Are Children A Part Of The Gay Marriage Conversation?

[JakeStarkey]

beagle is getting marching orders from ninjalion and jimbowie.

 

[Silhouette]

Denied, we have to give special privileges to people who, literally define themselves first by their sexuality?

How are two men, one who thinks he is a woman and uses his butt, his waste canal, a part of his body that is used to dispose of waste from the body, how is using the waste canal, the rectum as a sex organ, a defining characteristic to be a mother?

How is a man, that uses his rectum as a sex organ a defining characteristic of being a mother. I would say someone so broken-headed, wrong-thinking, needs a little different help, then lets say, the supreme court defining this man as MOM.

Yes, and I know your response will be most likely this is not about sex. Which means simply the Homosexual's and those who love them can not allow all the facts to be discussed in this debate.

If the Homosexuals and Activists can not control what is said, what is allowed into the debate, then they lose.

Do you know that some heterosexual couples practice anal sex?

Are they too "broken-headed" and "wrong-thinking" to be parents?

The heterosexual couples in your neighborhood that are telling everybody they are having Anal Sex are broken-headed.

And yet....people here seem to have the expectation that gay couples tell their kids about what kind of sex they are having.........

Gays don't need to talk to kids about what type of graphic sex they're having. They just take them to a pride parade and let it do the talking for them. Just ask Seawytch.

Here's your gay sex-ed, marching down main street, with nice kiddy-rainbow colors and streamers flying everywhere..soberly...as a matter of pride...hoping kiddies will be looking on...

Here's two dudes showing the kids how it's done:

Here's a guy and the crowd showing exactly what position the "bottom" takes during anal sex. The lesbians in the background are helping out by spelling it out for the kids with their signs.

And here's a man being quite helpful and honest showing kids about the basic mental stability of gay people and what happens when the anus is used too much as an artificial vagina. Anal leakage starts to happen. Or maye that's real from taking a pounding just before the parade?

Don't kid yourselves. Graphic gay sex education for kids and adults alike is in every town going on floats down main street. They are screaming for involuntary committment to a psyche ward. And here we are as a society, still slavish to being politically-correct to such a degree that we would place children in these homes before we frankly confronted what was going on right in front of our eyes.

Jake, do you approve of these actions as a matter of sober "pride" in public or not. And if not, how can we trust these people with orphaned children behind closed doors?

 

[ShackledNation]

Denied, we have to give special privileges to people who, literally define themselves first by their sexuality?

How are two men, one who thinks he is a woman and uses his butt, his waste canal, a part of his body that is used to dispose of waste from the body, how is using the waste canal, the rectum as a sex organ, a defining characteristic to be a mother?

How is a man, that uses his rectum as a sex organ a defining characteristic of being a mother. I would say someone so broken-headed, wrong-thinking, needs a little different help, then lets say, the supreme court defining this man as MOM.

Yes, and I know your response will be most likely this is not about sex. Which means simply the Homosexual's and those who love them can not allow all the facts to be discussed in this debate.

If the Homosexuals and Activists can not control what is said, what is allowed into the debate, then they lose.

Do you know that some heterosexual couples practice anal sex?

Are they too "broken-headed" and "wrong-thinking" to be parents?

The heterosexual couples in your neighborhood that are telling everybody they are having Anal Sex are broken-headed.

And yet....people here seem to have the expectation that gay couples tell their kids about what kind of sex they are having.........

Gays don't need to talk to kids about what type of graphic sex they're having. They just take them to a pride parade and let it do the talking for them. Just ask Seawytch.

Here's your gay sex-ed, marching down main street, with nice kiddy-rainbow colors and streamers flying everywhere..soberly...as a matter of pride...hoping kiddies will be looking on...

Here's two dudes showing the kids how it's done:

Here's a guy and the crowd showing exactly what position the "bottom" takes during anal sex. The lesbians in the background are helping out by spelling it out for the kids with their signs.

And here's a man being quite helpful and honest showing kids about the basic mental stability of gay people and what happens when the anus is used too much as an artificial vagina. Anal leakage starts to happen. Or maye that's real from taking a pounding just before the parade?

Don't kid yourselves. Graphic gay sex education for kids and adults alike is in every town going on floats down main street. They are screaming for involuntary committment to a psyche ward. And here we are as a society, still slavish to being politically-correct to such a degree that we would place children in these homes before we frankly confronted what was going on right in front of our eyes.

