Breaking News: U.S. Supreme Court Stops Gay Marriage In Utah

2. The law in California and now other states that forbids someone under 18 from accessing a therapist if that minor wants his or her own autonomy to throw off sexual imprinting done to them by a molestor, if that imprinting is homosexual.


My wife and I adopted a child from Foster care some years back. She was 12 at the time and I can tell you for a FACT, that Foster Care TEACHES children to claim that they're Homosexual. This sets the child up as something 'special'.

And by 'Special' I do not mean, someone of exceptional means and abilities.. I mean someone who can claim to 'need, want and desire' practically anything, and where someone rejects their request, they need only break out the "Homophobe" defense.

LGBT, is a scam of the infamous variety, with the only current close second being Global Warming.

It's all about dividing the culture toward the goal of the acquisition of power.

It's a deceitful premise, being fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant.

Deceit <=> FRAUD <=> Ignorance
>>> >> S O C I A L I S M << <<<
 
Last edited:
Where_R_My_Key completely self-analyzes with "Invalid reasoning remains invalid, without regard to who or how many adhere to its foolish conclusions, be the Judge the SCOTUS or every human being on earth. Makes absolutely no difference."

Your analysis is silly and makes no difference.

Hysterical.

Notice folks, how when the SCOTUS rules with them, they're the final authority, when they rule agains them, its meaningless.

This is called relativism and its what used to fast track civil war.

This is because relativism rejects objectivity.

Objectivity is essential to truth, trust, morality and justice.

When a government fails to be worthy of trust, thus fails to serve justice, the people quickly loose faith in the government to sustain justice and take matters into their own hands, in terms of serving justice.

This threatens the power of the government, which attacks the innocent and PRESTO! It's war.

What tickles me the most is how self righteous the purveyors of injustice are, shortly before the war. This of course all changes when they're being strung up and burned.

Those sufficiently long in the tooth will recall the history of Il Duce Italia. That jutting jaw was tucked well back when they were stringing him and his wife up by their feet and dowsing them with kerosene.

"It Mattered" then... On THAT you can bet your ass.

You are delusional, sadistic, and quite dangerous.

In the matter of justice, which those like you bastardize in the face of the broad popularity of offering equal justice under our laws to ALL people, regardless of sexual orientation, to claim poutrageous "victim" status, which is bad enough, but YOU want to add to that some twisted sociopathic justification to "war."

What you are really afraid of (all evil, even yours, is rooted in the banality of fear born of stupidity), is the loss of one more privileged status over "others," no matter who those others are. It's pretty universal.
 
Where_r_my_Keys argues inconsistently and incoherently rants on for his point of view.

Barb took him apart easily. The 14th protects everybody, including Where_r_my_Keys (who viciously attack those who opposed his failed policies) and his fruitcake buddies.

Benito Mussolini would be impressed with his bombast? No, the Leader would say, "Turn the nutter out into the alley."
 
Last edited:
Where_R_My_Key completely self-analyzes with "Invalid reasoning remains invalid, without regard to who or how many adhere to its foolish conclusions, be the Judge the SCOTUS or every human being on earth. Makes absolutely no difference."

Your analysis is silly and makes no difference.

Hysterical.

Notice folks, how when the SCOTUS rules with them, they're the final authority, when they rule agains them, its meaningless.

This is called relativism and its what used to fast track civil war.

This is because relativism rejects objectivity.

Objectivity is essential to truth, trust, morality and justice.

When a government fails to be worthy of trust, thus fails to serve justice, the people quickly loose faith in the government to sustain justice and take matters into their own hands, in terms of serving justice.

This threatens the power of the government, which attacks the innocent and PRESTO! It's war.

What tickles me the most is how self righteous the purveyors of injustice are, shortly before the war. This of course all changes when they're being strung up and burned.

Those sufficiently long in the tooth will recall the history of Il Duce Italia. That jutting jaw was tucked well back when they were stringing him and his wife up by their feet and dowsing them with kerosene.

"It Mattered" then... On THAT you can bet your ass.

You are delusional, sadistic, and quite dangerous.

In the matter of justice, which those like you bastardize in the face of the broad popularity of offering equal justice under our laws to ALL people, regardless of sexual orientation, to claim poutrageous "victim" status, which is bad enough, but YOU want to add to that some twisted sociopathic justification to "war."

What you are really afraid of (all evil, even yours, is rooted in the banality of fear born of stupidity), is the loss of one more privileged status over "others," no matter who those others are. It's pretty universal.

:doubt: Yeaaah :doubt:

My Crackhead Decoder Machine is in the shop. SOoooo I have no means to discern whatever it is you're trying to convey there.

