Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 57,352
- 42,380
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #61
NOTHING honest in the MSM fake news
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NOTHING honest in the MSM fake news
But you cant tell me there aren't.
I can't tell you that there aren't a few terrorists in every church or synagogue or any house of worship in the country. It's impossible to know for certain.
Look, I'm not claiming that Islam isn't the biggest religious driver of terrorism in the world today. Based on everything I've seen, it certainly is. I'm not going to assume every mosque in the country contains a terrorist, though.
Error on the side of caution.
I think every mosque in the country should be under surveillance.
I'm much less comfortable with increasing government surveillance on citizens or legal immigrants without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Simply being in a mosque is not reasonable suspicion.
The government already appears to engage in too much surveillance of citizens.
Since muslimes are prone to hiding weapons in mosques and are known to be terrorist I believe that gives us the right to keep an eye on em.
So who is going to "keep an eye on" these white gangs who call themselves "militias".These scumbags ar operating in full view. Who is attacking you in Michigan? Any police reports where you have called for help because you are being attacked? Under seige?
A few in every mosque, huh? I wonder what you base that assertion on, specifically?
Regardless, the government is certainly not supposed to assume that any mosque in the US contains terrorists and therefore not provide police protection.
But you cant tell me there aren't.
I can't tell you that there aren't a few terrorists in every church or synagogue or any house of worship in the country. It's impossible to know for certain.
Look, I'm not claiming that Islam isn't the biggest religious driver of terrorism in the world today. Based on everything I've seen, it certainly is. I'm not going to assume every mosque in the country contains a terrorist, though.
Error on the side of caution.
I think every mosque in the country should be under surveillance.
I'm much less comfortable with increasing government surveillance on citizens or legal immigrants without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Simply being in a mosque is not reasonable suspicion.
The government already appears to engage in too much surveillance of citizens.
Since muslimes are prone to hiding weapons in mosques and are known to be terrorist I believe that gives us the right to keep an eye on em.
But you cant tell me there aren't.
I can't tell you that there aren't a few terrorists in every church or synagogue or any house of worship in the country. It's impossible to know for certain.
Look, I'm not claiming that Islam isn't the biggest religious driver of terrorism in the world today. Based on everything I've seen, it certainly is. I'm not going to assume every mosque in the country contains a terrorist, though.
Error on the side of caution.
I think every mosque in the country should be under surveillance.
I'm much less comfortable with increasing government surveillance on citizens or legal immigrants without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Simply being in a mosque is not reasonable suspicion.
The government already appears to engage in too much surveillance of citizens.
Since muslimes are prone to hiding weapons in mosques and are known to be terrorist I believe that gives us the right to keep an eye on em.
Hiding weapons in mosques is something "muslimes [sic] are prone to," is it?
There have been known Christian terrorists, does that mean we have a right to keep an eye on them, too? Shall we just have the government set up cameras in every house of worship in the country?
Hey, I bet there have been terrorists who were Democrats, too! And Republicans! Let's put cameras in all political offices, meetings, and rallies for the 2 major parties. We have a right to keep an eye on em, right?
The vast majority of terrorists are men, so I guess we'll have to keep an eye on all the men, right?
Of course, some are women....
I guess we'll just have to let the government keep an eye on everyone.
I can't tell you that there aren't a few terrorists in every church or synagogue or any house of worship in the country. It's impossible to know for certain.
Look, I'm not claiming that Islam isn't the biggest religious driver of terrorism in the world today. Based on everything I've seen, it certainly is. I'm not going to assume every mosque in the country contains a terrorist, though.
Error on the side of caution.
I think every mosque in the country should be under surveillance.
I'm much less comfortable with increasing government surveillance on citizens or legal immigrants without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Simply being in a mosque is not reasonable suspicion.
The government already appears to engage in too much surveillance of citizens.
Since muslimes are prone to hiding weapons in mosques and are known to be terrorist I believe that gives us the right to keep an eye on em.
Hiding weapons in mosques is something "muslimes [sic] are prone to," is it?
There have been known Christian terrorists, does that mean we have a right to keep an eye on them, too? Shall we just have the government set up cameras in every house of worship in the country?
Hey, I bet there have been terrorists who were Democrats, too! And Republicans! Let's put cameras in all political offices, meetings, and rallies for the 2 major parties. We have a right to keep an eye on em, right?
The vast majority of terrorists are men, so I guess we'll have to keep an eye on all the men, right?
Of course, some are women....
I guess we'll just have to let the government keep an eye on everyone.
