Bernie Sanders

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

They would be hard working and not prosperous after paying for all of the items on Bernie's wish list!

Similar pessimism was expressed in anticipation of FDR's Presidency. What was not expected was the successful effect of the forthcoming 97% tax rate on the super-rich which facilitated the WPA and CCC make-work programs, which redistributed the Nation's wealth resource, which in turn gave rise to the thousands of new businesses and industries in response to the revitalized consumer demands. It resulted in the most prosperous decades in American history -- the late '40s to the early '80s.

If Sanders does the same thing and puts the unemployed to work rebuilding the Infrastructure we will see the end of wealth stagnation and a revitalization of the Middle Class.

FDR did it. So did Eisenhower. Sanders can do it, too.

Oh, my God! Another socialist that failed ECON 101 and American history also!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I like Bernie simply because he seems honest and cares about people.

That is what drives his agenda.

Hillary only cares about Hillary.

 

[Arianrhod]

They would be hard working and not prosperous after paying for all of the items on Bernie's wish list!

Similar pessimism was expressed in anticipation of FDR's Presidency. What was not expected was the successful effect of the forthcoming 97% tax rate on the super-rich which facilitated the WPA and CCC make-work programs, which redistributed the Nation's wealth resource, which in turn gave rise to the thousands of new businesses and industries in response to the revitalized consumer demands. It resulted in the most prosperous decades in American history -- the late '40s to the early '80s.

If Sanders does the same thing and puts the unemployed to work rebuilding the Infrastructure we will see the end of wealth stagnation and a revitalization of the Middle Class.

FDR did it. So did Eisenhower. Sanders can do it, too.

Oh, my God! Another socialist that failed ECON 101 and American history also!

Explain how he's wrong.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Sorry to hear you're so gullible, career politicians seem to have this effect on progressives. Socialism suits the weak minded very well...

Social Security is socialism. So is Medicare. So is the 40-hour work week, paid vacation and many other worker benefits. If you enjoy the living standard which is typical of the Middle Class -- you are enjoying the benefits and protections of socialism.

It's sad you don't know it.

Did you know that some people work less than 40 hours and get paid well...not because of government.

Did you know that some people get vacation...not because of of government.

Did you know that some people get other benefits like bonuses...not because of government.

Capitalism is a great thing.

If you want good employees...treat them right.

The only issue is that then everyone thinks they should have it.

The the far left shows up and uses government to ruin it for everyone.

 

[Rustic]

Sorry to hear you're so gullible, career politicians seem to have this effect on progressives. Socialism suits the weak minded very well...

Social Security is socialism. So is Medicare. So is the 40-hour work week, paid vacation and many other worker benefits. If you enjoy the living standard which is typical of the Middle Class -- you are enjoying the benefits and protections of socialism.

It's sad you don't know it.

I own three businesses, socialism has nothing to do with it.
Socialism is living off someone else's dime, the dimes will run out.

 

[Rustic]

They would be hard working and not prosperous after paying for all of the items on Bernie's wish list!

Similar pessimism was expressed in anticipation of FDR's Presidency. What was not expected was the successful effect of the forthcoming 97% tax rate on the super-rich which facilitated the WPA and CCC make-work programs, which redistributed the Nation's wealth resource, which in turn gave rise to the thousands of new businesses and industries in response to the revitalized consumer demands. It resulted in the most prosperous decades in American history -- the late '40s to the early '80s.

If Sanders does the same thing and puts the unemployed to work rebuilding the Infrastructure we will see the end of wealth stagnation and a revitalization of the Middle Class.

FDR did it. So did Eisenhower. Sanders can do it, too.

Taking someone else's money is cowardly at best, thieves have no spine.

 

[Conservative65]

They would be hard working and not prosperous after paying for all of the items on Bernie's wish list!

