Boycott Israel

[Hollie]

Do the Jewish people have the right to self-determination? No, no they do not.
Do the Jewish people have the right to self-determination in the form of self-government (a State). No, no they do not.
Do the Jewish people have the right to sovereign self-determination defined by international boundaries? They do not.
Do the Jewish people have the right to peace and security? No, they do not.

Does a religious group have the right to self-determination? Not necessarily, they need to first be the people of the place not settler colonists.
Does a religious group have the right to self-determination in the form of self-government (a State). No, no they do not.
Does a religious group have the right to sovereign self-determination defined by international boundaries? They do not.
Does a religious group have the right to peace and security? Yes, yes they do, just like everybody else, but when that religious group occupies, disposesses and oppresses an indigenous people, they shouldn't be surprised if that people resist.

Thank you. You have proved my point. Its not about Palestinian rights. Its about the restriction, refusal, and retraction of Jewish rights. The argument is not FOR Palestinian rights, but against Jewish rights.

What specific "Jewish rights" am I arguing against? Settler colonists do not have any rights over and above the native population, much less a random religious-political group that suddenly decides to take over someone elses homeland because their "holy book" says it's alright to do so. Your "point" is fundamentally invalid to begin with.

The befuddled Jew haters are always such fun as they fumble over their attempts at argumentation.

The "native population" you whine about is nothing more than a more recent group of invaders. Give us your timeline that defines when Mongolian vs. Muhammedan vs. Roman invaders suddenly become a "native population".

"Someone else's homeland" is nothing of the kind. As we know from Ottoman land records, the majority landowners were absentee owners in Egypt, Syria and Lebanon.

 

[Phoenall]

Do the Jewish people have the right to self-determination? No, no they do not.
Do the Jewish people have the right to self-determination in the form of self-government (a State). No, no they do not.
Do the Jewish people have the right to sovereign self-determination defined by international boundaries? They do not.
Do the Jewish people have the right to peace and security? No, they do not.

Does a religious group have the right to self-determination? Not necessarily, they need to first be the people of the place not settler colonists.
Does a religious group have the right to self-determination in the form of self-government (a State). No, no they do not.
Does a religious group have the right to sovereign self-determination defined by international boundaries? They do not.
Does a religious group have the right to peace and security? Yes, yes they do, just like everybody else, but when that religious group occupies, disposesses and oppresses an indigenous people, they shouldn't be surprised if that people resist.

Thank you. You have proved my point. Its not about Palestinian rights. Its about the restriction, refusal, and retraction of Jewish rights. The argument is not FOR Palestinian rights, but against Jewish rights.

What specific "Jewish rights" am I arguing against? Settler colonists do not have any rights over and above the native population, much less a random religious-political group that suddenly decides to take over someone elses homeland because their "holy book" says it's alright to do so. Your "point" is fundamentally invalid to begin with.

So you finally admit the arab muslims have no rights to the land they are squatting on because they claim their god told them it was theirs. The only people who make the claim for the Jews are neo marxists and islamonazi's because they have to have something they can twist and manipulate. Out of the thousands of posts on this board find one where a Jew has stated that their "holy book" says it is alright to steal another persons land ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Phoenall]

It is just your usual islamonazi talking points from Al Jazeera

 

[Shusha]

What specific "Jewish rights" am I arguing against? Settler colonists do not have any rights over and above the native population, much less a random religious-political group that suddenly decides to take over someone elses homeland because their "holy book" says it's alright to do so. Your "point" is fundamentally invalid to begin with.

With you, we'd have to start with the most basic right of recognition of the Jewish people as a people. Honestly, I don't know how to dig you out of a hole that deep that you won't even recognize that.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What specific "Jewish rights" am I arguing against? Settler colonists do not have any rights over and above the native population, much less a random religious-political group that suddenly decides to take over someone elses homeland because their "holy book" says it's alright to do so. Your "point" is fundamentally invalid to begin with.

With you, we'd have to start with the most basic right of recognition of the Jewish people as a people. Honestly, I don't know how to dig you out of a hole that deep that you won't even recognize that.

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;

(b) The right to national independence and sovereignty;

UN General Assembly Resolution 3236 and UN General Assembly Resolution 3237​

What do you have for the Jews?

 

[Shusha]

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;

(b) The right to national independence and sovereignty;

UN General Assembly Resolution 3236 and UN General Assembly Resolution 3237​

What do you have for the Jews?

Don't be silly. Anything that says "Jewish National Home".

But in the context of this conversation the same thing you have:

Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Jewish Palestinian people in Palestine.
Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Arab Palestinian people in Palestine.

They both have inalienable rights.

 

[P F Tinmore]

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;

(b) The right to national independence and sovereignty;

UN General Assembly Resolution 3236 and UN General Assembly Resolution 3237​

What do you have for the Jews?

Don't be silly. Anything that says "Jewish National Home".

But in the context of this conversation the same thing you have:

Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Jewish Palestinian people in Palestine.
Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Arab Palestinian people in Palestine.

They both have inalienable rights.

Link?

 

[Shusha]

Link?

