Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does this apply to married couples as well? If not, why not?
You can rape your wife
Two drunk people having sex, and one regretting it after is not rape, sexual assault or any other crime.
Progressives are all about "getting the government out of our bedrooms." Why is this suddenly not the case?
You don't understand the concept of criminal acts do you?
How bout we do this for our USMB conservatives?
If she is wearing skimpy clothes she is fair game? OK
If I were a single man in California, I would print up business cards, to be handed out to girls at the beginning of a date. The cards would have boxes to be checked, indicating what sorts and levels of intimacy are acceptable (use your imagination), then have a block at the bottom for signature. Before spending any money on her I would have her check the boxes of her choosing, then I would take the girl to a notary, to have her signature notarized for my records.
I might not get much p**sy, but I wouldn't have to worry about rape allegations.
I think apple needs to make a sex consent apt. Right before consummation, the guy pulls out his iphone and has her sign with finger that she consent to sex. Then there is a special check box for anal consent. She must then blow on the phone to record her blood/alcohol level, with an alert if she is unable to consent.
Heck they could toss in another acknowledgement that she confirms she is over 18.
What about for threesomes?
How bout we do this for our USMB conservatives?
If she is wearing skimpy clothes she is fair game? OK
Bzzt!!! you are going with another debate, not going to work.
Answer the question, do men have to live by a different set of standards under college justice systems, and how does this square under Title IX?
wow, this is awesomeDo liberals ever miss an opportunity to try to appeal to a voting block by unjustly harming another voting block? Do they think of unintended (although I honestly think they know the unintended consequences, but honestly don't care).As a father of daughters (and a son), I take rape seriously. Women should always feel safe and rapist should never get away with it. However, this law will do the opposite of what it's intended to do. It will put innocent men in jail and not prevent rape.
California adopts yes means yes sex-assault rule page 1
"This law has requires a woman to affirmative stated she wants to have sex before doing it. “an affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity.” The legislation says silence or lack of resistance does not constitute consent. Under the bill, someone who is drunk,..."
False claims of rape are real and more numerous then people want to think. This almost guarantees that any claim of rape will lead to a prosecution.
Soon they will be arresting people for bad thoughts!
how are they going to prove hearsay?
Her; I didn't say yes.
Him; She said yes.
pfft
I think apple needs to make a sex consent apt. Right before consummation, the guy pulls out his iphone and has her sign with finger that she consent to sex. Then there is a special check box for anal consent. She must then blow on the phone to record her blood/alcohol level, with an alert if she is unable to consent.
Heck they could toss in another acknowledgement that she confirms she is over 18.
What about for threesomes?
No consent form required in those cases. Since two women is involved, cancel themselves out and consent it implied!
wow, this is awesomeDo liberals ever miss an opportunity to try to appeal to a voting block by unjustly harming another voting block? Do they think of unintended (although I honestly think they know the unintended consequences, but honestly don't care).As a father of daughters (and a son), I take rape seriously. Women should always feel safe and rapist should never get away with it. However, this law will do the opposite of what it's intended to do. It will put innocent men in jail and not prevent rape.
California adopts yes means yes sex-assault rule page 1
"This law has requires a woman to affirmative stated she wants to have sex before doing it. “an affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity.” The legislation says silence or lack of resistance does not constitute consent. Under the bill, someone who is drunk,..."
False claims of rape are real and more numerous then people want to think. This almost guarantees that any claim of rape will lead to a prosecution.
Soon they will be arresting people for bad thoughts!
how are they going to prove hearsay?
Her; I didn't say yes.
Him; She said yes.
pfft
If you read into it, the burden of proof is in the defendant (man) to prove she said Yes! That is a tough hurdle to leap over!
How bout we do this for our USMB conservatives?
If she is wearing skimpy clothes she is fair game? OK
Bzzt!!! you are going with another debate, not going to work.
Answer the question, do men have to live by a different set of standards under college justice systems, and how does this square under Title IX?
When you can figure out how a woman can rape a man who is passed out, you may have a Title IX complaint
How bout we do this for our USMB conservatives?
If she is wearing skimpy clothes she is fair game? OK
Bzzt!!! you are going with another debate, not going to work.
Answer the question, do men have to live by a different set of standards under college justice systems, and how does this square under Title IX?
When you can figure out how a woman can rape a man who is passed out, you may have a Title IX complaint
Wow....My guess is somewhere buried in the bill are all kinds of provisions for relief through the civil courts.Do liberals ever miss an opportunity to try to appeal to a voting block by unjustly harming another voting block? Do they think of unintended (although I honestly think they know the unintended consequences, but honestly don't care).As a father of daughters (and a son), I take rape seriously. Women should always feel safe and rapist should never get away with it. However, this law will do the opposite of what it's intended to do. It will put innocent men in jail and not prevent rape.
California adopts yes means yes sex-assault rule page 1
"This law has requires a woman to affirmative stated she wants to have sex before doing it. “an affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity.” The legislation says silence or lack of resistance does not constitute consent. Under the bill, someone who is drunk,..."
False claims of rape are real and more numerous then people want to think. This almost guarantees that any claim of rape will lead to a prosecution.
Soon they will be arresting people for bad thoughts!
Never woke up to a BJ?How bout we do this for our USMB conservatives?
If she is wearing skimpy clothes she is fair game? OK
Bzzt!!! you are going with another debate, not going to work.
Answer the question, do men have to live by a different set of standards under college justice systems, and how does this square under Title IX?
When you can figure out how a woman can rape a man who is passed out, you may have a Title IX complaint
If you stick your dick in it......you'd better have consent
Then it seems like it's time for males to protect themselves. Just as how many males feel birth control was up the female...and if the female happens to become pregnant what happens. Right wingers and christians have tried to block every method of birth control and reason for an abortion.
Now the burden falls on the male to prove they didn't rape the female. It just doesn't feel right now does it.
Let's chew on that for bit.
The man hating lesbian feminist's of NOW must be overjoyed!! ....
I will be honest. In college under this law there could have been women who could have had me charged with rape and I would have lost. I mean who in college hadn't had sex when drunk?
Then it seems like it's time for males to protect themselves. Just as how many males feel birth control was up the female...and if the female happens to become pregnant what happens. Right wingers and christians have tried to block every method of birth control and reason for an abortion.
Now the burden falls on the male to prove they didn't rape the female. It just doesn't feel right now does it.
Let's chew on that for bit.
The man hating lesbian feminist's of NOW must be overjoyed!! ....
I will be honest. In college under this law there could have been women who could have had me charged with rape and I would have lost. I mean who in college hadn't had sex when drunk?
There's a great idea, lets counter one injustice with another injustice, even if the first injustice is more perceived than real.
Any woman with at least two brain cells working, knows that if she gets slap happy drunk in a bar, or at a party, she has a good chance of getting screwed by her partner, or even a stranger or two. Yet, they still do it, in large numbers. You can't fix stupid.
