Attorney General Garland appoints a special counsel in Hunter Biden probe

True.


We know what you will do about it. Probably get another whistleblower who will testify that they never heard Joe Biden talk business with any of Hunter's business associates (not illegal by the way), then you will turn right around and say that proves Joe Biden talked business with Hunter's business associates (not illegal by the way) and they say Joe Biden lied. (Not illegal by the way) just like your media masters tell you.

We've seen this show before.
Dozens of phone calls with Crackhead's "business" partners.

Dinners in DC with Crackhead's "business" partners.

Over 30 visits to the WH by Crackhead's "business" partner while Tater was VP.

Golf outings with Crackhead's "business" partners.

Every one of them just so they could hear Tater pontificate on the weather.

And you believe it. That's how stupid you are. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
That I tell the truth?

Did you not even read the Devin Archer testimony transcripts where he testified he never heard Joe Biden talk business with Hunter's business associates? ROFL.

It's amazing what how your media controls your bubble
Nope, Your ignorance of the business world. Breathtaking. Your opinion is disqualified because of this ignorance.
 
You know, you could just say “I agree that I have an excuse ready if I don’t get the result I want”. You know, since you’re only confirming EXACTLY what I said.

:rolleyes-41:
Chaotic, do you realize how stupid you sound.
We'll know early on with the way he handles this if he's sincere, or he's just a puppet.
I'm hoping he's sincere, but he didn't show that with the plea deal, it was a sham and
the judge called him and the defense on it.
Don't confuse "excuse" for the truth.
 
Some one outside of DC.
"Be specific"? Get serious. :rolleyes-41:

Weiss already tipped his hand with that plea agreement.
Just give me a name. That is all I ask.

Who and where is this impartial, non bias special council that trumpers seem to think should be chosen.

Obviously the guy Trump chose isn't good enough. Who exactly should they pick?
 
No problem.

I am not ashamed of the facts.

Why are you?
Fact is that no one, in the history of the entire world, has ever put their daddy on speaker phone in a business meeting with clients to talk about the weather. Let alone at least 20 times.

The fact that you would voluntarily regurgitate this absurd tale out you as either an ignoramus or a Bidenfluffing stooge.
 
Dozens of phone calls with Crackhead's "business" partners.

Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).

Dinners in DC with Crackhead's "business" partners.

Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).

Over 30 visits to the WH by Crackhead's "business" partner while Tater was VP.

Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



Golf outings with Crackhead's "business" partners.

Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).

Every one of them just so they could hear Tater pontificate on the weather.

That is what was stated in sworn testimony, yes.


And you believe it. That's how stupid you are. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
Your thoughts and feelings and beliefs are not evidence.
 
Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).





Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



That is what was stated in sworn testimony, yes.



Your thoughts and feelings and beliefs are not evidence.
QED
 
Fact is that no one, in the history of the entire world, has ever put their daddy on speaker phone in a business meeting with clients to talk about the weather. Let alone at least 20 times.

You have no way of knowing this but that is a meat story.

The fact that you would voluntarily regurgitate this absurd tale out you as either an ignoramus or a Bidenfluffing stooge.
My tale is based on sworn testimony.

Yours tale is based on your thoughts and feelings.
 
Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).





Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



That is what was stated in sworn testimony, yes.



Your thoughts and feelings and beliefs are not evidence.
Quote the sworn testimony they only talked about the weather, Simp.

Watch this.....
 
Chaotic, do you realize how stupid you sound.
We'll know early on with the way he handles this if he's sincere, or he's just a puppet.
I'm hoping he's sincere, but he didn't show that with the plea deal, it was a sham and
the judge called him and the defense on it.
Don't confuse "excuse" for the truth.
So you do plan to use that as an excuse. Like I said. :rolleyes-41:

You’re still agreeing with me. If you get the result you want, you’ll be satisfied. If you don’t get the result you want, you’re going to use this excuse. Whether you want to call it the “truth” instead of an excuse doesn’t change what I said. That’s just your retarded unfalsifiable opinion.
 
Last edited:
Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).





Not illegal. Never discussed business. (Which also wouldn't be illegal).



That is what was stated in sworn testimony, yes.



Your thoughts and feelings and beliefs are not evidence.
You really are that stupid.

Still waiting for that sworn testimony they only discussed the weather Catsnmeters
 
Quote the sworn testimony they only talked about the weather, Simp.

Watch this.....
Semantics is all you have when devoid of facts.

Not literally discussing the weather; meaning just every day casual conversation, in particular, not business as Devon testified too which is the actual point.
 
Semantics is all you have when devoid of facts.

Not literally discussing the weather; meaning just every day casual conversation, in particular, not business as Devon testified too which is the actual point.
You lied. Your spin isn’t gonna change that, liar.
 
That I tell the truth?

Did you not even read the Devin Archer testimony transcripts where he testified he never heard Joe Biden talk business with Hunter's business associates? ROFL.

It's amazing what how your media controls your bubble.
True to form for the far left. Splitting the already split hair! :D

All Hunter had to do, as you know, is to prove that he had the Vice President of the United States on speed dial, and/or could take you to dinner with him, and that seals the deal. What was Vice President Biden going to discuss? Whether Burisma was going to pay Hunter $80,000 a month or $90,000 a month?

As you know too, Hunter was selling access.

From bank records, which you'll pretend do not exist.
2023%2008%2009%20Bidens%2021%20Milion%20in%20bribes-X3.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top