Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,506
Uh, retard, did you check out the DATE of that article.Time to start pouring gasoline into those tunnels and lighting it while the drug traffickers are using them.We would have cheered for the country saving 113 billion per year by building a wall...simple arithmetic bud.
You're not saving a penny--you're WASTING billions and that's the POINT.
Border patrol agent explores newly discovered US-Mexico drug tunnel with GoPro camera
This is an 800 yard tunnel they found, after years of use that went right into San Diego. This tunnel was built to avoid a WALL. Drug lords will spend millions to build a tunnel. That's their bread and butter and they're going to protect it, and they'll spend whatever it takes to get it done.
If it's something they can SEE, they can and will compromise it. Motion electronic detectors, that they can't see, more border patrol stations and border patrol will stop it.
As far as the wall itself it can also be easily compromised. There's holes in walls & fences down there already that are big enough to drive trucks through.
It's clear none of you have ever been to the border. Even the people who live along the border & deal with this on a daily basis will tell you that a WALL is ridiculous.
And what do the goose-steppers want to do with the illegal immigrants already in the US?
There is nothing complex or trivial about this subject. It has only been made complex by loonies who love to write checks out of others check books.
"And what do the goose-steppers want to do with the illegal immigrants already in the US?"
Round them up and send them to work on the wall for 90 days before sending them back to the shithole they came from. If they have anchor babies here, the anchors, if old enough will have to decide if they want to head back south with Pedro and Guadalupe or not.
All incentives must be removed...No more citizenships given to anchors who were born here by illegal parents.
(I know, I know, I'm so cruel, how dare I think of what's best for REAL American's)
Comrade Trump has already announced that there will be no mass deportations.
Trump shifts immigration plan: No 'mass deportations'
MAKE AMERICA SMART AGAIN.
To change or repeal the 14th amendment would require 2/3's of the senate and 2/3's of the house and THEN 38 state legislatures would have to vote for approval. (You'll note that the President has nothing to do with it.) There's not a snowballs chance in hell of that happening.
And Comrade Trump was for a pathway to citizenship, before he was against it.
Trump supported path to citizenship, said Romney was "mean-spirited" on immigration | RedState
2012 FLASHBACK: Donald Trump Said GOP Was Too ‘Mean-Spirited’ Towards Illegal Immigrants
Didn't think so.