Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,842
BS..............you can be charged with aiding and abetting if you see a crime and do nothing about it now. In many of the cases people around the terrorist knew crap was going on.........but didn't do anything or report it....................could be considered aiding and abetting.That is an extremely dangerous precedent to set. Stalinist even.You can't, because it would be a clear violation of the Constitution. Which is why I voted No. Might surprise some here, but it is not the answer.Serious question here.
How would you go about banning Islam from America without violating the Constitution? Specifics if you please.
You don't have a lot of options against what is going on globally..........And this is a Global Problem.........Terror attacks are increasing in all areas of the World as the world tries to attack the tentacles of a Hydra.........A reactionary strategy versus a proactive strategy...........Nations will eventually be forced to start raiding, arresting, and/or deporting radical elements or those preaching it within their borders...........Which would include Mosques which will inflame even more trending to the Dark Side of Radical Islam. It will take us down the road of the slippery slope of Sedition Laws............which could backfire on us.............But the increasing number of attacks may very well FORCE US THERE.............
In regards to those Muslims who lived near the attackers............who knew they might be a problem............by not turning them in are they not aiding and abetting in a crime.................which might mean starting to charge those who refuse to turn in Radicals with a Crime................
This is all dangerous territory.........but eventually........as the attacks continue......we may very well have to go down this slippery slope.
![]()
We are approaching a regional War in the Middle East to end the Caliphate.............Which will only happen after enough have died to say "enough's enough.
In regards to Mosques practicing radical movements................it is dangerous but they could be charged with Sedition.
I've already said a slippery slope.........provided documents of Law Enforcement tracking cells and knowing radical elements..........but PROTECTED BY OUR LAWS.........even though they might perform the next attack.
So the families of killers should al lbe charged with aiding and abetting just on the basis of their being the family?
They should be thoroughly investigated at the very least.
Did they ever catch that girl shooter?