Show me one incident where Christians have hidden weapons in churches.
I can show you plenty of instances where muslimes have.
And of course you'll have to point out the last time Christians have used suicide vests and pressure cooker bombs to kill the innocent.
Error on the side of caution.
I think every mosque in the country should be under surveillance.
I'm much less comfortable with increasing government surveillance on citizens or legal immigrants without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Simply being in a mosque is not reasonable suspicion.
The government already appears to engage in too much surveillance of citizens.
Since muslimes are prone to hiding weapons in mosques and are known to be terrorist I believe that gives us the right to keep an eye on em.
Hiding weapons in mosques is something "muslimes [sic] are prone to," is it?
There have been known Christian terrorists, does that mean we have a right to keep an eye on them, too? Shall we just have the government set up cameras in every house of worship in the country?
Hey, I bet there have been terrorists who were Democrats, too! And Republicans! Let's put cameras in all political offices, meetings, and rallies for the 2 major parties. We have a right to keep an eye on em, right?
The vast majority of terrorists are men, so I guess we'll have to keep an eye on all the men, right?
Of course, some are women....
I guess we'll just have to let the government keep an eye on everyone.
Show me one incident where Christians have hidden weapons in churches.
I can show you plenty of instances where muslimes have.
And of course you'll have to point out the last time Christians have used suicide vests and pressure cooker bombs to kill the innocent.
I see. So you only approve of the government serveilling places where terrorists have hidden weapons? Well, I would guess that many of them have hidden weapons in their own homes. Should government be able to look into anyone's home?
How many members of a group have to be involved in terrorism before you think it's fine to "keep an eye on em"? What percentage of a particular population must be involved in terrorist acts for you to consider their Constitutional protections invalid? When does a person become part of a group, rather than an individual with individual rights?
How many suicide vests have been hidden in mosques in the US and used to kill the innocent? Are we going to now target groups of people for the actions of those in entirely different countries?
You know there was a time I might have gotten upset by you posting what you know are lies about me. But because I've been studying you all for the last year, I know that you're attempting to paint me in a false light, perhaps as a subversive or someone who needs to be on one of the U.S.'s shit lists.ALl of your threads reveal your contempt and hate for this country.
And that would be unconstitutional, but I think you all already know that.Which terrorists were getting police protection? Are you trying to say all Muslims are terrorists?
Not all of em obviously.
But I'd bet there's a few of em in every mosque.
A few in every mosque, huh? I wonder what you base that assertion on, specifically?
Regardless, the government is certainly not supposed to assume that any mosque in the US contains terrorists and therefore not provide police protection.
But you cant tell me there aren't.
I can't tell you that there aren't a few terrorists in every church or synagogue or any house of worship in the country. It's impossible to know for certain.
Look, I'm not claiming that Islam isn't the biggest religious driver of terrorism in the world today. Based on everything I've seen, it certainly is. I'm not going to assume every mosque in the country contains a terrorist, though.
Error on the side of caution.
I think every mosque in the country should be under surveillance.
Isn't that what they claimed they were doing in Florida when the police caught Patriot's owner Kraft with their hidden cameras, paying for sex? You think everyone there was doing that and deserved to be under surveillance.But you cant tell me there aren't.
I can't tell you that there aren't a few terrorists in every church or synagogue or any house of worship in the country. It's impossible to know for certain.
Look, I'm not claiming that Islam isn't the biggest religious driver of terrorism in the world today. Based on everything I've seen, it certainly is. I'm not going to assume every mosque in the country contains a terrorist, though.
Error on the side of caution.
I think every mosque in the country should be under surveillance.
I'm much less comfortable with increasing government surveillance on citizens or legal immigrants without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Simply being in a mosque is not reasonable suspicion.
The government already appears to engage in too much surveillance of citizens.
Since muslimes are prone to hiding weapons in mosques and are known to be terrorist I believe that gives us the right to keep an eye on em.
Hiding weapons in mosques is something "muslimes [sic] are prone to," is it?
There have been known Christian terrorists, does that mean we have a right to keep an eye on them, too? Shall we just have the government set up cameras in every house of worship in the country?
Hey, I bet there have been terrorists who were Democrats, too! And Republicans! Let's put cameras in all political offices, meetings, and rallies for the 2 major parties. We have a right to keep an eye on em, right?
The vast majority of terrorists are men, so I guess we'll have to keep an eye on all the men, right?
Of course, some are women....
I guess we'll just have to let the government keep an eye on everyone.