If you can boil that feckless drivel down to something cogent or at least coherent, that would be GREeeaat.

An if ya can't get that done, that'll be fine too. Probably preferred.
 
Hysterical.

Notice folks, how when the SCOTUS rules with them, they're the final authority, when they rule agains them, its meaningless.

This is called relativism and its what used to fast track civil war.

This is because relativism rejects objectivity.

Objectivity is essential to truth, trust, morality and justice.

When a government fails to be worthy of trust, thus fails to serve justice, the people quickly loose faith in the government to sustain justice and take matters into their own hands, in terms of serving justice.

This threatens the power of the government, which attacks the innocent and PRESTO! It's war.

What tickles me the most is how self righteous the purveyors of injustice are, shortly before the war. This of course all changes when they're being strung up and burned.

Those sufficiently long in the tooth will recall the history of Il Duce Italia. That jutting jaw was tucked well back when they were stringing him and his wife up by their feet and dowsing them with kerosene.

"It Mattered" then... On THAT you can bet your ass.

You are delusional, sadistic, and quite dangerous.

In the matter of justice, which those like you bastardize in the face of the broad popularity of offering equal justice under our laws to ALL people, regardless of sexual orientation, to claim poutrageous "victim" status, which is bad enough, but YOU want to add to that some twisted sociopathic justification to "war."

What you are really afraid of (all evil, even yours, is rooted in the banality of fear born of stupidity), is the loss of one more privileged status over "others," no matter who those others are. It's pretty universal.

:doubt: Yeaaah :doubt:

My Crackhead Decoder Machine is in the shop. SOoooo I have no means to discern whatever it is you're trying to convey there.

If you can boil that feckless drivel down to something cogent or at least coherent, that would be GREeeaat.

An if ya can't get that done, that'll be fine too. Probably preferred.

You're sick. Seek help.
 
Where_r_my_Keys argues inconsistently and incoherently rants on for his point of view.

Barb took him apart easily. The 14th protects everybody, including Where_r_my_Keys (who viciously attack those who opposed his failed policies) and his fruitcake buddies.

Benito Mussolini would be impressed with his bombast? No, the Leader would say, "Turn the nutter out into the alley."

If you have some idea of what Barb is saying, please, feel free to translate.

And you're argument is still failing in the religion forum. Did you intend to get back over there or are ya just hoping that the page turns and no one is going to notice that you got your intellectual ears boxed?
 
You are delusional, sadistic, and quite dangerous.

In the matter of justice, which those like you bastardize in the face of the broad popularity of offering equal justice under our laws to ALL people, regardless of sexual orientation, to claim poutrageous "victim" status, which is bad enough, but YOU want to add to that some twisted sociopathic justification to "war."

What you are really afraid of (all evil, even yours, is rooted in the banality of fear born of stupidity), is the loss of one more privileged status over "others," no matter who those others are. It's pretty universal.

:doubt: Yeaaah :doubt:

My Crackhead Decoder Machine is in the shop. SOoooo I have no means to discern whatever it is you're trying to convey there.

If you can boil that feckless drivel down to something cogent or at least coherent, that would be GREeeaat.

An if ya can't get that done, that'll be fine too. Probably preferred.

You're sick. Seek help.

Never mind Jake, she said even she doesn't know what she said, except she disagrees with what I said. It's standard "Progressive" boilerplate.

Barb, sweety, I'm going to have to ask you to calm down and try to act like an adult. If ya can't do that, I'd ask that you run back over to read more about Justin Bieber and his recent failure to reason soundly.

But if you can calm down and produce a coherent response I would love to discuss whatever concerns you may have. Now come on! Put on those big girl panties and let's have a discussion.
 
Last edited:
Where_r_my_Keys argues inconsistently and incoherently rants on for his point of view.

Barb took him apart easily. The 14th protects everybody, including Where_r_my_Keys (who viciously attack those who opposed his failed policies) and his fruitcake buddies.

Benito Mussolini would be impressed with his bombast? No, the Leader would say, "Turn the nutter out into the alley."

If you have some idea of what Barb is saying, please, feel free to translate.

And you're argument is still failing in the religion forum. Did you intend to get back over there or are ya just hoping that the page turns and no one is going to notice that you got your intellectual ears boxed?

You are a nutter who fails in argument with Barb. You are inconsistent and incoherent.

Go back and read Barb's comments carefully and objectively.

Then you will understand why you are standing bent over.

Son, don't dish it if you can't take it.
 
Where_r_my_Keys argues inconsistently and incoherently rants on for his point of view.

