Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And that's where the Muslim's slaves came from unless you are now claiming that all the black chieftains were engaging in the slave trade. If you actually think whites brought more misery than Islamics, you are even more delusional than usual. Islam colonizedNow, you are just making shit up. Most of the slaves we bought came from Central Africa.
And they also brought more misery to the rest of the world through slavery and colonialism.
No, the other seventy percent goes to whomever makes the lowest bid regardless of color. No one guarantees whites anything.Again, the other 70 percent goes to whites. 70 PERCENT!
Is that not enough?
Resonate this understanding:
WHITE IS A RACE! THIS MEANS THAT WHITE CONTRACTORS ARE ALSO CONSIDERED BASED ON RACE FOR 70 PERCENT OF THOSE CONTRACTS!
Weren’t given it, it was earnedAll we want is the same amount of money whites have been given.
The question has been raised as to why reparations to all blacks is unconstitutional, and the answer of course is that the government cannot give money to an entire race of people based solely on their skin color. Cases must be decided on an individual basis.
I have never suggested that there were no white people who were innocent of being involved in the slave trade or descendants of any of the original slave traders. The question I asked was who these "innocent" white people were who were allegedly being asked to dig into their own pockets to pay reparations as opposed to them being paid by the government. Of course I never got any proof of that happening.Jurisdiction? So for you, slavery was a legal matter not a moral one?
You condemn the US and suggest no whites person today is “innocent” but you disregard the larger context of slavery beyond America’s boarders.
And you don't?He said I was racist in a Zone 1 thread by falsely claiming I think I’m better than blacks.
Denying Black people equal employment opportunities was not unlawful so how were they going to sue for something that is not actionable?Then each person should go to said airline and sue them and prove they were denied work based on Race.
No, it was given.Weren’t given it, it was earned
Why do you think you would personally be on the hook for the reparation payments?Why should I pay a dime for something I wasn't part of, and my ancestors weren't part of?
Aren't these supposed to be people with superior intelligence?Why do you think you would personally be on the hook for the reparation payments?
We don't get a say in how the government spends "our" (their) tax dollars.
That's a really ignorant statement, both parts of it.No, AI makes you not have to do any work.
Which is the crux of the reason people like you demand free money..
Make your wife a 51% owner of your subcontracting companyIf you are asking my tax money for it, which will result in my taxes increasing directly for it, you are asking me to pay for it.
An intangible benefit as best, and one that now is reversed because If i wanted to start a subcontractor company that does municipal work in NYC I wouldn't be able to because I am not a disadvantaged business owner.
Annother white idioot tha purposefully iignore tthe white human rigts violations after sllaveryAnyone owed true reparations would have been the slaves freed by Lincoln because the very act of freeing them was an admission of the crime. Problem is that all those folks are long dead, never sought reparations, and while there were still some civil rights violations going on in the 60's, those would, like you said, be individual cases.
More to the point is the problem of forcing people who never committed any crime in being made to pay people who were never wronged! Worse, if blacks are owed reparations just for being black, what about the American Indian? Not only were they nearly exterminated by genocide, they were farmed into slave camps called reservations, then we stole their entire country.
Blacks were sold into slavery for the most part by other blacks, and last I checked, Africa is still there.
However, any blacks today still wanting reparations, I would be good with giving them a free one-way ticked back to Botswana. I mean, if we are so terribly bad, why would they want to stay here?
Women, minorities and disabled individuals right? Like disabled veterans?Listen closely. The 30% requirement is the TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE.
They are required to meet a 30% Disadvantaged business total of the TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE.
You don't make any profit off of subcontracted work, so obviously they try to sub out as little as possible.
That means only minority/women owned subs are considered. anyone else can't get in the door.
Why do whites like him think this is free money?That's a really ignorant statement, both parts of it.
Posting on U.S. Message Board doesn't generate any revenue for me. I'm not required to post anything here by my employer or clients, nor do I need to do so as in order to complete my homework/studies.
I use AI in the same manner that I would use a real assistant, to do research for me and to clarify things that I could use a deeper understanding of. If you were to go back to my original postings beginning in 2018 you would find that they are not much different than anything I've posted in the last 3 to 6 months. Hell, my browser has proof of my research into reparations long before ChatGPT was even a "thing".
So your misrepresentation of me, my knowledge and your false belief that I feel entitled to "free money" is absurd on its face because if the government determines that reparations are indeed due to certain members of the population, then it's not "free" money, it's recompense, whether you approve or agree or not.
He forgets all that to cry about 30 percent of subcontracted work as if white men deserve all the subcontracting jobs as well as major contractt jobs.Women, minorities and disabled individuals right? Like disabled veterans?
Yeah I remember reading in my Aviation Safety class about that DC-10 that crashed in the Black Forest due to explosive decompression ripping out control cables that attached to the rudder in the empennage. I haven't seen that report in decades but I think they lost either a cabin or cargo door midflight which cause the decompression. I also seem to recall that there was another incident that happened shortly before that particular crash, or after.As far as I know, the government didn't prevent black pilots from airline careers. The airlines refused to hire them. I believe that was more for public relations reasons than anything else. Women pilots had the same problems, the travelling public didn't trust their abilities. Right or wrong the travelling public's opinions have to be considered by airlines. I've always refused to fly on DC10s because I know enough about the engineering of them to consider them unsafe under some conditions. The reason I feel that way is that unlike other aircraft of that era, the control cables are routed under the floor and in the event of a cargo door latch failure, the floor buckles jamming the controls. Several DC10s crashed for exactly that reason. Douglas came up with a fix for the latches, but I refuse to trust a patch job like that when there are alternatives. That's the way some people felt about black and female pilots. That's changed now.
For a direct comparison, I applied for the California Highway Patrol back in the mid seventies, I scored in the high nineties in all the tests and interviews. After waiting for months for a call to report for training, I called to inquire about my status and was told the CHP was hiring only minorities and women for the foreseeable future. Under your "logic" I should be paid reparations for the career that was denied me.
Nor does it or anyone else have the ABILITY to do anything about most of it.The government doesn't have the legal authority to determine the private thoughts and conduct of its citizens. It can only dictate public conduct.
In your dreams, where math is racistNo, it was given.
And you don’t think the Greeks, Roman’s and Ottomans didn’t? The Ottoman even raised slave children in crèches to become slave soldiers. They called them Janissaries. Every culture that kept slaves bred them with the exception of some Native American tribes and the North African Muslims who castrated all their male black slaves so they couldn’t breed. But they had an endless supply of cheap black slaves from sub-Saharan Africa.I have never suggested that there were no white people who were innocent of being involved in the slave trade or descendants of any of the original slave traders. The question I asked was who these "innocent" white people were who were allegedly being asked to dig into their own pockets to pay reparations as opposed to them being paid by the government. Of course I never got any proof of that happening.
As far as my objecting to slavery based on legal grounds versus moral grounds, we have heard repeatedly, just within the last week "but it was LEGAL" as if that should make it better. Legalizing an immoral practice because it was "a different time" doesn't justify the actions. On the other hand though, you can't protect people from a particular act unless there is a law making said act illegal. That's how white society managed to keep people of African descent relegated to second class citizenry that was rife with violence and injustice. The very same acts that were committed against Black people were unlawful when committed against whites. That alone should tell you everything that is needed to be known about the times and practices.
Lastly, the type of slavery that was practiced in the U.S. was different than that practices in other jurisdictions around the world, that of chattel slavery. The slave holders in the U.S. created extensive "breeding" programs in order to increase their financial holdings and wealth.
Nope, in reality with real math. The type of math you're incapable of doing.In your dreams, where math is racist
