Bishop Asks Supreme Court to Recognize Personhood of the Unborn.

[task0778]

When the Supreme Court issued their ruling on Dobbs, they basically overturned Roe v Wade and threw the issue back to the states to determine what their abortion laws should be via the legislative process, which is answerable to the electorate. If the voters in a state are not satisfied with their state laws on the subject, they can vote in other people who can change it, and that is as it should be. We do not need 9 unelected people deciding such contentious issues, especially since there is nothing in the Constitution or federal law for them to base such a decision to ban all abortions.

The bishop can request whatever he wants, but he ain't going to get this, not with this Court.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The cry if those with nothing relevant to add.

"The cry if those with nothing relevant to add."

 

[busybee01]

Bishop Asks Supreme Court to Recognize Personhood of the Unborn.

Bishop Pfeifer asks Supreme Court to recognize ‘personhood’ of the unborn

U.S. Supreme Court building / Steven Frame/Shutterstock Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Sep 26, 2022 / 12:45 pm (CNA). An emeritus Texas bishop is asking the Supreme Court to explicitly affirm the personhood of the unborn child in the womb.“While th...

www.catholicworldreport.com

“Affirming the fetal personhood is totally in accord with medical science, which over and over in recent years recognizes that there is a new human being in the act of conception — which has always been our biblical belief,” he wrote. “Hence as we move into the future after Roe v. Wade, governments and courts at a national and state level must respect and protect the tiny unborn person made in God’s very image and must never be deprived of life and liberty.”

This is the path we need to take to get abortion banned nationwide. And we have the Supreme Court in place to do it. We have to strike while the iron is hot. This will put an end to the debate, and then we'll see approval of this hideous procedure drop year after year. We'll find the suitable case to present to the court, and hopefully get this ruling. What a happy day it will be when it is decided ALL children's lives matter.

There is no medical science to this. This is religious fascism at the point of a gun.

 

[busybee01]

Based on what in our Constitution? What part in there can be used as a basis for that decision? It's the same deal as abortion, it ain't in there so the SCOTUS cannot rule either way on personhood.

Roe vs Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution. The Constitution states that a right does not have to be enumerated in the Constitution to be a right. Politicians have no right to interfere in a woman's medical decisions.

 

[busybee01]

The Constitution ruled on 3/5 personhood for blacks, so yes, 'personhood' most definitely was in there.

You really are ignorant. That was a attempt to prevent slave states from getting more representation by getting more slaves. It has nothing to do with personhood.

 

[busybee01]

The good bishop is standing up for unborn children's rights.

He has no right to impose his religious beliefs on others at the point of a gun. He is a cheap tinhorn Nazi.

 

[insolent imp]

Roe vs Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution. The Constitution states that a right does not have to be enumerated in the Constitution to be a right. Politicians have no right to interfere in a woman's medical decisions.

and yet it's gone.

 

[busybee01]

Lame, and find a new church.

He find a non-fascist church.

 

[busybee01]

When the Supreme Court issued their ruling on Dobbs, they basically overturned Roe v Wade and threw the issue back to the states to determine what their abortion laws should be via the legislative process, which is answerable to the electorate. If the voters in a state are not satisfied with their state laws on the subject, they can vote in other people who can change it, and that is as it should be. We do not need 9 unelected people deciding such contentious issues, especially since there is nothing in the Constitution or federal law for them to base such a decision to ban all abortions.

The bishop can request whatever he wants, but he ain't going to get this, not with this Court.

They allowed politicians to dictate what a woman can do with her body. That is exactly what the Supreme Court should be doing. Protecting the rights of Americans against cheap politicians. Republicans have so gerrymandered red states that they can push their beliefs even if it is not popular. In many red states, the right to vote is meaningless.

 

[insolent imp]

He find a non-fascist church.

there are many churches who do good and many who are just piss poor.
Oliver Green once said " if you find a perfect church don't go you'll spoil it"

 

[busybee01]

and yet it's gone.

The Republicans have destroyed their party.

 

[insolent imp]

They allowed politicians to dictate what a woman can do with her body. Republicans have so gerrymandered red states that they can push their beliefs even if it is not popular.

well you can't sell pussy in most states and you can't kill a kid. I guess they CAN tell a woman what to do with her body.

 

[busybee01]

well you can't sell pussy in most states and you can't kill a kid. I guess they CAN tell a woman what to do with her body.

A fetus is not a kid.

 

[whitehall]

The question before the Court would be about whether the unborn would receive status as a person and retain the basic rights of life and liberty.

 

[insolent imp]

A fetus is not a kid.

whatever helps you sleep.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Roe vs Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution.

You’re a lunatic or illiterate or an illiterate lunatic.

The Constitution states that a right does not have to be enumerated in the Constitution to be a right.

It does to be a “constitutional right” that can be incorporated against the states.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

There is no medical science to this. This is religious fascism at the point of a gun.

"Medical science" IS religious fascism.

 

[scruffy]

Bishop Asks Supreme Court to Recognize Personhood of the Unborn.

Bishop Pfeifer asks Supreme Court to recognize ‘personhood’ of the unborn

U.S. Supreme Court building / Steven Frame/Shutterstock Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Sep 26, 2022 / 12:45 pm (CNA). An emeritus Texas bishop is asking the Supreme Court to explicitly affirm the personhood of the unborn child in the womb.“While th...

www.catholicworldreport.com

“Affirming the fetal personhood is totally in accord with medical science, which over and over in recent years recognizes that there is a new human being in the act of conception — which has always been our biblical belief,” he wrote. “Hence as we move into the future after Roe v. Wade, governments and courts at a national and state level must respect and protect the tiny unborn person made in God’s very image and must never be deprived of life and liberty.”

This is the path we need to take to get abortion banned nationwide. And we have the Supreme Court in place to do it. We have to strike while the iron is hot. This will put an end to the debate, and then we'll see approval of this hideous procedure drop year after year. We'll find the suitable case to present to the court, and hopefully get this ruling. What a happy day it will be when it is decided ALL children's lives matter.

This is a horrible, HORRIBLE idea.

There's a reason the Founders didn't do it

 

[task0778]

This is a horrible, HORRIBLE idea.

There's a reason the Founders didn't do it

There's also a reason why the Supreme Court didn't do it when they overturned Roe v Wade. They do not have to grounds or the power to do that.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

This is a horrible, HORRIBLE idea.

There's a reason the Founders didn't do it

It’s a great idea. It’s an IDEAL idea.

Shame the founders didn’t do it, but we can do it with a Constitutional Amendment. And we will.