Barb took him apart easily. The 14th protects everybody, including Where_r_my_Keys (who viciously attack those who opposed his failed policies) and his fruitcake buddies.

Benito Mussolini would be impressed with his bombast? No, the Leader would say, "Turn the nutter out into the alley."

If you have some idea of what Barb is saying, please, feel free to translate.

And you're argument is still failing in the religion forum. Did you intend to get back over there or are ya just hoping that the page turns and no one is going to notice that you got your intellectual ears boxed?

You are a nutter who fails in argument with Barb. You are inconsistent and incoherent.

Go back and read Barb's comments carefully and objectively.

Then you will understand why you are standing bent over.

Son, don't dish it if you can't take it.

I'm a what? A Nutter ya say?

Oh now THAT is hilarious. You're a Euro-peon? That is ADORABLE!

That explains the whole story from soup to Jake.

Barb's comments were unintelligible. I've invited her to reorganize her 'feelings' and have a discussion.

If she feels that her point of view is worth expressing, she'll do so through a well organized, thoughtful prose. Assuming she's capable of such.

Now I for one hope that she is. She seems to have some passion and that always promises some quality entertainment.
 
Last edited:
:doubt: Yeaaah :doubt:

My Crackhead Decoder Machine is in the shop. SOoooo I have no means to discern whatever it is you're trying to convey there.

If you can boil that feckless drivel down to something cogent or at least coherent, that would be GREeeaat.

An if ya can't get that done, that'll be fine too. Probably preferred.

You're sick. Seek help.

Never mind Jake, she said even she doesn't know what she said, except she disagrees with what I said. It's standard "Progressive" boilerplate.

Barb, sweety, I'm going to have to ask you to calm down and try to act like an adult. If ya can't do that, I'd ask that you run back over to read more about Justin Bieber and his recent failure to reason soundly.

But if you can calm down and produce a coherent response I would love to discuss whatever concerns you may have. Now come on! Put on those big girl panties and let's have a discussion.

Your comprehension skills aren't my problem.

And never, ever, call me "sweety," you sub-human piece if shit.
 
Anytime Barb.

The world waits with baited anticipation to learn what it is you're all amped up about. (Precious, Jake really needs this. He's countin' on ya. Please don't let him down!)
 
You're sick. Seek help.

Never mind Jake, she said even she doesn't know what she said, except she disagrees with what I said. It's standard "Progressive" boilerplate.

Barb, sweety, I'm going to have to ask you to calm down and try to act like an adult. If ya can't do that, I'd ask that you run back over to read more about Justin Bieber and his recent failure to reason soundly.

But if you can calm down and produce a coherent response I would love to discuss whatever concerns you may have. Now come on! Put on those big girl panties and let's have a discussion.

Your comprehension skills aren't my problem.

And never, ever, call me "sweety," you sub-human piece if shit.

Well we know from this screed that Barb's angry. But we knew that when we read her signature. Socialists are angry people. They can't explain WHY they're angry, but we know THEY'RE PISSED!

But hey, such is the nature of the lowly Relativist, they serve evil.
 
Last edited:
Where_r_my_Keys argues inconsistently and incoherently rants on for his point of view.

Barb took him apart easily. The 14th protects everybody, including Where_r_my_Keys (who viciously attack those who opposed his failed policies) and his fruitcake buddies.

Benito Mussolini would be impressed with his bombast? No, the Leader would say, "Turn the nutter out into the alley."

So far as I understand recent history, the 14th does not protect cult members. You'd have to demonstrate that LGBT isn't a cult but instead 'born that way' and then you'd have something. Right now all evidence points to it being a cult and indeed many gays are famous for saying it's a culture war and not one of an innate state of being.

They know. We know. The obvious is sometimes so obvious that it is comical. LGBT is a cult and they aren't covered by the 14th. Utah's voters' rights to their 1st Amendment expression through their vote IS however protected constitutionally.

Go get 'em Jake. You've got your work cut out for you against that landslide of evidence.
 
Where_r_my_Keys argues inconsistently and incoherently rants on for his point of view.

Barb took him apart easily. The 14th protects everybody, including Where_r_my_Keys (who viciously attack those who opposed his failed policies) and his fruitcake buddies.

Benito Mussolini would be impressed with his bombast? No, the Leader would say, "Turn the nutter out into the alley."

So far as I understand recent history, the 14th does not protect cult members. You'd have to demonstrate that LGBT isn't a cult but instead 'born that way' and then you'd have something. Right now all evidence points to it being a cult and indeed many gays are famous for saying it's a culture war and not one of an innate state of being.