Similar pessimism was expressed in anticipation of FDR's Presidency. What was not expected was the successful effect of the forthcoming 97% tax rate on the super-rich which facilitated the WPA and CCC make-work programs, which redistributed the Nation's wealth resource, which in turn gave rise to the thousands of new businesses and industries in response to the revitalized consumer demands. It resulted in the most prosperous decades in American history -- the late '40s to the early '80s.

If Sanders does the same thing and puts the unemployed to work rebuilding the Infrastructure we will see the end of wealth stagnation and a revitalization of the Middle Class.

FDR did it. So did Eisenhower. Sanders can do it, too.

Oh, my God! Another socialist that failed ECON 101 and American history also!

Explain how he's wrong.

FDR's programs weren't what helped the economy. That you think they did is just more proof you're an idiot.

 

[Conservative65]

I like Bernie simply because he seems honest and cares about people.

That is what drives his agenda.

Hillary only cares about Hillary.

If Bernie cared about people, he'd pay for that "free college" he proposes with his own money instead of proposing others be forced to do it. Same applies to all the bleeding hearts who say they care about people eating, having healthcare, etc. then go about supporting the government funding it by taking from those the bleeding hearts think have too much.

 

[Conservative65]

Sorry to hear you're so gullible, career politicians seem to have this effect on progressives. Socialism suits the weak minded very well...

Social Security is socialism. So is Medicare. So is the 40-hour work week, paid vacation and many other worker benefits. If you enjoy the living standard which is typical of the Middle Class -- you are enjoying the benefits and protections of socialism.

It's sad you don't know it.

Paid vacation and other benefits aren't socialism. No one has something taken from them so another person can get more of those things.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I strongly disapprove of Bernie Sanders' position on guns and I'm opposed to some of his standard Liberal positions, but I am vigorously supporting him because I believe his promise to push for wealth distribution is critically important to survival of the middle class. He is the only candidate with such radically positive intentions.

A Bernie Sanders Presidency will shatter the status quo we've been living with for the past few decades. If the trend isn't reversed we are heading for plutocratic rule. The indications are clear but too few Americans realize what they mean and how serious they are.

All of the Conservative candidates and some of the Liberals, such as Obama was, are in service to Wall Street and the bankers, which is a major problem. Sanders is the only candidate who stands in opposition to those influences.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I like Bernie simply because he seems honest and cares about people.

That is what drives his agenda.

Hillary only cares about Hillary.

If Bernie cared about people, he'd pay for that "free college" he proposes with his own money instead of proposing others be forced to do it. Same applies to all the bleeding hearts who say they care about people eating, having healthcare, etc. then go about supporting the government funding it by taking from those the bleeding hearts think have too much.

You need to separate the two.

Bernie clearly believes (and is somewhat right) that we have the resources to allow more to attend college. He believes this will improve their standard of living. In that sense, he cares. I like that he cares.

He is wrong in thinking it will improve the standard of living. You can go to college if you want to. The problem is that the very government that he wants to use to put people in college will render their education worthless.

He does not understand that.

But he still cares.

 

[Conservative65]

I strongly disapprove of Bernie Sanders' position on guns and I'm opposed to some of his standard Liberal positions, but I am vigorously supporting him because I believe his promise to push for wealth distribution is critically important to survival of the middle class. He is the only candidate with such radically positive intentions.

A Bernie Sanders Presidency will shatter the status quo we've been living with for the past few decades. If the trend isn't reversed we are heading for plutocratic rule. The indications are clear but too few Americans realize what they mean and how serious they are.

All of the Conservative candidates and some of the Liberals, such as Obama was, are in service to Wall Street and the bankers, which is a major problem. Sanders is the only candidate who stands in opposition to those influences.

He's one of Barbara Walters ten most interesting people. Trump too.

I bet not one of the real Republicans makes her list.

The old nutsack is a nobody...

Says the nobody who's obsessed with genitalia. Two posts up you called him a "loopy kunt." That's what your side considers "in-depth political analysis," isn't it?

Says the one who supports Hillary solely because of her genitalia.

 

[Conservative65]

I like Bernie simply because he seems honest and cares about people.

