Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As much as I hate to say it, that's the way it looks to me
..., you got your cookies off typing that! 
those muslime murderers had their own stash of weapons long before their planned attack, all they needed to do is get them from their local "Hate Shop" (mosque) 
I ask that question because I know what the result would be. Conservatives certainly wouldn't 'rally 'round the president' like they would demand if a Republican was in the WH. No, they would assail Obama and blame him for the attack. So, given that belief, doesn't it seem like a terrorist attack on Americans inside of America is something that conservatives actually WANT to happen? That way, they could use the attack as a political bludgeon with which to hopefully discredit the president and propel their candidate into the presidency. As much as I hate to say it, that's the way it looks to me.
You are a hateful moron.
SRSLY
I didn't write anything hateful.
II'm digging the generalizations here. FascinatingAnd they claim they are not nuts.Lol the number of paranoid rants by the right exponentially out number the paranoid posts of the left .Are Conservatives Hoping that a Terrorist Attack Happens in America?
You can tell when the liberals are losing the debate big-time.
They come up with hysterical rants like that, disguised as "questions".
Lets see.......over the last 2 days I've seen our right wing head job posters call for the summary execution of all democrats. Another demand that we start the race war. And another claim that Obama is trying to cause mass shootings.
Over just 2 days.
I was quoting a sone lyric by "the clash".I want a riot. A white riot.
Riots are never any good. Never.
I ask that question because I know what the result would be. Conservatives certainly wouldn't 'rally 'round the president' like they would demand if a Republican was in the WH. No, they would assail Obama and blame him for the attack. So, given that belief, doesn't it seem like a terrorist attack on Americans inside of America is something that conservatives actually WANT to happen? That way, they could use the attack as a political bludgeon with which to hopefully discredit the president and propel their candidate into the presidency. As much as I hate to say it, that's the way it looks to me.
You are a hateful moron.
SRSLY
I didn't write anything hateful.
Which just underscores what a moron you are, and hateful to boot.
As much as I hate to say it, that's the way it looks to me
i love saying the San Bernardino attack lays directly in O'Husseins lap!!
you demorats want gun control and even before the dead's blood started clotting on the floor.
I ask that question because I know what the result would be. Conservatives certainly wouldn't 'rally 'round the president' like they would demand if a Republican was in the WH. No, they would assail Obama and blame him for the attack. So, given that belief, doesn't it seem like a terrorist attack on Americans inside of America is something that conservatives actually WANT to happen? That way, they could use the attack as a political bludgeon with which to hopefully discredit the president and propel their candidate into the presidency. As much as I hate to say it, that's the way it looks to me.
Obama has ignored warnings of Islamist threats. For that, he deserves criticism. He also hasn't learned a damn thing from all the violence in other countries. The slaughter of Christians, gay and other innocents, not to mention the Paris attacks. He doesn't seem interested in preventing it here. Instead he is in denial that there is even a threat. I am hoping it's denial rather than a lack of concern for the infidels.
He knows we can't vet refugees, yet still wants to bring in large numbers over the next few years. He refuses to discuss radical Muslims. The left won't even admit that the latest attack was likely a terrorist attack. I'm hearing workplace violence, despite the guys known terrorist connections.
Obama's DOJ called the attack a wonderful opportunity to make a change. Every lib immediately tried to blame the NRA and whites and now that their hopes have dashed, they are focusing on gun control. France has strict gun control. Terrorists don't give a shit and likely prefer it when they go after those unarmed infidels.
The agenda comes first. The left would love it if tea party members or NRA members would go on shooting sprees. Instead, they are left to twist the facts when a lunatic or radical Muslims decide to kill people in gun-free zones. They think the solution is more gun-free zones and less armed victims.
No one wants a terrorist attack or any other. That is the whole point of wanting better background checks on people coming in the country. That is the point of secure borders.
What the right wants is for the left to learn from the attacks in Paris instead of having to suffer any more attacks on our soil. It happened. So Obama needs to learn from it. Radical Muslims are as worse than the random lunatic. When the Muslims attack, they come prepared and they come as a team to do more damage. They are trained and part of a larger group of killers. We need to take them more seriously before we have another 9/11.
--------------------------
"Sheryl Attkisson, host of Host of Full Measure, dropped a bombshell during an interview with Steve Salzburg in which she revealed that — according to her sources close to the White House — President Obama is in full denial mode and altogether refusing to hear about, or accept intelligence surrounding, radical Muslim terror groups.