Jake, do you approve of these actions as a matter of sober "pride" in public or not. And if not, how can we trust these people with orphaned children behind closed doors?

Your pictures are irrelevant. Here's a picture of a straight woman.

By your own reasoning, clearly, she is disgusting and perverse. She sings her music to children across the United States! Corrupting them! She is a heterosexual. Therefore, heterosexuals should not be allowed to marry. Because Miley Cyrus.

This one is even worse!

This heterosexual male is encouraging young boys to have anal sex with women! And the woman likes it! He isn't even wearing a shirt! Can we seriously allow heterosexual people to raise children and get married???

I can just as easily post pictures of straight people doing the same things you are harping on people at pride for doing. Yet they don't have any effect on whether or not straight people should be allowed to marry or adopt children. Do you see how idiotic your argument is yet?

 

[Silhouette]

Denied, we have to give special privileges to people who, literally define themselves first by their sexuality?

How are two men, one who thinks he is a woman and uses his butt, his waste canal, a part of his body that is used to dispose of waste from the body, how is using the waste canal, the rectum as a sex organ, a defining characteristic to be a mother?

How is a man, that uses his rectum as a sex organ a defining characteristic of being a mother. I would say someone so broken-headed, wrong-thinking, needs a little different help, then lets say, the supreme court defining this man as MOM.

Yes, and I know your response will be most likely this is not about sex. Which means simply the Homosexual's and those who love them can not allow all the facts to be discussed in this debate.

If the Homosexuals and Activists can not control what is said, what is allowed into the debate, then they lose.

Do you know that some heterosexual couples practice anal sex?

Are they too "broken-headed" and "wrong-thinking" to be parents?

The heterosexual couples in your neighborhood that are telling everybody they are having Anal Sex are broken-headed.

And yet....people here seem to have the expectation that gay couples tell their kids about what kind of sex they are having.........

Gays don't need to talk to kids about what type of graphic sex they're having. They just take them to a pride parade and let it do the talking for them. Just ask Seawytch.

Here's your gay sex-ed, marching down main street, with nice kiddy-rainbow colors and streamers flying everywhere..soberly...as a matter of pride...hoping kiddies will be looking on...

Here's two dudes showing the kids how it's done:

Here's a guy and the crowd showing exactly what position the "bottom" takes during anal sex. The lesbians in the background are helping out by spelling it out for the kids with their signs.

And here's a man being quite helpful and honest showing kids about the basic mental stability of gay people and what happens when the anus is used too much as an artificial vagina. Anal leakage starts to happen. Or maye that's real from taking a pounding just before the parade?

Don't kid yourselves. Graphic gay sex education for kids and adults alike is in every town going on floats down main street. They are screaming for involuntary committment to a psyche ward. And here we are as a society, still slavish to being politically-correct to such a degree that we would place children in these homes before we frankly confronted what was going on right in front of our eyes.

Jake, do you approve of these actions as a matter of sober "pride" in public or not. And if not, how can we trust these people with orphaned children behind closed doors?

Your pictures are irrelevant. Here's a picture of a straight woman.

By your own reasoning, clearly, she is disgusting and perverse. She sings her music to children across the United States! Corrupting them! She is a heterosexual. Therefore, heterosexuals should not be allowed to marry. Because Miley Cyrus.

Do you see how idiotic your argument is yet?

Nope, because Miley Cyrus is an individual for exposure on screenable media. Whereas the gay "pride" parade goes down public thoroughfares hoping kids will be there. If Ms. Cyrus did these things in public where kids were milling about, she'd be arrested.

 

[ricechickie]

So, the second picture, of an unknown woman grinding against the crotch of a shirtless guy in public, that fits your definition of heterosexual pride parade?

 

[ShackledNation]

Denied, we have to give special privileges to people who, literally define themselves first by their sexuality?

How are two men, one who thinks he is a woman and uses his butt, his waste canal, a part of his body that is used to dispose of waste from the body, how is using the waste canal, the rectum as a sex organ, a defining characteristic to be a mother?

How is a man, that uses his rectum as a sex organ a defining characteristic of being a mother. I would say someone so broken-headed, wrong-thinking, needs a little different help, then lets say, the supreme court defining this man as MOM.

Yes, and I know your response will be most likely this is not about sex. Which means simply the Homosexual's and those who love them can not allow all the facts to be discussed in this debate.

