Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So...as long as you agree with the bias, it's okay to be biased?Private schools are much more motivated to do a good job and please there customers, which are the parents.
I don't know about abolishing Public Schools, but something needs to be done, Because currently we are dumping Billions into our schools and the results were are getting are abysmal.
Bush Spent more on education that any president before him and still test scores went down. I always learned you do not just keep throwing good money after bad.
I also have a problem as a conservative with 2 kids just starting school. Because I can already see the Liberal Biases of teachers and my kids are not even out of elementary school yet. Ill be damned if I will send my kids to a Public school and pay taxes for it, so the teachers can have 8 hours a day to fill their heads with Liberal Propaganda and revisionist history. So I am seriously looking into private schools at the moment and hoping I can qualify for a voucher from the state
Ooohhhh...That 'splains it.Hit ya a little too close to the mark, did I?
Nice syntax and spelling, BTW...Them gubmint skools really did a grate job, huh?
Actually, public schools teach correct syntax and spelling. But those who refuse to learn...refuse to study...refuse to do homework.....well.......
Ooohhhh...That 'splains it.Actually, public schools teach correct syntax and spelling. But those who refuse to learn...refuse to study...refuse to do homework.....well.......
Do you have a better explanation when you have 32 students to a class and at least half get the lesson but the other half does not....same lesson taught...
Wow...That really did go over your head, in favor of your disparaging doom-and-gloom strawman, didn't it?If by "how the market works" you mean cheap, shoddy, second rate and imported from China, and that's how you expect the next generation to be educated, I'm wondering why?
All three compete for the same general clientele and offer differing products at competitive prices.
Nobody forces me, as a Target shopper, to pay for products on Wal-Mart's shelves. Also, as it turns out, Wal-Mart stores have bigger auto parts departments and cheaper crummier clothing. So, I may go to the one for auto stuff and the other for clothes.
Got any gloomy Gus cold water to throw on that basic proven economic dynamic?
another lefty who hates free speech
I hold all hate and fear mongers in very high disdain.
name 10 such talking heads ....
Wow...That really did go over your head, in favor of your disparaging doom-and-gloom strawman, didn't it?If by "how the market works" you mean cheap, shoddy, second rate and imported from China, and that's how you expect the next generation to be educated, I'm wondering why?
All three compete for the same general clientele and offer differing products at competitive prices.
Nobody forces me, as a Target shopper, to pay for products on Wal-Mart's shelves. Also, as it turns out, Wal-Mart stores have bigger auto parts departments and cheaper crummier clothing. So, I may go to the one for auto stuff and the other for clothes.
Got any gloomy Gus cold water to throw on that basic proven economic dynamic?
Since you are once again going off on your deluded economics, I will issue you this challenge once more. Let's hope you don't go runnning to your mommy like the last time I challenged you
Name one nation that became prosperous because of an economic policy of:
1) Little to no income taxes
2) Little to no business regulation
3) Little to no govt involvement in the economy
I gauarntee the Dude will fold
Wow...That really did go over your head, in favor of your disparaging doom-and-gloom strawman, didn't it?
All three compete for the same general clientele and offer differing products at competitive prices.
Nobody forces me, as a Target shopper, to pay for products on Wal-Mart's shelves. Also, as it turns out, Wal-Mart stores have bigger auto parts departments and cheaper crummier clothing. So, I may go to the one for auto stuff and the other for clothes.
Got any gloomy Gus cold water to throw on that basic proven economic dynamic?
Since you are once again going off on your deluded economics, I will issue you this challenge once more. Let's hope you don't go runnning to your mommy like the last time I challenged you
Name one nation that became prosperous because of an economic policy of:
1) Little to no income taxes
2) Little to no business regulation
3) Little to no govt involvement in the economy
I gauarntee the Dude will fold
Kuwait
Since you are once again going off on your deluded economics, I will issue you this challenge once more. Let's hope you don't go runnning to your mommy like the last time I challenged you
Name one nation that became prosperous because of an economic policy of:
1) Little to no income taxes
2) Little to no business regulation
3) Little to no govt involvement in the economy
I gauarntee the Dude will fold
Kuwait
Kuwait fails on #2 and #3
They got rich because they have a lot of oil, and they aligned themselves with the US; not because of a rightwing eco policy
Nice try though. I have to commend you for not going overboard for once
I was thinking it 'splained the horrible spelling and syntax of someone who claims to be an MBA.Ooohhhh...That 'splains it.Actually, public schools teach correct syntax and spelling. But those who refuse to learn...refuse to study...refuse to do homework.....well.......