They know. We know. The obvious is sometimes so obvious that it is comical. LGBT is a cult and they aren't covered by the 14th. Utah's voters' rights to their 1st Amendment expression through their vote IS however protected constitutionally.

Go get 'em Jake. You've got your work cut out for you against that landslide of evidence.

Well, this is all true. But common sense provides that the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality is a political movement of the Ideological Left, designed to promote the acquisition of power, for the Left.

This being profoundly demonstrated by individuals who simultaneously claim that their sexual lives are private, even as they set such on public display, for public discussion.

Much as those same people profess themselves to be Americans, while simultaneously professing their rejection of the principles that define America.

I mean nature precludes one from simultaneously adhering to both the thesis and the antithesis, thus the notion that those touting Foreign Ideas hostile to American Principle could make a valid claim of being Americans is INSANITY personified.

Of course, when push comes to shove and they're forced to explain how they could justify the claim, they immediately reduce the concept of America down to the lowest common denominator, which is of course that they were born in the Americas. As if sliding down a birth canal is a potential point of pride! "WOO HOO! I'm PRESENT man!"

Funny stuff.
 
Oh well, I'm off to watch some classics.

Please feel free to talk amongst yourselves. I'll pick it up later.
 
Where_r_my_Keys argues inconsistently and incoherently rants on for his point of view.

Barb took him apart easily. The 14th protects everybody, including Where_r_my_Keys (who viciously attack those who opposed his failed policies) and his fruitcake buddies.

Benito Mussolini would be impressed with his bombast? No, the Leader would say, "Turn the nutter out into the alley."

So far as I understand recent history, the 14th does not protect cult members. You'd have to demonstrate that LGBT isn't a cult but instead 'born that way' and then you'd have something. Right now all evidence points to it being a cult and indeed many gays are famous for saying it's a culture war and not one of an innate state of being.

They know. We know. The obvious is sometimes so obvious that it is comical. LGBT is a cult and they aren't covered by the 14th. Utah's voters' rights to their 1st Amendment expression through their vote IS however protected constitutionally.

Go get 'em Jake. You've got your work cut out for you against that landslide of evidence.

More and more state governments, as well as the preeminent one in the US, the FEDERAL government, doesn't seem to agree with your "findings,"

or your leavings.

Go figure.

:dunno:
 
Where_r_my_Keys argues inconsistently and incoherently rants on for his point of view.

Barb took him apart easily. The 14th protects everybody, including Where_r_my_Keys (who viciously attack those who opposed his failed policies) and his fruitcake buddies.

Benito Mussolini would be impressed with his bombast? No, the Leader would say, "Turn the nutter out into the alley."

So far as I understand recent history, the 14th does not protect cult members. You'd have to demonstrate that LGBT isn't a cult but instead 'born that way' and then you'd have something. Right now all evidence points to it being a cult and indeed many gays are famous for saying it's a culture war and not one of an innate state of being.

They know. We know. The obvious is sometimes so obvious that it is comical. LGBT is a cult and they aren't covered by the 14th. Utah's voters' rights to their 1st Amendment expression through their vote IS however protected constitutionally.

Go get 'em Jake. You've got your work cut out for you against that landslide of evidence.

Well, this is all true. But common sense provides that the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality is a political movement of the Ideological Left, designed to promote the acquisition of power, for the Left.

This being profoundly demonstrated by individuals who simultaneously claim that their sexual lives are private, even as they set such on public display, for public discussion.

Much as those same people profess themselves to be Americans, while simultaneously professing their rejection of the principles that define America.

I mean nature precludes one from simultaneously adhering to both the thesis and the antithesis, thus the notion that those touting Foreign Ideas hostile to American Principle could make a valid claim of being Americans is INSANITY personified.

Of course, when push comes to shove and they're forced to explain how they could justify the claim, they immediately reduce the concept of America down to the lowest common denominator, which is of course that they were born in the Americas. As if sliding down a birth canal is a potential point of pride! "WOO HOO! I'm PRESENT man!"

Funny stuff.

When you talk around the water cooler at work - as if anyone would willingly associate with you - but for argument's sake, do you discuss what you and the wife or girlfriend (poor woman!) did over the weekend? That would be setting "such on public display, for public discussion.

YOU do not set "the principles that define America," no matter how swelled your head is, and your exclusionary attitude is actually something hostile to American Principle .

:eusa_hand:
 
Just so. Sil and Where_ "do not set the principles that define America, no matter how swelled [their collective] head is, and [their collective]exclusionary attitude is actually something hostile to American Principle .

Your small reactionary far right cultic principles are not supported by the great majority of America.

Quite obvious.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top