If the Homosexuals and Activists can not control what is said, what is allowed into the debate, then they lose.

Do you know that some heterosexual couples practice anal sex?

Are they too "broken-headed" and "wrong-thinking" to be parents?

The heterosexual couples in your neighborhood that are telling everybody they are having Anal Sex are broken-headed.

And yet....people here seem to have the expectation that gay couples tell their kids about what kind of sex they are having.........

Gays don't need to talk to kids about what type of graphic sex they're having. They just take them to a pride parade and let it do the talking for them. Just ask Seawytch.

Here's your gay sex-ed, marching down main street, with nice kiddy-rainbow colors and streamers flying everywhere..soberly...as a matter of pride...hoping kiddies will be looking on...

Here's two dudes showing the kids how it's done:

Here's a guy and the crowd showing exactly what position the "bottom" takes during anal sex. The lesbians in the background are helping out by spelling it out for the kids with their signs.

And here's a man being quite helpful and honest showing kids about the basic mental stability of gay people and what happens when the anus is used too much as an artificial vagina. Anal leakage starts to happen. Or maye that's real from taking a pounding just before the parade?

Don't kid yourselves. Graphic gay sex education for kids and adults alike is in every town going on floats down main street. They are screaming for involuntary committment to a psyche ward. And here we are as a society, still slavish to being politically-correct to such a degree that we would place children in these homes before we frankly confronted what was going on right in front of our eyes.

Jake, do you approve of these actions as a matter of sober "pride" in public or not. And if not, how can we trust these people with orphaned children behind closed doors?

Your pictures are irrelevant. Here's a picture of a straight woman.

By your own reasoning, clearly, she is disgusting and perverse. She sings her music to children across the United States! Corrupting them! She is a heterosexual. Therefore, heterosexuals should not be allowed to marry. Because Miley Cyrus.

Do you see how idiotic your argument is yet?

Nope, because Miley Cyrus is an individual for exposure on screenable media. Whereas the gay "pride" parade goes down public thoroughfares hoping kids will be there. If Ms. Cyrus did these things in public where kids were milling about, she'd be arrested.

Kids are far more influenced by screenable media than people walking in public one day out of the year. Nor does one person's actions in a parade have any influence over whether or not other people should be allowed to get married and adopt children. Your argument fails on every possible level.

 

[Rikurzhen]

This one is even worse!

This heterosexual male is encouraging young boys to have anal sex with women! And the woman likes it! He isn't even wearing a shirt! Can we seriously allow heterosexual people to raise children and get married???

I can just as easily post pictures of straight people doing the same things you are harping on people at pride for doing. Yet they don't have any effect on whether or not straight people should be allowed to marry or adopt children. Do you see how idiotic your argument is yet?

Oh, it's you again. Why am I not surprised? Idiotic arguments are your calling card.

A Gay Pride parade serves to highlight homosexual pride, it's a showcase of who they are and how they wish to be seen. The counterpart to a Gay Pride parade is any other parade which takes place in a heteronormative society for that is how heterosexuals conduct themselves. So the marching bands, the pleasant parade floats, etc are how normal society presents itself.

Your photo here is not emblematic of Heterosexual Pride. There is no parade. This is the equivalent of taking a photo inside a Gay Bar. Young people are together for some concert or festival and they're expressing their sexuality, exactly what takes place in a Gay Bar.

Damn, you're such an idiot.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, because Miley Cyrus is an individual for exposure on screenable media. Whereas the gay "pride" parade goes down public thoroughfares hoping kids will be there. If Ms. Cyrus did these things in public where kids were milling about, she'd be arrested.

Once again from you, like Elektra and Rik, a failed deflection.

The failure is that of defective adults, not sexual orientation.

Sil, you have to come honest with Board members

 

[ricechickie]

Oh, it's you again. Why am I not surprised? Idiotic arguments are your calling card.

A Gay Pride parade serves to highlight homosexual pride, it's a showcase of who they are and how they wish to be seen. The counterpart to a Gay Pride parade is any other parade which takes place in a heteronormative society for that is how heterosexuals conduct themselves. So the marching bands, the pleasant parade floats, etc are how normal society presents itself.

Your photo here is not emblematic of Heterosexual Pride. There is no parade. This is the equivalent of taking a photo inside a Gay Bar. Young people are together for some concert or festival and they're expressing their sexuality, exactly what takes place in a Gay Bar.