And that would be unconstitutional, but I think you all already know that.Not all of em obviously.
But I'd bet there's a few of em in every mosque.
A few in every mosque, huh? I wonder what you base that assertion on, specifically?
Regardless, the government is certainly not supposed to assume that any mosque in the US contains terrorists and therefore not provide police protection.
But you cant tell me there aren't.
I can't tell you that there aren't a few terrorists in every church or synagogue or any house of worship in the country. It's impossible to know for certain.
Look, I'm not claiming that Islam isn't the biggest religious driver of terrorism in the world today. Based on everything I've seen, it certainly is. I'm not going to assume every mosque in the country contains a terrorist, though.
Error on the side of caution.
I think every mosque in the country should be under surveillance.
And that would be unconstitutional, but I think you all already know that.A few in every mosque, huh? I wonder what you base that assertion on, specifically?
Regardless, the government is certainly not supposed to assume that any mosque in the US contains terrorists and therefore not provide police protection.
But you cant tell me there aren't.
I can't tell you that there aren't a few terrorists in every church or synagogue or any house of worship in the country. It's impossible to know for certain.
Look, I'm not claiming that Islam isn't the biggest religious driver of terrorism in the world today. Based on everything I've seen, it certainly is. I'm not going to assume every mosque in the country contains a terrorist, though.
Error on the side of caution.
I think every mosque in the country should be under surveillance.
Watching over a group of people who are known to be terrorist is unconstitutional?
But I bet you're fine and dandy with surveilling militia groups.
I'm much less comfortable with increasing government surveillance on citizens or legal immigrants without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Simply being in a mosque is not reasonable suspicion.
The government already appears to engage in too much surveillance of citizens.
Since muslimes are prone to hiding weapons in mosques and are known to be terrorist I believe that gives us the right to keep an eye on em.
Hiding weapons in mosques is something "muslimes [sic] are prone to," is it?
There have been known Christian terrorists, does that mean we have a right to keep an eye on them, too? Shall we just have the government set up cameras in every house of worship in the country?
Hey, I bet there have been terrorists who were Democrats, too! And Republicans! Let's put cameras in all political offices, meetings, and rallies for the 2 major parties. We have a right to keep an eye on em, right?
The vast majority of terrorists are men, so I guess we'll have to keep an eye on all the men, right?
Of course, some are women....
I guess we'll just have to let the government keep an eye on everyone.
Show me one incident where Christians have hidden weapons in churches.
I can show you plenty of instances where muslimes have.
And of course you'll have to point out the last time Christians have used suicide vests and pressure cooker bombs to kill the innocent.
I see. So you only approve of the government serveilling places where terrorists have hidden weapons? Well, I would guess that many of them have hidden weapons in their own homes. Should government be able to look into anyone's home?
How many members of a group have to be involved in terrorism before you think it's fine to "keep an eye on em"? What percentage of a particular population must be involved in terrorist acts for you to consider their Constitutional protections invalid? When does a person become part of a group, rather than an individual with individual rights?
How many suicide vests have been hidden in mosques in the US and used to kill the innocent? Are we going to now target groups of people for the actions of those in entirely different countries?
So I guess you're against the common sense application of criminal profiling.
Since muslimes are prone to hiding weapons in mosques and are known to be terrorist I believe that gives us the right to keep an eye on em.
Hiding weapons in mosques is something "muslimes [sic] are prone to," is it?
There have been known Christian terrorists, does that mean we have a right to keep an eye on them, too? Shall we just have the government set up cameras in every house of worship in the country?
Hey, I bet there have been terrorists who were Democrats, too! And Republicans! Let's put cameras in all political offices, meetings, and rallies for the 2 major parties. We have a right to keep an eye on em, right?
The vast majority of terrorists are men, so I guess we'll have to keep an eye on all the men, right?
Of course, some are women....
I guess we'll just have to let the government keep an eye on everyone.
Show me one incident where Christians have hidden weapons in churches.
I can show you plenty of instances where muslimes have.
And of course you'll have to point out the last time Christians have used suicide vests and pressure cooker bombs to kill the innocent.
I see. So you only approve of the government serveilling places where terrorists have hidden weapons? Well, I would guess that many of them have hidden weapons in their own homes. Should government be able to look into anyone's home?
How many members of a group have to be involved in terrorism before you think it's fine to "keep an eye on em"? What percentage of a particular population must be involved in terrorist acts for you to consider their Constitutional protections invalid? When does a person become part of a group, rather than an individual with individual rights?