That is what drives his agenda.

Hillary only cares about Hillary.

If Bernie cared about people, he'd pay for that "free college" he proposes with his own money instead of proposing others be forced to do it. Same applies to all the bleeding hearts who say they care about people eating, having healthcare, etc. then go about supporting the government funding it by taking from those the bleeding hearts think have too much.

You need to separate the two.

Bernie clearly believes (and is somewhat right) that we have the resources to allow more to attend college. He believes this will improve their standard of living. In that sense, he cares. I like that he cares.

He is wrong in thinking it will improve the standard of living. You can go to college if you want to. The problem is that the very government that he wants to use to put people in college will render their education worthless.

He does not understand that.

But he still cares.

The two can't be separated. When it comes to causes for which I care, I put my money where my mouth is. I don't demand you or anyone else be forced to fund something because I care about.

Bernie can't say he cares then go about funding it by forcing others to do it. That's not caring. That's pandering.

You say that because he believes it will improve the standard of living, he cares then disagree that it will do what you say he cares about.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I strongly disapprove of Bernie Sanders' position on guns and I'm opposed to some of his standard Liberal positions, but I am vigorously supporting him because I believe his promise to push for wealth distribution is critically important to survival of the middle class. He is the only candidate with such radically positive intentions.

A Bernie Sanders Presidency will shatter the status quo we've been living with for the past few decades. If the trend isn't reversed we are heading for plutocratic rule. The indications are clear but too few Americans realize what they mean and how serious they are.

All of the Conservative candidates and some of the Liberals, such as Obama was, are in service to Wall Street and the bankers, which is a major problem. Sanders is the only candidate who stands in opposition to those influences.

I strongly disapprove of Bernie Sanders' position on guns and I'm opposed to some of his standard Liberal positions, but I am vigorously supporting him because I believe his promise to push for wealth distribution is critically important to survival of the middle class. He is the only candidate with such radically positive intentions.

A Bernie Sanders Presidency will shatter the status quo we've been living with for the past few decades. If the trend isn't reversed we are heading for plutocratic rule. The indications are clear but too few Americans realize what they mean and how serious they are.

All of the Conservative candidates and some of the Liberals, such as Obama was, are in service to Wall Street and the bankers, which is a major problem. Sanders is the only candidate who stands in opposition to those influences.

Bernie is a Senator. Why has he never even submitted a bill to promote your utopia wealth redistribution system? As President he can only sign laws, he cannot create them without Congress first saying lets do this.

Your boy Bernie is just blowing hot air up your skirt and you fell for the bullshit. I bet you believed Obamas lies too and voted for him twice.

 

[Iceweasel]

They would be hard working and not prosperous after paying for all of the items on Bernie's wish list!

Similar pessimism was expressed in anticipation of FDR's Presidency. What was not expected was the successful effect of the forthcoming 97% tax rate on the super-rich which facilitated the WPA and CCC make-work programs, which redistributed the Nation's wealth resource, which in turn gave rise to the thousands of new businesses and industries in response to the revitalized consumer demands. It resulted in the most prosperous decades in American history -- the late '40s to the early '80s.

If Sanders does the same thing and puts the unemployed to work rebuilding the Infrastructure we will see the end of wealth stagnation and a revitalization of the Middle Class.

FDR did it. So did Eisenhower. Sanders can do it, too.

You're full of it. No one with that kind of money paid the 97% tax. They could afford the financial people to avoid it in many ways. When Reagan lowered the punitive tax rate and closed loopholes, tax collection went up, not down. Socialists live in a world of delusion.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I like Bernie simply because he seems honest and cares about people.

That is what drives his agenda.

Hillary only cares about Hillary.

Lousy criteria. Hitler cared about the German people, didn't make him a good leader though.

 

[Conservative65]

I strongly disapprove of Bernie Sanders' position on guns and I'm opposed to some of his standard Liberal positions, but I am vigorously supporting him because I believe his promise to push for wealth distribution is critically important to survival of the middle class. He is the only candidate with such radically positive intentions.