Damn, you're such an idiot.

So, you'd be ok with gay people mixing in and expressing their sexuality?

 

[ShackledNation]

This one is even worse!

This heterosexual male is encouraging young boys to have anal sex with women! And the woman likes it! He isn't even wearing a shirt! Can we seriously allow heterosexual people to raise children and get married???

I can just as easily post pictures of straight people doing the same things you are harping on people at pride for doing. Yet they don't have any effect on whether or not straight people should be allowed to marry or adopt children. Do you see how idiotic your argument is yet?

Oh, it's you again. Why am I not surprised? Idiotic arguments are your calling card.

A Gay Pride parade serves to highlight homosexual pride, it's a showcase of who they are and how they wish to be seen. The counterpart to a Gay Pride parade is any other parade which takes place in a heteronormative society for that is how heterosexuals conduct themselves. So the marching bands, the pleasant parade floats, etc are how normal society presents itself.

Your photo here is not emblematic of Heterosexual Pride. There is no parade. This is the equivalent of taking a photo inside a Gay Bar. Young people are together for some concert or festival and they're expressing their sexuality, exactly what takes place in a Gay Bar.

Damn, you're such an idiot.

The counterpart to a Gay Pride parade is any other parade in a heteronormative society. Okay, fine.

A mardigras parade

I would have included pictures of bare-breasted women at those parades, which is quite common, but I fear anything more revealing than the 2nd pic would not be allowed on this forum.

Way to make a fool of yourself..again.

 

[Rikurzhen]

Oh, it's you again. Why am I not surprised? Idiotic arguments are your calling card.

A Gay Pride parade serves to highlight homosexual pride, it's a showcase of who they are and how they wish to be seen. The counterpart to a Gay Pride parade is any other parade which takes place in a heteronormative society for that is how heterosexuals conduct themselves. So the marching bands, the pleasant parade floats, etc are how normal society presents itself.

Your photo here is not emblematic of Heterosexual Pride. There is no parade. This is the equivalent of taking a photo inside a Gay Bar. Young people are together for some concert or festival and they're expressing their sexuality, exactly what takes place in a Gay Bar.

Damn, you're such an idiot.

So, you'd be ok with gay people mixing in and expressing their sexuality?

No. When the Shriners are holding a parade heterosexuals are not "expressing their sexuality." If a homosexual wants to join the Shriners and drive a fire truck, fine he can join the parade as a homosexual man driving a fire truck. To be homosexual doesn't not mean one has to celebrate perversity.

 

[ricechickie]

No. When the Shriners are holding a parade heterosexuals are not "expressing their sexuality." If a homosexual wants to join the Shriners and drive a fire truck, fine he can join the parade as a homosexual man driving a fire truck. To be homosexual doesn't not mean one has to celebrate perversity.

I'm not sure if you purposely misunderstood. I was talking about the group of young people at a concert or festival, expressing their sexuality. Would you be ok with gay people mixing in and expressing their sexuality?

 

[Rikurzhen]

No. When the Shriners are holding a parade heterosexuals are not "expressing their sexuality." If a homosexual wants to join the Shriners and drive a fire truck, fine he can join the parade as a homosexual man driving a fire truck. To be homosexual doesn't not mean one has to celebrate perversity.

I'm not sure if you purposely misunderstood. I was talking about the group of young people at a concert or festival, expressing their sexuality. Would you be ok with gay people mixing in and expressing their sexuality?

No, I'm not ok with that because I'm not OK with what the boy and girl were doing in public. I thought it was crass. I don't want to see it and I don't want to see one gay pantomiming blowing another guy.

 

[ricechickie]

No, I'm not ok with that because I'm not OK with what the boy and girl were doing in public. I thought it was crass. I don't want to see it and I don't want to see one gay pantomiming blowing another guy.

So, why aren't you more worried about the state of heterosexual relationships, when that kind of crass behavior is happening out in public? Why is that not emblematic of heterosexual pride, and creating a world hostile to childhood innocence?

 

[Rikurzhen]

No, I'm not ok with that because I'm not OK with what the boy and girl were doing in public. I thought it was crass. I don't want to see it and I don't want to see one gay pantomiming blowing another guy.

So, why aren't you more worried about the state of heterosexual relationships, when that kind of crass behavior is happening out in public?

