- Thread starter
- #61
and then, when she puts out her own thoughts
Haven't seen that yet.
you asshats say she doesn't know what she is talking about......
That's what happens when there isn't agreement on what reality and facts are, and when there are endless links and experts to support either point of view. I like to think that when I have an actual debate with somebody I'm typically pretty respectful and do my best to address points fairly and have an open mind, but maybe I'm just another simpleton after all.
Keep switching the goal posts instead of taking on her points.....you are all asshats...
They're not hers, and either way I've done it before and it ends up exactly like I said. I'm not interested in a link battle and wasting an entire day arguing against and dissecting the opinions of somebody that isn't even here. I'm interested in discourse with actual thought from the people I'm debating with. What she does is intentional and she knows it. It's a tactic to be so tedious that nobody in their right mind will bother. That's not intellectual and it's not winning an argument.
Everything I post....every single thing.....is my own thoughts.
All mine.
And then, I support same.
As per:
1. Citing an authority with an established reputation is better, of course, than citing someone whose credentials are not so lofty. (http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml)
Composition Patterns: Developing an Argument
2. What has been pejoratively referred to as ‘simply cut and paste,’ is, in fact, carefully chosen to substantiate a point. Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts.(LibGuides: Critically Analyzing Information Sources: Critical Appraisal and Analysis)
Knocking you cold is simply a bonus.