Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
How is it evil inspired?Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
Obamacare is all about control and nothing to do with healthcareHow is it evil inspired?Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
Maybe according to the fake news right.Obamacare is all about control and nothing to do with healthcareHow is it evil inspired?Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
How is it evil inspired?Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
That is the problem, the sense of entitlement that progressives have is born out of envy.Maybe according to the fake news right.Obamacare is all about control and nothing to do with healthcareHow is it evil inspired?Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
One goal of covering everyone was that the huge cost of last minute life saving emergency room visits for uninsured folks would be prevented and the cost of the prevention would be partially paid for by the individual,,,rather than the huge emergency cost being rolled into higher prices for everyone. The goal and result was clearly not control for the sake of it.
The gop has no solution for this problem, which is why they havent come up with a workable plan that addresses it. Some of them would say the person should die if they chose to forgo coverage and got caught.
There are probably only a few ways to get close to full coverage, which I believe is a necessity in the greatest country. One is a mandate, another is universal single payer. Both of these are a push motivation. Choice of being covered or not, is not allowed, because the probabilistic cost of health care should be assigned to those consuming it as much as possible.
A 3rd way would be a natural pull. If the product is cheap enough, and benefits clear enough, most people would opt to purchase it. However, this doesn't happen because the lowest paying jobs don't offer livable wages and also the benefits of price competition don't exist at the low end consumer level in many markets in our economy including this one. Large companies would sooner offer more expensive or similarly priced options when savings from economies of scale are achieved, not actually pass that savings to the consumer via a low cost option. Some folks who are on the fringe also just don't understand the importance of being covered due to poor education.
A 4th way is to require or convincingly incentivize employers to offer health care coverage to all employees. This might be the best option for a lot of reasons, but it would need to extend down to those living off low wages.
Why must the greatest country Have near full health care coverage? Because being born here should put people head and shoulders above the rest of the world. People should be focusing on making money, taking advantage of opportunities, providing for their family rather than whether or not they can afford to go to the doctor and solve a worsening health problem out of pocket. These financial crises severely maim people's lives, particularly at the bottom.
According to Who? Your fake news? We are just realistic about the cost of things and who benefits the most from them.That is the problem, the sense of entitlement that progressives have is born out of envy.Maybe according to the fake news right.Obamacare is all about control and nothing to do with healthcareHow is it evil inspired?Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
One goal of covering everyone was that the huge cost of last minute life saving emergency room visits for uninsured folks would be prevented and the cost of the prevention would be partially paid for by the individual,,,rather than the huge emergency cost being rolled into higher prices for everyone. The goal and result was clearly not control for the sake of it.
The gop has no solution for this problem, which is why they havent come up with a workable plan that addresses it. Some of them would say the person should die if they chose to forgo coverage and got caught.
There are probably only a few ways to get close to full coverage, which I believe is a necessity in the greatest country. One is a mandate, another is universal single payer. Both of these are a push motivation. Choice of being covered or not, is not allowed, because the probabilistic cost of health care should be assigned to those consuming it as much as possible.
A 3rd way would be a natural pull. If the product is cheap enough, and benefits clear enough, most people would opt to purchase it. However, this doesn't happen because the lowest paying jobs don't offer livable wages and also the benefits of price competition don't exist at the low end consumer level in many markets in our economy including this one. Large companies would sooner offer more expensive or similarly priced options when savings from economies of scale are achieved, not actually pass that savings to the consumer via a low cost option. Some folks who are on the fringe also just don't understand the importance of being covered due to poor education.
A 4th way is to require or convincingly incentivize employers to offer health care coverage to all employees. This might be the best option for a lot of reasons, but it would need to extend down to those living off low wages.
Why must the greatest country Have near full health care coverage? Because being born here should put people head and shoulders above the rest of the world. People should be focusing on making money, taking advantage of opportunities, providing for their family rather than whether or not they can afford to go to the doctor and solve a worsening health problem out of pocket. These financial crises severely maim people's lives, particularly at the bottom.
There is nothing right about progressive taxing.
I have never bought health insurance in my life, not about to start either.Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
So will you be dropping your health insurance coverage today?
I have never bought health insurance in my life, not about to start either.Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
So will you be dropping your health insurance coverage today?
Health-insurance is not healthcare
People need to take care of their own shit, forcing anyone into paying for anyone else is wrong in every aspect... certainly not charitableAccording to Who? Your fake news? We are just realistic about the cost of things and who benefits the most from them.That is the problem, the sense of entitlement that progressives have is born out of envy.Maybe according to the fake news right.Obamacare is all about control and nothing to do with healthcareHow is it evil inspired?Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
One goal of covering everyone was that the huge cost of last minute life saving emergency room visits for uninsured folks would be prevented and the cost of the prevention would be partially paid for by the individual,,,rather than the huge emergency cost being rolled into higher prices for everyone. The goal and result was clearly not control for the sake of it.
The gop has no solution for this problem, which is why they havent come up with a workable plan that addresses it. Some of them would say the person should die if they chose to forgo coverage and got caught.
There are probably only a few ways to get close to full coverage, which I believe is a necessity in the greatest country. One is a mandate, another is universal single payer. Both of these are a push motivation. Choice of being covered or not, is not allowed, because the probabilistic cost of health care should be assigned to those consuming it as much as possible.
