Are "Poor" Women too stupid to avoid getting pregnant?

[Ringtone]

Planned Parenthood also provides breast exams, pap testing and contraceptives.

So they don't just murder babies?

 

[DarthTrader]

Well, when a person had to bear the burden of their stupid decisions, that was possible.

Not No Mo.

It's called a social safety net...and that's on you, and me.

So when some ghetto queen goes out and gets knocked up...because she cannot think critically...guess who will be footing those bills?

Yeap.

Her children will become wage slaves to pay my gains in the market. So I really don't care.

 

[Ringtone]

So, if the stats are accurate, states that either prohibit or restrict abortion will end up with more poor families on public assistance.

Talk about a Pyrrhic victory…

Behold the psychopathy of leftist think.

 

[Jets]

Behold the psychopathy of leftist think.

Behold the reality of what will happen.

 

[DarthTrader]

Behold the reality of what will happen.

Or capital moves into states with more workers and a growing baby booming work force, housing prices rise, wages rise, etc.

You know...capitalism.

 

[Sandisk]

ALL of the current hissy-fits about RvW PRESUME that women can get pregnant, (a) by accident, (b) without their knowledge, and/or (c) without their consent. And while one can imagine bizarre examples of these three phenomena, they are extremely rare.

They also ignore the moral/ethical aspect of abortion, to wit, it is possibly the taking of an innocent human life (after viability, remove the word, "possibly").

And yet, our kids who are lucky enough to attend American public schools learn about contraception in Kindergarten, and if not then, certainly before they are capable of getting pregnant.

Must one count the ways?

Refrain from reproductive activity (which has the added benefit of being without cost),
Take The Pill,
Use a mechanical obstructor.

As a final thought, what is the point of Planned Parenthood now? Women's reproductive health? What is that if not getting fixed when you want it?

Disturbing statistic: Black women, who comprise less than 7% of the population, are the recipients of more than 40% of the abortions. Is that simply a function of poverty, or are other factors involved? Inquiring minds want to know.

1) abortion is NOT taking a human life if the fetus does not have brain activity.
Human's can NOT exist without their brains working.
This falls under the 'well duh' category.

2) what other subjects are you going to make broad judgements about that you clearly know little/nothing about?
Nuclear fusion?
Crack cocaine?
Bournemouth FC?

Inquiring minds want to know.

 

[DarthTrader]

1) abortion is NOT taking a human life if the fetus does not have brain activity.
Human's can NOT exist without their brains working.
2) what other subjects are you going to make broad judgements about that you clearly know dick about?
Nuclear fusion?
Crack cocaine?
What it feels like to give birth?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Humans can't exist without their parents existing, so why not just kill people before they get pregnant?

 

[Sandisk]

Should we punish women who are careless about contraception? Force them into 20 years of motherhood?

True.

And worse.
Force them to raise a child they do not want to raise...thus punishing the child?

 

[August West]

So they don't just murder babies?

If you know where babies are being murdered, get off your fat lazy ass and do something about it. Have you called 911?

 

[Sandisk]

The most effective mode of birth control is abstinence you know.

Unfortunately, Liberal Politicians have largely outlawed teaching it in the government schools.

The fact that the abstinence technique is very economical and doesn't cost a dime eliminates the economic motivation for teaching it.

How 1950's of you.

 

[Sandisk]

ALL of the current hissy-fits about RvW PRESUME that women can get pregnant, (a) by accident, (b) without their knowledge, and/or (c) without their consent. And while one can imagine bizarre examples of these three phenomena, they are extremely rare.

They also ignore the moral/ethical aspect of abortion, to wit, it is possibly the taking of an innocent human life (after viability, remove the word, "possibly").

And yet, our kids who are lucky enough to attend American public schools learn about contraception in Kindergarten, and if not then, certainly before they are capable of getting pregnant.

Must one count the ways?

Refrain from reproductive activity (which has the added benefit of being without cost),
Take The Pill,
Use a mechanical obstructor.

As a final thought, what is the point of Planned Parenthood now? Women's reproductive health? What is that if not getting fixed when you want it?

Disturbing statistic: Black women, who comprise less than 7% of the population, are the recipients of more than 40% of the abortions. Is that simply a function of poverty, or are other factors involved? Inquiring minds want to know.

Lucky enough?
I bet you that an American child would be better educated if he/she stayed at home and surfed the web 6 hours a day rather then attend American public schools.

 

[Vastator]

so... should it be an individual choice to kill them if they are not viable and are unwanted?

That’s your murderous argument. Not mine.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

Her children will become wage slaves to pay my gains in the market. So I really don't care.

Or welfare, foster care, and penal system resulting in a net negative lifetime.

Creating more of a draw on the social welfare system and an increase in taxation.

More than likely your property, fuel, and capital gains tax.

Since the poor always vote for increased poverty.

Abortion is a good thing, sterilization, ideal.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Humans can't exist without their parents existing, so why not just kill people before they get pregnant?

Mandatory after the second abortion.

 

[gronked]

1) abortion is NOT taking a human life if the fetus does not have brain activity.
Human's can NOT exist without their brains working.
This falls under the 'well duh' category.

2) what other subjects are you going to make broad judgements about that you clearly know little/nothing about?
Nuclear fusion?
Crack cocaine?
Bournemouth FC?

Inquiring minds want to know.

So you are saying if a person has no brain activity they are not human? you realize that argument will never win in debate right?

on a side note, why are you using latin? you do understand what the term fetus means right?

 

[gronked]

True.

And worse.
Force them to raise a child they do not want to raise...thus punishing the child?

shall we be allowed to kill "unwanted" people? or people who are not convenient?

 

[gronked]

That’s your murderous argument. Not mine.

not an argument, just posed a question? which you didnt answer by the way...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That’s your murderous argument. Not mine.

Actually, that was a question, not an argument. And you dodged it.

 

[Vastator]

not an argument, just posed a question? which you didnt answer by the way...

It’s a moot question; because that IS precisely your argument in favor of abortion. Whether in principle, or practice.

 

[LilOlLady]

The most effective mode of birth control is abstinence you know.

Unfortunately, Liberal Politicians have largely outlawed teaching it in the government schools.

The fact that the abstinence technique is very economical and doesn't cost a dime eliminates the economic motivation for teaching it.

There is 16 methods of birth control and women are too stupid to use one of them. Abortion is not health care of birthcontrol.
And this is sad.....Abortion is a routine part of reproductive health care. Approximately 25 percent of women in the U.S. will undergo an abortion before the age of 45
In the United States, the abortion rate for black women is almost five times that for white women.