If the choice was between Clinton and Reagan, I'd take the guy who lied under oath about a sexual affair than the guy who lied about selling weapons to Iran.
If the choice was between Clinton and Bush, I'd take the guy who lied under oath about a sexual affair rather than the guy who started a war under false pretenses.
If the choice was between Hillary and Trump, I'd take the candidate who is married to a man who lied under oath about sex, than a man who lacks the minimum policy knowledge to be president of the United States.
Yup, Bill Clinton has low character, and that would disqualify him from just about everything but a presidential contest where his competition comes from a political party that has turned lying and dirty politics into an art form.
A republican voter complaining about character is like a turd complaining about the smell of shit. That dog don't hunt.
"If the choice was between Clinton and Reagan, I'd take the guy who lied under oath about a sexual affair than the guy who lied about selling weapons to Iran."
Reagan didn't lie, and you left out the fact that the weapons were brokered by Israel.
"If the choice was between Clinton and Bush, I'd take the guy who lied under oath about a sexual affair rather than the guy who started a war under false pretenses."
You might have a case if you would blame Bush, the US Congress, the UN and all of the members of the coalition including Tony Blair in you nonsensical claim of false pretenses.
"If the choice was between Hillary and Trump, I'd take the candidate who is married to a man who lied under oath about sex, than a man who lacks the minimum policy knowledge to be president of the United States."
Trump has negotiated more and better deals with foreign countries in a year than the clueless Clinton did in 4 years a Sec of State.
You passing judgement on what a Republican stands for is not worthy of discussion, but you did notice that Bill Clinton has a low character so you got one right.
Last edited: