Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 25,515
- 9,482
He said he didn't know what? Be specific.Haha I’m nervous?
he said he didn’t know…why did he lie?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He said he didn't know what? Be specific.Haha I’m nervous?
he said he didn’t know…why did he lie?
Did you even read your own link?Yeah, cultist, tell us who this NARA employee really is! It's Trump, right?
Anything about hunters foreign businessHe said he didn't know what? Be specific.
That kind of implies that he knew Hunter was working for a foreign business don't it? Anything else? Do you have proof he knew anything else?Anything about hunters foreign business
Geez man…where the f have you been? He repeatedly stated that
So why did he lie?
Then why did he lie? Answer the question…he’s literally on the calls as your own link proves.That kind of implies that he knew Hunter was working for a foreign business don't it? Anything else? Do you have proof he knew anything else?
Lie about what? What have you proven he knew?Then why did he lie? Answer the question…he’s literally on the calls as your own link proves.
Did you even read your own link?
Didn't htink so. You never do.
Needless to say, it doesn't support your crazy stories.
You proved that he was well aware of hunter’s business dealing by providing us a link where a witness testified he was on the callsLie about what? What have you proven he knew?![]()
You proved that he was well aware of hunter’s business dealing by providing us a link where a witness testified he was on the calls
So why did he lie?
Why are you such an idiot? He wasn't on business calls. He was on personal calls with his son. The witness testified that Hunter called him occasionally from business meetings but that they never discussed any business.You proved that he was well aware of hunter’s business dealing by providing us a link where a witness testified he was on the calls
So why did he lie?
Why are you such an idiot? He wasn't on business calls. He was on personal calls with his son. The witness testified that Hunter called him occasionally from business meetings but that they never discussed any business.
Who's cares if I believe it or not? The standard for you to charge and convict Biden is evidence that its false. Do you have any?I actually think you're dumb enough to believe that.
LOL
Cultist gonna cultRemember, Joe Biden said multiple times that he "never talked to his son about business", and the cultists clapped like trained seals.
The cultists have since moved the goalposts several times, to where we're now being told "Yes, Hunter took massive bribes based on extortion phone calls both he and Joe made, but the money didn't actually go to Joe, just a bunch of other family members."
Not sure, but it almost got burned up with his cat and wife in a small kitchen fire.Did they find them in his garage next to his corvette? Wait, did that corvette once belong to a Russian oligarch?
Claiming others are deflecting while deflecting.Suuuuuuuuuuure it was.
We get it. Trump is in trouble, so you've been commanded to deflect. And you always obey orders, even if they make you look this crazy.
You must work hard at being so clueless.That kind of implies that he knew Hunter was working for a foreign business don't it? Anything else? Do you have proof he knew anything else?
I'm not pretending as if Joe couldn't have used his influence to help Hunter and his business partners out in exchange for millions of dollars, I'm just not willing to believe that's what happened without any evidence.You must work hard at being so clueless.
Serious…yesterday he learned what the Executive Branch of govt does…but still maintains that the Executive “office” doesn’t enforce lawYou must work hard at being so clueless.
Yeah. Crackhead’s ”business” partners wanted Crackhead to get Tater on the phone two dozen times so they could listen to Tater opine on the current weather conditions.Why are you such an idiot? He wasn't on business calls. He was on personal calls with his son. The witness testified that Hunter called him occasionally from business meetings but that they never discussed any business.
You do understand that your inference isn't evidence right?Yeah. Crackhead’s ”business” partners wanted Crackhead to get Tater on the phone two dozen times so they could listen to Tater opine on the current weather conditions.
Innuendo is also not evidence.Oddly enough, Tater went to multiple dinners in swanky DC eateries with Crackhead‘s “business” partners so Tater could dazzle them for hours with his knowledge of high and low pressure systems….