How many suicide vests have been hidden in mosques in the US and used to kill the innocent? Are we going to now target groups of people for the actions of those in entirely different countries?
So I guess you're against the common sense application of criminal profiling.
If what you call "common sense" either violates the law or the Constitutional protections every citizen enjoys, then yes.
Hiding weapons in mosques is something "muslimes [sic] are prone to," is it?
There have been known Christian terrorists, does that mean we have a right to keep an eye on them, too? Shall we just have the government set up cameras in every house of worship in the country?
Hey, I bet there have been terrorists who were Democrats, too! And Republicans! Let's put cameras in all political offices, meetings, and rallies for the 2 major parties. We have a right to keep an eye on em, right?
The vast majority of terrorists are men, so I guess we'll have to keep an eye on all the men, right?
Of course, some are women....
I guess we'll just have to let the government keep an eye on everyone.
Show me one incident where Christians have hidden weapons in churches.
I can show you plenty of instances where muslimes have.
And of course you'll have to point out the last time Christians have used suicide vests and pressure cooker bombs to kill the innocent.
I see. So you only approve of the government serveilling places where terrorists have hidden weapons? Well, I would guess that many of them have hidden weapons in their own homes. Should government be able to look into anyone's home?
How many members of a group have to be involved in terrorism before you think it's fine to "keep an eye on em"? What percentage of a particular population must be involved in terrorist acts for you to consider their Constitutional protections invalid? When does a person become part of a group, rather than an individual with individual rights?
How many suicide vests have been hidden in mosques in the US and used to kill the innocent? Are we going to now target groups of people for the actions of those in entirely different countries?
So I guess you're against the common sense application of criminal profiling.
If what you call "common sense" either violates the law or the Constitutional protections every citizen enjoys, then yes.
So you're the guy who would be offended if they put out a BOLA on a black dude.....
Just keep showing us what CRCs are all about.After thousands of assaults on and murders of white Christians, and Christians of all races, my area in SE Michigan is treated to this double standard
And....In the parking lot of the Islamic Center of Detroit Friday, a watchful police officer sat in a squad car, keeping an eye out for any signs of potential trouble. Worshippers thanked the officer — offering him food, drinks, a handshake. Inside, Dearborn Police Chief Ronald Haddad greeted congregants with handshakes and hugs. Dearborn is a Detroit suburb with a large Arab and Muslim population.
Haddad said he doesn’t know if houses of worship are more of a target today than in previous times, but the scale and scope of the attacks in New Zealand clearly attracted his attention.
“Given what happened in New Zealand last night, we want to make sure that our community feels safe and secure,” he said.
In Chicago, the Muslim Community Center and the Downtown Islamic Center increased security during Friday prayers. Several armed police officers stood guard outside and inside throughout the afternoon service.
Event hosted by Haleemah Aqel, Mohammad Shaikh, Arwa Gayar and Silan Fadlallah on Facebook here
In the wake of the mosque shootings in New Zealand, the Islamophobia Working Group is holding a solidarity vigil on the Diag in Ann Arbor this Saturday at 4 pm.
All are welcome. Please spread the word so that UM may come together as a community in a time of crisis.
Show me one incident where Christians have hidden weapons in churches.
I can show you plenty of instances where muslimes have.
And of course you'll have to point out the last time Christians have used suicide vests and pressure cooker bombs to kill the innocent.
I see. So you only approve of the government serveilling places where terrorists have hidden weapons? Well, I would guess that many of them have hidden weapons in their own homes. Should government be able to look into anyone's home?
How many members of a group have to be involved in terrorism before you think it's fine to "keep an eye on em"? What percentage of a particular population must be involved in terrorist acts for you to consider their Constitutional protections invalid? When does a person become part of a group, rather than an individual with individual rights?
How many suicide vests have been hidden in mosques in the US and used to kill the innocent? Are we going to now target groups of people for the actions of those in entirely different countries?
So I guess you're against the common sense application of criminal profiling.
If what you call "common sense" either violates the law or the Constitutional protections every citizen enjoys, then yes.
So you're the guy who would be offended if they put out a BOLA on a black dude.....
If the entire description consisted of "a black dude" I'd be offended at the stupidity of it. Are you trying to find a strawman you can argue effectively against or something?
So why aren't they staking out churches?Its the police job to protect terrorist targets.
There are a lot of people who don't have a clue when it comes to the laws they're operating underSo why aren't they staking out churches?Its the police job to protect terrorist targets.