Attkisson, the former investigative correspondent in the Washington bureau of CBS News, stated:
"I have talked to people who have worked in the Obama administration who firmly believe he has made up his mind, I would say closed his mind, they say, to the intelligence they try to bring him about various groups he does not consider terrorists even if they’re on the U.S. list of designated terrorists. I don’t know the reasoning for it I’ve only been told by those who have allegedly attempted to present him or been in the circle that has attempted to present him with certain intelligence that they said he doesn’t want it, he said he doesn’t want it or he won’t read it in some instances.""
http://www.tpnn.com/2015/11/23/white-house-sources-just-dropped-bombshell-obama-flat-refusing/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=NewVoiceNetwork&utm_content=12/02/2015&utm_campaign=manualpost
"We’re at the point where these issues have come together really like never before in law enforcement thought and in our nation’s history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity and a wonderful moment to really make significant change."
http://toprightnews.com/obamas-attorney-general-just-exposed-the-entire-liberal-agenda-with-these-two-chilling-words/
I ask that question because I know what the result would be. Conservatives certainly wouldn't 'rally 'round the president' like they would demand if a Republican was in the WH. No, they would assail Obama and blame him for the attack. So, given that belief, doesn't it seem like a terrorist attack on Americans inside of America is something that conservatives actually WANT to happen? That way, they could use the attack as a political bludgeon with which to hopefully discredit the president and propel their candidate into the presidency. As much as I hate to say it, that's the way it looks to me.
Obama has ignored warnings of Islamist threats. For that, he deserves criticism. He also hasn't learned a damn thing from all the violence in other countries. The slaughter of Christians, gay and other innocents, not to mention the Paris attacks. He doesn't seem interested in preventing it here. Instead he is in denial that there is even a threat. I am hoping it's denial rather than a lack of concern for the infidels.
He knows we can't vet refugees, yet still wants to bring in large numbers over the next few years. He refuses to discuss radical Muslims. The left won't even admit that the latest attack was likely a terrorist attack. I'm hearing workplace violence, despite the guys known terrorist connections.
Obama's DOJ called the attack a wonderful opportunity to make a change. Every lib immediately tried to blame the NRA and whites and now that their hopes have dashed, they are focusing on gun control. France has strict gun control. Terrorists don't give a shit and likely prefer it when they go after those unarmed infidels.
The agenda comes first. The left would love it if tea party members or NRA members would go on shooting sprees. Instead, they are left to twist the facts when a lunatic or radical Muslims decide to kill people in gun-free zones. They think the solution is more gun-free zones and less armed victims.
No one wants a terrorist attack or any other. That is the whole point of wanting better background checks on people coming in the country. That is the point of secure borders.
What the right wants is for the left to learn from the attacks in Paris instead of having to suffer any more attacks on our soil. It happened. So Obama needs to learn from it. Radical Muslims are as worse than the random lunatic. When the Muslims attack, they come prepared and they come as a team to do more damage. They are trained and part of a larger group of killers. We need to take them more seriously before we have another 9/11.
--------------------------
"Sheryl Attkisson, host of Host of Full Measure, dropped a bombshell during an interview with Steve Salzburg in which she revealed that — according to her sources close to the White House — President Obama is in full denial mode and altogether refusing to hear about, or accept intelligence surrounding, radical Muslim terror groups.
Attkisson, the former investigative correspondent in the Washington bureau of CBS News, stated:
"I have talked to people who have worked in the Obama administration who firmly believe he has made up his mind, I would say closed his mind, they say, to the intelligence they try to bring him about various groups he does not consider terrorists even if they’re on the U.S. list of designated terrorists. I don’t know the reasoning for it I’ve only been told by those who have allegedly attempted to present him or been in the circle that has attempted to present him with certain intelligence that they said he doesn’t want it, he said he doesn’t want it or he won’t read it in some instances.""
http://www.tpnn.com/2015/11/23/white-house-sources-just-dropped-bombshell-obama-flat-refusing/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=NewVoiceNetwork&utm_content=12/02/2015&utm_campaign=manualpost
"We’re at the point where these issues have come together really like never before in law enforcement thought and in our nation’s history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity and a wonderful moment to really make significant change."
http://toprightnews.com/obamas-attorney-general-just-exposed-the-entire-liberal-agenda-with-these-two-chilling-words/
And how exactly is it that you know Obama has ignored warnings of threats?