A 3rd way would be a natural pull. If the product is cheap enough, and benefits clear enough, most people would opt to purchase it. However, this doesn't happen because the lowest paying jobs don't offer livable wages and also the benefits of price competition don't exist at the low end consumer level in many markets in our economy including this one. Large companies would sooner offer more expensive or similarly priced options when savings from economies of scale are achieved, not actually pass that savings to the consumer via a low cost option. Some folks who are on the fringe also just don't understand the importance of being covered due to poor education.
A 4th way is to require or convincingly incentivize employers to offer health care coverage to all employees. This might be the best option for a lot of reasons, but it would need to extend down to those living off low wages.
Why must the greatest country Have near full health care coverage? Because being born here should put people head and shoulders above the rest of the world. People should be focusing on making money, taking advantage of opportunities, providing for their family rather than whether or not they can afford to go to the doctor and solve a worsening health problem out of pocket. These financial crises severely maim people's lives, particularly at the bottom.
There is nothing right about progressive taxing.
explain the mandate? that's all one needs to understand it was about welfare and wealth distribution. LOL.Maybe according to the fake news right.Obamacare is all about control and nothing to do with healthcareHow is it evil inspired?Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
One goal of covering everyone was that the huge cost of last minute life saving emergency room visits for uninsured folks would be prevented and the cost of the prevention would be partially paid for by the individual,,,rather than the huge emergency cost being rolled into higher prices for everyone. The goal and result was clearly not control for the sake of it.
The gop has no solution for this problem, which is why they havent come up with a workable plan that addresses it. Some of them would say the person should die if they chose to forgo coverage and got caught.
There are probably only a few ways to get close to full coverage, which I believe is a necessity in the greatest country. One is a mandate, another is universal single payer. Both of these are a push motivation. Choice of being covered or not, is not allowed, because the probabilistic cost of health care should be assigned to those consuming it as much as possible.
A 3rd way would be a natural pull. If the product is cheap enough, and benefits clear enough, most people would opt to purchase it. However, this doesn't happen because the lowest paying jobs don't offer livable wages and also the benefits of price competition don't exist at the low end consumer level in many markets in our economy including this one. Large companies would sooner offer more expensive or similarly priced options when savings from economies of scale are achieved, not actually pass that savings to the consumer via a low cost option. Some folks who are on the fringe also just don't understand the importance of being covered due to poor education.
A 4th way is to require or convincingly incentivize employers to offer health care coverage to all employees. This might be the best option for a lot of reasons, but it would need to extend down to those living off low wages.
Why must the greatest country Have near full health care coverage? Because being born here should put people head and shoulders above the rest of the world. People should be focusing on making money, taking advantage of opportunities, providing for their family rather than whether or not they can afford to go to the doctor and solve a worsening health problem out of pocket. These financial crises severely maim people's lives, particularly at the bottom.
not in the least.People need to take care of their own shit, forcing anyone into paying for anyone else is wrong in every aspect... certainly not charitableAccording to Who? Your fake news? We are just realistic about the cost of things and who benefits the most from them.That is the problem, the sense of entitlement that progressives have is born out of envy.Maybe according to the fake news right.Obamacare is all about control and nothing to do with healthcareHow is it evil inspired?
One goal of covering everyone was that the huge cost of last minute life saving emergency room visits for uninsured folks would be prevented and the cost of the prevention would be partially paid for by the individual,,,rather than the huge emergency cost being rolled into higher prices for everyone. The goal and result was clearly not control for the sake of it.
The gop has no solution for this problem, which is why they havent come up with a workable plan that addresses it. Some of them would say the person should die if they chose to forgo coverage and got caught.
There are probably only a few ways to get close to full coverage, which I believe is a necessity in the greatest country. One is a mandate, another is universal single payer. Both of these are a push motivation. Choice of being covered or not, is not allowed, because the probabilistic cost of health care should be assigned to those consuming it as much as possible.
A 3rd way would be a natural pull. If the product is cheap enough, and benefits clear enough, most people would opt to purchase it. However, this doesn't happen because the lowest paying jobs don't offer livable wages and also the benefits of price competition don't exist at the low end consumer level in many markets in our economy including this one. Large companies would sooner offer more expensive or similarly priced options when savings from economies of scale are achieved, not actually pass that savings to the consumer via a low cost option. Some folks who are on the fringe also just don't understand the importance of being covered due to poor education.
A 4th way is to require or convincingly incentivize employers to offer health care coverage to all employees. This might be the best option for a lot of reasons, but it would need to extend down to those living off low wages.
Why must the greatest country Have near full health care coverage? Because being born here should put people head and shoulders above the rest of the world. People should be focusing on making money, taking advantage of opportunities, providing for their family rather than whether or not they can afford to go to the doctor and solve a worsening health problem out of pocket. These financial crises severely maim people's lives, particularly at the bottom.
There is nothing right about progressive taxing.
Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
I have paid my family’s medical expenses out of pocket for 20+ years, including the birth of both of my daughters... I have been self-employed and debt free for 20+ years, Success for self-employment teaches you to spend less than what you have and not go in debt, just the facts of life... lolI have never bought health insurance in my life, not about to start either.Republicans force tax cuts through the Senate | Daily Mail Online
Most can not afford it, dont want anything to do with it and will never benefit from it.
So will you be dropping your health insurance coverage today?
Health-insurance is not healthcare
I found the moocher!!
Next we need to remove all laws that mandate someone get medical treatment they cannot pay for.
Get in an accident and do not have insurance and do not have the cash to pay the bill then you are out of luck.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