A Bernie Sanders Presidency will shatter the status quo we've been living with for the past few decades. If the trend isn't reversed we are heading for plutocratic rule. The indications are clear but too few Americans realize what they mean and how serious they are.

All of the Conservative candidates and some of the Liberals, such as Obama was, are in service to Wall Street and the bankers, which is a major problem. Sanders is the only candidate who stands in opposition to those influences.

In other words, you believe something that belongs to one person should forcibly be taken so it can be given to someone that didn't earn it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I like Bernie simply because he seems honest and cares about people.

That is what drives his agenda.

Hillary only cares about Hillary.

Lousy criteria. Hitler cared about the German people, didn't make him a good leader though.

Being honest is a lousy criteria ?

Seriously ?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I like Bernie simply because he seems honest and cares about people.

That is what drives his agenda.

Hillary only cares about Hillary.

If Bernie cared about people, he'd pay for that "free college" he proposes with his own money instead of proposing others be forced to do it. Same applies to all the bleeding hearts who say they care about people eating, having healthcare, etc. then go about supporting the government funding it by taking from those the bleeding hearts think have too much.

You need to separate the two.

Bernie clearly believes (and is somewhat right) that we have the resources to allow more to attend college. He believes this will improve their standard of living. In that sense, he cares. I like that he cares.

He is wrong in thinking it will improve the standard of living. You can go to college if you want to. The problem is that the very government that he wants to use to put people in college will render their education worthless.

He does not understand that.

But he still cares.

The two can't be separated. When it comes to causes for which I care, I put my money where my mouth is. I don't demand you or anyone else be forced to fund something because I care about.

Bernie can't say he cares then go about funding it by forcing others to do it. That's not caring. That's pandering.

You say that because he believes it will improve the standard of living, he cares then disagree that it will do what you say he cares about.

Yes, I did.

Right now, everyone I see in the national spotlight appears to care about themselves more than others.

I am ideologically at odds with Sanders on a lot of issues.

But at least he talks about them in terms of the human condition. I think he promotes dialogue.

Donald Trump is an asshole. He could be right on every issue but really cares less about process. He's the king.

Screw him. I'd probably vote for HIllary first.

 

[Conservative65]

I like Bernie simply because he seems honest and cares about people.

That is what drives his agenda.

Hillary only cares about Hillary.

If Bernie cared about people, he'd pay for that "free college" he proposes with his own money instead of proposing others be forced to do it. Same applies to all the bleeding hearts who say they care about people eating, having healthcare, etc. then go about supporting the government funding it by taking from those the bleeding hearts think have too much.

You need to separate the two.

Bernie clearly believes (and is somewhat right) that we have the resources to allow more to attend college. He believes this will improve their standard of living. In that sense, he cares. I like that he cares.

He is wrong in thinking it will improve the standard of living. You can go to college if you want to. The problem is that the very government that he wants to use to put people in college will render their education worthless.

He does not understand that.

But he still cares.

The two can't be separated. When it comes to causes for which I care, I put my money where my mouth is. I don't demand you or anyone else be forced to fund something because I care about.

Bernie can't say he cares then go about funding it by forcing others to do it. That's not caring. That's pandering.

You say that because he believes it will improve the standard of living, he cares then disagree that it will do what you say he cares about.

Yes, I did.

Right now, everyone I see in the national spotlight appears to care about themselves more than others.

I am ideologically at odds with Sanders on a lot of issues.

But at least he talks about them in terms of the human condition. I think he promotes dialogue.

Donald Trump is an asshole. He could be right on every issue but really cares less about process. He's the king.

Screw him. I'd probably vote for HIllary first.

Sanders talks about the human condition with one focus and that is seeing how much he can pander to others with using someone else's money. He promotes socialism.

While I haven't decided on my vote, I would rather have someone that I thought was right even if he was an asshole. You, on the other hand, would support someone you say you're at odds with on many issues because you don't like the way the person says it.