How does a remark about something that already happened equate to a desire for wanting harm to come to more people? You are a sick clown.We've got Con-servatives already starting threads crowing that the San Bernadino attack will help Trump win the Presidency. So, we know the OP is right.
His own people have said he ignored the intelligence on Isis for example...
Look at that fucked up logic. ... what gun law ever stopped a mass murderer?There is something seriously wrong with you Mustang, if you think a group of Americans WANT other Americans to be harmed. You don't agree with conservatives, fine. But to suggest they want a terrorist attack here in the US is just sick.
Americans sell guns to strangers. Those guns go to inner city street.
Americans knowingly harm other Americans every day.
Of course republican conservatives live in fear and many hope for terrorist attacks, it confirms their belief Armageddon and the end is near. Given our daily mass shootings brought to you by the NRA, a congress of tools, and a base of nutcase preppers, we already have enough craziness to keep them tuned to Savage, Hannity, Fox, and Limbaugh for who's to blame. Their leading candidate is a dyed in wool fascist who will sell out the base, that elects him, to corporate power, ironically even then they will cower in fear and bow and blame others. Nothing new here except the fact this insanity passes for normal in a republican party who created this Frankenstein and now tremble when the monster speaks. And you thought the tea party was crazy?
Why Fascist Is the Term That Best Describes Donald Trump
Trump lies and the fools follow: “You people are just lying. How stupid do you think we are?” Larry Wilmore delivers the epic Trump takedown the political press hasn’t managed
A few wonder at their creation: Private memo lays out how the GOP would deal with Trump as its nominee
A bit over the top but????
I don't think you know what Fascist means. It's becoming yet another word the left is overusing and losing it's bite. They've already worn out racist, bigot and homophobe.
..and conservatives contrive and propagate the lie that 'all Muslims' are 'terrorists,' and Islam a 'terrorist religion,' along with the lie that the president is somehow 'responsible.'
How does a remark about something that already happened equate to a desire for wanting harm to come to more people? You are a sick clown.We've got Con-servatives already starting threads crowing that the San Bernadino attack will help Trump win the Presidency. So, we know the OP is right.
[/QUOTE]
>>As a Jew I know what it is like to be called evil for my religion. I am not orthodox. I don't subscribe to a literal reading of the Torah. I don't support the State of Israel, but I identify with the Jewish people.<<As a Jew I know what it is like to be called evil for my religion. I am not orthodox. I don't subscribe to a literal reading of the Torah. I don't support the current leadership of Israel, but I identify with the Jewish people deeply.
I prefer to be judged on my actions, not the religion or nation or skin color into which I was born.
I think anyone engaging in terrorism - from radical Islam to homegrown gun nuts - should be tortured to death.
Before you start putting Muslims on a train and slaughtering Muslim children, you should realize that there are many peaceful Muslim nations that have no problem with the West.
The goal of ISIS is to scare and intimidate moderate Muslim nations into hating and attacking the West. The goal of the Republican Party is to convince the U.S. Population that there is no such thing as a moderate Muslim - and that we must declare war against 1.4 billion people - thus ensuring an increase in blowback/terrorism. ISIS is depending on the west to bomb civilian Muslim populations. This is how they turn moderates against the west, making it impossible for Syria and Iraq to be rebuilt without a terminal US occupation, which will bankrupt the USA as surely as the Soviets were bankrupted in Afghanistan. This is the only way they can defeat the west, by destroying any partnership with moderate Muslims.
Your hatred of all Muslims helps ISIS, because it destroys any potential partnership between moderate, non-violent Muslims and the West. Without that partnership, the West will never be able to empower moderate Muslims to isolate and expunge the radicals.
The Republicans and ISIS need to radicalize Turkey, Egypt, and Jordan. You need Dubai to be a home for Jihad, even though it is currently filled with peaceful Muslims and Christians living together.. You and ISIS need non-violent Muslim nations to became anti-western jihadists.
Without a cosmic war for civilization, the ability of ISIS and the Republican Party to achieve and hold power goes down.
I ask that question because I know what the result would be. Conservatives certainly wouldn't 'rally 'round the president' like they would demand if a Republican was in the WH. No, they would assail Obama and blame him for the attack. So, given that belief, doesn't it seem like a terrorist attack on Americans inside of America is something that conservatives actually WANT to happen? That way, they could use the attack as a political bludgeon with which to hopefully discredit the president and propel their candidate into the presidency. As much as I hate to say it, that's the way it looks to me.
