cost benefit analysis?


What's the point of having an environment if we can't use it?
Isn't the environment a product of nature?
Man is part of nature.

True . And some of us have evolved to know we must care for the environment so we don’t end up like the dinosaurs.

for the right it's about spite. if they think something matters to anyone to the left then they have to crush it. they get a smug enjoyment from it... kind of like a real life version of trolling. they do it with the environment, the arts, education, CHIP, anything that's decent....even meals on wheels.


Is that like the filthy Left saying they care about children but advocate the murder of a million American children each year on demand for the sake of convenience or is it like they say they are for free speech but shut down speech from Conservatives on almost every college campus in the US? Maybe it is like the bastards saying they are for Dreamers but only if you are a Mexican.
 
There’s his focus on promoting coal.

He even uses “clean coal” in His state of the union . Rubes think if you put “clean” in front of it , then it’s ok!
Quit falling down the well
 
There was that whole repeal of the lead bullet ban. That was like the first thing Trumps and the Cons passed .

The ban was just an end run attempt around the 2nd amendment.

Bullets don’t need to be made of lead . Lead is poisonous and very damaging when introduced into the environment by hunters .

Just another end run around the 2nd amendment. Make the bullets either more expensive via copper, or have bans on any steel cored or jacketed bullets as "Armor-piercing"
 
Show me one example of a Trump policy having a negative impact on the environment.

science gets little attention from the Trump administration, other than firing scientists, whose work offends Trump's love of coal & steam.

research in science gets more return on investment than coal jobs ever could. Trump is cutting research and expanding coal.

Trump's budget cut billions of dollars in research for biomedicine. Reagan, on the other hand, wasn't against science, though he was close with the fossil fuel industry.

So actually you don't have anything.

Thanks for playing.
 
Show me one example of a Trump policy having a negative impact on the environment.

i'm currently reading "It's Even Worse Than You Think: How The Trump Administration is Destroying America" by David Cay Johnston...when i get to the part about the environment, i'll give ya plenty of examples...
/----/ Nice dodge. Ever consider skipping ahead?
 
Show me one example of a Trump policy having a negative impact on the environment.
I dump my used oil now...

And how is Trump responsible for that?
He is president..

weak.
He takes credit for other events that are not under his direct control so he can take credit for this also...

Still weak.
 

Forum List

Back
Top