Do you have a better explanation when you have 32 students to a class and at least half get the lesson but the other half does not....same lesson taught...
Kuwait
Kuwait fails on #2 and #3
They got rich because they have a lot of oil, and they aligned themselves with the US; not because of a rightwing eco policy
Nice try though. I have to commend you for not going overboard for once
Your 3 conditions say nothing of right wing policy.
1) Kuwait has no income tax - although they are talking of instituting a modest one
2) They are rated as the 2nd least restrictive government in the middle east and are actually ranked AHEAD of the US in that regard
3) The oil fields are privately owned, although each citizen DOES receive a share of the profits.
America, from 1786 until about the time of WWI....What's your fool guarantee worth?Wow...That really did go over your head, in favor of your disparaging doom-and-gloom strawman, didn't it?If by "how the market works" you mean cheap, shoddy, second rate and imported from China, and that's how you expect the next generation to be educated, I'm wondering why?
All three compete for the same general clientele and offer differing products at competitive prices.
Nobody forces me, as a Target shopper, to pay for products on Wal-Mart's shelves. Also, as it turns out, Wal-Mart stores have bigger auto parts departments and cheaper crummier clothing. So, I may go to the one for auto stuff and the other for clothes.
Got any gloomy Gus cold water to throw on that basic proven economic dynamic?
Since you are once again going off on your deluded economics, I will issue you this challenge once more. Let's hope you don't go runnning to your mommy like the last time I challenged you
Name one nation that became prosperous because of an economic policy of:
1) Little to no income taxes
2) Little to no business regulation
3) Little to no govt involvement in the economy
I gauarntee the Dude will fold
How do you know that?Wow...That really did go over your head, in favor of your disparaging doom-and-gloom strawman, didn't it?If by "how the market works" you mean cheap, shoddy, second rate and imported from China, and that's how you expect the next generation to be educated, I'm wondering why?
All three compete for the same general clientele and offer differing products at competitive prices.
Nobody forces me, as a Target shopper, to pay for products on Wal-Mart's shelves. Also, as it turns out, Wal-Mart stores have bigger auto parts departments and cheaper crummier clothing. So, I may go to the one for auto stuff and the other for clothes.
Got any gloomy Gus cold water to throw on that basic proven economic dynamic?
I do know that rural and small towns are not going to be served by market based education. The smaller the market, the fewer the opportunities. And with fewer opportunities comes shoddier workmanship. With public education, those small 'markets' are served with the economic power of the larger market (the state and federal funding).
So...as long as you agree with the bias, it's okay to be biased?Private schools are much more motivated to do a good job and please there customers, which are the parents.
I don't know about abolishing Public Schools, but something needs to be done, Because currently we are dumping Billions into our schools and the results were are getting are abysmal.
Bush Spent more on education that any president before him and still test scores went down. I always learned you do not just keep throwing good money after bad.
I also have a problem as a conservative with 2 kids just starting school. Because I can already see the Liberal Biases of teachers and my kids are not even out of elementary school yet. Ill be damned if I will send my kids to a Public school and pay taxes for it, so the teachers can have 8 hours a day to fill their heads with Liberal Propaganda and revisionist history. So I am seriously looking into private schools at the moment and hoping I can qualify for a voucher from the state
there's a Christian school here in town. I'd sooner send my children to West Virginia for and education before i let the "Christians" teach them that mankind was placed on earth like a potted plant!
America, from 1786 until about the time of WWI....What's your fool guarantee worth?Wow...That really did go over your head, in favor of your disparaging doom-and-gloom strawman, didn't it?
All three compete for the same general clientele and offer differing products at competitive prices.
Nobody forces me, as a Target shopper, to pay for products on Wal-Mart's shelves. Also, as it turns out, Wal-Mart stores have bigger auto parts departments and cheaper crummier clothing. So, I may go to the one for auto stuff and the other for clothes.
Got any gloomy Gus cold water to throw on that basic proven economic dynamic?
Since you are once again going off on your deluded economics, I will issue you this challenge once more. Let's hope you don't go runnning to your mommy like the last time I challenged you
Name one nation that became prosperous because of an economic policy of:
1) Little to no income taxes
2) Little to no business regulation
3) Little to no govt involvement in the economy
I gauarntee the Dude will fold
BTW, what does any of that have to do with privatizing education?
Toro already told you that you're wrong about that, complete with charts which showed you wrong.
You're still wrong, to go with your rank economic ignorance.
Gonna go for the trifecta?