Biden Regime defying court order to reinstate "Stay In Mexico Policy".

[Moonglow]

And their actions have been ruled unconstitutional.

No they have not since the act of changing a policy is not unconstitutional.

 

[Nostra]

The borders are secure as far as they can be...Just as with any president through history.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Evidently the media called Biden out this time.. Sorry that your canned response is wrong.

Where is that link? We would LOVE To see it

 

[buckeye45_73]

No they have not since the act of changing a policy is not unconstitutional.

IT is when judges rule you have to run the existing policy.........

U.S. appeals judge's order reviving Trump 'remain in Mexico' program

The administration of U.S. President Joe Biden on Monday appealed a federal judge's order to reinstate a controversial immigration program that forced tens of thousands of migrants to wait in Mexico for the resolution of their U.S. asylum cases.

www.reuters.com

 

[Faun]

Excuse me, he was not convicted and removed from office. The fact that they issued the articles of impeachment is meaningless if the senate refuses to convict. This is even more markedly true in Trump's case considering there was no actual question about the phone call itself. That was in record.

In fact, it is worse IMHO. It sets precedent.

No, it's not meaningless. It's a political maneuver and it goes down in the history books. It's certainly a blemish on a presidents' legacy, even if not convicted. In Trump's case, it will be taught in schools how he was impeached for soliciting campaign help from a foreign national. Had ne never been impeached, that would have been forgotten.

 

[Nostra]

No, it's not meaningless. It's a political maneuver and it goes down in the history books. It's certainly a blemish on a presidents' legacy, even if not convicted. In Trump's case, it will be taught in schools how he was impeached for soliciting campaign help from a foreign national. Had ne never been impeached, that would have been forgotten.

It will be taught as an abuse of power by Nazi Piglosi.

 

[Faun]

It will be taught as an abuse of power by Nazi Piglosi.

LOLOL

Sure, numbnuts.

 

[Nostra]

LOLOL

Sure, numbnuts.

Massive failure both times. Not a single crime was charged.

Blatant abuse of power.

 

[FA_Q2]

No, it's not meaningless. It's a political maneuver and it goes down in the history books. It's certainly a blemish on a presidents' legacy, even if not convicted. In Trump's case, it will be taught in schools how he was impeached for soliciting campaign help from a foreign national. Had ne never been impeached, that would have been forgotten.

No, it really will not.

None of my children were alive for Bill Clinton and none of them have any idea he was impeached let alone why.

 

[Faun]

No, it really will not.

None of my children were alive for Bill Clinton and none of them have any idea he was impeached let alone why.

It's already taught in schools. Though at some levels, the more salacious aspects are left out, but the reasons for being impeached remain. Just as it was for Johnson and just as it was for Nixon, even though he resigned to avoid being impeached. It will be the same for Trump.

History Textbooks Assess Clinton

Impeachment Scandal In Schoolbooks On Bill Clinton's Presidency

www.cbsnews.com

And again, if not for the impeachment, his less than "perfect" phone call would have been forgotten.

 

[excalibur]

Brush Up on Your Voodoo!

www.takimag.com

 

[Uncensored2008]

The Constitution has nothing in it about a "Stay in Mexico" policy that is an addendum to the federal immigration laws.

No, but it has a great deal to say about separation of powers and the role of the judiciary.

By defying the courts, Xi's puppet is violating the the Constitution and guilty of treason.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The borders are secure as far as they can be...Just as with any president through history.

The borders are as wide open as they can be. As they have never been before under any president in history. Xi's man is ushering in a foreign invasion.

 

[Uncensored2008]

No they have not since the act of changing a policy is not unconstitutional.

Defying a court order by the executive branch is unconstitutional, though.

Xi's man is shitting all over our Constitution, to loud applause by you treasonous fascists.

 

[Care4all]

Biden apparently thinks he is a dictator and doesn't need to follow the Constitution and court orders.

Biden administration trying again to end 'Remain in Mexico' policy

The Biden administration is still trying to end the Trump-era 'Remain in Mexico' policy for migrants, despite a court ordering it to re-up the program.

www.foxnews.com

The White House appealed the federal court's injunction, and DHS says that with its forthcoming new memo, the agency "intends to address the concerns raised by the courts with respect to the prior memorandum."

The agency says it has been following the federal judge's orders and "has been working in good faith to restart MPP."

 

[Uncensored2008]

The White House appealed the federal court's injunction, and DHS says that with its forthcoming new memo, the agency "intends to address the concerns raised by the courts with respect to the prior memorandum."

The agency says it has been following the federal judge's orders and "has been working in good faith to restart MPP."

And Bubba is working in good faith to keep Daisy Mae from running into more doorknobs and falling down....

Dictator Biden is in violation of the United States Constitution - an act of treason. He has openly and flagrantly defied the rulings of the courts on dozens of occasions. This is just the latest.

 

[j-mac]

The Biden admin is trying to get rid of the policy.

Why?

 

[Care4all]

Why?

Because the Mexican camps holding them for us until their court dates ....are overflowing and have become overwhelming for the Mexican gvt. And inhumane for the asylum seekers, is my best guess.

 

[Nostra]

Because the Mexican camps holding them for us until their court dates ....are overflowing and have become overwhelming for the Mexican gvt. And inhumane for the asylum seekers, is my best guess.

That would be Mexico's problem.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Huh? The last guy WAS impeached for abusing the power of his office. How the fuck did you miss that??

What abuse? You are so full of shit.....Biden did worse.....got his son hooked up with some fat contracts and threatened the guy investigating to drop them or else.....that is ABUSE......Trump asked for dirt.....I know the Puritan democrats never do that.......but if asking for dirt by a politician is a crime and impeachable.....we can get rid of the entire Democrat Party as they did nothing for 4 years but look for dirt on Trump............fucking hypocrite.