Surely you don't need a link to documents which read, "Jewish National Home". Try to keep up.

 

[Phoenall]

What specific "Jewish rights" am I arguing against? Settler colonists do not have any rights over and above the native population, much less a random religious-political group that suddenly decides to take over someone elses homeland because their "holy book" says it's alright to do so. Your "point" is fundamentally invalid to begin with.

With you, we'd have to start with the most basic right of recognition of the Jewish people as a people. Honestly, I don't know how to dig you out of a hole that deep that you won't even recognize that.

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;

(b) The right to national independence and sovereignty;

UN General Assembly Resolution 3236 and UN General Assembly Resolution 3237​

What do you have for the Jews?

The above as they are also the palestinian people in palestine, to deny this is to deny the Jews their legal, moral, civil and human rights under International laws

 

[Phoenall]

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

(a) The right to self-determination without external interference;

(b) The right to national independence and sovereignty;

UN General Assembly Resolution 3236 and UN General Assembly Resolution 3237​

What do you have for the Jews?

Don't be silly. Anything that says "Jewish National Home".

But in the context of this conversation the same thing you have:

Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Jewish Palestinian people in Palestine.
Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Arab Palestinian people in Palestine.

They both have inalienable rights.

Link?

UN General Assembly Resolution 3236 and UN General Assembly Resolution 3237



Or are you denying the arab muslims their rights now ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Phoenall]

About time people realised that BDS is not about the plight of the palestinians but about neo nazi blood libels, propaganda and racist abuse of the Jews. If it was about the palestinians then they would be targetting arab muslim outlets for selling Israeli goods prodiced in the west bank.

 

[P F Tinmore]

More fuel for BDS

 

[Phoenall]

More fuel for BDS

Again all you have is islaminazi talking points, you do know Malaysia is an islamonazi state, and palestinian propaganda

 

[P F Tinmore]

More fuel for BDS

Again all you have is islaminazi talking points, you do know Malaysia is an islamonazi state, and palestinian propaganda

Could you point to something she said that would classify her as islamonazi?

Of course not. You are just blowing smoke out your ass.

 

[Phoenall]

More fuel for BDS

Again all you have is islaminazi talking points, you do know Malaysia is an islamonazi state, and palestinian propaganda

Could you point to something she said that would classify her as islamonazi?

Of course not. You are just blowing smoke out your ass.

Did you watch the video, or did you just post it blindly because your imam told you to

The backdrop is pictures much used as islamonazi propaganda, so making the video islamonazi propaganda.

 

[Hossfly]

I guess we will have Tinmore pull up another one of his videos when I post this article. He must belong to some anti-Israel Arab group that supplies him with all of these in order to support his brethren and convince others to hate Israel in order to destroy that country.. After all, he believes that Israel is in the country of Palestine.

As BDS resolutions stall, pro-Palestinian students shift tactics

 

[P F Tinmore]

I guess we will have Tinmore pull up another one of his videos when I post this article. He must belong to some anti-Israel Arab group that supplies him with all of these in order to support his brethren and convince others to hate Israel in order to destroy that country.. After all, he believes that Israel is in the country of Palestine.

As BDS resolutions stall, pro-Palestinian students shift tactics

But Ben Lorber, campus coordinator for the pro-BDS Jewish Voice for Peace, said divestment resolutions and protests at events serve the same purpose: sparking conversation about Palestinian rights. He predicted that BDS resolutions would re-emerge next semester with the approach of the 50th anniversary of the Six-Day War between Israel and Arab states, as a result of which the West Bank came under Israeli control.

“The larger goal is to educate the community as a whole,” Lorber said. “Divestment is so effective because it gets the whole campus talking about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and looking into these issues. Students are continuing to exercise their free-speech rights to protest injustice on campus and in the world around them.”

 

[Hollie]

I guess we will have Tinmore pull up another one of his videos when I post this article. He must belong to some anti-Israel Arab group that supplies him with all of these in order to support his brethren and convince others to hate Israel in order to destroy that country.. After all, he believes that Israel is in the country of Palestine.

As BDS resolutions stall, pro-Palestinian students shift tactics

But Ben Lorber, campus coordinator for the pro-BDS Jewish Voice for Peace, said divestment resolutions and protests at events serve the same purpose: sparking conversation about Palestinian rights. He predicted that BDS resolutions would re-emerge next semester with the approach of the 50th anniversary of the Six-Day War between Israel and Arab states, as a result of which the West Bank came under Israeli control.

“The larger goal is to educate the community as a whole,” Lorber said. “Divestment is so effective because it gets the whole campus talking about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and looking into these issues. Students are continuing to exercise their free-speech rights to protest injustice on campus and in the world around them.”

In a real sense, you are correct regarding free speech and, at least in the West, our freedom of speech. One of the most effective tools against the BDS'ers, is represented by folks such as yourself who's Jew hating agenda is displayed in uncompromising fashion.

What is comical is to see the screeching BDS'ers wail on about free speech when their fascist agenda is so closely aligned with Islamism and its totalitarian agenda.