What have I written which has given you the impression that I'm not concerned about the state of heterosexual relationships?

 

[ricechickie]

What have I written which has given you the impression that I'm not concerned about the state of heterosexual relationships?

The fact that the photo was dismissed as a group of young people at a festival, expressing their sexuality.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The hetero fascists on the similarity issue every single time.

Heterosexual expression in public will be met with the same result as homosexual expression, as will any heterosexual and homosexual adult pursuit of children.

Sil's fancil cult theory is down in flames and has been for months.

 

[elektra]

again, the Homosexual Activist are fixated on talking about Heterosexuality, not Homosexuality, while in the same breath saying we should not be talking about the Homosexual's sexuality.

Dictating the direction of the Debate.

 

[elektra]

Nope, because Miley Cyrus is an individual for exposure on screenable media. Whereas the gay "pride" parade goes down public thoroughfares hoping kids will be there. If Ms. Cyrus did these things in public where kids were milling about, she'd be arrested.

Once again from you, like Elektra and Rik, a failed deflection.

The failure is that of defective adults, not sexual orientation.

Sil, you have to come honest with Board members

Deflecting would be not quoting what you are replying to in this post.
Bigots point fingers at others.

 

[elektra]

Denied, we have to give special privileges to people who, literally define themselves first by their sexuality?

How are two men, one who thinks he is a woman and uses his butt, his waste canal, a part of his body that is used to dispose of waste from the body, how is using the waste canal, the rectum as a sex organ, a defining characteristic to be a mother?

How is a man, that uses his rectum as a sex organ a defining characteristic of being a mother. I would say someone so broken-headed, wrong-thinking, needs a little different help, then lets say, the supreme court defining this man as MOM.

Yes, and I know your response will be most likely this is not about sex. Which means simply the Homosexual's and those who love them can not allow all the facts to be discussed in this debate.

If the Homosexuals and Activists can not control what is said, what is allowed into the debate, then they lose.

Do you know that some heterosexual couples practice anal sex?

Are they too "broken-headed" and "wrong-thinking" to be parents?

The heterosexual couples in your neighborhood that are telling everybody they are having Anal Sex are broken-headed.

And yet....people here seem to have the expectation that gay couples tell their kids about what kind of sex they are having.........

Gays don't need to talk to kids about what type of graphic sex they're having. They just take them to a pride parade and let it do the talking for them. Just ask Seawytch.

Here's your gay sex-ed, marching down main street, with nice kiddy-rainbow colors and streamers flying everywhere..soberly...as a matter of pride...hoping kiddies will be looking on...

Here's two dudes showing the kids how it's done:

Here's a guy and the crowd showing exactly what position the "bottom" takes during anal sex. The lesbians in the background are helping out by spelling it out for the kids with their signs.



And here's a man being quite helpful and honest showing kids about the basic mental stability of gay people and what happens when the anus is used too much as an artificial vagina. Anal leakage starts to happen. Or maye that's real from taking a pounding just before the parade?



Don't kid yourselves. Graphic gay sex education for kids and adults alike is in every town going on floats down main street. They are screaming for involuntary committment to a psyche ward. And here we are as a society, still slavish to being politically-correct to such a degree that we would place children in these homes before we frankly confronted what was going on right in front of our eyes.

Jake, do you approve of these actions as a matter of sober "pride" in public or not. And if not, how can we trust these people with orphaned children behind closed doors?

Your pictures are irrelevant. Here's a picture of a straight woman.


By your own reasoning, clearly, she is disgusting and perverse. She sings her music to children across the United States! Corrupting them! She is a heterosexual. Therefore, heterosexuals should not be allowed to marry. Because Miley Cyrus.

Do you see how idiotic your argument is yet?

Nope, because Miley Cyrus is an individual for exposure on screenable media. Whereas the gay "pride" parade goes down public thoroughfares hoping kids will be there. If Ms. Cyrus did these things in public where kids were milling about, she'd be arrested.

Kids are far more influenced by screenable media than people walking in public one day out of the year. Nor does one person's actions in a parade have any influence over whether or not other people should be allowed to get married and adopt children. Your argument fails on every possible level.

Actually, ShackledNation failed as soon as Shackled Nation stated children are influenced more over a something on a "screen", vs something they see in real life.

What proof do you to back up that contention, that Homosexuals exposing themselves and simulating sex directly in front of children has no influence on them?