Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every single democrat did. Why didnt the FBI correct your lies YEARS ago? Why does it require the GOP to become fucking investigators in order to prove its real? These are Congressmen for Christ sake, not detectives. Thats the FBIs fucking job.The FBI never said it was disinformation.
I am nor wrong every time!If you think he is guilty, then he obviously isnt. You are wrong every single time.
No he was not. He was indicted like two weeks ago you fool.He was charged in November 2022.
The DoJ doesn’t prosecute people for fun. They convict over 90% of everyone they charge. So just playing the odds, he’s probably guilty.
But moreover, people who flee justice seem like they’re guilty to me. Call me crazy.
It’s not the FBI’s job to correct people.Every single democrat did. Why didnt the FBI correct your lies YEARS ago? Why does it require the GOP to become fucking investigators in order to prove its real? These are Congressmen for Christ sake, not detectives. Thats the FBIs fucking job.
A bunch of evidence that led to prosecution of Trump? Oh yeah, that didn't happen because of lack of evidence.Unlike the DJT trials, which has a bunch of evidence, the Bidens have none.
Youre an idiot. I dont even know what to say to this ^ drivel.It’s not the FBI’s job to correct people.
There are tons of forensic specialists who could have confirmed the laptop. Legitimate media organizations wanted to use them to investigate but Rudy wouldn’t let anyone see the data. He gave it to the NY Post who were either too stupid or lazy to get that done.
So everyone had to wonder if it was real or not because no one was allowed to investigate further.
Blame Rudy.
Your right wing media does you a tremendous disservice.No he was not. He was indicted like two weeks ago you fool.
It’s accurate.Youre an idiot. I dont even know what to say to this ^ drivel.
It’s accurate.
The Washington Post finally got a copy and did the actual forensic work on it but by that time it had been passed around so much a lot of the data was corrupted.
Your article isnt to be believed. Here is the New York Times from a couple weeks ago.Your right wing media does you a tremendous disservice.
He was indicted November 1, 2022 according to the docket. He was arrested in Cyprus February 2023 but was let out on bail while awaiting extradition. That’s when he disappeared and is now a fugitive.
The Wild Story Of Gal Luft, James Comer’s ‘Missing,’ Now-Indicted Hunter Biden Witness
We now know more about why a key witness in the House GOP's sordid tale of an investigation has supposedly gone "missing." He was on the lam after having been indicted way back in November — even…talkingpointsmemo.com
“Per the docket, unsealed on Tuesday, the indictment came down on Nov. 1, 2022. That’s eight months before the DOJ made it public, and three months before Luft himself first loudly alleged that he was the victim of a Biden political persecution.”
The argument from left went from it's not Hunter's laptop to it was Russian disinformation to the data was corrupted. You guys are twisting yourself into pretzels to prove Biden's innocence.It’s accurate.
The Washington Post finally got a copy and did the actual forensic work on it but by that time it had been passed around so much a lot of the data was corrupted.
You guys really can’t tell the difference between who is credible and who is just telling you what you want to hear.Well it's Washington Compost....it has to be reliable... to left loons.
Anyone else rolls their eyes
Yes, it's true. No one has come forward.That's no longer true
There's just too much out there to be ignored.
The explosive new evidence of Biden family's breathtaking corruption
The explosive new evidence of Biden family's breathtaking corruption
The sheer magnitude of Biden family corruption uncovered by the House Oversight Committee is deeply alarming.www.foxnews.com
You'd have to be a moron to not think the original story was a little fishy. I man, c'mon, the computer shop repairman was legally blind and couldn't even say if it was Hunter Biden who gave it to him. That's just so convenient. It was obviously fishy to the point that one of the main authors of the story took their name off the article. Combine that with everything we know about how Russians operate, everyone is right to be suspicious.The argument from left went from it's not Hunter's laptop to it was Russian disinformation to the data was corrupted. You guys are twisting yourself into pretzels to prove Biden's innocence.
You really need to read your own articles. From the Washington Post:Your article isnt to be believed. Here is the New York Times from a couple weeks ago.
The G.O.P. Backed Him on Hunter Biden Claims. Now He Has Been Indicted.
Gal Luft, promoted by House Republicans as possessing evidence of corruption by the Biden family, was charged by federal prosecutors with lobbying and sanctions violations and with brokering arms deals with China and Iran.www.nytimes.com
Here is the Washington Post...
You really need to read your own articles. From the Washington Post:
"The timeline is important. It appears, both from comments by Luft in the video reported by the New York Post and in looking at court records, the indictment was handed down last fall. (Update: It occurred on Nov. 1, as Luft indicated in the video reported by the New York Post.)"
The indictment was unsealed a few weeks ago but it was filed in November 2022. You're embarassing yourself.
So why was it sealed until the day after he made a video detailing the bribery scheme? This news hurts your case, it doesnt help.You really need to read your own articles. From the Washington Post:
"The timeline is important. It appears, both from comments by Luft in the video reported by the New York Post and in looking at court records, the indictment was handed down last fall. (Update: It occurred on Nov. 1, as Luft indicated in the video reported by the New York Post.)"
The indictment was unsealed a few weeks ago but it was filed in November 2022. You're embarassing yourself.
Yes, it's true. No one has come forward.
Maybe Ruby didn't turn it in because he didn't trust the FBI and for good reason.You'd have to be a moron to not think the original story was a little fishy. I man, c'mon, the computer shop repairman was legally blind and couldn't even say if it was Hunter Biden who gave it to him. That's just so convenient. It was obviously fishy to the point that one of the main authors of the story took their name off the article. Combine that with everything we know about how Russians operate, everyone is right to be suspicious.
That could have been avoided if Rudy had just given the drive to other people to examine properly but he didn't do that. I don't really know why, but he has indicated he didn't really want other people looking at it before the election, maybe because he wanted to control the narrative. That backfired.
Truth be told, there wasn't all that much incriminating information on the laptop. It's been years and we have yet to see any real smoking guns.
